Loading…

Older Adults' Recognition of Trade-Offs in Healthcare Decision-Making

Objectives To examine older persons’ understanding of healthcare decision‐making involving trade‐offs. Design Cross‐sectional survey. Setting Primary care clinics. Participants Community‐living persons aged 65 and older (N = 50). Measurements After being primed to think about trade‐offs with a focus...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) 2015-08, Vol.63 (8), p.1658-1662
Main Authors: Case, Siobhan M., O'Leary, John, Kim, Nancy, Tinetti, Mary E., Fried, Terri R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4874-492ee4055eae632ae4528ffd3492cce2d1f668ddce07008fd2552f415ed4eb63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4874-492ee4055eae632ae4528ffd3492cce2d1f668ddce07008fd2552f415ed4eb63
container_end_page 1662
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1658
container_title Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)
container_volume 63
creator Case, Siobhan M.
O'Leary, John
Kim, Nancy
Tinetti, Mary E.
Fried, Terri R.
description Objectives To examine older persons’ understanding of healthcare decision‐making involving trade‐offs. Design Cross‐sectional survey. Setting Primary care clinics. Participants Community‐living persons aged 65 and older (N = 50). Measurements After being primed to think about trade‐offs with a focus on chronic disease management, participants were asked to describe a decision they had made in the past involving a trade‐off. If they could not, they were asked to describe a decision they might face in the future and were then given an example of a decision. They were also asked about communication with their primary care provider about their priorities when faced with a trade‐off. Results Forty‐four participants (88%) were able to describe a healthcare decision involving a trade‐off; 25 provided a decision in the past, 17 provided a decision they might face in the future, and two provided a future decision after hearing an example. One participant described a nonmedical decision, and two participants described goals without providing a trade‐off. Of the healthcare decisions, 26 involved surgery, seven were end‐of life decisions, seven involved treatment of chronic disease, and four involved chemotherapy. When asked whether their providers should know their health outcome priorities, 44 (88%) replied yes, and 35 (70%) believed their providers knew their priorities, but only 18 (36%) said that they had had a specific conversation about priorities. Conclusion The majority of participants were able to recognize the trade‐offs involved in healthcare decision‐making and wanted their providers to know their priorities regarding the trade‐offs. Despite being primed to think about the trade‐offs involved in day‐to‐day treatment of chronic disease, participants most frequently described episodic, high‐stakes decisions including surgery and end‐of‐life care.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jgs.13534
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808029914</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1808029914</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4874-492ee4055eae632ae4528ffd3492cce2d1f668ddce07008fd2552f415ed4eb63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c1OGzEUBWALgSDQLniBaiQWbRcD_h_PElEaiCCR2kgsLWNfpw6TGbBnVHj7mgZYIAHe3IW_e6Srg9A-wYckv6PlIh0SJhjfQCMiGC0FJ2ITjTDGtFSS8B20m9ISY0KxUttoh0pSsYqzETqdNQ5iceyGpk9fi19gu0Ub-tC1ReeLeTQOypn3qQhtcQam6f9YE6H4ATakjMpLcxPaxSe05U2T4PPT3EPzn6fzk7PyYjY-Pzm-KC1XFS95TQE4FgIMSEYNcEGV947lD2uBOuKlVM5ZwBXGyjsqBPX5FnAcriXbQ9_Wsbexuxsg9XoVkoWmMS10Q9JEYYVpXRP-Ma2wqKgSlGZ68IouuyG2-Q5NiZKScy7Ee-oxi1VK1HVW39fKxi6lCF7fxrAy8UETrB-70rkr_b-rbL88JQ7XK3Av8rmcDI7W4G9o4OHtJD0Z_36OLNcbIfVw_7Jh4o2WOVPoq-lYT_mkJlM50ZfsH_3ZqQg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1705378599</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Older Adults' Recognition of Trade-Offs in Healthcare Decision-Making</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Case, Siobhan M. ; O'Leary, John ; Kim, Nancy ; Tinetti, Mary E. ; Fried, Terri R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Case, Siobhan M. ; O'Leary, John ; Kim, Nancy ; Tinetti, Mary E. ; Fried, Terri R.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To examine older persons’ understanding of healthcare decision‐making involving trade‐offs. Design Cross‐sectional survey. Setting Primary care clinics. Participants Community‐living persons aged 65 and older (N = 50). Measurements After being primed to think about trade‐offs with a focus on chronic disease management, participants were asked to describe a decision they had made in the past involving a trade‐off. If they could not, they were asked to describe a decision they might face in the future and were then given an example of a decision. They were also asked about communication with their primary care provider about their priorities when faced with a trade‐off. Results Forty‐four participants (88%) were able to describe a healthcare decision involving a trade‐off; 25 provided a decision in the past, 17 provided a decision they might face in the future, and two provided a future decision after hearing an example. One participant