Loading…

QL-06 RELIABILITY OF THE SF-36 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR ASSESSMENT OF HEALTH RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE IN NEUROSURGICAL BRAIN TUMOR PATIENTS

BACKGROUND: Brain tumor is often a devastating disease associated with significant impairment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We evaluated reliability of the SF-36 questionnaire for assessment of HRQoL in neurosurgical brain tumor patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients admitted for prima...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.) Va.), 2014-11, Vol.16 (suppl 5), p.v179-v179
Main Authors: Bunevicius, A., Tamasauskas, S., Deltuva, V. P., Tamasauskas, A., Bunevicius, R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page v179
container_issue suppl 5
container_start_page v179
container_title Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)
container_volume 16
creator Bunevicius, A.
Tamasauskas, S.
Deltuva, V. P.
Tamasauskas, A.
Bunevicius, R.
description BACKGROUND: Brain tumor is often a devastating disease associated with significant impairment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We evaluated reliability of the SF-36 questionnaire for assessment of HRQoL in neurosurgical brain tumor patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients admitted for primary brain tumor surgery were considered for this prospective study. On admission, patients were evaluated for HRQoL (SF-36 scale), functional status (Barthel index or BI) and depressive symptom severity (Beck depression inventory-II or BDI-II). RESULTS: Two-hundred and fourteen patients (70% women and 30% men; mean age 55.8 plus or minus 14.4 years) completed the study. The most common brain tumor diagnoses were meningioma (40%), high-grade glioma (18%) and pituitary adenoma (13%). The lowest scores were on the SF-36 General health (48.3 plus or minus 20.0), Role limitations due to physical problems (53.2 plus or minus 42.5) and Energy/vitality (53.7 plus or minus 21.5) subscales. Internal consistency of individual SF-36 subscales was acceptable for all but Social functioning subscale of the SF-36 questionnaire with Cronbach's coefficients alpha ranging from 0.92 for Physical functioning subscale to 0.69 for General health subscale of the SF-36. There was a moderate-to-strong correlation of the Role limitations due to emotional problems, Energy/vitality and Emotional well-being SF-36 subscales with the BDI-II scores (Pearson's correlation coefficients r range from -0.30 to -0.66; p-values
doi_str_mv 10.1093/neuonc/nou269.6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808619434</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1808619434</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1146-6e58b58f797e4580ff450baf729c9451dc3dbc088e1f16640952287d353502833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kMFPgzAUhxujiXN69tqjF1xLaSnHbhZpwsBBOXgijJVkZoNJ5eDZf1w29PReXr7fl7wfAI8YPWMUkEVrhq6tF203uCx4ZldghqlLHMoZu77srsMp9m_BnbUfCLmYMjwDP5vYQQxmMlZiqWKl32EaQh1JmIcOYXBTyFyrNEmEyiQM0wyKPJd5vpaJPpORFLGOznmh5cuIi39HrEIJVQITWWRpXmSvaiViuMzEeNPFejS9Ca1GTX4PbprqYM3D35yDIpR6FTlxegk5NcYec5ihfEt54we-8ShHTeNRtK0a3w3qwKN4V5PdtkacG9xgxjwUjD9zf0coocjlhMzB0-Q99d3nYOxXedzb2hwOVWu6wZaYI85w4BFvRBcTWvedtb1pylO_P1b9d4lRea67nOoup7pLRn4B-XRplA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1808619434</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>QL-06 RELIABILITY OF THE SF-36 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR ASSESSMENT OF HEALTH RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE IN NEUROSURGICAL BRAIN TUMOR PATIENTS</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Oxford University Press:Jisc Collections:OUP Read and Publish 2024-2025 (2024 collection) (Reading list)</source><creator>Bunevicius, A. ; Tamasauskas, S. ; Deltuva, V. P. ; Tamasauskas, A. ; Bunevicius, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bunevicius, A. ; Tamasauskas, S. ; Deltuva, V. P. ; Tamasauskas, A. ; Bunevicius, R.