Loading…
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a cancer patient denied for surgical aortic valve replacement—a case report
Summary Background Aortic stenosis is a progressive disease. Symptomatic aortic stenosis has a poor prognosis, which is frequently worse than that of a malignant disease. Cancer patients with severe aortic stenosis may be denied for optimal oncologic treatment because of high operative risk and for...
Saved in:
Published in: | Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 2016-07, Vol.128 (13-14), p.516-520 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-759134131b0271fbf80b5c77eb93fdd2b3dd82d3c6dfb9857408f3b8ba81cd493 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-759134131b0271fbf80b5c77eb93fdd2b3dd82d3c6dfb9857408f3b8ba81cd493 |
container_end_page | 520 |
container_issue | 13-14 |
container_start_page | 516 |
container_title | Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift |
container_volume | 128 |
creator | Mrak, Miha Ambrožič, Jana Mušič, Špela Terseglav, Simon Kontestabile, Bojan Lakič, Nikola Bunc, Matjaž |
description | Summary
Background
Aortic stenosis is a progressive disease. Symptomatic aortic stenosis has a poor prognosis, which is frequently worse than that of a malignant disease. Cancer patients with severe aortic stenosis may be denied for optimal oncologic treatment because of high operative risk and for aortic valve replacement because of the significant comorbidity itself. In patients treated with medical therapy alone, 1-year-mortality exceeds 50 %.
Case report
A 71-year-old woman with well-differentiated, surgically treated, ovarian carcinoma and two relapses treated with chemo- and radiotherapy presented with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (aortic valve area 0.6 cm
2
, mean gradient 60 mmHg). The tumor was in stagnation. She was rejected for surgical valve replacement. We implanted a 29 mm CoreValve aortic prosthesis via transfemoral approach. After the procedure haemodynamic variables remain stable, patient’s exertional capacity is excellent.
Conclusion
Aortic valve replacement improves survival of cancer patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI) is a treatment option in inoperable patients and patients at high surgical risk. Symptoms should not be confused for the progression of the malignant disease. In patient selection emphasis should be made on their frailty and futility. Eligible patients must have a life expectancy of at least 1 year. Final decision has to be made by a multidisciplinary heart team. TAVI can reduce treatment risk and facilitate the oncologic treatment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00508-016-0990-0 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1804865772</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1804865772</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-759134131b0271fbf80b5c77eb93fdd2b3dd82d3c6dfb9857408f3b8ba81cd493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOl4ewI1k6aZ60iRNuhTxBoIbXYfcqh3adExa0Z0P4RP6JGacUXDj6sA53__D-RA6JHBCAMRpAuAgCyBVAXUNBWygGakILUQlyCaaATBacFryHbSb0hyAcibINtopq1rSmrMZer2POiSrxyc_-oj1EMfW4hfdvXjc9otOh1GP7RBwG7DGVgebqUVe-TBi50PrHW6GiNMUH1uru78N0ecG6_sMf75_LPPpe5mZfbTV6C75g_XcQw-XF_fn18Xt3dXN-dltYSljYyF4TSgjlBgoBWlMI8FwK4Q3NW2cKw11TpaO2so1ppZcMJANNdJoSaxjNd1Dx6veRRyeJ59G1bfJ-i5_5ocpKSKByYoLUWaUrFAbh5Sib9Qitr2Ob4qAWgpXK-EqC1dL4Qpy5mhdP5neu9_Ej-EMlCsg5VN49FHNhymG_PI_rV97zI6W</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1804865772</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a cancer patient denied for surgical aortic valve replacement—a case report</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Mrak, Miha ; Ambrožič, Jana ; Mušič, Špela ; Terseglav, Simon ; Kontestabile, Bojan ; Lakič, Nikola ; Bunc, Matjaž</creator><creatorcontrib>Mrak, Miha ; Ambrožič, Jana ; Mušič, Špela ; Terseglav, Simon ; Kontestabile, Bojan ; Lakič, Nikola ; Bunc, Matjaž</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
Background
Aortic stenosis is a progressive disease. Symptomatic aortic stenosis has a poor prognosis, which is frequently worse than that of a malignant disease. Cancer patients with severe aortic stenosis may be denied for optimal oncologic treatment because of high operative risk and for aortic valve replacement because of the significant comorbidity itself. In patients treated with medical therapy alone, 1-year-mortality exceeds 50 %.
