Loading…

Residue evaluation of imidacloprid, spirotetramat, and spirotetramat-enol in/on grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) and soil

A combination of imidacloprid and spirotetramat effectively controls sucking pests on grapevines. Residues of these insecticides on grapes were evaluated after treatment with spirotetramat 12 % + imidacloprid 12 % (240 SC) three times at 90 and 180 g a.i. ha −1 . The samples were extracted and purif...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental monitoring and assessment 2015-10, Vol.187 (10), p.632-632, Article 632
Main Authors: Mohapatra, Soudamini, Kumar, Sampath, Prakash, G.S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-82b26d0c69d1bcaf23bfda924d142f70aaf441f44f4b4f333f4399b2769da593
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-82b26d0c69d1bcaf23bfda924d142f70aaf441f44f4b4f333f4399b2769da593
container_end_page 632
container_issue 10
container_start_page 632
container_title Environmental monitoring and assessment
container_volume 187
creator Mohapatra, Soudamini
Kumar, Sampath
Prakash, G.S.
description A combination of imidacloprid and spirotetramat effectively controls sucking pests on grapevines. Residues of these insecticides on grapes were evaluated after treatment with spirotetramat 12 % + imidacloprid 12 % (240 SC) three times at 90 and 180 g a.i. ha −1 . The samples were extracted and purified by QuEChERS method and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography with a photodiode array detector (imidacloprid) and gas chromatography mass spectrometry (spirotetramat and its metabolite spirotetramat-enol). Satisfactory results were obtained with ranges of 80.6–98.6 % for the recovery, 3.1–10 % for the relative standard deviation range, and 9.8–15.6 % for the uncertainty. The limits of detection and quantification were 0.015 μg mL −1 and 0.05 mg kg −1 , respectively. Initial residue concentrations of imidacloprid after the 90 and 180 g a.i. ha −1 treatments were 0.912 (half-life 11 days) and 1.681 mg kg −1 (half-life 12.4 days), respectively. For spirotetramat + spirotetramat-enol, the residue concentrations were 1.337 (half-life 5.6 days) and 2.0 mg kg −1 (half-life 7.6 days) for the 90 and 180 g a.i. ha −1 treatments, respectively. Spirotetramat degraded faster than spirotetramat-enol. After treatment at 90 g a.i. ha −1 , the initial residues of both insecticides were within European Union maximum residue limits and a 1-day pre-harvest interval (PHI) was adequate for safe consumption of grapes. After treatment at 180 g a.i. ha −1 , the required PHI was 7 day. Therefore, a PHI of 7 day should be used after treatment with imidacloprid and spirotetramat.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10661-015-4859-x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808379946</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1715916393</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-82b26d0c69d1bcaf23bfda924d142f70aaf441f44f4b4f333f4399b2769da593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LHTEYRoNY9PrxA9yUgBsFo_nOZFmkauFCoYjbkJkkEpmZ3CYzYv99I6OiQukiBJLzPCHvAeCI4HOCsbooBEtJECYC8UZo9LQFVkQohqgWehusMJEKSSb1Ltgr5QFjrBXXO2CXStYwxdQKlF--RDd76B9tP9spphGmAOMQne36tMnRncGyiTlNfsp2sNMZtKP7eIT8mHoYx4savs924ws8uYtTLPAxjjH4bOH6_HTJpdgfgC_B9sUfvuz74Pbq--3lDVr_vP5x-W2NOo7FhBraUulwJ7UjbWcDZW1wVlPuCKdBYWsD56SuwFseGGOBM61bqmrACs32wclSu8np9-zLZIZYOt_3dvRpLoY0uA5Bay7_jyoiNJFMs4oef0If0pzH-o9KUSaYFrypFFmoLqdSsg-mTnKw-Y8h2Dy7M4s7U92ZZ3fmqWa-vjTP7eDdW-JVVgXoApR6Nd77_O7pf7b-BUzWpPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1723539548</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Residue evaluation of imidacloprid, spirotetramat, and spirotetramat-enol in/on grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) and soil</title><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Mohapatra, Soudamini ; Kumar, Sampath ; Prakash, G.S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mohapatra, Soudamini ; Kumar, Sampath ; Prakash, G.S.</creatorcontrib><description>A combination of imidacloprid and spirotetramat effectively controls sucking pests on grapevines. Residues of these insecticides on grapes were evaluated after treatment with spirotetramat 12 % + imidacloprid 12 % (240 SC) three times at 90 and 180 g a.i. ha −1 . The samples were extracted and purified by QuEChERS method and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography with a photodiode array detector (imidacloprid) and gas chromatography mass spectrometry (spirotetramat and its metabolite spirotetramat-enol). Satisfactory results were obtained with ranges of 80.6–98.6 % for the recovery, 3.1–10 % for the relative standard deviation range, and 9.8–15.6 % for the uncertainty. The limits of detection and quantification were 0.015 μg mL −1 and 0.05 mg kg −1 , respectively. Initial residue concentrations of imidacloprid after the 90 and 180 g a.i. ha −1 treatments were 0.912 (half-life 11 days) and 1.681 mg kg −1 (half-life 12.4 days), respectively. For spirotetramat + spirotetramat-enol, the residue concentrations were 1.337 (half-life 5.6 days) and 2.0 mg kg −1 (half-life 7.6 days) for the 90 and 180 g a.i. ha −1 treatments, respectively. Spirotetramat degraded faster than spirotetramat-enol. After treatment at 90 g a.i. ha −1 , the initial residues of both insecticides were within European Union maximum residue limits and a 1-day pre-harvest interval (PHI) was adequate for safe consumption of grapes. After treatment at 180 g a.i. ha −1 , the required PHI was 7 day. Therefore, a PHI of 7 day should be used after treatment with imidacloprid and spirotetramat.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6369</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10661-015-4859-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26383737</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Aza Compounds - analysis ; Chromatography ; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid ; Crops ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Ecotoxicology ; Environment ; Environmental Management ; Environmental monitoring ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Fruits ; Gas chromatography ; Half-Life ; Horticulture ; Imidazoles - analysis ; Insecticides ; Insecticides - analysis ; Insects ; Liquid chromatography ; Mass spectrometry ; Metabolites ; Monitoring/Environmental Analysis ; Neonicotinoids ; Nitro Compounds - analysis ; Pest control ; Pesticide Residues - analysis ; Pesticides ; Residues ; Soil Pollutants - analysis ; Spiro Compounds - analysis ; Vitaceae ; Vitis - chemistry ; Vitis vinifera</subject><ispartof>Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2015-10, Vol.187 (10), p.632-632, Article 632</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-82b26d0c69d1bcaf23bfda924d142f70aaf441f44f4b4f333f4399b2769da593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-82b26d0c69d1bcaf23bfda924d142f70aaf441f44f4b4f333f4399b2769da593</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1723539548/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1723539548?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11667,27901,27902,36037,36038,44339,74865</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26383737$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mohapatra, Soudamini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Sampath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prakash, G.S.</creatorcontrib><title>Residue evaluation of imidacloprid, spirotetramat, and spirotetramat-enol in/on grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) and soil</title><title>Environmental monitoring and assessment</title><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><description>A combination of imidacloprid and spirotetramat effectively controls sucking pests on grapevines. Residues of these insecticides on grapes were evaluated after treatment with spirotetramat 12 % + imidacloprid 12 % (240 SC) three times at 90 and 180 g a.i. ha −1 . The samples were extracted and purified by QuEChERS method and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography with a photodiode array detector (imidacloprid) and gas chromatography mass spectrometry (spirotetramat and its metabolite spirotetramat-enol). Satisfactory results were obtained with ranges of 80.6–98.6 % for the recovery, 3.1–10 % for the relative standard deviation range, and 9.8–15.6 % for the uncertainty. The limits of detection and quantification were 0.015 μg mL −1 and 0.05 mg kg −1 , respectively. Initial residue concentrations of imidacloprid after the 90 and 180 g a.i. ha −1 treatments were 0.912 (half-life 11 days) and 1.681 mg kg −1 (half-life 12.4 days), respectively. For spirotetramat + spirotetramat-enol, the residue concentrations were 1.337 (half-life 5.6 days) and 2.0 mg kg −1 (half-life 7.6 days) for the 90 and 180 g a.i. ha −1 treatments, respectively. Spirotetramat degraded faster than spirotetramat-enol. After treatment at 90 g a.i. ha −1 , the initial residues of both insecticides were within European Union maximum residue limits and a 1-day pre-harvest interval (PHI) was adequate for safe consumption of grapes. After treatment at 180 g a.i. ha −1 , the required PHI was 7 day. Therefore, a PHI of 7 day should be used after treatment with imidacloprid and spirotetramat.