Loading…

A longitudinal, randomized, and prospective study of nocturnal monitoring in children and adolescents with epilepsy: Effects on quality of life and sleep

Abstract Objective Most studies on seizure detection systems focus more on the effectiveness of devices than on their practicability in and impact on everyday life. Our study investigated the impact of a technical monitoring system on subjective quality of sleep and the lives of affected families. F...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Epilepsy & behavior 2016-08, Vol.61, p.192-198
Main Authors: Borusiak, Peter, Bast, Thomas, Kluger, Gerhard, Weidenfeld, Andrea, Langer, Thorsten, Jenke, Andreas C.W, Wiegand, Gert
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-ec0cc91736dc925d3a2d2c00c4ef65df4208271cc569760acd8e77f2bf01e9d83
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-ec0cc91736dc925d3a2d2c00c4ef65df4208271cc569760acd8e77f2bf01e9d83
container_end_page 198
container_issue
container_start_page 192
container_title Epilepsy & behavior
container_volume 61
creator Borusiak, Peter
Bast, Thomas
Kluger, Gerhard
Weidenfeld, Andrea
Langer, Thorsten
Jenke, Andreas C.W
Wiegand, Gert
description Abstract Objective Most studies on seizure detection systems focus more on the effectiveness of devices than on their practicability in and impact on everyday life. Our study investigated the impact of a technical monitoring system on subjective quality of sleep and the lives of affected families. Furthermore, we evaluated the impact of anxiety levels on seizure monitoring and vice versa. Methods Forty-three patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy were included. Initially, the families decided whether they did (group 1, n = 27) or did not (group 2, n = 16) want to use a monitoring device. In group 1, patients were randomly assigned to using Epi-Care® (group 1A, n = 14) or an audio baby monitor (group 1B, n = 13). Quality of life was assessed at two points (t1, at the start of the study and t2, at 5–7 months of follow-up) using the SF-12, Kindl-R, and “Familien-Belastungs-Fragebogen” (German version of the “Impact on Family Scale”). In addition, parental anxiety was measured using the State–Trait Anxiety-Inventory, and subjective quality of sleep was measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Statistical analysis focused on the possible differences between groups 1 and 2 that may influence parents' decisions and the effects of the presence and types of technical monitoring over time. Results Anxiety levels were not significantly different between the groups with and without monitoring (group 1 vs. group 2). We also found no statistically significant, substantial baseline differences between the Epi-Care® and audio baby monitor groups, with at least medium effect sizes (group 1A vs. group 1B). Parents' health-related mental quality of life measured via the SF-12 increased significantly over time in all groups. By tendency, the fear of further seizures as well as the frequency of cosleeping arrangements in the monitoring group decreased during the study and approached the stable values of the control group. Significance Individual parental anxiety levels are not crucial in the decision regarding the use of a monitoring device. A monitoring system may help some families in certain aspects of daily life. During the first months following a diagnosis of epilepsy, quality of life increases independently of the use of a monitoring system.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.05.035
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808386748</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1525505016301366</els_id><sourcerecordid>1808386748</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-ec0cc91736dc925d3a2d2c00c4ef65df4208271cc569760acd8e77f2bf01e9d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUk1v1DAQjRCIlsIvQEI-cugGf8ROFgmkqiofUiUOwNny2uOuF8dO7aQo_BP-LU629MCFk8fSe2_mzZuqeklwTTARbw71DDvY17R8asxrzPij6pRwyjcci-3jh5rjk-pZzgeMCeGMPK1OaMta0nXNafX7AvkYbtw4GReUP0dJBRN79wvMOSolGlLMA-jR3QHKBTWjaFGIepxSwaM-BjfG5MINcgHpvfMmQViZykQPWUMYM_rpxj2CwXkY8vwWXVlbJDOKAd1OyrtxVfXOwsrMHmB4Xj2xymd4cf-eVd8_XH27_LS5_vLx8-XF9UY3pBk3oLHWW9IyYfSWcsMUNVRjrBuwghvbUNzRlmjNxbYVWGnTQdtaurOYwNZ07Kx6fdQtTm8nyKPsXZnaexUgTlmSDnesE22zQNkRqstScgIrh-R6lWZJsFwykQe5ZiKXTCTmsmRSWK_uG0y7HswD528IBfDuCIBi885Bklk7CBqMS2VN0kT3nwbv_-Fr74LTyv-AGfIhrlEVJzJTieXX5SyWqyCCYcKEYH8AliG2bA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1808386748</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A longitudinal, randomized, and prospective study of nocturnal monitoring in children and adolescents with epilepsy: Effects on quality of life and sleep</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Borusiak, Peter ; Bast, Thomas ; Kluger, Gerhard ; Weidenfeld, Andrea ; Langer, Thorsten ; Jenke, Andreas C.W ; Wiegand, Gert</creator><creatorcontrib>Borusiak, Peter ; Bast, Thomas ; Kluger, Gerhard ; Weidenfeld, Andrea ; Langer, Thorsten ; Jenke, Andreas C.W ; Wiegand, Gert</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective Most studies on seizure detection systems focus more on the effectiveness of devices than on their practicability in and impact on everyday life. Our study investigated the impact of a technical monitoring system on subjective quality of sleep and the lives of affected families. Furthermore, we evaluated the impact of anxiety levels on seizure monitoring and vice versa. Methods Forty-three patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy were included. Initially, the families decided whether they did (group 1, n = 27) or did not (group 2, n = 16) want to use a monitoring device. In group 1, patients were randomly assigned to using Epi-Care® (group 1A, n = 14) or an audio baby monitor (group 1B, n = 13). Quality of life was assessed at two points (t1, at the start of the study and t2, at 5–7 months of follow-up) using the SF-12, Kindl-R, and “Familien-Belastungs-Fragebogen” (German version of the “Impact on Family Scale”). In addition, parental anxiety was measured using the State–Trait Anxiety-Inventory, and subjective quality of sleep was measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Statistical analysis focused on the possible differences between groups 1 and 2 that may influence parents' decisions and the effects of the presence and types of technical monitoring over time. Results Anxiety levels were not significantly different between the groups with and without monitoring (group 1 vs. group 2). We also found no statistically significant, substantial baseline differences between the Epi-Care® and audio baby monitor groups, with at least medium effect sizes (group 1A vs. group 1B). Parents' health-related mental quality of life measured via the SF-12 increased significantly over time in all groups. By tendency, the fear of further seizures as well as the frequency of cosleeping arrangements in the monitoring group decreased during the study and approached the stable values of the control group. Significance Individual parental anxiety levels are not crucial in the decision regarding the use of a monitoring device. A monitoring system may help some families in certain aspects of daily life. During the first months following a diagnosis of epilepsy, quality of life increases independently of the use of a monitoring system.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-5050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-5069</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.05.035</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27371884</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Anxiety - psychology ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Cohort Studies ; Epilepsy ; Epilepsy - diagnosis ; Epilepsy - physiopathology ; Epilepsy - psychology ; Family ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Monitoring ; Monitoring, Physiologic - adverse effects ; Neurology ; Parents - psychology ; Pediatrics ; Prospective Studies ; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales ; Quality of Life ; Seizure detection ; Sleep ; SUDEP</subject><ispartof>Epilepsy &amp; behavior, 2016-08, Vol.61, p.192-198</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-ec0cc91736dc925d3a2d2c00c4ef65df4208271cc569760acd8e77f2bf01e9d83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-ec0cc91736dc925d3a2d2c00c4ef65df4208271cc569760acd8e77f2bf01e9d83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27371884$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Borusiak, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bast, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kluger, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weidenfeld, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langer, Thorsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenke, Andreas C.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiegand, Gert</creatorcontrib><title>A longitudinal, randomized, and prospective study of nocturnal monitoring in children and adolescents with epilepsy: Effects on quality of life and sleep</title><title>Epilepsy &amp; behavior</title><addtitle>Epilepsy Behav</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective Most studies on seizure detection systems focus more on the effectiveness of devices than on their practicability in and impact on everyday life. Our study investigated the impact of a technical monitoring system on subjective quality of sleep and the lives of affected families. Furthermore, we evaluated the impact of anxiety levels on seizure monitoring and vice versa. Methods Forty-three patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy were included. Initially, the families decided whether they did (group 1, n = 27) or did not (group 2, n = 16) want to use a monitoring device. In group 1, patients were randomly assigned to using Epi-Care® (group 1A, n = 14) or an audio baby monitor (group 1B, n = 13). Quality of life was assessed at two points (t1, at the start of the study and t2, at 5–7 months of follow-up) using the SF-12, Kindl-R, and “Familien-Belastungs-Fragebogen” (German version of the “Impact on Family Scale”). In addition, parental anxiety was measured using the State–Trait Anxiety-Inventory, and subjective quality of sleep was measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Statistical analysis focused on the possible differences between groups 1 and 2 that may influence parents' decisions and the effects of the presence and types of technical monitoring over time. Results Anxiety levels were not significantly different between the groups with and without monitoring (group 1 vs. group 2). We also found no statistically significant, substantial baseline differences between the Epi-Care® and audio baby monitor groups, with at least medium effect sizes (group 1A vs. group 1B). Parents' health-related mental quality of life measured via the SF-12 increased significantly over time in all groups. By tendency, the fear of further seizures as well as the frequency of cosleeping arrangements in the monitoring group decreased during the study and approached the stable values of the control group. Significance Individual parental anxiety levels are not crucial in the decision regarding the use of a monitoring device. A monitoring system may help some families in certain aspects of daily life. During the first months following a diagnosis of epilepsy, quality of life increases independently of the use of a monitoring system.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anxiety - psychology</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Epilepsy</subject><subject>Epilepsy - diagnosis</subject><subject>Epilepsy - physiopathology</subject><subject>Epilepsy - psychology</subject><subject>Family</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Monitoring, Physiologic - adverse effects</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Parents - psychology</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Seizure detection</subject><subject>Sleep</subject><subject>SUDEP</subject><issn>1525-5050</issn><issn>1525-5069</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUk1v1DAQjRCIlsIvQEI-cugGf8ROFgmkqiofUiUOwNny2uOuF8dO7aQo_BP-LU629MCFk8fSe2_mzZuqeklwTTARbw71DDvY17R8asxrzPij6pRwyjcci-3jh5rjk-pZzgeMCeGMPK1OaMta0nXNafX7AvkYbtw4GReUP0dJBRN79wvMOSolGlLMA-jR3QHKBTWjaFGIepxSwaM-BjfG5MINcgHpvfMmQViZykQPWUMYM_rpxj2CwXkY8vwWXVlbJDOKAd1OyrtxVfXOwsrMHmB4Xj2xymd4cf-eVd8_XH27_LS5_vLx8-XF9UY3pBk3oLHWW9IyYfSWcsMUNVRjrBuwghvbUNzRlmjNxbYVWGnTQdtaurOYwNZ07Kx6fdQtTm8nyKPsXZnaexUgTlmSDnesE22zQNkRqstScgIrh-R6lWZJsFwykQe5ZiKXTCTmsmRSWK_uG0y7HswD528IBfDuCIBi885Bklk7CBqMS2VN0kT3nwbv_-Fr74LTyv-AGfIhrlEVJzJTieXX5SyWqyCCYcKEYH8AliG2bA</recordid><startdate>20160801</startdate><enddate>20160801</enddate><creator>Borusiak, Peter</creator><creator>Bast, Thomas</creator><creator>Kluger, Gerhard</creator><creator>Weidenfeld, Andrea</creator><creator>Langer, Thorsten</creator><creator>Jenke, Andreas C.W</creator><creator>Wiegand, Gert</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160801</creationdate><title>A longitudinal, randomized, and prospective study of nocturnal monitoring in children and adolescents with epilepsy: Effects on quality of life and sleep</title><author>Borusiak, Peter ; Bast, Thomas ; Kluger, Gerhard ; Weidenfeld, Andrea ; Langer, Thorsten ; Jenke, Andreas C.W ; Wiegand, Gert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-ec0cc91736dc925d3a2d2c00c4ef65df4208271cc569760acd8e77f2bf01e9d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anxiety - psychology</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Epilepsy</topic><topic>Epilepsy - diagnosis</topic><topic>Epilepsy - physiopathology</topic><topic>Epilepsy - psychology</topic><topic>Family</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Monitoring, Physiologic - adverse effects</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Parents - psychology</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Psychiatric Status Rating Scales</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Seizure detection</topic><topic>Sleep</topic><topic>SUDEP</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Borusiak, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bast, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kluger, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weidenfeld, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langer, Thorsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jenke, Andreas C.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiegand, Gert</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Epilepsy &amp; behavior</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Borusiak, Peter</au><au>Bast, Thomas</au><au>Kluger, Gerhard</au><au>Weidenfeld, Andrea</au><au>Langer, Thorsten</au><au>Jenke, Andreas C.W</au><au>Wiegand, Gert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A longitudinal, randomized, and prospective study of nocturnal monitoring in children and adolescents with epilepsy: Effects on quality of life and sleep</atitle><jtitle>Epilepsy &amp; behavior</jtitle><addtitle>Epilepsy Behav</addtitle><date>2016-08-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>61</volume><spage>192</spage><epage>198</epage><pages>192-198</pages><issn>1525-5050</issn><eissn>1525-5069</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective Most studies on seizure detection systems focus more on the effectiveness of devices than on their practicability in and impact on everyday life. Our study investigated the impact of a technical monitoring system on subjective quality of sleep and the lives of affected families. Furthermore, we evaluated the impact of anxiety levels on seizure monitoring and vice versa. Methods Forty-three patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy were included. Initially, the families decided whether they did (group 1, n = 27) or did not (group 2, n = 16) want to use a monitoring device. In group 1, patients were randomly assigned to using Epi-Care® (group 1A, n = 14) or an audio baby monitor (group 1B, n = 13). Quality of life was assessed at two points (t1, at the start of the study and t2, at 5–7 months of follow-up) using the SF-12, Kindl-R, and “Familien-Belastungs-Fragebogen” (German version of the “Impact on Family Scale”). In addition, parental anxiety was measured using the State–Trait Anxiety-Inventory, and subjective quality of sleep was measured using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Statistical analysis focused on the possible differences between groups 1 and 2 that may influence parents' decisions and the effects of the presence and types of technical monitoring over time. Results Anxiety levels were not significantly different between the groups with and without monitoring (group 1 vs. group 2). We also found no statistically significant, substantial baseline differences between the Epi-Care® and audio baby monitor groups, with at least medium effect sizes (group 1A vs. group 1B). Parents' health-related mental quality of life measured via the SF-12 increased significantly over time in all groups. By tendency, the fear of further seizures as well as the frequency of cosleeping arrangements in the monitoring group decreased during the study and approached the stable values of the control group. Significance Individual parental anxiety levels are not crucial in the decision regarding the use of a monitoring device. A monitoring system may help some families in certain aspects of daily life. During the first months following a diagnosis of epilepsy, quality of life increases independently of the use of a monitoring system.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27371884</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.05.035</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1525-5050
ispartof Epilepsy & behavior, 2016-08, Vol.61, p.192-198
issn 1525-5050
1525-5069
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808386748
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Anxiety - psychology
Child
Child, Preschool
Cohort Studies
Epilepsy
Epilepsy - diagnosis
Epilepsy - physiopathology
Epilepsy - psychology
Family
Female
Humans
Infant
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Monitoring
Monitoring, Physiologic - adverse effects
Neurology
Parents - psychology
Pediatrics
Prospective Studies
Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
Quality of Life
Seizure detection
Sleep
SUDEP
title A longitudinal, randomized, and prospective study of nocturnal monitoring in children and adolescents with epilepsy: Effects on quality of life and sleep
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-08T14%3A04%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20longitudinal,%20randomized,%20and%20prospective%20study%20of%20nocturnal%20monitoring%20in%20children%20and%20adolescents%20with%20epilepsy:%20Effects%20on%20quality%20of%20life%20and%20sleep&rft.jtitle=Epilepsy%20&%20behavior&rft.au=Borusiak,%20Peter&rft.date=2016-08-01&rft.volume=61&rft.spage=192&rft.epage=198&rft.pages=192-198&rft.issn=1525-5050&rft.eissn=1525-5069&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.05.035&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1808386748%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c414t-ec0cc91736dc925d3a2d2c00c4ef65df4208271cc569760acd8e77f2bf01e9d83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1808386748&rft_id=info:pmid/27371884&rfr_iscdi=true