Loading…

A new approach for land cover classification and change analysis: Integrating backdating and an object-based method

Accurate information on land use and land cover (LULC) change is crucial for ecosystem monitoring and environmental change studies. Updating/backdating approaches have been increasingly used for LULC classification and change analysis, but mostly based on pixels. Here, we presented a new approach, a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote sensing of environment 2016-05, Vol.177, p.37-47
Main Authors: Yu, Wenjuan, Zhou, Weiqi, Qian, Yuguo, Yan, Jingli
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-e628b2422c95c909765a35a3fc19b7550db2e1e4137b5fd0f489891f59709e1f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-e628b2422c95c909765a35a3fc19b7550db2e1e4137b5fd0f489891f59709e1f3
container_end_page 47
container_issue
container_start_page 37
container_title Remote sensing of environment
container_volume 177
creator Yu, Wenjuan
Zhou, Weiqi
Qian, Yuguo
Yan, Jingli
description Accurate information on land use and land cover (LULC) change is crucial for ecosystem monitoring and environmental change studies. Updating/backdating approaches have been increasingly used for LULC classification and change analysis, but mostly based on pixels. Here, we presented a new approach, an object-based backdating approach which integrates the backdating approach with an object-based method, and further compared it with the pixel-based backdating approach. We tested the new approach by using Landsat TM data collected in 2001 and 2009 at the Beijing metropolitan region. We found that: 1) an object-based backdating approach achieved higher accuracy for change detection, LULC classification and change analysis than the pixel-based backdating approach. With the object-based approach, the overall accuracies for the classification and change analysis were 84.33% (versus 69.33% for a pixel-based approach), and 80.00% (versus 70.50% for a pixel-based approach), respectively. 2) The object-based backdating approach greatly increases the efficiency because classification and change analysis are only conducted for locations with changes. The increase in efficiency is particularly important for LULC classification and change analysis conducted at a large area, for example, at the national or global scale. •We present a new approach for land cover classification and change analysis.•This new approach integrates backdating and an object-based method.•The object-based backdating method has higher accuracy and efficiency.•Errors caused by spatial misregistration are greatly reduced by the new method.•The new method effectively incorporates spatial information and expert knowledge.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.030
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808086248</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S003442571630058X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1808086248</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-e628b2422c95c909765a35a3fc19b7550db2e1e4137b5fd0f489891f59709e1f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv3CAQhVHUSNkm-QG5cezFzoDBmPYURU26UqRemjPCeNhl4zVb8KbKvw8b99yKkXjSfA_p8Qi5YVAzYO3trk4Za15kDbyGBs7IinVKV6BAfCIrgEZUgkt1QT7nvANgslNsRfIdnfAPtYdDitZtqY-JjnYaqIuvmKgbbc7BB2fnECf6sdjaaYNF2vEth_yVrqcZN6kA04b21r0MizyxdqKx36Gbq95mHOge520crsi5t2PG67_3JXl--P7r_kf19PNxfX_3VDmh-Fxhy7ueC86dlk6DVq20TRnvmO6VlDD0HBkK1qhe-gG86HSnmZdagUbmm0vyZXm3ZPt9xDybfcgOx5IP4zEb1kE5LRfd_1HVSS5a3rKCsgV1Keac0JtDCnub3gwDc-rC7Ezpwpy6MMBN6aJ4vi0eLHFfAyaTXcDJ4RBS-R0zxPAP9zsmU5Gh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1785246261</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A new approach for land cover classification and change analysis: Integrating backdating and an object-based method</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Yu, Wenjuan ; Zhou, Weiqi ; Qian, Yuguo ; Yan, Jingli</creator><creatorcontrib>Yu, Wenjuan ; Zhou, Weiqi ; Qian, Yuguo ; Yan, Jingli</creatorcontrib><description>Accurate information on land use and land cover (LULC) change is crucial for ecosystem monitoring and environmental change studies. Updating/backdating approaches have been increasingly used for LULC classification and change analysis, but mostly based on pixels. Here, we presented a new approach, an object-based backdating approach which integrates the backdating approach with an object-based method, and further compared it with the pixel-based backdating approach. We tested the new approach by using Landsat TM data collected in 2001 and 2009 at the Beijing metropolitan region. We found that: 1) an object-based backdating approach achieved higher accuracy for change detection, LULC classification and change analysis than the pixel-based backdating approach. With the object-based approach, the overall accuracies for the classification and change analysis were 84.33% (versus 69.33% for a pixel-based approach), and 80.00% (versus 70.50% for a pixel-based approach), respectively. 