Loading…
Real-time volcano monitoring using GNSS single-frequency receivers
We present a real‐time volcano monitoring strategy that uses the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), and we examine the performance of the strategy by processing simulated and real data and comparing the results with published solutions. The cost of implementing the strategy is reduced greatl...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth 2015-12, Vol.120 (12), p.8551-8569 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5375-4b84473b041022bff3a0788719588f1bd35e60bf22f007d1f70f8e452590b5d93 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5375-4b84473b041022bff3a0788719588f1bd35e60bf22f007d1f70f8e452590b5d93 |
container_end_page | 8569 |
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 8551 |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth |
container_volume | 120 |
creator | Lee, Seung-Woo Yun, Sung-Hyo Kim, Do Hyeong Lee, Dukkee Lee, Young J. Schutz, Bob E. |
description | We present a real‐time volcano monitoring strategy that uses the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), and we examine the performance of the strategy by processing simulated and real data and comparing the results with published solutions. The cost of implementing the strategy is reduced greatly by using single‐frequency GNSS receivers except for one dual‐frequency receiver that serves as a base receiver. Positions of the single‐frequency receivers are computed relative to the base receiver on an epoch‐by‐epoch basis using the high‐rate double‐difference (DD) GNSS technique, while the position of the base station is fixed to the values obtained with a deferred‐time precise point positioning technique and updated on a regular basis. Since the performance of the single‐frequency high‐rate DD technique depends on the conditions of the ionosphere over the monitoring area, the ionospheric total electron content is monitored using the dual‐frequency data from the base receiver. The surface deformation obtained with the high‐rate DD technique is eventually processed by a real‐time inversion filter based on the Mogi point source model. The performance of the real‐time volcano monitoring strategy is assessed through a set of tests and case studies, in which the data recorded during the 2007 eruption of Kilauea and the 2005 eruption of Augustine are processed in a simulated real‐time mode. The case studies show that the displacement time series obtained with the strategy seem to agree with those obtained with deferred‐time, dual‐frequency approaches at the level of 10–15 mm. Differences in the estimated volume change of the Mogi source between the real‐time inversion filter and previously reported works were in the range of 11 to 13% of the maximum volume changes of the cases examined.
Key Points
We present a real‐time volcano monitoring strategy using L1 GNSS receivers
Performance of the strategy has been examined using tests and case studies
The strategy can be an inexpensive alternative to dual‐frequency‐based strategies |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/2014JB011648 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800485031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1800485031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5375-4b84473b041022bff3a0788719588f1bd35e60bf22f007d1f70f8e452590b5d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PwkAQhjdGEwly8wc08eLB6uxXd3sUI1VETMCveNm0ZdcUS4u7BeXfuwRDjAfmMDOZPO9k5kXoGMM5BiAXBDDrdwHjiMk91CI4isOY8mh_22N6iDrOTcGH9CPMWqg70mkZNsVMB8u6zNOqDmZ1VTS1Lar3YOHWORmOx8G6K3VorP5c6CpfBVbnulhq647QgUlLpzu_tY2eetePVzfh4CG5vbochCmngocsk4wJmgHDQEhmDE1BSClwzKU0OJtQriPIDCEGQEywEWCkZpzwGDI-iWkbnW72zm3tb3CNmhUu12WZVrpeOIUlAJMc_J9tdPIPndYLW_nrFAEeiZgSwXZRWHDBCSMx9dTZhspt7ZzVRs1tMUvtSmFQa-fVX-c9Tjf4V1Hq1U5W9ZNRl2NvjleFG1XhGv29VaX2Q0XCA-plmKj7N9q_6z2_qhH9AfIdj_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1757524293</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Real-time volcano monitoring using GNSS single-frequency receivers</title><source>Wiley</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lee, Seung-Woo ; Yun, Sung-Hyo ; Kim, Do Hyeong ; Lee, Dukkee ; Lee, Young J. ; Schutz, Bob E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Seung-Woo ; Yun, Sung-Hyo ; Kim, Do Hyeong ; Lee, Dukkee ; Lee, Young J. ; Schutz, Bob E.</creatorcontrib><description>We present a real‐time volcano monitoring strategy that uses the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), and we examine the performance of the strategy by processing simulated and real data and comparing the results with published solutions. The cost of implementing the strategy is reduced greatly by using single‐frequency GNSS receivers except for one dual‐frequency receiver that serves as a base receiver. Positions of the single‐frequency receivers are computed relative to the base receiver on an epoch‐by‐epoch basis using the high‐rate double‐difference (DD) GNSS technique, while the position of the base station is fixed to the values obtained with a deferred‐time precise point positioning technique and updated on a regular basis. Since the performance of the single‐frequency high‐rate DD technique depends on the conditions of the ionosphere over the monitoring area, the ionospheric total electron content is monitored using the dual‐frequency data from the base receiver. The surface deformation obtained with the high‐rate DD technique is eventually processed by a real‐time inversion filter based on the Mogi point source model. The performance of the real‐time volcano monitoring strategy is assessed through a set of tests and case studies, in which the data recorded during the 2007 eruption of Kilauea and the 2005 eruption of Augustine are processed in a simulated real‐time mode. The case studies show that the displacement time series obtained with the strategy seem to agree with those obtained with deferred‐time, dual‐frequency approaches at the level of 10–15 mm. Differences in the estimated volume change of the Mogi source between the real‐time inversion filter and previously reported works were in the range of 11 to 13% of the maximum volume changes of the cases examined.
