Loading…

The utility of STAT6 and ALDH1 expression in the differential diagnosis of solitary fibrous tumor versus prostate-specific stromal neoplasms

Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) diagnosis in prostate can be challenging on small biopsies. Prostatic stromal tumors of unknown malignant potential (STUMP) and SFT have overlapping features. NAB2-STAT6 gene fusions that were recently identified in various SFTs lead to nuclear translocalization of STAT6...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Human pathology 2016-08, Vol.54, p.184-188
Main Authors: Guner, Gunes, Bishop, Justin A., Bezerra, Stephania M., Taheri, Diana, Zahavi, David J., Mendoza Rodriguez, Maria Angelica, Sharma, Rajni, Epstein, Jonathan I., Netto, George J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-288600402111a21b3b5aa7d0c4b114c7b730eb954030a01c8cd41e5ba80f5db83
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-288600402111a21b3b5aa7d0c4b114c7b730eb954030a01c8cd41e5ba80f5db83
container_end_page 188
container_issue
container_start_page 184
container_title Human pathology
container_volume 54
creator Guner, Gunes
Bishop, Justin A.
Bezerra, Stephania M.
Taheri, Diana
Zahavi, David J.
Mendoza Rodriguez, Maria Angelica
Sharma, Rajni
Epstein, Jonathan I.
Netto, George J.
description Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) diagnosis in prostate can be challenging on small biopsies. Prostatic stromal tumors of unknown malignant potential (STUMP) and SFT have overlapping features. NAB2-STAT6 gene fusions that were recently identified in various SFTs lead to nuclear translocalization of STAT6. Nuclear STAT6 immunostaining is now considered an adjunct for SFT diagnosis. We evaluated STAT6 and an emerging stemness marker, ALDH1, in the differential diagnosis of SFT versus prostatic stromal lesions. Sixteen STUMPs, 12 SFTs, and 4 prostatic stromal sarcomas (12 needle biopsies, 13 radical prostatectomies, 7 transurethral resections) were retrieved (1995-2015). Sections were stained with polyclonal STAT6 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA; S20, 1:100) and monoclonal ALDH1 antibody (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA; clone 44, 1:250). In STAT6 cases, only unequivocal nuclear staining (with/without cytoplasmic staining) was considered positive. Cytoplasmic ALDH1 staining was counted positive. Ten of 11 evaluable SFTs demonstrated strong and diffuse nuclear STAT6 positivity; 4 of 16 STUMPs had nuclear staining that was weak (1/4) or focal (1/4). ALDH1 positivity was seen in 10 of 12 evaluable SFTs and 3 of 15 STUMPs. Prostatic stromal sarcomas were STAT6 negative (4/4); 2 of 4 were ALDH1 positive. The sensitivity and specificity for STAT6 for the diagnosis of SFT were 91% and 75%, respectively. Coexpression of STAT6 and ALDH1 yielded the same sensitivity but improved the specificity (100%) for the diagnosis of SFT. STAT6 is a useful marker in the differential diagnosis of SFT versus STUMP. Using STAT6 and ALDH1 together increases specificity. STUMPs can show STAT6 positivity, and when they do, it is likely to be weak or focal.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.humpath.2016.03.011
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1802740450</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0046817716300302</els_id><sourcerecordid>4111342331</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-288600402111a21b3b5aa7d0c4b114c7b730eb954030a01c8cd41e5ba80f5db83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUGP0zAQhS0EYsvCTwBZ4sIlYRzbTXpC1S6wSJU4UM6W40yoqyQOHmfF_gd-NC4tHLhwskb63vObeYy9FFAKEOu3x_KwjLNNh7LKYwmyBCEesZXQsioauakesxWAWheNqOsr9ozoCJnQSj9lV1UN60ZXcsV-7g_Il-QHnx546PmX_Xa_5nbq-HZ3eyc4_pgjEvkwcT_xlOHO9z1GnJK3Qx7stymQp5OWQnax8YH3vo1hIZ6WMUR-j5HyMMdAySYsaEbne-84pRjGbDJhmAdLIz1nT3o7EL64vNfs64f3-5u7Yvf546eb7a5wciNTUTXNOq8GlRDCVqKVrba27sCpVgjl6raWgO1GK5BgQbjGdUqgbm0Dve7aRl6zN2ffnOn7gpTM6MnhMNgcZSEjGqhqBUpDRl__gx7DEqec7jelNiqfOlP6TLm8JEXszRz9mE9hBJhTXeZoLnWZU10GpMllZN2ri_vSjtj9Vf3pJwPvzgDmc9x7jIacx8lh5yO6ZLrg__PFLyYgqgQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1802494392</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The utility of STAT6 and ALDH1 expression in the differential diagnosis of solitary fibrous tumor versus prostate-specific stromal neoplasms</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Guner, Gunes ; Bishop, Justin A. ; Bezerra, Stephania M. ; Taheri, Diana ; Zahavi, David J. ; Mendoza Rodriguez, Maria Angelica ; Sharma, Rajni ; Epstein, Jonathan I. ; Netto, George J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Guner, Gunes ; Bishop, Justin A. ; Bezerra, Stephania M. ; Taheri, Diana ; Zahavi, David J. ; Mendoza Rodriguez, Maria Angelica ; Sharma, Rajni ; Epstein, Jonathan I. ; Netto, George J.