2) The object-based backdating approach greatly increases the efficiency because classification and change analysis are only conducted for locations with changes. The increase in efficiency is particularly important for LULC classification and change analysis conducted at a large area, for example, at the national or global scale. •We present a new approach for land cover classification and change analysis.•This new approach integrates backdating and an object-based method.•The object-based backdating method has higher accuracy and efficiency.•Errors caused by spatial misregistration are greatly reduced by the new method.•The new method effectively incorporates spatial information and expert knowledge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-4257</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0704</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.030</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Backdating ; Beijing ; Change analysis ; Change detection ; Classification ; Ecosystems ; Environmental monitoring ; Land cover ; Land cover classification ; Land use ; Object-based method ; Pixels ; Remote sensing</subject><ispartof>Remote sensing of environment, 2016-05, Vol.177, p.37-47</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-e628b2422c95c909765a35a3fc19b7550db2e1e4137b5fd0f489891f59709e1f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-e628b2422c95c909765a35a3fc19b7550db2e1e4137b5fd0f489891f59709e1f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yu, Wenjuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Weiqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Yuguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Jingli</creatorcontrib><title>A new approach for land cover classification and change analysis: Integrating backdating and an object-based method</title><title>Remote sensing of environment</title><description>Accurate information on land use and land cover (LULC) change is crucial for ecosystem monitoring and environmental change studies. Updating/backdating approaches have been increasingly used for LULC classification and change analysis, but mostly based on pixels. Here, we presented a new approach, an object-based backdating approach which integrates the backdating approach with an object-based method, and further compared it with the pixel-based backdating approach. We tested the new approach by using Landsat TM data collected in 2001 and 2009 at the Beijing metropolitan region. We found that: 1) an object-based backdating approach achieved higher accuracy for change detection, LULC classification and change analysis than the pixel-based backdating approach. With the object-based approach, the overall accuracies for the classification and change analysis were 84.33% (versus 69.33% for a pixel-based approach), and 80.00% (versus 70.50% for a pixel-based approach), respectively. 2) The object-based backdating approach greatly increases the efficiency because classification and change analysis are only conducted for locations with changes. The increase in efficiency is particularly important for LULC classification and change analysis conducted at a large area, for example, at the national or global scale. •We present a new approach for land cover classification and change analysis.•This new approach integrates backdating and an object-based method.•The object-based backdating method has higher accuracy and efficiency.•Errors caused by spatial misregistration are greatly reduced by the new method.•The new method effectively incorporates spatial information and expert knowledge.</description><subject>Backdating</subject><subject>Beijing</subject><subject>Change analysis</subject><subject>Change detection</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Land cover</subject><subject>Land cover classification</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Object-based method</subject><subject>Pixels</subject><subject>Remote sensing</subject><issn>0034-4257</issn><issn>1879-0704</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUFv3CAQhVHUSNkm-QG5cezFzoDBmPYURU26UqRemjPCeNhl4zVb8KbKvw8b99yKkXjSfA_p8Qi5YVAzYO3trk4Za15kDbyGBs7IinVKV6BAfCIrgEZUgkt1QT7nvANgslNsRfIdnfAPtYdDitZtqY-JjnYaqIuvmKgbbc7BB2fnECf6sdjaaYNF2vEth_yVrqcZN6kA04b21r0MizyxdqKx36Gbq95mHOge520crsi5t2PG67_3JXl--P7r_kf19PNxfX_3VDmh-Fxhy7ueC86dlk6DVq20TRnvmO6VlDD0HBkK1qhe-gG86HSnmZdagUbmm0vyZXm3ZPt9xDybfcgOx5IP4zEb1kE5LRfd_1HVSS5a3rKCsgV1Keac0JtDCnub3gwDc-rC7Ezpwpy6MMBN6aJ4vi0eLHFfAyaTXcDJ4RBS-R0zxPAP9zsmU5Gh</recordid><startdate>201605</startdate><enddate>201605</enddate><creator>Yu, Wenjuan</creator><creator>Zhou, Weiqi</creator><creator>Qian, Yuguo</creator><creator>Yan, Jingli</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201605</creationdate><title>A