Key Points
We present a real‐time volcano monitoring strategy using L1 GNSS receivers
Performance of the strategy has been examined using tests and case studies
The strategy can be an inexpensive alternative to dual‐frequency‐based strategies</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2014JB011648</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Computer simulation ; Data ; Data processing ; Deformation ; Eruptions ; Geophysics ; Global navigation satellite system ; GNSS ; Inversions ; Ionosphere ; Ionospheric electron content ; Monitoring ; Navigation ; Navigation satellites ; Navigation systems ; Owner operator ; Real time ; Receivers ; Satellites ; Solutions ; Strategy ; Volcano monitoring ; Volcanoes ; Water pollution</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2015-12, Vol.120 (12), p.8551-8569</ispartof><rights>2015. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5375-4b84473b041022bff3a0788719588f1bd35e60bf22f007d1f70f8e452590b5d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5375-4b84473b041022bff3a0788719588f1bd35e60bf22f007d1f70f8e452590b5d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Seung-Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yun, Sung-Hyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Do Hyeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Dukkee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Young J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schutz, Bob E.</creatorcontrib><title>Real-time volcano monitoring using GNSS single-frequency receivers</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth</addtitle><description>We present a real‐time volcano monitoring strategy that uses the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), and we examine the performance of the strategy by processing simulated and real data and comparing the results with published solutions. The cost of implementing the strategy is reduced greatly by using single‐frequency GNSS receivers except for one dual‐frequency receiver that serves as a base receiver. Positions of the single‐frequency receivers are computed relative to the base receiver on an epoch‐by‐epoch basis using the high‐rate double‐difference (DD) GNSS technique, while the position of the base station is fixed to the values obtained with a deferred‐time precise point positioning technique and updated on a regular basis. Since the performance of the single‐frequency high‐rate DD technique depends on the conditions of the ionosphere over the monitoring area, the ionospheric total electron content is monitored using the dual‐frequency data from the base receiver. The surface deformation obtained with the high‐rate DD technique is eventually processed by a real‐time inversion filter based on the Mogi point source model. The performance of the real‐time volcano monitoring strategy is assessed through a set of tests and case studies, in which the data recorded during the 2007 eruption of Kilauea and the 2005 eruption of Augustine are processed in a simulated real‐time mode. The case studies show that the displacement time series obtained with the strategy seem to agree with those obtained with deferred‐time, dual‐frequency approaches at the level of 10–15 mm. Differences in the estimated volume change of the Mogi source between the real‐time inversion filter and previously reported works were in the range of 11 to 13% of the maximum volume changes of the cases examined.
