Let’s make peer review scientific

Thirty years on from the first congress on peer review, Drummond Rennie reflects on the improvements brought about by research into the process — and calls for more.

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nature (London) 2016-07, Vol.535 (7610), p.31-33
Main Author: Rennie, Drummond
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
692/308
706/648/479/429
706/689/112
comment
Double-Blind Method
Humanities and Social Sciences
multidisciplinary
Peer Review, Research - methods
Peer Review, Research - standards
Peer Review, Research - trends
Research Design - standards
Science
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Thirty years on from the first congress on peer review, Drummond Rennie reflects on the improvements brought about by research into the process — and calls for more.
ISSN:0028-0836
1476-4687
DOI:10.1038/535031a