described a nonmedical decision, and two participants described goals without providing a trade‐off. Of the healthcare decisions, 26 involved surgery, seven were end‐of life decisions, seven involved treatment of chronic disease, and four involved chemotherapy. When asked whether their providers should know their health outcome priorities, 44 (88%) replied yes, and 35 (70%) believed their providers knew their priorities, but only 18 (36%) said that they had had a specific conversation about priorities. Conclusion The majority of participants were able to recognize the trade‐offs involved in healthcare decision‐making and wanted their providers to know their priorities regarding the trade‐offs. Despite being primed to think about the trade‐offs involved in day‐to‐day treatment of chronic disease, participants most frequently described episodic, high‐stakes decisions including surgery and end‐of‐life care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5415</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jgs.13534</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26173743</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAGSAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aged ; Chemotherapy ; Chronic Disease ; Chronic illnesses ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Decision Making ; Female ; Geriatrics ; Health care ; Health Priorities ; Humans ; Male ; Older people ; Primary care ; Surgery ; Terminal Care - organization &amp; administration ; trade-offs</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), 2015-08, Vol.63 (8), p.1658-1662</ispartof><rights>2015, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2015, The American Geriatrics Society</rights><rights>2015, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2015, The American Geriatrics Society.</rights><rights>2015 American Geriatrics Society and Wiley Periodicals, Inc</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4874-492ee4055eae632ae4528ffd3492cce2d1f668ddce07008fd2552f415ed4eb63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4874-492ee4055eae632ae4528ffd3492cce2d1f668ddce07008fd2552f415ed4eb63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26173743$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Case, Siobhan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Leary, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinetti, Mary E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fried, Terri R.</creatorcontrib><title>Older Adults' Recognition of Trade-Offs in Healthcare Decision-Making</title><title>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</title><addtitle>J Am Geriatr Soc</addtitle><description>Objectives To examine older persons’ understanding of healthcare decision‐making involving trade‐offs. Design Cross‐sectional survey. Setting Primary care clinics. Participants Community‐living persons aged 65 and older (N = 50). Measurements After being primed to think about trade‐offs with a focus on chronic disease management, participants were asked to describe a decision they had made in the past involving a trade‐off. If they could not, they were asked to describe a decision they might face in the future and were then given an example of a decision. They were also asked about communication with their primary care provider about their priorities when faced with a trade‐off. Results Forty‐four participants (88%) were able to describe a healthcare decision involving a trade‐off; 25 provided a decision in the past, 17 provided a decision they might face in the future, and two provided a future decision after hearing an example. One participant described a nonmedical decision, and two participants described goals without providing a trade‐off. Of the healthcare decisions, 26 involved surgery, seven were end‐of life decisions, seven involved treatment of chronic disease, and four involved chemotherapy. When asked whether their providers should know their health outcome priorities, 44 (88%) replied yes, and 35 (70%) believed their providers knew their priorities, but only 18 (36%) said that they had had a specific conversation about priorities. Conclusion The majority of participants were able to recognize the trade‐offs involved in healthcare decision‐making and wanted their providers to know their priorities regarding the trade‐offs. Despite being primed to think about the trade‐offs involved in day‐to‐day treatment of chronic disease, participants most frequently described episodic, high‐stakes decisions including surgery and end‐of‐life care.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Chronic Disease</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health Priorities</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Terminal Care - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>trade-offs</subject><issn>0002-8614</issn><issn>1532-5415</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0c1OGzEUBWALgSDQLniBaiQWbRcD_h_PElEaiCCR2kgsLWNfpw6TGbBnVHj7mgZYIAHe3IW_e6Srg9A-wYckv6PlIh0SJhjfQCMiGC0FJ2ITjTDGtFSS8B20m9ISY0KxUttoh0pSsYqzETqdNQ5iceyGpk9fi19gu0Ub-tC1ReeLeTQOypn3qQhtcQam6f9YE6H4ATakjMpLcxPaxSe05U2T4PPT3EPzn6fzk7PyYjY-Pzm-KC1XFS95TQE4FgIMSEYNcEGV947lD2uBOuKlVM5ZwBXGyjsqBPX5FnAcriXbQ9_Wsbexuxsg9XoVkoWmMS10Q9JEYYVpXRP-Ma2wqKgSlGZ68IouuyG2-Q5NiZKScy7Ee-oxi1VK1HVW39fKxi6lCF7fxrAy8UETrB-70rkr_b-rbL88JQ7XK3Av8rmcDI7W4G9o4OHtJD0Z_36OLNcbIfVw_7Jh4o2WOVPoq-lYT_mkJlM50ZfsH_3ZqQg</recordid><startdate>201508</startdate><enddate>201508</enddate><creator>Case, Siobhan M.