</creatorcontrib><description>Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) diagnosis in prostate can be challenging on small biopsies. Prostatic stromal tumors of unknown malignant potential (STUMP) and SFT have overlapping features. NAB2-STAT6 gene fusions that were recently identified in various SFTs lead to nuclear translocalization of STAT6. Nuclear STAT6 immunostaining is now considered an adjunct for SFT diagnosis. We evaluated STAT6 and an emerging stemness marker, ALDH1, in the differential diagnosis of SFT versus prostatic stromal lesions. Sixteen STUMPs, 12 SFTs, and 4 prostatic stromal sarcomas (12 needle biopsies, 13 radical prostatectomies, 7 transurethral resections) were retrieved (1995-2015). Sections were stained with polyclonal STAT6 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA; S20, 1:100) and monoclonal ALDH1 antibody (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA; clone 44, 1:250). In STAT6 cases, only unequivocal nuclear staining (with/without cytoplasmic staining) was considered positive. Cytoplasmic ALDH1 staining was counted positive. Ten of 11 evaluable SFTs demonstrated strong and diffuse nuclear STAT6 positivity; 4 of 16 STUMPs had nuclear staining that was weak (1/4) or focal (1/4). ALDH1 positivity was seen in 10 of 12 evaluable SFTs and 3 of 15 STUMPs. Prostatic stromal sarcomas were STAT6 negative (4/4); 2 of 4 were ALDH1 positive. The sensitivity and specificity for STAT6 for the diagnosis of SFT were 91% and 75%, respectively. Coexpression of STAT6 and ALDH1 yielded the same sensitivity but improved the specificity (100%) for the diagnosis of SFT. STAT6 is a useful marker in the differential diagnosis of SFT versus STUMP. Using STAT6 and ALDH1 together increases specificity. STUMPs can show STAT6 positivity, and when they do, it is likely to be weak or focal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-8177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-8392</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2016.03.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27068523</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; ALDH1 ; Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis ; Biopsy ; Cloning ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Gene expression ; Humans ; Immunohistochemistry ; Isoenzymes - analysis ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Prostate ; Prostatic Neoplasms - enzymology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retinal Dehydrogenase - analysis ; Sarcoma - enzymology ; Sarcoma - pathology ; SFT ; Smooth muscle ; Solitary Fibrous Tumors - enzymology ; Solitary Fibrous Tumors - pathology ; STAT6 ; STAT6 Transcription Factor - analysis ; Statistical analysis ; Stromal ; Stromal Cells - enzymology ; Stromal Cells - pathology ; STUMP ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Human pathology, 2016-08, Vol.54, p.184-188</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Aug 01, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-288600402111a21b3b5aa7d0c4b114c7b730eb954030a01c8cd41e5ba80f5db83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-288600402111a21b3b5aa7d0c4b114c7b730eb954030a01c8cd41e5ba80f5db83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27068523$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guner, Gunes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bishop, Justin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bezerra, Stephania M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taheri, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zahavi, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendoza Rodriguez, Maria Angelica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Rajni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epstein, Jonathan I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Netto, George J.</creatorcontrib><title>The utility of STAT6 and ALDH1 expression in the differential diagnosis of solitary fibrous tumor versus prostate-specific stromal neoplasms</title><title>Human pathology</title><addtitle>Hum Pathol</addtitle><description>Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) diagnosis in prostate can be challenging on small biopsies. Prostatic stromal tumors of unknown malignant potential (STUMP) and SFT have overlapping features. NAB2-STAT6 gene fusions that were recently identified in various SFTs lead to nuclear translocalization of STAT6. Nuclear STAT6 immunostaining is now considered an adjunct for SFT diagnosis. We evaluated STAT6 and an emerging stemness marker, ALDH1, in the differential diagnosis of SFT versus prostatic stromal lesions. Sixteen STUMPs, 12 SFTs, and 4 prostatic stromal sarcomas (12 needle biopsies, 13 radical prostatectomies, 7 transurethral resections) were retrieved (1995-2015). Sections were stained with polyclonal STAT6 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA; S20, 