Loading…
Older Adults' Recognition of Trade-Offs in Healthcare Decision-Making
Objectives To examine older persons’ understanding of healthcare decision‐making involving trade‐offs. Design Cross‐sectional survey. Setting Primary care clinics. Participants Community‐living persons aged 65 and older (N = 50). Measurements After being primed to think about trade‐offs with a focus...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) 2015-08, Vol.63 (8), p.1658-1662 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4874-492ee4055eae632ae4528ffd3492cce2d1f668ddce07008fd2552f415ed4eb63 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4874-492ee4055eae632ae4528ffd3492cce2d1f668ddce07008fd2552f415ed4eb63 |
container_end_page | 1662 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 1658 |
container_title | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Case, Siobhan M. O'Leary, John Kim, Nancy Tinetti, Mary E. Fried, Terri R. |
description | Objectives
To examine older persons’ understanding of healthcare decision‐making involving trade‐offs.
Design
Cross‐sectional survey.
Setting
Primary care clinics.
Participants
Community‐living persons aged 65 and older (N = 50).
Measurements
After being primed to think about trade‐offs with a focus on chronic disease management, participants were asked to describe a decision they had made in the past involving a trade‐off. If they could not, they were asked to describe a decision they might face in the future and were then given an example of a decision. They were also asked about communication with their primary care provider about their priorities when faced with a trade‐off.
Results
Forty‐four participants (88%) were able to describe a healthcare decision involving a trade‐off; 25 provided a decision in the past, 17 provided a decision they might face in the future, and two provided a future decision after hearing an example. One participant described a nonmedical decision, and two participants described goals without providing a trade‐off. Of the healthcare decisions, 26 involved surgery, seven were end‐of life decisions, seven involved treatment of chronic disease, and four involved chemotherapy. When asked whether their providers should know their health outcome priorities, 44 (88%) replied yes, and 35 (70%) believed their providers knew their priorities, but only 18 (36%) said that they had had a specific conversation about priorities.
Conclusion
The majority of participants were able to recognize the trade‐offs involved in healthcare decision‐making and wanted their providers to know their priorities regarding the trade‐offs. Despite being primed to think about the trade‐offs involved in day‐to‐day treatment of chronic disease, participants most frequently described episodic, high‐stakes decisions including surgery and end‐of‐life care. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jgs.13534 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808029914</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1808029914</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4874-492ee4055eae632ae4528ffd3492cce2d1f668ddce07008fd2552f415ed4eb63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c1OGzEUBWALgSDQLniBaiQWbRcD_h_PElEaiCCR2kgsLWNfpw6TGbBnVHj7mgZYIAHe3IW_e6Srg9A-wYckv6PlIh0SJhjfQCMiGC0FJ2ITjTDGtFSS8B20m9ISY0KxUttoh0pSsYqzETqdNQ5iceyGpk9fi19gu0Ub-tC1ReeLeTQOypn3qQhtcQam6f9YE6H4ATakjMpLcxPaxSe05U2T4PPT3EPzn6fzk7PyYjY-Pzm-KC1XFS95TQE4FgIMSEYNcEGV947lD2uBOuKlVM5ZwBXGyjsqBPX5FnAcriXbQ9_Wsbexuxsg9XoVkoWmMS10Q9JEYYVpXRP-Ma2wqKgSlGZ68IouuyG2-Q5NiZKScy7Ee-oxi1VK1HVW39fKxi6lCF7fxrAy8UETrB-70rkr_b-rbL88JQ7XK3Av8rmcDI7W4G9o4OHtJD0Z_36OLNcbIfVw_7Jh4o2WOVPoq-lYT_mkJlM50ZfsH_3ZqQg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1705378599</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Older Adults' Recognition of Trade-Offs in Healthcare Decision-Making</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Case, Siobhan M. ; O'Leary, John ; Kim, Nancy ; Tinetti, Mary E. ; Fried, Terri R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Case, Siobhan M. ; O'Leary, John ; Kim, Nancy ; Tinetti, Mary E. ; Fried, Terri R.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To examine older persons’ understanding of healthcare decision‐making involving trade‐offs.
Design
Cross‐sectional survey.
Setting
Primary care clinics.
Participants
Community‐living persons aged 65 and older (N = 50).
Measurements
After being primed to think about trade‐offs with a focus on chronic disease management, participants were asked to describe a decision they had made in the past involving a trade‐off. If they could not, they were asked to describe a decision they might face in the future and were then given an example of a decision. They were also asked about communication with their primary care provider about their priorities when faced with a trade‐off.
