Loading…

The biodiversity of Diptera in Old World rain forest surveys: a comparative faunistic analysis

Aim Identify the taxonomic patterns and the relative importance of particular families of Diptera sampled in comparative biodiversity surveys carried out at seven rain forest locations. We test and quantify the contention that different trapping methods routinely target different families. We identi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of biogeography 2004-07, Vol.31 (7), p.1185-1200
Main Authors: Kitching, R. L., Bickel, D., Creagh, A. C., Hurley, K., Symonds, C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4316-8a803035205a34de2faa4eb80dbfd29ecda476ef177facb0c2bce88915368c283
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4316-8a803035205a34de2faa4eb80dbfd29ecda476ef177facb0c2bce88915368c283
container_end_page 1200
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1185
container_title Journal of biogeography
container_volume 31
creator Kitching, R. L.
Bickel, D.
Creagh, A. C.
Hurley, K.
Symonds, C.
description Aim Identify the taxonomic patterns and the relative importance of particular families of Diptera sampled in comparative biodiversity surveys carried out at seven rain forest locations. We test and quantify the contention that different trapping methods routinely target different families. We identify the south-north (and upland/lowland) patterns and generate a set of hypotheses concerning mechanisms underlying these patterns. Location Australia and Papua New Guinea. Methods A total of 28,647 Diptera collected using canopy knockdown, yellow pan (water) traps and Malaise traps have been sorted to 56 families following these surveys. Comparative analyses across sites from Lamington National Park in south-east Queensland, Australia to the Kau Wildlife area in Madang Province, Papua New Guinea, of the dipteran assemblages, and separately, of the 14 families which collectively made up 95.8% of the sample, are presented. Results Ordination by multi-dimensional scaling and analyses of variances showed that the three methods complemented each other in terms of target families and, together, sampled a large proportion of the expected fauna of these sites. Ordinations on a method-by-method basis permitted the identification of groups of sites and analyses of variance indicated which taxa differed significantly across these groups. Main conclusions Recurrent patterns and associated hypotheses about their generation emerge from the data. These mirror floristic differences and reflect the biogeographic history of the sites since the Miocene. Clear linkages between the lowland faunas of Papua New Guinea and northern Australia are evident and are reflected in the abundances of the Dolichopodidae, Empididae, Muscidae and Tipulidae (other groupings underlined the essential difference of the New Guinean fauna which had characteristic proportions of Cecidomyiidae, Chironomidae, Dolichopodidae, Phoridae and Psychodidae). A subtropical grouping of families was evident comprising, inter alia, Chloropidae, Mycetophilidae, Drosophilidae and Phoridae which was frequently linked with the higher elevation tropical fauna at Robson's Creek, Atherton Tablelands. The long isolated, high elevation, rain-forested massif at Eungella, central Queensland often emerged as a unique entity in the analyses, characterized by the high numbers of and proportions of Chironomidae, Psychodidae, Tipulidae and Empididae. This study supports the case for the wider use of Diptera in biodiversity analyses,
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01096.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18049138</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3554815</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3554815</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4316-8a803035205a34de2faa4eb80dbfd29ecda476ef177facb0c2bce88915368c283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM1u1DAUhS1EJYaBN2DhDeyS-jdxkFjAAKVoNF20qDusG8cWHjLJ1M6UydvXIdV0Wy_sa53zXV8fhDAlOU3rfJtTXsiMFVWVM0JETiipivz4Ai1Owku0IJzIjLCSvEKvY9wSQirJxQL9vvljce37xt_bEP0w4t7hr34_2ADYd_iqbfBtH9IeIF1dH2wccDyEezvGjxiw6Xd7CDAkHjs4dD4O3mDooB2jj2_QmYM22reP5xL9-v7tZvUjW19dXK4-rzMjOC0yBSoNyCUjErhoLHMAwtaKNLVrWGVNA6IsrKNl6cDUxLDaWKUqKnmhDFN8iT7MffehvzukEfXOR2PbFjrbH6KmioiK8smoZqMJfYzBOr0Pfgdh1JToKVC91VNuespNT4Hq_4HqY0LfP74B0UDrAnTGxydeKqEKxZPv0-z751s7Pru__vnlcqoS_27mt3How4nnUgqVPrxE2SynpO3xJEP4q4uSl1Lfbi60ZGq9ud5IveIPJDWiwg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18049138</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The biodiversity of Diptera in Old World rain forest surveys: a comparative faunistic analysis</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Kitching, R. L. ; Bickel, D. ; Creagh, A. C. ; Hurley, K. ; Symonds, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kitching, R. L. ; Bickel, D. ; Creagh, A. C. ; Hurley, K. ; Symonds, C.