1:100) and monoclonal ALDH1 antibody (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA; clone 44, 1:250). In STAT6 cases, only unequivocal nuclear staining (with/without cytoplasmic staining) was considered positive. Cytoplasmic ALDH1 staining was counted positive. Ten of 11 evaluable SFTs demonstrated strong and diffuse nuclear STAT6 positivity; 4 of 16 STUMPs had nuclear staining that was weak (1/4) or focal (1/4). ALDH1 positivity was seen in 10 of 12 evaluable SFTs and 3 of 15 STUMPs. Prostatic stromal sarcomas were STAT6 negative (4/4); 2 of 4 were ALDH1 positive. The sensitivity and specificity for STAT6 for the diagnosis of SFT were 91% and 75%, respectively. Coexpression of STAT6 and ALDH1 yielded the same sensitivity but improved the specificity (100%) for the diagnosis of SFT. STAT6 is a useful marker in the differential diagnosis of SFT versus STUMP. Using STAT6 and ALDH1 together increases specificity. STUMPs can show STAT6 positivity, and when they do, it is likely to be weak or focal.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>ALDH1</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Cloning</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Gene expression</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunohistochemistry</subject><subject>Isoenzymes - analysis</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - enzymology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retinal Dehydrogenase - analysis</subject><subject>Sarcoma - enzymology</subject><subject>Sarcoma - pathology</subject><subject>SFT</subject><subject>Smooth muscle</subject><subject>Solitary Fibrous Tumors - enzymology</subject><subject>Solitary Fibrous Tumors - pathology</subject><subject>STAT6</subject><subject>STAT6 Transcription Factor - analysis</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Stromal</subject><subject>Stromal Cells - enzymology</subject><subject>Stromal Cells - pathology</subject><subject>STUMP</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0046-8177</issn><issn>1532-8392</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUGP0zAQhS0EYsvCTwBZ4sIlYRzbTXpC1S6wSJU4UM6W40yoqyQOHmfF_gd-NC4tHLhwskb63vObeYy9FFAKEOu3x_KwjLNNh7LKYwmyBCEesZXQsioauakesxWAWheNqOsr9ozoCJnQSj9lV1UN60ZXcsV-7g_Il-QHnx546PmX_Xa_5nbq-HZ3eyc4_pgjEvkwcT_xlOHO9z1GnJK3Qx7stymQp5OWQnax8YH3vo1hIZ6WMUR-j5HyMMdAySYsaEbne-84pRjGbDJhmAdLIz1nT3o7EL64vNfs64f3-5u7Yvf546eb7a5wciNTUTXNOq8GlRDCVqKVrba27sCpVgjl6raWgO1GK5BgQbjGdUqgbm0Dve7aRl6zN2ffnOn7gpTM6MnhMNgcZSEjGqhqBUpDRl__gx7DEqec7jelNiqfOlP6TLm8JEXszRz9mE9hBJhTXeZoLnWZU10GpMllZN2ri_vSjtj9Vf3pJwPvzgDmc9x7jIacx8lh5yO6ZLrg__PFLyYgqgQ</recordid><startdate>201608</startdate><enddate>201608</enddate><creator>Guner, Gunes</creator><creator>Bishop, Justin A.</creator><creator>Bezerra, Stephania M.</creator><creator>Taheri, Diana</creator><creator>Zahavi, David J.</creator><creator>Mendoza Rodriguez, Maria Angelica</creator><creator>Sharma, Rajni</creator><creator>Epstein, Jonathan I.</creator><creator>Netto, George J.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201608</creationdate><title>The utility of STAT6 and ALDH1 expression in the differential diagnosis of solitary fibrous tumor versus prostate-specific stromal neoplasms</title><author>Guner, Gunes ; Bishop, Justin A. ; Bezerra, Stephania M. ; Taheri, Diana ; Zahavi, David J. ; Mendoza Rodriguez, Maria Angelica ; Sharma, Rajni ; Epstein, Jonathan I. ; Netto, George J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-288600402111a21b3b5aa7d0c4b114c7b730eb954030a01c8cd41e5ba80f5db83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>ALDH1</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Cloning</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Gene expression</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunohistochemistry</topic><topic>Isoenzymes - analysis</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - enzymology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retinal Dehydrogenase - analysis</topic><topic>Sarcoma - enzymology</topic><topic>Sarcoma - pathology</topic><topic>SFT</topic><topic>Smooth muscle</topic><topic>Solitary Fibrous Tumors - enzymology</topic><topic>Solitary Fibrous Tumors - pathology</topic><topic>STAT6</topic><topic>STAT6 Transcription Factor - analysis</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Stromal</topic><topic>Stromal Cells - enzymology</topic><topic>Stromal Cells - pathology</topic><topic>STUMP</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guner, Gunes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bishop, Justin A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bezerra, Stephania M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taheri, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zahavi, David J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendoza Rodriguez, Maria Angelica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Rajni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epstein, Jonathan I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Netto, George J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Human pathology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guner, Gunes</au><au>Bishop, Justin A.</au><au>Bezerra, Stephania M.</au><au>Taheri, Diana</au><au>Zahavi, David J.</au><au>Mendoza Rodriguez, Maria Angelica</au><au>Sharma, Rajni</au><au>Epstein, Jonathan I.</au><au>Netto, George J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The utility of STAT6 and ALDH1 expression in the differential diagnosis of solitary fibrous tumor versus prostate-specific stromal neoplasms</atitle><jtitle>Human pathology</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Pathol</addtitle><date>2016-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>54</volume><spage>184</spage><epage>188</epage><pages>184-188</pages><issn>0046-8177</issn><eissn>1532-8392</eissn><abstract>Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) diagnosis in prostate can be challenging on small biopsies. Prostatic stromal tumors of unknown malignant potential (STUMP) and SFT have overlapping features. NAB2-STAT6 gene fusions that were recently identified in various SFTs lead to nuclear translocalization of STAT6. Nuclear STAT6 immunostaining is now considered an adjunct for SFT diagnosis. We evaluated STAT6 and an emerging stemness marker, ALDH1, in the differential diagnosis of SFT versus prostatic stromal lesions. Sixteen STUMPs, 12 SFTs, and 4 prostatic stromal sarcomas (12 needle biopsies, 13 radical prostatectomies, 7 transurethral resections) were retrieved (1995-2015). Sections were stained with polyclonal STAT6 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA; S20, 1:100) and monoclonal ALDH1 antibody (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA; clone 44, 1:250). In STAT6 cases, only unequivocal nuclear staining (with/without cytoplasmic staining) was considered positive. Cytoplasmic ALDH1 staining was counted positive. Ten of 11 evaluable SFTs demonstrated strong and diffuse nuclear STAT6 positivity; 4 of 16 STUMPs had nuclear staining that was weak (1/4) or focal (1/4). ALDH1 positivity was seen in 10 of 12 evaluable SFTs and 3 of 15 STUMPs. Prostatic stromal sarcomas were STAT6 negative (4/4); 2 of 4 were ALDH1 positive. The sensitivity and specificity for STAT6 for the diagnosis of SFT were 91% and 75%, respectively. Coexpression of STAT6 and ALDH1 yielded the same sensitivity but improved the specificity (100%) for the diagnosis of SFT. STAT6 is a useful marker in the differential diagnosis of SFT versus STUMP. Using STAT6 and ALDH1 together increases specificity. STUMPs can show STAT6 positivity, and when they do, it is likely to be weak or focal.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27068523</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.humpath.2016.03.011</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0046-8177
ispartof Human pathology, 2016-08, Vol.54, p.184-188
issn 0046-8177
1532-8392
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1802740450
source Elsevier
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
ALDH1
Biomarkers, Tumor - analysis
Biopsy
Cloning
Diagnosis, Differential
Gene expression
Humans
Immunohistochemistry
Isoenzymes - analysis
Male
Middle Aged
Predictive Value of Tests
Prostate
Prostatic Neoplasms - enzymology
Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology
Reproducibility of Results
Retinal Dehydrogenase - analysis
Sarcoma - enzymology
Sarcoma - pathology
SFT
Smooth muscle
Solitary Fibrous Tumors - enzymology
Solitary Fibrous Tumors - pathology
STAT6
STAT6 Transcription Factor - analysis
Statistical analysis
Stromal
Stromal Cells - enzymology
Stromal Cells - pathology
STUMP
Tumors
title The utility of STAT6 and ALDH1 expression in the differential diagnosis of solitary fibrous tumor versus prostate-specific stromal neoplasms
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A38%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20utility%20of%20STAT6%20and%20ALDH1%20expression%20in%20the%20differential%20diagnosis%20of%20solitary%20fibrous%20tumor%20versus%20prostate-specific%20stromal%20neoplasms&rft.jtitle=Human%20pathology&rft.au=Guner,%20Gunes&rft.date=2016-08&rft.volume=54&rft.spage=184&rft.epage=188&rft.pages=184-188&rft.issn=0046-8177&rft.eissn=1532-8392&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.humpath.2016.03.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4111342331%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-288600402111a21b3b5aa7d0c4b114c7b730eb954030a01c8cd41e5ba80f5db83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1802494392&rft_id=info:pmid/27068523&rfr_iscdi=true