Results
Forty‐four participants (88%) were able to describe a healthcare decision involving a trade‐off; 25 provided a decision in the past, 17 provided a decision they might face in the future, and two provided a future decision after hearing an example. One participant described a nonmedical decision, and two participants described goals without providing a trade‐off. Of the healthcare decisions, 26 involved surgery, seven were end‐of life decisions, seven involved treatment of chronic disease, and four involved chemotherapy. When asked whether their providers should know their health outcome priorities, 44 (88%) replied yes, and 35 (70%) believed their providers knew their priorities, but only 18 (36%) said that they had had a specific conversation about priorities.
Conclusion
The majority of participants were able to recognize the trade‐offs involved in healthcare decision‐making and wanted their providers to know their priorities regarding the trade‐offs. Despite being primed to think about the trade‐offs involved in day‐to‐day treatment of chronic disease, participants most frequently described episodic, high‐stakes decisions including surgery and end‐of‐life care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5415</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jgs.13534</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26173743</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAGSAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Chemotherapy ; Chronic Disease ; Chronic illnesses ; Cognition & reasoning ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Decision Making ; Female ; Geriatrics ; Health care ; Health Priorities ; Humans ; Male ; Older people ; Primary care ; Surgery ; Terminal Care - organization & administration ; trade-offs</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), 2015-08, Vol.63 (8), p.1658-1662</ispartof><rights>2015, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2015, The American Geriatrics Society</rights><rights>2015, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2015, The American Geriatrics Society.</rights><rights>2015 American Geriatrics Society and Wiley Periodicals, Inc</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4874-492ee4055eae632ae4528ffd3492cce2d1f668ddce07008fd2552f415ed4eb63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4874-492ee4055eae632ae4528ffd3492cce2d1f668ddce07008fd2552f415ed4eb63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26173743$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Case, Siobhan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Leary, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinetti, Mary E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fried, Terri R.</creatorcontrib><title>Older Adults' Recognition of Trade-Offs in Healthcare Decision-Making</title><title>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</title><addtitle>J Am Geriatr Soc</addtitle><description>Objectives
To examine older persons’ understanding of healthcare decision‐making involving trade‐offs.
Design
Cross‐sectional survey.
Setting
Primary care clinics.
Participants
Community‐living persons aged 65 and older (N = 50).
Measurements
After being primed to think about trade‐offs with a focus on chronic disease management, participants were asked to describe a decision they had made in the past involving a trade‐off. If they could not, they were asked to describe a decision they might face in the future and were then given an example of a decision. They were also asked about communication with their primary care provider about their priorities when faced with a trade‐off.
Results
Forty‐four participants (88%) were able to describe a healthcare decision involving a trade‐off; 25 provided a decision in the past, 17 provided a decision they might face in the future, and two provided a future decision after hearing an example. One participant described a nonmedical decision, and two participants described goals without providing a trade‐off. Of the healthcare decisions, 26 involved surgery, seven were end‐of life decisions, seven involved treatment of chronic disease, and four involved chemotherapy. When asked whether their providers should know their health outcome priorities, 44 (88%) replied yes, and 35 (70%) believed their providers knew their priorities, but only 18 (36%) said that they had had a specific conversation about priorities.
