Loading…

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a cancer patient denied for surgical aortic valve replacement—a case report

Summary Background Aortic stenosis is a progressive disease. Symptomatic aortic stenosis has a poor prognosis, which is frequently worse than that of a malignant disease. Cancer patients with severe aortic stenosis may be denied for optimal oncologic treatment because of high operative risk and for...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 2016-07, Vol.128 (13-14), p.516-520
Main Authors: Mrak, Miha, Ambrožič, Jana, Mušič, Špela, Terseglav, Simon, Kontestabile, Bojan, Lakič, Nikola, Bunc, Matjaž
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-759134131b0271fbf80b5c77eb93fdd2b3dd82d3c6dfb9857408f3b8ba81cd493
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-759134131b0271fbf80b5c77eb93fdd2b3dd82d3c6dfb9857408f3b8ba81cd493
container_end_page 520
container_issue 13-14
container_start_page 516
container_title Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift
container_volume 128
creator Mrak, Miha
Ambrožič, Jana
Mušič, Špela
Terseglav, Simon
Kontestabile, Bojan
Lakič, Nikola
Bunc, Matjaž
description Summary Background Aortic stenosis is a progressive disease. Symptomatic aortic stenosis has a poor prognosis, which is frequently worse than that of a malignant disease. Cancer patients with severe aortic stenosis may be denied for optimal oncologic treatment because of high operative risk and for aortic valve replacement because of the significant comorbidity itself. In patients treated with medical therapy alone, 1-year-mortality exceeds 50 %. Case report A 71-year-old woman with well-differentiated, surgically treated, ovarian carcinoma and two relapses treated with chemo- and radiotherapy presented with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (aortic valve area 0.6 cm 2 , mean gradient 60 mmHg). The tumor was in stagnation. She was rejected for surgical valve replacement. We implanted a 29 mm CoreValve aortic prosthesis via transfemoral approach. After the procedure haemodynamic variables remain stable, patient’s exertional capacity is excellent. Conclusion Aortic valve replacement improves survival of cancer patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI) is a treatment option in inoperable patients and patients at high surgical risk. Symptoms should not be confused for the progression of the malignant disease. In patient selection emphasis should be made on their frailty and futility. Eligible patients must have a life expectancy of at least 1 year. Final decision has to be made by a multidisciplinary heart team. TAVI can reduce treatment risk and facilitate the oncologic treatment.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00508-016-0990-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1804865772</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1804865772</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-759134131b0271fbf80b5c77eb93fdd2b3dd82d3c6dfb9857408f3b8ba81cd493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOl4ewI1k6aZ60iRNuhTxBoIbXYfcqh3adExa0Z0P4RP6JGacUXDj6sA53__D-RA6JHBCAMRpAuAgCyBVAXUNBWygGakILUQlyCaaATBacFryHbSb0hyAcibINtopq1rSmrMZer2POiSrxyc_-oj1EMfW4hfdvXjc9otOh1GP7RBwG7DGVgebqUVe-TBi50PrHW6GiNMUH1uru78N0ecG6_sMf75_LPPpe5mZfbTV6C75g_XcQw-XF_fn18Xt3dXN-dltYSljYyF4TSgjlBgoBWlMI8FwK4Q3NW2cKw11TpaO2so1ppZcMJANNdJoSaxjNd1Dx6veRRyeJ59G1bfJ-i5_5ocpKSKByYoLUWaUrFAbh5Sib9Qitr2Ob4qAWgpXK-EqC1dL4Qpy5mhdP5neu9_Ej-EMlCsg5VN49FHNhymG_PI_rV97zI6W</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1804865772</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a cancer patient denied for surgical aortic valve replacement—a case report</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Mrak, Miha ; Ambrožič, Jana ; Mušič, Špela ; Terseglav, Simon ; Kontestabile, Bojan ; Lakič, Nikola ; Bunc, Matjaž</creator><creatorcontrib>Mrak, Miha ; Ambrožič, Jana ; Mušič, Špela ; Terseglav, Simon ; Kontestabile, Bojan ; Lakič, Nikola ; Bunc, Matjaž</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Background Aortic stenosis is a progressive disease. Symptomatic aortic stenosis has a poor prognosis, which is frequently worse than that of a malignant disease. Cancer patients with severe aortic stenosis may be denied for optimal oncologic treatment because of high operative risk and for aortic valve replacement because of the significant comorbidity itself. In patients treated with medical therapy alone, 1-year-mortality exceeds 50 %. Case report A 71-year-old woman with well-differentiated, surgically treated, ovarian carcinoma and two relapses treated with chemo- and radiotherapy presented with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (aortic valve area 0.6 cm 2 , mean gradient 60 mmHg). The tumor was in stagnation. She was rejected for surgical valve replacement. We implanted a 29 mm CoreValve aortic prosthesis via transfemoral approach. After the procedure haemodynamic variables remain stable, patient’s exertional capacity is excellent. Conclusion Aortic valve replacement improves survival of cancer patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI) is a treatment option in inoperable patients and patients at high surgical risk. Symptoms should not be confused for the progression of the malignant disease. In patient selection emphasis should be made on their frailty and futility. Eligible patients must have a life expectancy of at least 1 year. Final decision has to be made by a multidisciplinary heart team. TAVI can reduce treatment risk and facilitate the oncologic treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-5325</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1613-7671</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00508-016-0990-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26983954</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Vienna: Springer Vienna</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - complications ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery ; Case Report ; Endocrinology ; Female ; Gastroenterology ; Heart Valve Prosthesis ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Ovarian Neoplasms - complications ; Patient Selection ; Pneumology/Respiratory System ; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - methods ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, 2016-07, Vol.128 (13-14), p.516-520</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Wien 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-759134131b0271fbf80b5c77eb93fdd2b3dd82d3c6dfb9857408f3b8ba81cd493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-759134131b0271fbf80b5c77eb93fdd2b3dd82d3c6dfb9857408f3b8ba81cd493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26983954$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mrak, Miha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambrožič, Jana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mušič, Špela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terseglav, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kontestabile, Bojan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakič, Nikola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bunc, Matjaž</creatorcontrib><title>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a cancer patient denied for surgical aortic valve replacement—a case report</title><title>Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift</title><addtitle>Wien Klin Wochenschr</addtitle><addtitle>Wien Klin Wochenschr</addtitle><description>Summary Background Aortic stenosis is a progressive disease. Symptomatic aortic stenosis has a poor prognosis, which is frequently worse than that of a malignant disease. Cancer patients with severe aortic stenosis may be denied for optimal oncologic treatment because of high operative risk and for aortic valve replacement because of the significant comorbidity itself. In patients treated with medical therapy alone, 1-year-mortality exceeds 50 %. Case report A 71-year-old woman with well-differentiated, surgically treated, ovarian carcinoma and two relapses treated with chemo- and radiotherapy presented with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (aortic valve area 0.6 cm 2 , mean gradient 60 mmHg). The tumor was in stagnation. She was rejected for surgical valve replacement. We implanted a 29 mm CoreValve aortic prosthesis via transfemoral approach. After the procedure haemodynamic variables remain stable, patient’s exertional capacity is excellent. Conclusion Aortic valve replacement improves survival of cancer patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI) is a treatment option in inoperable patients and patients at high surgical risk. Symptoms should not be confused for the progression of the malignant disease. In patient selection emphasis should be made on their frailty and futility. Eligible patients must have a life expectancy of at least 1 year. Final decision has to be made by a multidisciplinary heart team. TAVI can reduce treatment risk and facilitate the oncologic treatment.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - complications</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Case Report</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Pneumology/Respiratory System</subject><subject>Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - methods</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0043-5325</issn><issn>1613-7671</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOl4ewI1k6aZ60iRNuhTxBoIbXYfcqh3adExa0Z0P4RP6JGacUXDj6sA53__D-RA6JHBCAMRpAuAgCyBVAXUNBWygGakILUQlyCaaATBacFryHbSb0hyAcibINtopq1rSmrMZer2POiSrxyc_-oj1EMfW4hfdvXjc9otOh1GP7RBwG7DGVgebqUVe-TBi50PrHW6GiNMUH1uru78N0ecG6_sMf75_LPPpe5mZfbTV6C75g_XcQw-XF_fn18Xt3dXN-dltYSljYyF4TSgjlBgoBWlMI8FwK4Q3NW2cKw11TpaO2so1ppZcMJANNdJoSaxjNd1Dx6veRRyeJ59G1bfJ-i5_5ocpKSKByYoLUWaUrFAbh5Sib9Qitr2Ob4qAWgpXK-EqC1dL4Qpy5mhdP5neu9_Ej-EMlCsg5VN49FHNhymG_PI_rV97zI6W</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Mrak, Miha</creator><creator>Ambrožič, Jana</creator><creator>Mušič, Špela</creator><creator>Terseglav, Simon</creator><creator>Kontestabile, Bojan</creator><creator>Lakič, Nikola</creator><creator>Bunc, Matjaž</creator><general>Springer Vienna</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a cancer patient denied for surgical aortic valve replacement—a case report</title><author>Mrak, Miha ; Ambrožič, Jana ; Mušič, Špela ; Terseglav, Simon ; Kontestabile, Bojan ; Lakič, Nikola ; Bunc, Matjaž</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-759134131b0271fbf80b5c77eb93fdd2b3dd82d3c6dfb9857408f3b8ba81cd493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - complications</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Case Report</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Pneumology/Respiratory System</topic><topic>Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - methods</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mrak, Miha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambrožič, Jana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mušič, Špela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terseglav, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kontestabile, Bojan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakič, Nikola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bunc, Matjaž</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mrak, Miha</au><au>Ambrožič, Jana</au><au>Mušič, Špela</au><au>Terseglav, Simon</au><au>Kontestabile, Bojan</au><au>Lakič, Nikola</au><au>Bunc, Matjaž</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a cancer patient denied for surgical aortic valve replacement—a case report</atitle><jtitle>Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift</jtitle><stitle>Wien Klin Wochenschr</stitle><addtitle>Wien Klin Wochenschr</addtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>13-14</issue><spage>516</spage><epage>520</epage><pages>516-520</pages><issn>0043-5325</issn><eissn>1613-7671</eissn><abstract>Summary Background Aortic stenosis is a progressive disease. Symptomatic aortic stenosis has a poor prognosis, which is frequently worse than that of a malignant disease. Cancer patients with severe aortic stenosis may be denied for optimal oncologic treatment because of high operative risk and for aortic valve replacement because of the significant comorbidity itself. In patients treated with medical therapy alone, 1-year-mortality exceeds 50 %. Case report A 71-year-old woman with well-differentiated, surgically treated, ovarian carcinoma and two relapses treated with chemo- and radiotherapy presented with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (aortic valve area 0.6 cm 2 , mean gradient 60 mmHg). The tumor was in stagnation. She was rejected for surgical valve replacement. We implanted a 29 mm CoreValve aortic prosthesis via transfemoral approach. After the procedure haemodynamic variables remain stable, patient’s exertional capacity is excellent. Conclusion Aortic valve replacement improves survival of cancer patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI) is a treatment option in inoperable patients and patients at high surgical risk. Symptoms should not be confused for the progression of the malignant disease. In patient selection emphasis should be made on their frailty and futility. Eligible patients must have a life expectancy of at least 1 year. Final decision has to be made by a multidisciplinary heart team. TAVI can reduce treatment risk and facilitate the oncologic treatment.</abstract><cop>Vienna</cop><pub>Springer Vienna</pub><pmid>26983954</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00508-016-0990-0</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0043-5325
ispartof Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, 2016-07, Vol.128 (13-14), p.516-520
issn 0043-5325
1613-7671
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1804865772
source Springer Link
subjects Aged
Aortic Valve Stenosis - complications
Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery
Case Report
Endocrinology
Female
Gastroenterology
Heart Valve Prosthesis
Humans
Internal Medicine
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Ovarian Neoplasms - complications
Patient Selection
Pneumology/Respiratory System
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - methods
Treatment Outcome
title Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a cancer patient denied for surgical aortic valve replacement—a case report
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T04%3A06%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transcatheter%20aortic%20valve%20implantation%20in%20a%20cancer%20patient%20denied%20for%20surgical%20aortic%20valve%20replacement%E2%80%94a%20case%20report&rft.jtitle=Wiener%20Klinische%20Wochenschrift&rft.au=Mrak,%20Miha&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=13-14&rft.spage=516&rft.epage=520&rft.pages=516-520&rft.issn=0043-5325&rft.eissn=1613-7671&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00508-016-0990-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1804865772%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-759134131b0271fbf80b5c77eb93fdd2b3dd82d3c6dfb9857408f3b8ba81cd493%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1804865772&rft_id=info:pmid/26983954&rfr_iscdi=true