Loading…

Rasch analysis of the Fatigue Severity Scale in Italian subjects with multiple sclerosis

To perform a psychometric analysis of the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) using Rasch analysis in a sample of Italian subjects with multiple sclerosis. The 9-item FSS was administered to 156 Italian-speaking subjects with multiple sclerosis. Responses were assessed using Cronbach's alpha, item-rem...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of rehabilitation medicine 2016-07, Vol.48 (7), p.597-603
Main Authors: Ottonello, Marcella, Pellicciari, Leonardo, Giordano, Andrea, Foti, Calogero
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-39eb600a4fa81e68f345c239f5aad8c726cda833f5f19c3cb5e38a84df2a6c883
cites
container_end_page 603
container_issue 7
container_start_page 597
container_title Journal of rehabilitation medicine
container_volume 48
creator Ottonello, Marcella
Pellicciari, Leonardo
Giordano, Andrea
Foti, Calogero
description To perform a psychometric analysis of the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) using Rasch analysis in a sample of Italian subjects with multiple sclerosis. The 9-item FSS was administered to 156 Italian-speaking subjects with multiple sclerosis. Responses were assessed using Cronbach's alpha, item-remainder correlations, factor analysis and Rasch analysis. The FSS showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95), but presented problems in the rating categories and failed to fit the Rasch model. After re-coding and deletion of item 1 (infit mean-square (MnSq) = 1.65; outfit MnSq = 1.72), the 8-item version fitted the latent construct that the scale was intended to measure and showed satisfactory reliability indices. The scale was not optimally targeted to the sample, but no sex or age bias was found. The 8-item FSS shows better psychometric properties than the 9-item version. However, a significant ceiling effect emerged in our sample of Italian adults with multiple sclerosis and, consequently, there is a targeting problem for patients with low-level disability. To consider this a valid tool for use in clinical practice and research, further studies with a larger sample of subjects with multiple sclerosis are needed.
doi_str_mv 10.2340/16501977-2116
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1805483804</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1805483804</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-39eb600a4fa81e68f345c239f5aad8c726cda833f5f19c3cb5e38a84df2a6c883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkM9LwzAUx4Mobk6PXiXgxUs1aZo0PcpwOhgITsFbeU0Tl9Efs0mV_fembvPg6b3H-_CF7wehS0puY5aQOyo4oVmaRjGl4giNw02jmEh6_LuTaHiO0Jlza0Joyll6ikZxypIkE3KM3l_AqRWGBqqtsw63BvuVxjPw9qPXeKm_dGf9Fi8VVBrbBs89VBYa7PpirZV3-Nv6Fa77yttNIJyqdNeGpHN0YqBy-mI_J-ht9vA6fYoWz4_z6f0iUkwQH7FMF4IQSAxIqoU0LOEqZpnhAKVUaSxUCZIxww3NFFMF10yCTEoTg1BSsgm62eVuuvaz187ntXVKVxU0uu1dTiXhiWSSJAG9_oeu274LzQdKMi5Yymmgoh2lQg_XaZNvOltDt80pyQfl-UF5PigP_NU-tS9qXf7RB8fsB-1tezE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1883563751</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Rasch analysis of the Fatigue Severity Scale in Italian subjects with multiple sclerosis</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ottonello, Marcella ; Pellicciari, Leonardo ; Giordano, Andrea ; Foti, Calogero</creator><creatorcontrib>Ottonello, Marcella ; Pellicciari, Leonardo ; Giordano, Andrea ; Foti, Calogero</creatorcontrib><description>To perform a psychometric analysis of the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) using Rasch analysis in a sample of Italian subjects with multiple sclerosis. The 9-item FSS was administered to 156 Italian-speaking subjects with multiple sclerosis. Responses were assessed using Cronbach's alpha, item-remainder correlations, factor analysis and Rasch analysis. The FSS showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95), but presented problems in the rating categories and failed to fit the Rasch model. After re-coding and deletion of item 1 (infit mean-square (MnSq) = 1.65; outfit MnSq = 1.72), the 8-item version fitted the latent construct that the scale was intended to measure and showed satisfactory reliability indices. The scale was not optimally targeted to the sample, but no sex or age bias was found. The 8-item FSS shows better psychometric properties than the 9-item version. However, a significant ceiling effect emerged in our sample of Italian adults with multiple sclerosis and, consequently, there is a targeting problem for patients with low-level disability. To consider this a valid tool for use in clinical practice and research, further studies with a larger sample of subjects with multiple sclerosis