new approach for land cover classification and change analysis: Integrating backdating and an object-based method</title><author>Yu, Wenjuan ; Zhou, Weiqi ; Qian, Yuguo ; Yan, Jingli</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-e628b2422c95c909765a35a3fc19b7550db2e1e4137b5fd0f489891f59709e1f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Backdating</topic><topic>Beijing</topic><topic>Change analysis</topic><topic>Change detection</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Land cover</topic><topic>Land cover classification</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Object-based method</topic><topic>Pixels</topic><topic>Remote sensing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Wenjuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Weiqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qian, Yuguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Jingli</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Remote sensing of environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Wenjuan</au><au>Zhou, Weiqi</au><au>Qian, Yuguo</au><au>Yan, Jingli</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A new approach for land cover classification and change analysis: Integrating backdating and an object-based method</atitle><jtitle>Remote sensing of environment</jtitle><date>2016-05</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>177</volume><spage>37</spage><epage>47</epage><pages>37-47</pages><issn>0034-4257</issn><eissn>1879-0704</eissn><abstract>Accurate information on land use and land cover (LULC) change is crucial for ecosystem monitoring and environmental change studies. Updating/backdating approaches have been increasingly used for LULC classification and change analysis, but mostly based on pixels. Here, we presented a new approach, an object-based backdating approach which integrates the backdating approach with an object-based method, and further compared it with the pixel-based backdating approach. We tested the new approach by using Landsat TM data collected in 2001 and 2009 at the Beijing metropolitan region. We found that: 1) an object-based backdating approach achieved higher accuracy for change detection, LULC classification and change analysis than the pixel-based backdating approach. With the object-based approach, the overall accuracies for the classification and change analysis were 84.33% (versus 69.33% for a pixel-based approach), and 80.00% (versus 70.50% for a pixel-based approach), respectively. 2) The object-based backdating approach greatly increases the efficiency because classification and change analysis are only conducted for locations with changes. The increase in efficiency is particularly important for LULC classification and change analysis conducted at a large area, for example, at the national or global scale. •We present a new approach for land cover classification and change analysis.•This new approach integrates backdating and an object-based method.•The object-based backdating method has higher accuracy and efficiency.•Errors caused by spatial misregistration are greatly reduced by the new method.•The new method effectively incorporates spatial information and expert knowledge.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.030</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0034-4257
ispartof Remote sensing of environment, 2016-05, Vol.177, p.37-47
issn 0034-4257
1879-0704
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808086248
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Backdating
Beijing
Change analysis
Change detection
Classification
Ecosystems
Environmental monitoring
Land cover
Land cover classification
Land use
Object-based method
Pixels
Remote sensing
title A new approach for land cover classification and change analysis: Integrating backdating and an object-based method
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T23%3A02%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20new%20approach%20for%20land%20cover%20classification%20and%20change%20analysis:%20Integrating%20backdating%20and%20an%20object-based%20method&rft.jtitle=Remote%20sensing%20of%20environment&rft.au=Yu,%20Wenjuan&rft.date=2016-05&rft.volume=177&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=47&rft.pages=37-47&rft.issn=0034-4257&rft.eissn=1879-0704&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.rse.2016.02.030&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1808086248%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-e628b2422c95c909765a35a3fc19b7550db2e1e4137b5fd0f489891f59709e1f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1785246261&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true