Loading…
Some comments on transient and steady-state reconnection at the dayside magnetopause
Reconnection at the dayside magnetopause is the principal method by which energy is transferred from the solar wind into the magnetosphere‐ionosphere system. There is still considerable uncertainty as to whether reconnection is transient or quasi‐steady. Here we discuss some of the implications of a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Geophysical research letters 2000-05, Vol.27 (9), p.1359-1362 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4121-cbf90d8fe8dbf3a817ce0e936d671ece335405800d1e339479388fcd99a8b62a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4121-cbf90d8fe8dbf3a817ce0e936d671ece335405800d1e339479388fcd99a8b62a3 |
container_end_page | 1362 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1359 |
container_title | Geophysical research letters |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Rodger, Alan S. Coleman, Iain J. Pinnock, Mike |
description | Reconnection at the dayside magnetopause is the principal method by which energy is transferred from the solar wind into the magnetosphere‐ionosphere system. There is still considerable uncertainty as to whether reconnection is transient or quasi‐steady. Here we discuss some of the implications of assuming that reconnection occurring in regions where the magnetosheath flow is super‐Alfvénic must be transient. We use a simple magnetospheric model to illustrate where on the magnetopause transient reconnection is most likely to occur, and show that the location of these regions is dependent critically upon the dipole tilt angle and the interplanetary magnetic field orientation. Although our idealised examples do not take into account temporal variations of the solar wind conditions, or the influence of the bow shock or magnetosheath, we believe that they demonstrate interesting features. For example, the results suggest that reconnection for northward IMF is almost always likely to be transient. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/1999GL010758 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18084297</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18084297</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4121-cbf90d8fe8dbf3a817ce0e936d671ece335405800d1e339479388fcd99a8b62a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi1UJLaFGz_AB9RTQ8d2EtvHtipLqwgkKNCbNWtPIDQf29gr2H-Pq12VnnqaGel5X2kext4KeC9A2lNhrV02IEBX5gVbCFuWhQHQB2wBYPMudf2KHcb4GwAUKLFgN1-ngbifhoHGFPk08jTjGLt8cRwDj4kwbIuYMBGfyU_jSD51mcPE0y_iAbexC8QH_DlSmta4ifSavWyxj_RmP4_Ytw-XNxcfi-bz8urirCl8KaQo_Kq1EExLJqxahUZoT0BW1aHWgjwpVZVQ5QeCyLsttVXGtD5Yi2ZVS1RH7HjXu56n-w3F5IYueup7HGnaRCcMmFJancGTHejnKcaZWreeuwHnrRPgHtS5p-oy_m7fi9Fj32Yjvov_M6qSUj9gcof96XraPlvpll8aIUshcqjYhbqs9u9jCOc7V2ulK_fj09LdNtfy-_lt5Wr1D9imjDQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18084297</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Some comments on transient and steady-state reconnection at the dayside magnetopause</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive</source><creator>Rodger, Alan S. ; Coleman, Iain J. ; Pinnock, Mike</creator><creatorcontrib>Rodger, Alan S. ; Coleman, Iain J. ; Pinnock, Mike</creatorcontrib><description>Reconnection at the dayside magnetopause is the principal method by which energy is transferred from the solar wind into the magnetosphere‐ionosphere system. There is still considerable uncertainty as to whether reconnection is transient or quasi‐steady. Here we discuss some of the implications of assuming that reconnection occurring in regions where the magnetosheath flow is super‐Alfvénic must be transient. We use a simple magnetospheric model to illustrate where on the magnetopause transient reconnection is most likely to occur, and show that the location of these regions is dependent critically upon the dipole tilt angle and the interplanetary magnetic field orientation. Although our idealised examples do not take into account temporal variations of the solar wind conditions, or the influence of the bow shock or magnetosheath, we believe that they demonstrate interesting features. For example, the results suggest that reconnection for northward IMF is almost always likely to be transient.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/1999GL010758</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GPRLAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Interaction between magnetosphere and interplanetary space ; Physics of the magnetosphere</subject><ispartof>Geophysical research letters, 2000-05, Vol.27 (9), p.1359-1362</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2000 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4121-cbf90d8fe8dbf3a817ce0e936d671ece335405800d1e339479388fcd99a8b62a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4121-cbf90d8fe8dbf3a817ce0e936d671ece335405800d1e339479388fcd99a8b62a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F1999GL010758$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F1999GL010758$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,11497,27907,27908,46451,46875</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1352278$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rodger, Alan S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Iain J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinnock, Mike</creatorcontrib><title>Some comments on transient and steady-state reconnection at the dayside magnetopause</title><title>Geophysical research letters</title><addtitle>Geophys. Res. Lett</addtitle><description>Reconnection