Loading…

Real-time volcano monitoring using GNSS single-frequency receivers

We present a real‐time volcano monitoring strategy that uses the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), and we examine the performance of the strategy by processing simulated and real data and comparing the results with published solutions. The cost of implementing the strategy is reduced greatl...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth 2015-12, Vol.120 (12), p.8551-8569
Main Authors: Lee, Seung-Woo, Yun, Sung-Hyo, Kim, Do Hyeong, Lee, Dukkee, Lee, Young J., Schutz, Bob E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5375-4b84473b041022bff3a0788719588f1bd35e60bf22f007d1f70f8e452590b5d93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5375-4b84473b041022bff3a0788719588f1bd35e60bf22f007d1f70f8e452590b5d93
container_end_page 8569
container_issue 12
container_start_page 8551
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth
container_volume 120
creator Lee, Seung-Woo
Yun, Sung-Hyo
Kim, Do Hyeong
Lee, Dukkee
Lee, Young J.
Schutz, Bob E.
description We present a real‐time volcano monitoring strategy that uses the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), and we examine the performance of the strategy by processing simulated and real data and comparing the results with published solutions. The cost of implementing the strategy is reduced greatly by using single‐frequency GNSS receivers except for one dual‐frequency receiver that serves as a base receiver. Positions of the single‐frequency receivers are computed relative to the base receiver on an epoch‐by‐epoch basis using the high‐rate double‐difference (DD) GNSS technique, while the position of the base station is fixed to the values obtained with a deferred‐time precise point positioning technique and updated on a regular basis. Since the performance of the single‐frequency high‐rate DD technique depends on the conditions of the ionosphere over the monitoring area, the ionospheric total electron content is monitored using the dual‐frequency data from the base receiver. The surface deformation obtained with the high‐rate DD technique is eventually processed by a real‐time inversion filter based on the Mogi point source model. The performance of the real‐time volcano monitoring strategy is assessed through a set of tests and case studies, in which the data recorded during the 2007 eruption of Kilauea and the 2005 eruption of Augustine are processed in a simulated real‐time mode. The case studies show that the displacement time series obtained with the strategy seem to agree with those obtained with deferred‐time, dual‐frequency approaches at the level of 10–15 mm. Differences in the estimated volume change of the Mogi source between the real‐time inversion filter and previously reported works were in the range of 11 to 13% of the maximum volume changes of the cases examined. Key Points We present a real‐time volcano monitoring strategy using L1 GNSS receivers Performance of the strategy has been examined using tests and case studies The strategy can be an inexpensive alternative to dual‐frequency‐based strategies
doi_str_mv 10.1002/2014JB011648
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800485031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1800485031</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5375-4b84473b041022bff3a0788719588f1bd35e60bf22f007d1f70f8e452590b5d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PwkAQhjdGEwly8wc08eLB6uxXd3sUI1VETMCveNm0ZdcUS4u7BeXfuwRDjAfmMDOZPO9k5kXoGMM5BiAXBDDrdwHjiMk91CI4isOY8mh_22N6iDrOTcGH9CPMWqg70mkZNsVMB8u6zNOqDmZ1VTS1Lar3YOHWORmOx8G6K3VorP5c6CpfBVbnulhq647QgUlLpzu_tY2eetePVzfh4CG5vbochCmngocsk4wJmgHDQEhmDE1BSClwzKU0OJtQriPIDCEGQEywEWCkZpzwGDI-iWkbnW72zm3tb3CNmhUu12WZVrpeOIUlAJMc_J9tdPIPndYLW_nrFAEeiZgSwXZRWHDBCSMx9dTZhspt7ZzVRs1tMUvtSmFQa-fVX-c9Tjf4V1Hq1U5W9ZNRl2NvjleFG1XhGv29VaX2Q0XCA-plmKj7N9q_6z2_qhH9AfIdj_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1757524293</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Real-time volcano monitoring using GNSS single-frequency receivers</title><source>Wiley</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lee, Seung-Woo ; Yun, Sung-Hyo ; Kim, Do Hyeong ; Lee, Dukkee ; Lee, Young J. ; Schutz, Bob E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Seung-Woo ; Yun, Sung-Hyo ; Kim, Do Hyeong ; Lee, Dukkee ; Lee, Young J. ; Schutz, Bob E.</creatorcontrib><description>We present a real‐time volcano monitoring strategy that uses the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), and we examine the performance of the strategy by processing simulated and real data and comparing the results with published solutions. The cost of implementing the strategy is reduced greatly by using single‐frequency GNSS receivers except for one dual‐frequency receiver that serves as a base receiver. Positions of the single‐frequency receivers are computed relative to the base receiver on an epoch‐by‐epoch basis using the high‐rate double‐difference (DD) GNSS technique, while the position of the base station is fixed to the values obtained with a deferred‐time precise point positioning technique and updated on a regular basis. Since the performance of the single‐frequency high‐rate DD technique depends on the conditions of the ionosphere over the monitoring area, the ionospheric total electron content is monitored using the dual‐frequency data from the base receiver. The surface deformation obtained with the high‐rate DD technique is eventually processed by a real‐time inversion filter based on the Mogi point source model. The performance of the real‐time volcano monitoring strategy is assessed through a