THE HISTORY SPECIALIST IN PSYCHOLOGY: From Avocation to Professionalization

This article focuses on the history of psychology as a core area in the field of psychology. Does the discipline recognize the contributions of historical research, or does the history of psychology only serve a pedagogical function in the discipline? Our concerns center on the relationship (or lack...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:History of psychology 2016-08, Vol.19 (3), p.192-208
Main Authors: Barnes, Marissa E, Greer, Scott
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Canada
Experimentation
Historiography
History
History of medicine and histology
Human
Ireland
Philosophy
Professional Specialization
Professionalism
Psychology
Psychology - education
Psychology - standards
Teaching
United Kingdom
United States
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This article focuses on the history of psychology as a core area in the field of psychology. Does the discipline recognize the contributions of historical research, or does the history of psychology only serve a pedagogical function in the discipline? Our concerns center on the relationship (or lack thereof) between pedagogy and research in the academy. This stems from the fact that historical research is not viewed as contributing to the advancement of the field both professionally and pedagogically. We summarize the pedagogical function that the history of psychology serves in the academic discipline, as well as its status for professionalism in psychology. Moving from the U.S. and Canadian context, we address the status of the history and philosophy of psychology within Britain and Ireland. This comparative analysis allows us to remark more broadly on the issue of professionalism for psychologists as it pertains to the requirement of the history of psychology for advancement in the field (from undergraduate student to practitioner in the field). We also discuss the issue of professionalism for historians of psychology. Specifically, what does it mean to identify as a historian of psychology, and what challenges emerge from specializing in this area? We conclude with remarks suggesting that strength in this area is derived from a combination of both teaching and research activities. We suggest that the development of a stronger community among historical researchers (despite epistemological differences) may be a way forward, and suggest where future work might head on these topics.
ISSN:1093-4510
1939-0610
DOI:10.1037/hop0000027