at the dayside magnetopause is the principal method by which energy is transferred from the solar wind into the magnetosphere‐ionosphere system. There is still considerable uncertainty as to whether reconnection is transient or quasi‐steady. Here we discuss some of the implications of assuming that reconnection occurring in regions where the magnetosheath flow is super‐Alfvénic must be transient. We use a simple magnetospheric model to illustrate where on the magnetopause transient reconnection is most likely to occur, and show that the location of these regions is dependent critically upon the dipole tilt angle and the interplanetary magnetic field orientation. Although our idealised examples do not take into account temporal variations of the solar wind conditions, or the influence of the bow shock or magnetosheath, we believe that they demonstrate interesting features. For example, the results suggest that reconnection for northward IMF is almost always likely to be transient.</description><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Interaction between magnetosphere and interplanetary space</subject><subject>Physics of the magnetosphere</subject><issn>0094-8276</issn><issn>1944-8007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi1UJLaFGz_AB9RTQ8d2EtvHtipLqwgkKNCbNWtPIDQf29gr2H-Pq12VnnqaGel5X2kext4KeC9A2lNhrV02IEBX5gVbCFuWhQHQB2wBYPMudf2KHcb4GwAUKLFgN1-ngbifhoHGFPk08jTjGLt8cRwDj4kwbIuYMBGfyU_jSD51mcPE0y_iAbexC8QH_DlSmta4ifSavWyxj_RmP4_Ytw-XNxcfi-bz8urirCl8KaQo_Kq1EExLJqxahUZoT0BW1aHWgjwpVZVQ5QeCyLsttVXGtD5Yi2ZVS1RH7HjXu56n-w3F5IYueup7HGnaRCcMmFJancGTHejnKcaZWreeuwHnrRPgHtS5p-oy_m7fi9Fj32Yjvov_M6qSUj9gcof96XraPlvpll8aIUshcqjYhbqs9u9jCOc7V2ulK_fj09LdNtfy-_lt5Wr1D9imjDQ</recordid><startdate>20000501</startdate><enddate>20000501</enddate><creator>Rodger, Alan S.</creator><creator>Coleman, Iain J.</creator><creator>Pinnock, Mike</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000501</creationdate><title>Some comments on transient and steady-state reconnection at the dayside magnetopause</title><author>Rodger, Alan S. ; Coleman, Iain J. ; Pinnock, Mike</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4121-cbf90d8fe8dbf3a817ce0e936d671ece335405800d1e339479388fcd99a8b62a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Interaction between magnetosphere and interplanetary space</topic><topic>Physics of the magnetosphere</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rodger, Alan S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Iain J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinnock, Mike</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rodger, Alan S.</au><au>Coleman, Iain J.</au><au>Pinnock, Mike</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Some comments on transient and steady-state reconnection at the dayside magnetopause</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle><addtitle>Geophys. Res. Lett</addtitle><date>2000-05-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1359</spage><epage>1362</epage><pages>1359-1362</pages><issn>0094-8276</issn><eissn>1944-8007</eissn><coden>GPRLAJ</coden><abstract>Reconnection at the dayside magnetopause is the principal method by which energy is transferred from the solar wind into the magnetosphere‐ionosphere system. There is still considerable uncertainty as to whether reconnection is transient or quasi‐steady. Here we discuss some of the implications of assuming that reconnection occurring in regions where the magnetosheath flow is super‐Alfvénic must be transient. We use a simple magnetospheric model to illustrate where on the magnetopause transient reconnection is most likely to occur, and show that the location of these regions is dependent critically upon the dipole tilt angle and the interplanetary magnetic field orientation. Although our idealised examples do not take into account temporal variations of the solar wind conditions, or the influence of the bow shock or magnetosheath, we believe that they demonstrate interesting features. For example, the results suggest that reconnection for northward IMF is almost always likely to be transient.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/1999GL010758</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-8276 |
ispartof | Geophysical research letters, 2000-05, Vol.27 (9), p.1359-1362 |
issn | 0094-8276 1944-8007 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18084297 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive |
subjects | Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology External geophysics Interaction between magnetosphere and interplanetary space Physics of the magnetosphere |
title | Some comments on transient and steady-state reconnection at the dayside magnetopause |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T23%3A09%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Some%20comments%20on%20transient%20and%20steady-state%20reconnection%20at%20the%20dayside%20magnetopause&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20research%20letters&rft.au=Rodger,%20Alan%20S.&rft.date=2000-05-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1359&rft.epage=1362&rft.pages=1359-1362&rft.issn=0094-8276&rft.eissn=1944-8007&rft.coden=GPRLAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/1999GL010758&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18084297%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4121-cbf90d8fe8dbf3a817ce0e936d671ece335405800d1e339479388fcd99a8b62a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18084297&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |