Multiple Effects of Weather on the Starvation and Predation Risk Trade-off in Choice of Feeding Location in Redshanks

1. Animals should choose the feeding habitat that allows them to meet their energy requirements while minimizing predation risk, but as weather becomes more severe, animals may choose riskier, but more profitable, feeding habitats. 2. At the Tyninghame estuary, Scotland, Redshanks (Tringa totanus) c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Functional ecology 2003-12, Vol.17 (6), p.727-736
Main Authors: Yasué, M., Quinn, J. L., Cresswell, W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Accipiter nisus
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Autoecology
Aves
Biological and medical sciences
Energy budgets
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
habitat selection
Human ecology
Marine
Microhabitats
Mud flats
Predation
Salt marshes
Sparrowhawk
Starvation
Swallows
Tringa totanus
Vertebrata
Weather
Wind velocity
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:1. Animals should choose the feeding habitat that allows them to meet their energy requirements while minimizing predation risk, but as weather becomes more severe, animals may choose riskier, but more profitable, feeding habitats. 2. At the Tyninghame estuary, Scotland, Redshanks (Tringa totanus) chose to feed on either a mudflat or saltmarsh. Energy intake rates were 23% higher and thermoregulatory costs were 40% lower on the saltmarsh, but predation risk from sparrowhawks (Accipiter nisus) was 21 times higher. 3. The investigation tested whether the riskier habitat was chosen only when weather conditions were such that individuals were unable to meet their energy requirements in the safer habitat, and how any additional effects of weather affected this choice. 4. When starvation risk increased on the mudflat, more Redshanks selected the saltmarsh where energy budgets alone accounted for 22% of the variation in habitat choice. Temperature and wind may have had smaller additional, independent effects that were probably related to their effects on vigilance behaviour and predator detection. 5. The results show that weather may be crucial in determining habitat choice through its direct effects on starvation and predation risk, and the importance of considering a wide range of weather conditions when determining habitat requirements.
ISSN:0269-8463
1365-2435
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2435.2003.00783.x