Case report
A 71-year-old woman with well-differentiated, surgically treated, ovarian carcinoma and two relapses treated with chemo- and radiotherapy presented with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (aortic valve area 0.6 cm
2
, mean gradient 60 mmHg). The tumor was in stagnation. She was rejected for surgical valve replacement. We implanted a 29 mm CoreValve aortic prosthesis via transfemoral approach. After the procedure haemodynamic variables remain stable, patient’s exertional capacity is excellent.
Conclusion
Aortic valve replacement improves survival of cancer patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI) is a treatment option in inoperable patients and patients at high surgical risk. Symptoms should not be confused for the progression of the malignant disease. In patient selection emphasis should be made on their frailty and futility. Eligible patients must have a life expectancy of at least 1 year. Final decision has to be made by a multidisciplinary heart team. TAVI can reduce treatment risk and facilitate the oncologic treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-5325</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1613-7671</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00508-016-0990-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26983954</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Vienna: Springer Vienna</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - complications ; Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery ; Case Report ; Endocrinology ; Female ; Gastroenterology ; Heart Valve Prosthesis ; Humans ; Internal Medicine ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Ovarian Neoplasms - complications ; Patient Selection ; Pneumology/Respiratory System ; Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - methods ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, 2016-07, Vol.128 (13-14), p.516-520</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Wien 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-759134131b0271fbf80b5c77eb93fdd2b3dd82d3c6dfb9857408f3b8ba81cd493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-759134131b0271fbf80b5c77eb93fdd2b3dd82d3c6dfb9857408f3b8ba81cd493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26983954$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mrak, Miha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambrožič, Jana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mušič, Špela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terseglav, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kontestabile, Bojan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakič, Nikola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bunc, Matjaž</creatorcontrib><title>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a cancer patient denied for surgical aortic valve replacement—a case report</title><title>Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift</title><addtitle>Wien Klin Wochenschr</addtitle><addtitle>Wien Klin Wochenschr</addtitle><description>Summary
Background
Aortic stenosis is a progressive disease. Symptomatic aortic stenosis has a poor prognosis, which is frequently worse than that of a malignant disease. Cancer patients with severe aortic stenosis may be denied for optimal oncologic treatment because of high operative risk and for aortic valve replacement because of the significant comorbidity itself. In patients treated with medical therapy alone, 1-year-mortality exceeds 50 %.
Case report
A 71-year-old woman with well-differentiated, surgically treated, ovarian carcinoma and two relapses treated with chemo- and radiotherapy presented with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (aortic valve area 0.6 cm
2
, mean gradient 60 mmHg). The tumor was in stagnation. She was rejected for surgical valve replacement. We implanted a 29 mm CoreValve aortic prosthesis via transfemoral approach. After the procedure haemodynamic variables remain stable, patient’s exertional capacity is excellent.
Conclusion
Aortic valve replacement improves survival of cancer patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI) is a treatment option in inoperable patients and patients at high surgical risk. Symptoms should not be confused for the progression of the malignant disease. In patient selection emphasis should be made on their frailty and futility. Eligible patients must have a life expectancy of at least 1 year. Final decision has to be made by a multidisciplinary heart team. TAVI can reduce treatment risk and facilitate the oncologic treatment.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - complications</subject><subject>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</subject><subject>Case Report</subject><subject>Endocrinology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Heart Valve Prosthesis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Ovarian Neoplasms - complications</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Pneumology/Respiratory System</subject><subject>Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - methods</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0043-5325</issn><issn>1613-7671</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKxDAUhoMoOl4ewI1k6aZ60iRNuhTxBoIbXYfcqh3adExa0Z0P4RP6JGacUXDj6sA53__D-RA6JHBCAMRpAuAgCyBVAXUNBWygGakILUQlyCaaATBacFryHbSb0hyAcibINtopq1rSmrMZer2POiSrxyc_-oj1EMfW4hfdvXjc9otOh1GP7RBwG7DGVgebqUVe-TBi50PrHW6GiNMUH1uru78N0ecG6_sMf75_LPPpe5mZfbTV6C75g_XcQw-XF_fn18Xt3dXN-dltYSljYyF4TSgjlBgoBWlMI8FwK4Q3NW2cKw11TpaO2so1ppZcMJANNdJoSaxjNd1Dx6veRRyeJ59G1bfJ-i5_5ocpKSKByYoLUWaUrFAbh5Sib9Qitr2Ob4qAWgpXK-EqC1dL4Qpy5mhdP5neu9_Ej-EMlCsg5VN49FHNhymG_PI_rV97zI6W</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Mrak, Miha</creator><creator>Ambrožič, Jana</creator><creator>Mušič, Špela</creator><creator>Terseglav, Simon</creator><creator>Kontestabile, Bojan</creator><creator>Lakič, Nikola</creator><creator>Bunc, Matjaž</creator><general>Springer Vienna</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a cancer patient denied for surgical aortic valve replacement—a case report</title><author>Mrak, Miha ; Ambrožič, Jana ; Mušič, Špela ; Terseglav, Simon ; Kontestabile, Bojan ; Lakič, Nikola ; Bunc, Matjaž</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-759134131b0271fbf80b5c77eb93fdd2b3dd82d3c6dfb9857408f3b8ba81cd493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - complications</topic><topic>Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery</topic><topic>Case Report</topic><topic>Endocrinology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Heart Valve Prosthesis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Ovarian Neoplasms - complications</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Pneumology/Respiratory System</topic><topic>Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - methods</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mrak, Miha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ambrožič, Jana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mušič, Špela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Terseglav, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kontestabile, Bojan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lakič, Nikola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bunc, Matjaž</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mrak, Miha</au><au>Ambrožič, Jana</au><au>Mušič, Špela</au><au>Terseglav, Simon</au><au>Kontestabile, Bojan</au><au>Lakič, Nikola</au><au>Bunc, Matjaž</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a cancer patient denied for surgical aortic valve replacement—a case report</atitle><jtitle>Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift</jtitle><stitle>Wien Klin Wochenschr</stitle><addtitle>Wien Klin Wochenschr</addtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>128</volume><issue>13-14</issue><spage>516</spage><epage>520</epage><pages>516-520</pages><issn>0043-5325</issn><eissn>1613-7671</eissn><abstract>Summary
Background
Aortic stenosis is a progressive disease. Symptomatic aortic stenosis has a poor prognosis, which is frequently worse than that of a malignant disease. Cancer patients with severe aortic stenosis may be denied for optimal oncologic treatment because of high operative risk and for aortic valve replacement because of the significant comorbidity itself. In patients treated with medical therapy alone, 1-year-mortality exceeds 50 %.
Case report
A 71-year-old woman with well-differentiated, surgically treated, ovarian carcinoma and two relapses treated with chemo- and radiotherapy presented with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis (aortic valve area 0.6 cm
2
, mean gradient 60 mmHg). The tumor was in stagnation. She was rejected for surgical valve replacement. We implanted a 29 mm CoreValve aortic prosthesis via transfemoral approach. After the procedure haemodynamic variables remain stable, patient’s exertional capacity is excellent.
Conclusion
Aortic valve replacement improves survival of cancer patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI) is a treatment option in inoperable patients and patients at high surgical risk. Symptoms should not be confused for the progression of the malignant disease. In patient selection emphasis should be made on their frailty and futility. Eligible patients must have a life expectancy of at least 1 year. Final decision has to be made by a multidisciplinary heart team. TAVI can reduce treatment risk and facilitate the oncologic treatment.</abstract><cop>Vienna</cop><pub>Springer Vienna</pub><pmid>26983954</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00508-016-0990-0</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-5325 |
ispartof | Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, 2016-07, Vol.128 (13-14), p.516-520 |
issn | 0043-5325 1613-7671 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1804865772 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Aged Aortic Valve Stenosis - complications Aortic Valve Stenosis - surgery Case Report Endocrinology Female Gastroenterology Heart Valve Prosthesis Humans Internal Medicine Medicine Medicine & Public Health Ovarian Neoplasms - complications Patient Selection Pneumology/Respiratory System Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement - methods Treatment Outcome |
title | Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in a cancer patient denied for surgical aortic valve replacement—a case report |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T04%3A06%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transcatheter%20aortic%20valve%20implantation%20in%20a%20cancer%20patient%20denied%20for%20surgical%20aortic%20valve%20replacement%E2%80%94a%20case%20report&rft.jtitle=Wiener%20Klinische%20Wochenschrift&rft.au=Mrak,%20Miha&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=128&rft.issue=13-14&rft.spage=516&rft.epage=520&rft.pages=516-520&rft.issn=0043-5325&rft.eissn=1613-7671&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00508-016-0990-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1804865772%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c344t-759134131b0271fbf80b5c77eb93fdd2b3dd82d3c6dfb9857408f3b8ba81cd493%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1804865772&rft_id=info:pmid/26983954&rfr_iscdi=true |