set of tests and case studies, in which the data recorded during the 2007 eruption of Kilauea and the 2005 eruption of Augustine are processed in a simulated real‐time mode. The case studies show that the displacement time series obtained with the strategy seem to agree with those obtained with deferred‐time, dual‐frequency approaches at the level of 10–15 mm. Differences in the estimated volume change of the Mogi source between the real‐time inversion filter and previously reported works were in the range of 11 to 13% of the maximum volume changes of the cases examined. Key Points We present a real‐time volcano monitoring strategy using L1 GNSS receivers Performance of the strategy has been examined using tests and case studies The strategy can be an inexpensive alternative to dual‐frequency‐based strategies</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/2014JB011648</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Computer simulation ; Data ; Data processing ; Deformation ; Eruptions ; Geophysics ; Global navigation satellite system ; GNSS ; Inversions ; Ionosphere ; Ionospheric electron content ; Monitoring ; Navigation ; Navigation satellites ; Navigation systems ; Owner operator ; Real time ; Receivers ; Satellites ; Solutions ; Strategy ; Volcano monitoring ; Volcanoes ; Water pollution</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2015-12, Vol.120 (12), p.8551-8569</ispartof><rights>2015. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5375-4b84473b041022bff3a0788719588f1bd35e60bf22f007d1f70f8e452590b5d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a5375-4b84473b041022bff3a0788719588f1bd35e60bf22f007d1f70f8e452590b5d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Seung-Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yun, Sung-Hyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Do Hyeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Dukkee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Young J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schutz, Bob E.</creatorcontrib><title>Real-time volcano monitoring using GNSS single-frequency receivers</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth</addtitle><description>We present a real‐time volcano monitoring strategy that uses the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), and we examine the performance of the strategy by processing simulated and real data and comparing the results with published solutions. The cost of implementing the strategy is reduced greatly by using single‐frequency GNSS receivers except for one dual‐frequency receiver that serves as a base receiver. Positions of the single‐frequency receivers are computed relative to the base receiver on an epoch‐by‐epoch basis using the high‐rate double‐difference (DD) GNSS technique, while the position of the base station is fixed to the values obtained with a deferred‐time precise point positioning technique and updated on a regular basis. Since the performance of the single‐frequency high‐rate DD technique depends on the conditions of the ionosphere over the monitoring area, the ionospheric total electron content is monitored using the dual‐frequency data from the base receiver. The surface deformation obtained with the high‐rate DD technique is eventually processed by a real‐time inversion filter based on the Mogi point source model. The performance of the real‐time volcano monitoring strategy is assessed through a set of tests and case studies, in which the data recorded during the 2007 eruption of Kilauea and the 2005 eruption of Augustine are processed in a simulated real‐time mode. The case studies show that the displacement time series obtained with the strategy seem to agree with those obtained with deferred‐time, dual‐frequency approaches at the level of 10–15 mm. Differences in the estimated volume change of the Mogi source between the real‐time inversion filter and previously reported works were in the range of 11 to 13% of the maximum volume changes of the cases examined. Key Points We present a real‐time volcano monitoring strategy using L1 GNSS receivers Performance of the strategy has been examined using tests and case studies The strategy can be an inexpensive alternative to dual‐frequency‐based strategies</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Eruptions</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Global navigation satellite system</subject><subject>GNSS</subject><subject>Inversions</subject><subject>Ionosphere</subject><subject>Ionospheric electron content</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Navigation</subject><subject>Navigation satellites</subject><subject>Navigation systems</subject><subject>Owner operator</subject><subject>Real time</subject><subject>Receivers</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Solutions</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Volcano monitoring</subject><subject>Volcanoes</subject><subject>Water pollution</subject><issn>2169-9313</issn><issn>2169-9356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PwkAQhjdGEwly8wc08eLB6uxXd3sUI1VETMCveNm0ZdcUS4u7BeXfuwRDjAfmMDOZPO9k5kXoGMM5BiAXBDDrdwHjiMk91CI4isOY8mh_22N6iDrOTcGH9CPMWqg70mkZNsVMB8u6zNOqDmZ1VTS1Lar3YOHWORmOx8G6K3VorP5c6CpfBVbnulhq647QgUlLpzu_tY2eetePVzfh4CG5vbochCmngocsk4wJmgHDQEhmDE1BSClwzKU0OJtQriPIDCEGQEywEWCkZpzwGDI-iWkbnW72zm3tb3CNmhUu12WZVrpeOIUlAJMc_J9tdPIPndYLW_nrFAEeiZgSwXZRWHDBCSMx9dTZhspt7ZzVRs1tMUvtSmFQa-fVX-c9Tjf4V1Hq1U5W9ZNRl2NvjleFG1XhGv29VaX2Q0XCA-plmKj7N9q_6z2_qhH9AfIdj_Q</recordid><startdate>201512</startdate><enddate>201512</enddate><creator>Lee, Seung-Woo</creator><creator>Yun, Sung-Hyo</creator><creator>Kim, Do Hyeong</creator><creator>Lee, Dukkee</creator><creator>Lee, Young J.