Key Points
We present a real‐time volcano monitoring strategy using L1 GNSS receivers
Performance of the strategy has been examined using tests and case studies
The strategy can be an inexpensive alternative to dual‐frequency‐based strategies</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Eruptions</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Global navigation satellite system</subject><subject>GNSS</subject><subject>Inversions</subject><subject>Ionosphere</subject><subject>Ionospheric electron content</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Navigation</subject><subject>Navigation satellites</subject><subject>Navigation systems</subject><subject>Owner operator</subject><subject>Real time</subject><subject>Receivers</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Solutions</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Volcano monitoring</subject><subject>Volcanoes</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><issn>2169-9313</issn><issn>2169-9356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PwkAQhjdGEwly8wc08eLB6uxXd3sUI1VETMCveNm0ZdcUS4u7BeXfuwRDjAfmMDOZPO9k5kXoGMM5BiAXBDDrdwHjiMk91CI4isOY8mh_22N6iDrOTcGH9CPMWqg70mkZNsVMB8u6zNOqDmZ1VTS1Lar3YOHWORmOx8G6K3VorP5c6CpfBVbnulhq647QgUlLpzu_tY2eetePVzfh4CG5vbochCmngocsk4wJmgHDQEhmDE1BSClwzKU0OJtQriPIDCEGQEywEWCkZpzwGDI-iWkbnW72zm3tb3CNmhUu12WZVrpeOIUlAJMc_J9tdPIPndYLW_nrFAEeiZgSwXZRWHDBCSMx9dTZhspt7ZzVRs1tMUvtSmFQa-fVX-c9Tjf4V1Hq1U5W9ZNRl2NvjleFG1XhGv29VaX2Q0XCA-plmKj7N9q_6z2_qhH9AfIdj_Q</recordid><startdate>201512</startdate><enddate>201512</enddate><creator>Lee, Seung-Woo</creator><creator>Yun, Sung-Hyo</creator><creator>Kim, Do Hyeong</creator><creator>Lee, Dukkee</creator><creator>Lee, Young J.</creator><creator>Schutz, Bob E.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201512</creationdate><title>Real-time volcano monitoring using GNSS single-frequency receivers</title><author>Lee, Seung-Woo ; Yun, Sung-Hyo ; Kim, Do Hyeong ; Lee, Dukkee ; Lee, Young J. ; Schutz, Bob E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5375-4b84473b041022bff3a0788719588f1bd35e60bf22f007d1f70f8e452590b5d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Eruptions</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Global navigation satellite system</topic><topic>GNSS</topic><topic>Inversions</topic><topic>Ionosphere</topic><topic>Ionospheric electron content</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Navigation</topic><topic>Navigation satellites</topic><topic>Navigation systems</topic><topic>Owner operator</topic><topic>Real time</topic><topic>Receivers</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Solutions</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Volcano monitoring</topic><topic>Volcanoes</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Seung-Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yun, Sung-Hyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Do Hyeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Dukkee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Young J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schutz, Bob E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Seung-Woo</au><au>Yun, Sung-Hyo</au><au>Kim, Do Hyeong</au><au>Lee, Dukkee</au><au>Lee, Young J.</au><au>Schutz, Bob E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Real-time volcano monitoring using GNSS single-frequency receivers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth</addtitle><date>2015-12</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>8551</spage><epage>8569</epage><pages>8551-8569</pages><issn>2169-9313</issn><eissn>2169-9356</eissn><abstract>We present a real‐time volcano monitoring strategy that uses the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), and we examine the performance of the strategy by processing simulated and real data and comparing the results with published solutions. The cost of implementing the strategy is reduced greatly by using single‐frequency GNSS receivers except for one dual‐frequency receiver that serves as a base receiver. Positions of the single‐frequency receivers are computed relative to the base receiver on an epoch‐by‐epoch basis using the high‐rate double‐difference (DD) GNSS technique, while the position of the base station is fixed to the values obtained with a deferred‐time precise point positioning technique and updated on a regular basis. Since the performance of the single‐frequency high‐rate DD technique depends on the conditions of the ionosphere over the monitoring area, the ionospheric total electron content is monitored using the dual‐frequency data from the base receiver. The surface deformation obtained with the high‐rate DD technique is eventually processed by a real‐time inversion filter based on the Mogi point source model. The performance of the real‐time volcano monitoring strategy is assessed through a set of tests and case studies, in which the data recorded during the 2007 eruption of Kilauea and the 2005 eruption of Augustine are processed in a simulated real‐time mode. The case studies show that the displacement time series obtained with the strategy seem to agree with those obtained with deferred‐time, dual‐frequency approaches at the level of 10–15 mm. Differences in the estimated volume change of the Mogi source between the real‐time inversion filter and previously reported works were in the range of 11 to 13% of the maximum volume changes of the cases examined.
Key Points
We present a real‐time volcano monitoring strategy using L1 GNSS receivers
Performance of the strategy has been examined using tests and case studies
The strategy can be an inexpensive alternative to dual‐frequency‐based strategies</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2014JB011648</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-9313 |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2015-12, Vol.120 (12), p.8551-8569 |
issn | 2169-9313 2169-9356 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800485031 |
source | Wiley; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Case studies Computer simulation Data Data processing Deformation Eruptions Geophysics Global navigation satellite system GNSS Inversions Ionosphere Ionospheric electron content Monitoring Navigation Navigation satellites Navigation systems Owner operator Real time Receivers Satellites Solutions Strategy Volcano monitoring Volcanoes Water pollution |
title | Real-time volcano monitoring using GNSS single-frequency receivers |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T16%3A25%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Real-time%20volcano%20monitoring%20using%20GNSS%20single-frequency%20receivers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Solid%20earth&rft.au=Lee,%20Seung-Woo&rft.date=2015-12&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=8551&rft.epage=8569&rft.pages=8551-8569&rft.issn=2169-9313&rft.eissn=2169-9356&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2014JB011648&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1800485031%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5375-4b84473b041022bff3a0788719588f1bd35e60bf22f007d1f70f8e452590b5d93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1757524293&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |