Loading…

Some comments on transient and steady-state reconnection at the dayside magnetopause

Reconnection at the dayside magnetopause is the principal method by which energy is transferred from the solar wind into the magnetosphere‐ionosphere system. There is still considerable uncertainty as to whether reconnection is transient or quasi‐steady. Here we discuss some of the implications of a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Geophysical research letters 2000-05, Vol.27 (9), p.1359-1362
Main Authors: Rodger, Alan S., Coleman, Iain J., Pinnock, Mike
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4121-cbf90d8fe8dbf3a817ce0e936d671ece335405800d1e339479388fcd99a8b62a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4121-cbf90d8fe8dbf3a817ce0e936d671ece335405800d1e339479388fcd99a8b62a3
container_end_page 1362
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1359
container_title Geophysical research letters
container_volume 27
creator Rodger, Alan S.
Coleman, Iain J.
Pinnock, Mike
description Reconnection at the dayside magnetopause is the principal method by which energy is transferred from the solar wind into the magnetosphere‐ionosphere system. There is still considerable uncertainty as to whether reconnection is transient or quasi‐steady. Here we discuss some of the implications of assuming that reconnection occurring in regions where the magnetosheath flow is super‐Alfvénic must be transient. We use a simple magnetospheric model to illustrate where on the magnetopause transient reconnection is most likely to occur, and show that the location of these regions is dependent critically upon the dipole tilt angle and the interplanetary magnetic field orientation. Although our idealised examples do not take into account temporal variations of the solar wind conditions, or the influence of the bow shock or magnetosheath, we believe that they demonstrate interesting features. For example, the results suggest that reconnection for northward IMF is almost always likely to be transient.
doi_str_mv 10.1029/1999GL010758
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18084297</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18084297</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4121-cbf90d8fe8dbf3a817ce0e936d671ece335405800d1e339479388fcd99a8b62a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi1UJLaFGz_AB9RTQ8d2EtvHtipLqwgkKNCbNWtPIDQf29gr2H-Pq12VnnqaGel5X2kext4KeC9A2lNhrV02IEBX5gVbCFuWhQHQB2wBYPMudf2KHcb4GwAUKLFgN1-ngbifhoHGFPk08jTjGLt8cRwDj4kwbIuYMBGfyU_jSD51mcPE0y_iAbexC8QH_DlSmta4ifSavWyxj_RmP4_Ytw-XNxcfi-bz8urirCl8KaQo_Kq1EExLJqxahUZoT0BW1aHWgjwpVZVQ5QeCyLsttVXGtD5Yi2ZVS1RH7HjXu56n-w3F5IYueup7HGnaRCcMmFJancGTHejnKcaZWreeuwHnrRPgHtS5p-oy_m7fi9Fj32Yjvov_M6qSUj9gcof96XraPlvpll8aIUshcqjYhbqs9u9jCOc7V2ulK_fj09LdNtfy-_lt5Wr1D9imjDQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18084297</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Some comments on transient and steady-state reconnection at the dayside magnetopause</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive</source><creator>Rodger, Alan S. ; Coleman, Iain J. ; Pinnock, Mike</creator><creatorcontrib>Rodger, Alan S. ; Coleman, Iain J. ; Pinnock, Mike</creatorcontrib><description>Reconnection at the dayside magnetopause is the principal method by which energy is transferred from the solar wind into the magnetosphere‐ionosphere system. There is still considerable uncertainty as to whether reconnection is transient or quasi‐steady. Here we discuss some of the implications of assuming that reconnection occurring in regions where the magnetosheath flow is super‐Alfvénic must be transient. We use a simple magnetospheric model to illustrate where on the magnetopause transient reconnection is most likely to occur, and show that the location of these regions is dependent critically upon the dipole tilt angle and the interplanetary magnetic field orientation. Although our idealised examples do not take into account temporal variations of the solar wind conditions, or the influence of the bow shock or magnetosheath, we believe that they demonstrate interesting features. For example, the results suggest that reconnection for northward IMF is almost always likely to be transient.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/1999GL010758</identifier><identifier>CODEN: GPRLAJ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Interaction between magnetosphere and interplanetary space ; Physics of the magnetosphere</subject><ispartof>Geophysical research letters, 2000-05, Vol.27 (9), p.1359-1362</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2000 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4121-cbf90d8fe8dbf3a817ce0e936d671ece335405800d1e339479388fcd99a8b62a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4121-cbf90d8fe8dbf3a817ce0e936d671ece335405800d1e339479388fcd99a8b62a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F1999GL010758$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F1999GL010758$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,11497,27907,27908,46451,46875</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1352278$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rodger, Alan S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Iain J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinnock, Mike</creatorcontrib><title>Some comments on transient and steady-state reconnection at the dayside magnetopause</title><title>Geophysical research letters</title><addtitle>Geophys. Res. Lett</addtitle><description>Reconnection at the dayside magnetopause is the principal method by which energy is transferred from the solar wind into the magnetosphere‐ionosphere system. There is still considerable uncertainty as to whether reconnection is transient or quasi‐steady. Here we discuss some of the implications of assuming that reconnection occurring in regions where the magnetosheath flow is super‐Alfvénic must be transient. We use a simple magnetospheric model to illustrate where on the magnetopause transient reconnection is most likely to occur, and show that the location of these regions is dependent critically upon the dipole tilt angle and the interplanetary magnetic field orientation. Although our idealised examples do not take into account temporal variations of the solar wind conditions, or the influence of the bow shock or magnetosheath, we believe that they demonstrate interesting features. For example, the results suggest that reconnection for northward IMF is almost always likely to be transient.</description><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Interaction between magnetosphere and interplanetary space</subject><subject>Physics of the magnetosphere</subject><issn>0094-8276</issn><issn>1944-8007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi1UJLaFGz_AB9RTQ8d2EtvHtipLqwgkKNCbNWtPIDQf29gr2H-Pq12VnnqaGel5X2kext4KeC9A2lNhrV02IEBX5gVbCFuWhQHQB2wBYPMudf2KHcb4GwAUKLFgN1-ngbifhoHGFPk08jTjGLt8cRwDj4kwbIuYMBGfyU_jSD51mcPE0y_iAbexC8QH_DlSmta4ifSavWyxj_RmP4_Ytw-XNxcfi-bz8urirCl8KaQo_Kq1EExLJqxahUZoT0BW1aHWgjwpVZVQ5QeCyLsttVXGtD5Yi2ZVS1RH7HjXu56n-w3F5IYueup7HGnaRCcMmFJancGTHejnKcaZWreeuwHnrRPgHtS5p-oy_m7fi9Fj32Yjvov_M6qSUj9gcof96XraPlvpll8aIUshcqjYhbqs9u9jCOc7V2ulK_fj09LdNtfy-_lt5Wr1D9imjDQ</recordid><startdate>20000501</startdate><enddate>20000501</enddate><creator>Rodger, Alan S.</creator><creator>Coleman, Iain J.</creator><creator>Pinnock, Mike</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000501</creationdate><title>Some comments on transient and steady-state reconnection at the dayside magnetopause</title><author>Rodger, Alan S. ; Coleman, Iain J. ; Pinnock, Mike</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4121-cbf90d8fe8dbf3a817ce0e936d671ece335405800d1e339479388fcd99a8b62a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Interaction between magnetosphere and interplanetary space</topic><topic>Physics of the magnetosphere</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rodger, Alan S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coleman, Iain J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinnock, Mike</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rodger, Alan S.</au><au>Coleman, Iain J.</au><au>Pinnock, Mike</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Some comments on transient and steady-state reconnection at the dayside magnetopause</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle><addtitle>Geophys. Res. Lett</addtitle><date>2000-05-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1359</spage><epage>1362</epage><pages>1359-1362</pages><issn>0094-8276</issn><eissn>1944-8007</eissn><coden>GPRLAJ</coden><abstract>Reconnection at the dayside magnetopause is the principal method by which energy is transferred from the solar wind into the magnetosphere‐ionosphere system. There is still considerable uncertainty as to whether reconnection is transient or quasi‐steady. Here we discuss some of the implications of assuming that reconnection occurring in regions where the magnetosheath flow is super‐Alfvénic must be transient. We use a simple magnetospheric model to illustrate where on the magnetopause transient reconnection is most likely to occur, and show that the location of these regions is dependent critically upon the dipole tilt angle and the interplanetary magnetic field orientation. Although our idealised examples do not take into account temporal variations of the solar wind conditions, or the influence of the bow shock or magnetosheath, we believe that they demonstrate interesting features. For example, the results suggest that reconnection for northward IMF is almost always likely to be transient.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/1999GL010758</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-8276
ispartof Geophysical research letters, 2000-05, Vol.27 (9), p.1359-1362
issn 0094-8276
1944-8007
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18084297
source Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Archive
subjects Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
External geophysics
Interaction between magnetosphere and interplanetary space
Physics of the magnetosphere
title Some comments on transient and steady-state reconnection at the dayside magnetopause
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T23%3A09%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Some%20comments%20on%20transient%20and%20steady-state%20reconnection%20at%20the%20dayside%20magnetopause&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20research%20letters&rft.au=Rodger,%20Alan%20S.&rft.date=2000-05-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1359&rft.epage=1362&rft.pages=1359-1362&rft.issn=0094-8276&rft.eissn=1944-8007&rft.coden=GPRLAJ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/1999GL010758&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18084297%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4121-cbf90d8fe8dbf3a817ce0e936d671ece335405800d1e339479388fcd99a8b62a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18084297&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true