Conclusion
The majority of participants were able to recognize the trade‐offs involved in healthcare decision‐making and wanted their providers to know their priorities regarding the trade‐offs. Despite being primed to think about the trade‐offs involved in day‐to‐day treatment of chronic disease, participants most frequently described episodic, high‐stakes decisions including surgery and end‐of‐life care.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health Priorities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Terminal Care - organization & administration</subject><subject>trade-offs</subject><issn>0002-8614</issn><issn>1532-5415</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0c1OGzEUBWALgSDQLniBaiQWbRcD_h_PElEaiCCR2kgsLWNfpw6TGbBnVHj7mgZYIAHe3IW_e6Srg9A-wYckv6PlIh0SJhjfQCMiGC0FJ2ITjTDGtFSS8B20m9ISY0KxUttoh0pSsYqzETqdNQ5iceyGpk9fi19gu0Ub-tC1ReeLeTQOypn3qQhtcQam6f9YE6H4ATakjMpLcxPaxSe05U2T4PPT3EPzn6fzk7PyYjY-Pzm-KC1XFS95TQE4FgIMSEYNcEGV947lD2uBOuKlVM5ZwBXGyjsqBPX5FnAcriXbQ9_Wsbexuxsg9XoVkoWmMS10Q9JEYYVpXRP-Ma2wqKgSlGZ68IouuyG2-Q5NiZKScy7Ee-oxi1VK1HVW39fKxi6lCF7fxrAy8UETrB-70rkr_b-rbL88JQ7XK3Av8rmcDI7W4G9o4OHtJD0Z_36OLNcbIfVw_7Jh4o2WOVPoq-lYT_mkJlM50ZfsH_3ZqQg</recordid><startdate>201508</startdate><enddate>201508</enddate><creator>Case, Siobhan M.</creator><creator>O'Leary, John</creator><creator>Kim, Nancy</creator><creator>Tinetti, Mary E.</creator><creator>Fried, Terri R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201508</creationdate><title>Older Adults' Recognition of Trade-Offs in Healthcare Decision-Making</title><author>Case, Siobhan M. ; O'Leary, John ; Kim, Nancy ; Tinetti, Mary E. ; Fried, Terri R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4874-492ee4055eae632ae4528ffd3492cce2d1f668ddce07008fd2552f415ed4eb63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health Priorities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Terminal Care - organization & administration</topic><topic>trade-offs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Case, Siobhan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Leary, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinetti, Mary E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fried, Terri R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Case, Siobhan M.</au><au>O'Leary, John</au><au>Kim, Nancy</au><au>Tinetti, Mary E.</au><au>Fried, Terri R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Older Adults' Recognition of Trade-Offs in Healthcare Decision-Making</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Geriatr Soc</addtitle><date>2015-08</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1658</spage><epage>1662</epage><pages>1658-1662</pages><issn>0002-8614</issn><eissn>1532-5415</eissn><coden>JAGSAF</coden><abstract>Objectives
To examine older persons’ understanding of healthcare decision‐making involving trade‐offs.
Design
Cross‐sectional survey.
Setting
Primary care clinics.
Participants
Community‐living persons aged 65 and older (N = 50).
Measurements
After being primed to think about trade‐offs with a focus on chronic disease management, participants were asked to describe a decision they had made in the past involving a trade‐off. If they could not, they were asked to describe a decision they might face in the future and were then given an example of a decision. They were also asked about communication with their primary care provider about their priorities when faced with a trade‐off.
Results
Forty‐four participants (88%) were able to describe a healthcare decision involving a trade‐off; 25 provided a decision in the past, 17 provided a decision they might face in the future, and two provided a future decision after hearing an example. One participant described a nonmedical decision, and two participants described goals without providing a trade‐off. Of the healthcare decisions, 26 involved surgery, seven were end‐of life decisions, seven involved treatment of chronic disease, and four involved chemotherapy. When asked whether their providers should know their health outcome priorities, 44 (88%) replied yes, and 35 (70%) believed their providers knew their priorities, but only 18 (36%) said that they had had a specific conversation about priorities.
Conclusion
The majority of participants were able to recognize the trade‐offs involved in healthcare decision‐making and wanted their providers to know their priorities regarding the trade‐offs. Despite being primed to think about the trade‐offs involved in day‐to‐day treatment of chronic disease, participants most frequently described episodic, high‐stakes decisions including surgery and end‐of‐life care.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26173743</pmid><doi>10.1111/jgs.13534</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-8614 |
ispartof | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), 2015-08, Vol.63 (8), p.1658-1662 |
issn | 0002-8614 1532-5415 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808029914 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Aged Chemotherapy Chronic Disease Chronic illnesses Cognition & reasoning Cross-Sectional Studies Decision Making Female Geriatrics Health care Health Priorities Humans Male Older people Primary care Surgery Terminal Care - organization & administration trade-offs |
title | Older Adults' Recognition of Trade-Offs in Healthcare Decision-Making |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A11%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Older%20Adults'%20Recognition%20of%20Trade-Offs%20in%20Healthcare%20Decision-Making&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Geriatrics%20Society%20(JAGS)&rft.au=Case,%20Siobhan%20M.&rft.date=2015-08&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1658&rft.epage=1662&rft.pages=1658-1662&rft.issn=0002-8614&rft.eissn=1532-5415&rft.coden=JAGSAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jgs.13534&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1808029914%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4874-492ee4055eae632ae4528ffd3492cce2d1f668ddce07008fd2552f415ed4eb63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1705378599&rft_id=info:pmid/26173743&rfr_iscdi=true |