</creatorcontrib><description>Aim Identify the taxonomic patterns and the relative importance of particular families of Diptera sampled in comparative biodiversity surveys carried out at seven rain forest locations. We test and quantify the contention that different trapping methods routinely target different families. We identify the south-north (and upland/lowland) patterns and generate a set of hypotheses concerning mechanisms underlying these patterns. Location Australia and Papua New Guinea. Methods A total of 28,647 Diptera collected using canopy knockdown, yellow pan (water) traps and Malaise traps have been sorted to 56 families following these surveys. Comparative analyses across sites from Lamington National Park in south-east Queensland, Australia to the Kau Wildlife area in Madang Province, Papua New Guinea, of the dipteran assemblages, and separately, of the 14 families which collectively made up 95.8% of the sample, are presented. Results Ordination by multi-dimensional scaling and analyses of variances showed that the three methods complemented each other in terms of target families and, together, sampled a large proportion of the expected fauna of these sites. Ordinations on a method-by-method basis permitted the identification of groups of sites and analyses of variance indicated which taxa differed significantly across these groups. Main conclusions Recurrent patterns and associated hypotheses about their generation emerge from the data. These mirror floristic differences and reflect the biogeographic history of the sites since the Miocene. Clear linkages between the lowland faunas of Papua New Guinea and northern Australia are evident and are reflected in the abundances of the Dolichopodidae, Empididae, Muscidae and Tipulidae (other groupings underlined the essential difference of the New Guinean fauna which had characteristic proportions of Cecidomyiidae, Chironomidae, Dolichopodidae, Phoridae and Psychodidae). A subtropical grouping of families was evident comprising, inter alia, Chloropidae, Mycetophilidae, Drosophilidae and Phoridae which was frequently linked with the higher elevation tropical fauna at Robson's Creek, Atherton Tablelands. The long isolated, high elevation, rain-forested massif at Eungella, central Queensland often emerged as a unique entity in the analyses, characterized by the high numbers of and proportions of Chironomidae, Psychodidae, Tipulidae and Empididae. This study supports the case for the wider use of Diptera in biodiversity analyses, complementing extensive earlier analyses which have used, predominantly, large coleopteran assemblages. The results indicate the potential power of family-level analyses at large geographical scales and contribute to the ongoing debate on 'taxonomic sufficiency'.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-0270</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2699</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01096.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JBIODN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biodiversity ; Biogeography ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chironomidae ; Diptera ; Fauna ; Forest canopy ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Insects Galore ; Lowlands ; Old World ; Ordination ; Proportions ; Psychodidae ; rain forest ; Rain forests ; survey ; Synecology ; Taxa ; Tropical rain forests</subject><ispartof>Journal of biogeography, 2004-07, Vol.31 (7), p.1185-1200</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 Blackwell Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4316-8a803035205a34de2faa4eb80dbfd29ecda476ef177facb0c2bce88915368c283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4316-8a803035205a34de2faa4eb80dbfd29ecda476ef177facb0c2bce88915368c283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3554815$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3554815$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,58238,58471</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15848683$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kitching, R. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bickel, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creagh, A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurley, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Symonds, C.