are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1650-1977</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1651-2081</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2116</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27344968</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Sweden: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine</publisher><subject>Adult ; Analysis ; Bias ; Clinical research ; Cronbach's alpha ; Disability ; Factor analysis ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Fatigue ; Fatigue - etiology ; Fatigue - psychology ; Female ; Humans ; Italy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Multiple sclerosis ; Multiple Sclerosis - complications ; Multiple Sclerosis - psychology ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - standards ; Psychometrics ; Quantitative psychology ; Rasch model ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Severity ; Severity of Illness Index</subject><ispartof>Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2016-07, Vol.48 (7), p.597-603</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd. Jul 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-39eb600a4fa81e68f345c239f5aad8c726cda833f5f19c3cb5e38a84df2a6c883</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,30999</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27344968$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ottonello, Marcella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellicciari, Leonardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giordano, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foti, Calogero</creatorcontrib><title>Rasch analysis of the Fatigue Severity Scale in Italian subjects with multiple sclerosis</title><title>Journal of rehabilitation medicine</title><addtitle>J Rehabil Med</addtitle><description>To perform a psychometric analysis of the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) using Rasch analysis in a sample of Italian subjects with multiple sclerosis. The 9-item FSS was administered to 156 Italian-speaking subjects with multiple sclerosis. Responses were assessed using Cronbach's alpha, item-remainder correlations, factor analysis and Rasch analysis. The FSS showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95), but presented problems in the rating categories and failed to fit the Rasch model. After re-coding and deletion of item 1 (infit mean-square (MnSq) = 1.65; outfit MnSq = 1.72), the 8-item version fitted the latent construct that the scale was intended to measure and showed satisfactory reliability indices. The scale was not optimally targeted to the sample, but no sex or age bias was found. The 8-item FSS shows better psychometric properties than the 9-item version. However, a significant ceiling effect emerged in our sample of Italian adults with multiple sclerosis and, consequently, there is a targeting problem for patients with low-level disability. To consider this a valid tool for use in clinical practice and research, further studies with a larger sample of subjects with multiple sclerosis are needed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Clinical research</subject><subject>Cronbach's alpha</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Fatigue</subject><subject>Fatigue - etiology</subject><subject>Fatigue - psychology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Italy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multiple sclerosis</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - complications</subject><subject>Multiple Sclerosis - psychology</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - standards</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Rasch model</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Severity</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><issn>1650-1977</issn><issn>1651-2081</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkM9LwzAUx4Mobk6PXiXgxUs1aZo0PcpwOhgITsFbeU0Tl9Efs0mV_fembvPg6b3H-_CF7wehS0puY5aQOyo4oVmaRjGl4giNw02jmEh6_LuTaHiO0Jlza0Joyll6ikZxypIkE3KM3l_AqRWGBqqtsw63BvuVxjPw9qPXeKm_dGf9Fi8VVBrbBs89VBYa7PpirZV3-Nv6Fa77yttNIJyqdNeGpHN0YqBy-mI_J-ht9vA6fYoWz4_z6f0iUkwQH7FMF4IQSAxIqoU0LOEqZpnhAKVUaSxUCZIxww3NFFMF10yCTEoTg1BSsgm62eVuuvaz187ntXVKVxU0uu1dTiXhiWSSJAG9_oeu274LzQdKMi5Yymmgoh2lQg_XaZNvOltDt80pyQfl-UF5PigP_NU-tS9qXf7RB8fsB-1tezE</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Ottonello, Marcella</creator><creator>Pellicciari, Leonardo</creator><creator>Giordano, Andrea</creator><creator>Foti, Calogero</creator><general>Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Rasch analysis of the Fatigue Severity Scale in Italian subjects with multiple sclerosis</title><author>Ottonello, Marcella ; Pellicciari, Leonardo ; Giordano, Andrea ; Foti, Calogero</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-39eb600a4fa81e68f345c239f5aad8c726cda833f5f19c3cb5e38a84df2a6c883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Clinical research</topic><topic>Cronbach's alpha</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Fatigue</topic><topic>Fatigue - etiology</topic><topic>Fatigue - psychology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Italy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multiple sclerosis</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - complications</topic><topic>Multiple Sclerosis - psychology</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - standards</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Rasch model</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Severity</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ottonello, Marcella</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pellicciari, Leonardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giordano, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foti, Calogero</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of rehabilitation medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ottonello, Marcella</au><au>Pellicciari, Leonardo</au><au>Giordano, Andrea</au><au>Foti, Calogero</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Rasch analysis of the Fatigue Severity Scale in Italian subjects with multiple sclerosis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of rehabilitation medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Rehabil Med</addtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>597</spage><epage>603</epage><pages>597-603</pages><issn>1650-1977</issn><eissn>1651-2081</eissn><abstract>To perform a psychometric analysis of the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) using Rasch analysis in a sample of Italian subjects with multiple sclerosis. The 9-item FSS was administered to 156 Italian-speaking subjects with multiple sclerosis. Responses were assessed using Cronbach's alpha, item-remainder correlations, factor analysis and Rasch analysis. The FSS showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.95), but presented problems in the rating categories and failed to fit the Rasch model. After re-coding and deletion of item 1 (infit mean-square (MnSq) = 1.65; outfit MnSq = 1.72), the 8-item version fitted the latent construct that the scale was intended to measure and showed satisfactory reliability indices. The scale was not optimally targeted to the sample, but no sex or age bias was found. The 8-item FSS shows better psychometric properties than the 9-item version. However, a significant ceiling effect emerged in our sample of Italian adults with multiple sclerosis and, consequently, there is a targeting problem for patients with low-level disability. To consider this a valid tool for use in clinical practice and research, further studies with a larger sample of subjects with multiple sclerosis are needed.</abstract><cop>Sweden</cop><pub>Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine</pub><pmid>27344968</pmid><doi>10.2340/16501977-2116</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1650-1977
ispartof Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2016-07, Vol.48 (7), p.597-603
issn 1650-1977
1651-2081
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1805483804
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Analysis
Bias
Clinical research
Cronbach's alpha
Disability
Factor analysis
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Fatigue
Fatigue - etiology
Fatigue - psychology
Female
Humans
Italy
Male
Middle Aged
Multiple sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis - complications
Multiple Sclerosis - psychology
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales - standards
Psychometrics
Quantitative psychology
Rasch model
Reliability
Reproducibility of Results
Severity
Severity of Illness Index
title Rasch analysis of the Fatigue Severity Scale in Italian subjects with multiple sclerosis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T19%3A34%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Rasch%20analysis%20of%20the%20Fatigue%20Severity%20Scale%20in%20Italian%20subjects%20with%20multiple%20sclerosis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20rehabilitation%20medicine&rft.au=Ottonello,%20Marcella&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=597&rft.epage=603&rft.pages=597-603&rft.issn=1650-1977&rft.eissn=1651-2081&rft_id=info:doi/10.2340/16501977-2116&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1805483804%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-39eb600a4fa81e68f345c239f5aad8c726cda833f5f19c3cb5e38a84df2a6c883%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1883563751&rft_id=info:pmid/27344968&rfr_iscdi=true