</description><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Aza Compounds - analysis</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental monitoring</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Fruits</subject><subject>Gas chromatography</subject><subject>Half-Life</subject><subject>Horticulture</subject><subject>Imidazoles - analysis</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>Insecticides - analysis</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Liquid chromatography</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Metabolites</subject><subject>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</subject><subject>Neonicotinoids</subject><subject>Nitro Compounds - analysis</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Pesticide Residues - analysis</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Residues</subject><subject>Soil Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Spiro Compounds - analysis</subject><subject>Vitaceae</subject><subject>Vitis - chemistry</subject><subject>Vitis vinifera</subject><issn>0167-6369</issn><issn>1573-2959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU1LHTEYRoNY9PrxA9yUgBsFo_nOZFmkauFCoYjbkJkkEpmZ3CYzYv99I6OiQukiBJLzPCHvAeCI4HOCsbooBEtJECYC8UZo9LQFVkQohqgWehusMJEKSSb1Ltgr5QFjrBXXO2CXStYwxdQKlF--RDd76B9tP9spphGmAOMQne36tMnRncGyiTlNfsp2sNMZtKP7eIT8mHoYx4savs924ws8uYtTLPAxjjH4bOH6_HTJpdgfgC_B9sUfvuz74Pbq--3lDVr_vP5x-W2NOo7FhBraUulwJ7UjbWcDZW1wVlPuCKdBYWsD56SuwFseGGOBM61bqmrACs32wclSu8np9-zLZIZYOt_3dvRpLoY0uA5Bay7_jyoiNJFMs4oef0If0pzH-o9KUSaYFrypFFmoLqdSsg-mTnKw-Y8h2Dy7M4s7U92ZZ3fmqWa-vjTP7eDdW-JVVgXoApR6Nd77_O7pf7b-BUzWpPQ</recordid><startdate>20151001</startdate><enddate>20151001</enddate><creator>Mohapatra, Soudamini</creator><creator>Kumar, Sampath</creator><creator>Prakash, G.S.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PJZUB</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PPXIY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TV</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151001</creationdate><title>Residue evaluation of imidacloprid, spirotetramat, and spirotetramat-enol in/on grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) and soil</title><author>Mohapatra, Soudamini ; Kumar, Sampath ; Prakash, G.S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-82b26d0c69d1bcaf23bfda924d142f70aaf441f44f4b4f333f4399b2769da593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Aza Compounds - analysis</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental monitoring</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Fruits</topic><topic>Gas chromatography</topic><topic>Half-Life</topic><topic>Horticulture</topic><topic>Imidazoles - analysis</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>Insecticides - analysis</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Liquid chromatography</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Metabolites</topic><topic>Monitoring/Environmental Analysis</topic><topic>Neonicotinoids</topic><topic>Nitro Compounds - analysis</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Pesticide Residues - analysis</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Residues</topic><topic>Soil Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Spiro Compounds - analysis</topic><topic>Vitaceae</topic><topic>Vitis - chemistry</topic><topic>Vitis vinifera</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mohapatra, Soudamini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Sampath</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prakash, G.S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture &amp; Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Research Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Health &amp; Nursing</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mohapatra, Soudamini</au><au>Kumar, Sampath</au><au>Prakash, G.S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Residue evaluation of imidacloprid, spirotetramat, and spirotetramat-enol in/on grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) and soil</atitle><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle><stitle>Environ Monit Assess</stitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><date>2015-10-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>187</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>632</spage><epage>632</epage><pages>632-632</pages><artnum>632</artnum><issn>0167-6369</issn><eissn>1573-2959</eissn><abstract>A combination of imidacloprid and spirotetramat effectively controls sucking pests on grapevines. Residues of these insecticides on grapes were evaluated after treatment with spirotetramat 12 % + imidacloprid 12 % (240 SC) three times at 90 and 180 g a.i. ha −1 . The samples were extracted and purified by QuEChERS method and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography with a photodiode array detector (imidacloprid) and gas chromatography mass spectrometry (spirotetramat and its metabolite spirotetramat-enol). Satisfactory results were obtained with ranges of 80.6–98.6 % for the recovery, 3.1–10 % for the relative standard deviation range, and 9.8–15.6 % for the uncertainty. The limits of detection and quantification were 0.015 μg mL −1 and 0.05 mg kg −1 , respectively. Initial residue concentrations of imidacloprid after the 90 and 180 g a.i. ha −1 treatments were 0.912 (half-life 11 days) and 1.681 mg kg −1 (half-life 12.4 days), respectively. For spirotetramat + spirotetramat-enol, the residue concentrations were 1.337 (half-life 5.6 days) and 2.0 mg kg −1 (half-life 7.6 days) for the 90 and 180 g a.i. ha −1 treatments, respectively. Spirotetramat degraded faster than spirotetramat-enol. After treatment at 90 g a.i. ha −1 , the initial residues of both insecticides were within European Union maximum residue limits and a 1-day pre-harvest interval (PHI) was adequate for safe consumption of grapes. After treatment at 180 g a.i. ha −1 , the required PHI was 7 day. Therefore, a PHI of 7 day should be used after treatment with imidacloprid and spirotetramat.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>26383737</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10661-015-4859-x</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-6369
ispartof Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2015-10, Vol.187 (10), p.632-632, Article 632
issn 0167-6369
1573-2959
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808379946
source ABI/INFORM global; Springer Nature
subjects Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution
Aza Compounds - analysis
Chromatography
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid
Crops
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecology
Ecotoxicology
Environment
Environmental Management
Environmental monitoring
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Fruits
Gas chromatography
Half-Life
Horticulture
Imidazoles - analysis
Insecticides
Insecticides - analysis
Insects
Liquid chromatography
Mass spectrometry
Metabolites
Monitoring/Environmental Analysis
Neonicotinoids
Nitro Compounds - analysis
Pest control
Pesticide Residues - analysis
Pesticides
Residues
Soil Pollutants - analysis
Spiro Compounds - analysis
Vitaceae
Vitis - chemistry
Vitis vinifera
title Residue evaluation of imidacloprid, spirotetramat, and spirotetramat-enol in/on grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) and soil
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T22%3A32%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Residue%20evaluation%20of%20imidacloprid,%20spirotetramat,%20and%20spirotetramat-enol%20in/on%20grapes%20(Vitis%20vinifera%20L.)%20and%20soil&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20monitoring%20and%20assessment&rft.au=Mohapatra,%20Soudamini&rft.date=2015-10-01&rft.volume=187&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=632&rft.epage=632&rft.pages=632-632&rft.artnum=632&rft.issn=0167-6369&rft.eissn=1573-2959&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10661-015-4859-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1715916393%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c405t-82b26d0c69d1bcaf23bfda924d142f70aaf441f44f4b4f333f4399b2769da593%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1723539548&rft_id=info:pmid/26383737&rfr_iscdi=true