How reliable is the visual appraisal of a surgeon for diagnosing orbital fractures?

Summary Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of intra-operative visualisation, endoscopic assistance, and CT measurements for estimating the orbital fracture size and complexity. Methods Ten human cadaver heads were subjected to thin-slice computed tomography (CT). Standardis...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery 2016-08, Vol.44 (8), p.1015-1024
Main Authors: Dubois, Leander, Jansen, Jesper, Schreurs, Ruud, Habets, Petra E.M, Reinartz, Susanne M, Gooris, Peter J.J, Becking, Alfred G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cadaver
Classification
Computed tomography
Computer-assisted surgery
Dentistry
Diagnostics
Endoscope
Endoscopy
Humans
Observer Variation
Orbital fracture
Orbital Fractures - diagnosis
Orbital Fractures - diagnostic imaging
Orbital Fractures - pathology
Surgeons
Surgery
Surgery, Computer-Assisted
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of intra-operative visualisation, endoscopic assistance, and CT measurements for estimating the orbital fracture size and complexity. Methods Ten human cadaver heads were subjected to thin-slice computed tomography (CT). Standardised fractures were created using piezoelectric surgery in accordance with the Jaquiéry classification system. Four surgeons and one anatomist used six different observation methods to visualise and describe the orbital defects. Results The intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for the fracture length measurements were relatively low for all observation methods (range, 0.666–0.883). CT measurements of width showed high consistency (ICC, 0.910). The surface area of the defect was highly overestimated by all methods (range, 121–184%). None of the observers was able to accurately estimate the length or width of 95% of the defects within an error range of +/-0.75 cm. Conclusion CT measurements are the most consistent and accurate tool for estimating the critical size of orbital factures. In daily practice, a measurement tool in a DICOM viewer could be used, although software packages that allow manual adjustments are advisable. Direct intraoperative visualisation and surgeon experience are of limited value in the estimation of fracture size and complexity, and endoscopy provides no additional advantages.
ISSN:1010-5182
1878-4119
DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2016.05.001