</creator><creator>Schutz, Bob E.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201512</creationdate><title>Real-time volcano monitoring using GNSS single-frequency receivers</title><author>Lee, Seung-Woo ; Yun, Sung-Hyo ; Kim, Do Hyeong ; Lee, Dukkee ; Lee, Young J. ; Schutz, Bob E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5375-4b84473b041022bff3a0788719588f1bd35e60bf22f007d1f70f8e452590b5d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Eruptions</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Global navigation satellite system</topic><topic>GNSS</topic><topic>Inversions</topic><topic>Ionosphere</topic><topic>Ionospheric electron content</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Navigation</topic><topic>Navigation satellites</topic><topic>Navigation systems</topic><topic>Owner operator</topic><topic>Real time</topic><topic>Receivers</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Solutions</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Volcano monitoring</topic><topic>Volcanoes</topic><topic>Water pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Seung-Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yun, Sung-Hyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Do Hyeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Dukkee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Young J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schutz, Bob E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Seung-Woo</au><au>Yun, Sung-Hyo</au><au>Kim, Do Hyeong</au><au>Lee, Dukkee</au><au>Lee, Young J.</au><au>Schutz, Bob E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Real-time volcano monitoring using GNSS single-frequency receivers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth</addtitle><date>2015-12</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>8551</spage><epage>8569</epage><pages>8551-8569</pages><issn>2169-9313</issn><eissn>2169-9356</eissn><abstract>We present a real‐time volcano monitoring strategy that uses the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), and we examine the performance of the strategy by processing simulated and real data and comparing the results with published solutions. The cost of implementing the strategy is reduced greatly by using single‐frequency GNSS receivers except for one dual‐frequency receiver that serves as a base receiver. Positions of the single‐frequency receivers are computed relative to the base receiver on an epoch‐by‐epoch basis using the high‐rate double‐difference (DD) GNSS technique, while the position of the base station is fixed to the values obtained with a deferred‐time precise point positioning technique and updated on a regular basis. Since the performance of the single‐frequency high‐rate DD technique depends on the conditions of the ionosphere over the monitoring area, the ionospheric total electron content is monitored using the dual‐frequency data from the base receiver. The surface deformation obtained with the high‐rate DD technique is eventually processed by a real‐time inversion filter based on the Mogi point source model. The performance of the real‐time volcano monitoring strategy is assessed through a set of tests and case studies, in which the data recorded during the 2007 eruption of Kilauea and the 2005 eruption of Augustine are processed in a simulated real‐time mode. The case studies show that the displacement time series obtained with the strategy seem to agree with those obtained with deferred‐time, dual‐frequency approaches at the level of 10–15 mm. Differences in the estimated volume change of the Mogi source between the real‐time inversion filter and previously reported works were in the range of 11 to 13% of the maximum volume changes of the cases examined. Key Points We present a real‐time volcano monitoring strategy using L1 GNSS receivers Performance of the strategy has been examined using tests and case studies The strategy can be an inexpensive alternative to dual‐frequency‐based strategies</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/2014JB011648</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9313
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2015-12, Vol.120 (12), p.8551-8569
issn 2169-9313
2169-9356
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1800485031
source Wiley; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Case studies
Computer simulation
Data
Data processing
Deformation
Eruptions
Geophysics
Global navigation satellite system
GNSS
Inversions
Ionosphere
Ionospheric electron content
Monitoring
Navigation
Navigation satellites
Navigation systems
Owner operator
Real time
Receivers
Satellites
Solutions
Strategy
Volcano monitoring
Volcanoes
Water pollution
title Real-time volcano monitoring using GNSS single-frequency receivers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T16%3A25%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Real-time%20volcano%20monitoring%20using%20GNSS%20single-frequency%20receivers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Solid%20earth&rft.au=Lee,%20Seung-Woo&rft.date=2015-12&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=8551&rft.epage=8569&rft.pages=8551-8569&rft.issn=2169-9313&rft.eissn=2169-9356&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/2014JB011648&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1800485031%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a5375-4b84473b041022bff3a0788719588f1bd35e60bf22f007d1f70f8e452590b5d93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1757524293&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true