</creatorcontrib><title>The biodiversity of Diptera in Old World rain forest surveys: a comparative faunistic analysis</title><title>Journal of biogeography</title><description>Aim Identify the taxonomic patterns and the relative importance of particular families of Diptera sampled in comparative biodiversity surveys carried out at seven rain forest locations. We test and quantify the contention that different trapping methods routinely target different families. We identify the south-north (and upland/lowland) patterns and generate a set of hypotheses concerning mechanisms underlying these patterns. Location Australia and Papua New Guinea. Methods A total of 28,647 Diptera collected using canopy knockdown, yellow pan (water) traps and Malaise traps have been sorted to 56 families following these surveys. Comparative analyses across sites from Lamington National Park in south-east Queensland, Australia to the Kau Wildlife area in Madang Province, Papua New Guinea, of the dipteran assemblages, and separately, of the 14 families which collectively made up 95.8% of the sample, are presented. Results Ordination by multi-dimensional scaling and analyses of variances showed that the three methods complemented each other in terms of target families and, together, sampled a large proportion of the expected fauna of these sites. Ordinations on a method-by-method basis permitted the identification of groups of sites and analyses of variance indicated which taxa differed significantly across these groups. Main conclusions Recurrent patterns and associated hypotheses about their generation emerge from the data. These mirror floristic differences and reflect the biogeographic history of the sites since the Miocene. Clear linkages between the lowland faunas of Papua New Guinea and northern Australia are evident and are reflected in the abundances of the Dolichopodidae, Empididae, Muscidae and Tipulidae (other groupings underlined the essential difference of the New Guinean fauna which had characteristic proportions of Cecidomyiidae, Chironomidae, Dolichopodidae, Phoridae and Psychodidae). A subtropical grouping of families was evident comprising, inter alia, Chloropidae, Mycetophilidae, Drosophilidae and Phoridae which was frequently linked with the higher elevation tropical fauna at Robson's Creek, Atherton Tablelands. The long isolated, high elevation, rain-forested massif at Eungella, central Queensland often emerged as a unique entity in the analyses, characterized by the high numbers of and proportions of Chironomidae, Psychodidae, Tipulidae and Empididae. This study supports the case for the wider use of Diptera in biodiversity analyses, complementing extensive earlier analyses which have used, predominantly, large coleopteran assemblages. The results indicate the potential power of family-level analyses at large geographical scales and contribute to the ongoing debate on 'taxonomic sufficiency'.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biogeography</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chironomidae</subject><subject>Diptera</subject><subject>Fauna</subject><subject>Forest canopy</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Insects Galore</subject><subject>Lowlands</subject><subject>Old World</subject><subject>Ordination</subject><subject>Proportions</subject><subject>Psychodidae</subject><subject>rain forest</subject><subject>Rain forests</subject><subject>survey</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Tropical rain forests</subject><issn>0305-0270</issn><issn>1365-2699</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkM1u1DAUhS1EJYaBN2DhDeyS-jdxkFjAAKVoNF20qDusG8cWHjLJ1M6UydvXIdV0Wy_sa53zXV8fhDAlOU3rfJtTXsiMFVWVM0JETiipivz4Ai1Owku0IJzIjLCSvEKvY9wSQirJxQL9vvljce37xt_bEP0w4t7hr34_2ADYd_iqbfBtH9IeIF1dH2wccDyEezvGjxiw6Xd7CDAkHjs4dD4O3mDooB2jj2_QmYM22reP5xL9-v7tZvUjW19dXK4-rzMjOC0yBSoNyCUjErhoLHMAwtaKNLVrWGVNA6IsrKNl6cDUxLDaWKUqKnmhDFN8iT7MffehvzukEfXOR2PbFjrbH6KmioiK8smoZqMJfYzBOr0Pfgdh1JToKVC91VNuespNT4Hq_4HqY0LfP74B0UDrAnTGxydeKqEKxZPv0-z751s7Pru__vnlcqoS_27mt3How4nnUgqVPrxE2SynpO3xJEP4q4uSl1Lfbi60ZGq9ud5IveIPJDWiwg</recordid><startdate>200407</startdate><enddate>200407</enddate><creator>Kitching, R. L.</creator><creator>Bickel, D.</creator><creator>Creagh, A. C.</creator><creator>Hurley, K.</creator><creator>Symonds, C.</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200407</creationdate><title>The biodiversity of Diptera in Old World rain forest surveys: a comparative faunistic analysis</title><author>Kitching, R. L. ; Bickel, D. ; Creagh, A. C. ; Hurley, K. ; Symonds, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4316-8a803035205a34de2faa4eb80dbfd29ecda476ef177facb0c2bce88915368c283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biogeography</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chironomidae</topic><topic>Diptera</topic><topic>Fauna</topic><topic>Forest canopy</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Insects Galore</topic><topic>Lowlands</topic><topic>Old World</topic><topic>Ordination</topic><topic>Proportions</topic><topic>Psychodidae</topic><topic>rain forest</topic><topic>Rain forests</topic><topic>survey</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Tropical rain forests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kitching, R. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bickel, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Creagh, A. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurley, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Symonds, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of biogeography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kitching, R. L.</au><au>Bickel, D.</au><au>Creagh, A. C.</au><au>Hurley, K.</au><au>Symonds, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The biodiversity of Diptera in Old World rain forest surveys: a comparative faunistic analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biogeography</jtitle><date>2004-07</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1185</spage><epage>1200</epage><pages>1185-1200</pages><issn>0305-0270</issn><eissn>1365-2699</eissn><coden>JBIODN</coden><abstract>Aim Identify the taxonomic patterns and the relative importance of particular families of Diptera sampled in comparative biodiversity surveys carried out at seven rain forest locations. We test and quantify the contention that different trapping methods routinely target different families. We identify the south-north (and upland/lowland) patterns and generate a set of hypotheses concerning mechanisms underlying these patterns. Location Australia and Papua New Guinea. Methods A total of 28,647 Diptera collected using canopy knockdown, yellow pan (water) traps and Malaise traps have been sorted to 56 families following these surveys. Comparative analyses across sites from Lamington National Park in south-east Queensland, Australia to the Kau Wildlife area in Madang Province, Papua New Guinea, of the dipteran assemblages, and separately, of the 14 families which collectively made up 95.8% of the sample, are presented. Results Ordination by multi-dimensional scaling and analyses of variances showed that the three methods complemented each other in terms of target families and, together, sampled a large proportion of the expected fauna of these sites. Ordinations on a method-by-method basis permitted the identification of groups of sites and analyses of variance indicated which taxa differed significantly across these groups. Main conclusions Recurrent patterns and associated hypotheses about their generation emerge from the data. These mirror floristic differences and reflect the biogeographic history of the sites since the Miocene. Clear linkages between the lowland faunas of Papua New Guinea and northern Australia are evident and are reflected in the abundances of the Dolichopodidae, Empididae, Muscidae and Tipulidae (other groupings underlined the essential difference of the New Guinean fauna which had characteristic proportions of Cecidomyiidae, Chironomidae, Dolichopodidae, Phoridae and Psychodidae). A subtropical grouping of families was evident comprising, inter alia, Chloropidae, Mycetophilidae, Drosophilidae and Phoridae which was frequently linked with the higher elevation tropical fauna at Robson's Creek, Atherton Tablelands. The long isolated, high elevation, rain-forested massif at Eungella, central Queensland often emerged as a unique entity in the analyses, characterized by the high numbers of and proportions of Chironomidae, Psychodidae, Tipulidae and Empididae. This study supports the case for the wider use of Diptera in biodiversity analyses, complementing extensive earlier analyses which have used, predominantly, large coleopteran assemblages. The results indicate the potential power of family-level analyses at large geographical scales and contribute to the ongoing debate on 'taxonomic sufficiency'.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01096.x</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-0270
ispartof Journal of biogeography, 2004-07, Vol.31 (7), p.1185-1200
issn 0305-0270
1365-2699
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18049138
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biodiversity
Biogeography
Biological and medical sciences
Chironomidae
Diptera
Fauna
Forest canopy
Freshwater
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Insects Galore
Lowlands
Old World
Ordination
Proportions
Psychodidae
rain forest
Rain forests
survey
Synecology
Taxa
Tropical rain forests
title The biodiversity of Diptera in Old World rain forest surveys: a comparative faunistic analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A37%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20biodiversity%20of%20Diptera%20in%20Old%20World%20rain%20forest%20surveys:%20a%20comparative%20faunistic%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biogeography&rft.au=Kitching,%20R.%20L.&rft.date=2004-07&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1185&rft.epage=1200&rft.pages=1185-1200&rft.issn=0305-0270&rft.eissn=1365-2699&rft.coden=JBIODN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01096.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E3554815%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4316-8a803035205a34de2faa4eb80dbfd29ecda476ef177facb0c2bce88915368c283%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18049138&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3554815&rfr_iscdi=true