</creator><creator>O'Leary, John</creator><creator>Kim, Nancy</creator><creator>Tinetti, Mary E.</creator><creator>Fried, Terri R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201508</creationdate><title>Older Adults' Recognition of Trade-Offs in Healthcare Decision-Making</title><author>Case, Siobhan M. ; O'Leary, John ; Kim, Nancy ; Tinetti, Mary E. ; Fried, Terri R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4874-492ee4055eae632ae4528ffd3492cce2d1f668ddce07008fd2552f415ed4eb63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Chronic Disease</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health Priorities</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Terminal Care - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>trade-offs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Case, Siobhan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Leary, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tinetti, Mary E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fried, Terri R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Case, Siobhan M.</au><au>O'Leary, John</au><au>Kim, Nancy</au><au>Tinetti, Mary E.</au><au>Fried, Terri R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Older Adults' Recognition of Trade-Offs in Healthcare Decision-Making</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Geriatr Soc</addtitle><date>2015-08</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1658</spage><epage>1662</epage><pages>1658-1662</pages><issn>0002-8614</issn><eissn>1532-5415</eissn><coden>JAGSAF</coden><abstract>Objectives To examine older persons’ understanding of healthcare decision‐making involving trade‐offs. Design Cross‐sectional survey. Setting Primary care clinics. Participants Community‐living persons aged 65 and older (N = 50). Measurements After being primed to think about trade‐offs with a focus on chronic disease management, participants were asked to describe a decision they had made in the past involving a trade‐off. If they could not, they were asked to describe a decision they might face in the future and were then given an example of a decision. They were also asked about communication with their primary care provider about their priorities when faced with a trade‐off. Results Forty‐four participants (88%) were able to describe a healthcare decision involving a trade‐off; 25 provided a decision in the past, 17 provided a decision they might face in the future, and two provided a future decision after hearing an example. One participant described a nonmedical decision, and two participants described goals without providing a trade‐off. Of the healthcare decisions, 26 involved surgery, seven were end‐of life decisions, seven involved treatment of chronic disease, and four involved chemotherapy. When asked whether their providers should know their health outcome priorities, 44 (88%) replied yes, and 35 (70%) believed their providers knew their priorities, but only 18 (36%) said that they had had a specific conversation about priorities. Conclusion The majority of participants were able to recognize the trade‐offs involved in healthcare decision‐making and wanted their providers to know their priorities regarding the trade‐offs. Despite being primed to think about the trade‐offs involved in day‐to‐day treatment of chronic disease, participants most frequently described episodic, high‐stakes decisions including surgery and end‐of‐life care.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26173743</pmid><doi>10.1111/jgs.13534</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-8614
ispartof Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), 2015-08, Vol.63 (8), p.1658-1662
issn 0002-8614
1532-5415
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808029914
source Wiley
subjects Aged
Chemotherapy
Chronic Disease
Chronic illnesses
Cognition & reasoning
Cross-Sectional Studies
Decision Making
Female
Geriatrics
Health care
Health Priorities
Humans
Male
Older people
Primary care
Surgery
Terminal Care - organization & administration
trade-offs
title Older Adults' Recognition of Trade-Offs in Healthcare Decision-Making
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T17%3A11%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Older%20Adults'%20Recognition%20of%20Trade-Offs%20in%20Healthcare%20Decision-Making&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Geriatrics%20Society%20(JAGS)&rft.au=Case,%20Siobhan%20M.&rft.date=2015-08&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1658&rft.epage=1662&rft.pages=1658-1662&rft.issn=0002-8614&rft.eissn=1532-5415&rft.coden=JAGSAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jgs.13534&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1808029914%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4874-492ee4055eae632ae4528ffd3492cce2d1f668ddce07008fd2552f415ed4eb63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1705378599&rft_id=info:pmid/26173743&rfr_iscdi=true