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: Brain tumor is often a devastating disease associated with significant impairment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We evaluated reliability of the SF-36 questionnaire for assessment of HRQoL in neurosurgical brain tumor patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients admitted for primary brain tumor surgery were considered for this prospective study. On admission, patients were evaluated for HRQoL (SF-36 scale), functional status (Barthel index or BI) and depressive symptom severity (Beck depression inventory-II or BDI-II). RESULTS: Two-hundred and fourteen patients (70% women and 30% men; mean age 55.8 plus or minus 14.4 years) completed the study. The most common brain tumor diagnoses were meningioma (40%), high-grade glioma (18%) and pituitary adenoma (13%). The lowest scores were on the SF-36 General health (48.3 plus or minus 20.0), Role limitations due to physical problems (53.2 plus or minus 42.5) and Energy/vitality (53.7 plus or minus 21.5) subscales. Internal consistency of individual SF-36 subscales was acceptable for all but Social functioning subscale of the SF-36 questionnaire with Cronbach's coefficients alpha ranging from 0.92 for Physical functioning subscale to 0.69 for General health subscale of the SF-36. There was a moderate-to-strong correlation of the Role limitations due to emotional problems, Energy/vitality and Emotional well-being SF-36 subscales with the BDI-II scores (Pearson's correlation coefficients r range from -0.30 to -0.66; p-values &lt;0.001). Scores on the SF-36 Physical functioning and Role limitations due to physical problems correlated with BI scores (0.49 and 0.25, p-values &lt;0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In neurosurgical brain tumor patients, the greatest impairment was found in General health, Role limitations due to physical problems and Energy/vitality domains of HRQoL. The SF-36 subscales had acceptable internal consistency with an exception of Social functioning subscale. The SF-36 subscales pertaining to physical health and emotional health aspects of HRQoL demonstrated adequate construct validity. The SF-36 is a reliable measure of HRQoL in neurosurgical brain tumor patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-8517</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-5866</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nou269.6</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.), 2014-11, Vol.16 (suppl 5), p.v179-v179</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bunevicius, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamasauskas, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deltuva, V. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamasauskas, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bunevicius, R.</creatorcontrib><title>QL-06 RELIABILITY OF THE SF-36 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR ASSESSMENT OF HEALTH RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE IN NEUROSURGICAL BRAIN TUMOR PATIENTS</title><title>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)</title><description>BACKGROUND: Brain tumor is often a devastating disease associated with significant impairment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We evaluated reliability of the SF-36 questionnaire for assessment of HRQoL in neurosurgical brain tumor patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients admitted for primary brain tumor surgery were considered for this prospective study. On admission, patients were evaluated for HRQoL (SF-36 scale), functional status (Barthel index or BI) and depressive symptom severity (Beck depression inventory-II or BDI-II). RESULTS: Two-hundred and fourteen patients (70% women and 30% men; mean age 55.8 plus or minus 14.4 years) completed the study. The most common brain tumor diagnoses were meningioma (40%), high-grade glioma (18%) and pituitary adenoma (13%). The lowest scores were on the SF-36 General health (48.3 plus or minus 20.0), Role limitations due to physical problems (53.2 plus or minus 42.5) and Energy/vitality (53.7 plus or minus 21.5) subscales. Internal consistency of individual SF-36 subscales was acceptable for all but Social functioning subscale of the SF-36 questionnaire with Cronbach's coefficients alpha ranging from 0.92 for Physical functioning subscale to 0.69 for General health subscale of the SF-36. There was a moderate-to-strong correlation of the Role limitations due to emotional problems, Energy/vitality and Emotional well-being SF-36 subscales with the BDI-II scores (Pearson's correlation coefficients r range from -0.30 to -0.66; p-values &lt;0.001). Scores on the SF-36 Physical functioning and Role limitations due to physical problems correlated with BI scores (0.49 and 0.25, p-values &lt;0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In neurosurgical brain tumor patients, the greatest impairment was found in General health, Role limitations due to physical problems and Energy/vitality domains of HRQoL. The SF-36 subscales had acceptable internal consistency with an exception of Social functioning subscale. The SF-36 subscales pertaining to physical health and emotional health aspects of HRQoL demonstrated adequate construct validity. The SF-36 is a reliable measure of HRQoL in neurosurgical brain tumor patients.</description><issn>1522-8517</issn><issn>1523-5866</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1kMFPgzAUhxujiXN69tqjF1xLaSnHbhZpwsBBOXgijJVkZoNJ5eDZf1w29PReXr7fl7wfAI8YPWMUkEVrhq6tF203uCx4ZldghqlLHMoZu77srsMp9m_BnbUfCLmYMjwDP5vYQQxmMlZiqWKl32EaQh1JmIcOYXBTyFyrNEmEyiQM0wyKPJd5vpaJPpORFLGOznmh5cuIi39HrEIJVQITWWRpXmSvaiViuMzEeNPFejS9Ca1GTX4PbprqYM3D35yDIpR6FTlxegk5NcYec5ihfEt54we-8ShHTeNRtK0a3w3qwKN4V5PdtkacG9xgxjwUjD9zf0coocjlhMzB0-Q99d3nYOxXedzb2hwOVWu6wZaYI85w4BFvRBcTWvedtb1pylO_P1b9d4lRea67nOoup7pLRn4B-XRplA</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Bunevicius, A.</creator><creator>Tamasauskas, S.</creator><creator>Deltuva, V. P.</creator><creator>Tamasauskas, A.</creator><creator>Bunevicius, R.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>QL-06 RELIABILITY OF THE SF-36 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR ASSESSMENT OF HEALTH RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE IN NEUROSURGICAL BRAIN TUMOR PATIENTS</title><author>Bunevicius, A. ; Tamasauskas, S. ; Deltuva, V. P. ; Tamasauskas, A. ; Bunevicius, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1146-6e58b58f797e4580ff450baf729c9451dc3dbc088e1f16640952287d353502833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bunevicius, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamasauskas, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deltuva, V. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tamasauskas, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bunevicius, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bunevicius, A.</au><au>Tamasauskas, S.</au><au>Deltuva, V. P.</au><au>Tamasauskas, A.</au><au>Bunevicius, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>QL-06 RELIABILITY OF THE SF-36 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR ASSESSMENT OF HEALTH RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE IN NEUROSURGICAL BRAIN TUMOR PATIENTS</atitle><jtitle>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>suppl 5</issue><spage>v179</spage><epage>v179</epage><pages>v179-v179</pages><issn>1522-8517</issn><eissn>1523-5866</eissn><abstract>BACKGROUND: Brain tumor is often a devastating disease associated with significant impairment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). We evaluated reliability of the SF-36 questionnaire for assessment of HRQoL in neurosurgical brain tumor patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients admitted for primary brain tumor surgery were considered for this prospective study. On admission, patients were evaluated for HRQoL (SF-36 scale), functional status (Barthel index or BI) and depressive symptom severity (Beck depression inventory-II or BDI-II). RESULTS: Two-hundred and fourteen patients (70% women and 30% men; mean age 55.8 plus or minus 14.4 years) completed the study. The most common brain tumor diagnoses were meningioma (40%), high-grade glioma (18%) and pituitary adenoma (13%). The lowest scores were on the SF-36 General health (48.3 plus or minus 20.0), Role limitations due to physical problems (53.2 plus or minus 42.5) and Energy/vitality (53.7 plus or minus 21.5) subscales. Internal consistency of individual SF-36 subscales was acceptable for all but Social functioning subscale of the SF-36 questionnaire with Cronbach's coefficients alpha ranging from 0.92 for Physical functioning subscale to 0.69 for General health subscale of the SF-36. There was a moderate-to-strong correlation of the Role limitations due to emotional problems, Energy/vitality and Emotional well-being SF-36 subscales with the BDI-II scores (Pearson's correlation coefficients r range from -0.30 to -0.66; p-values &lt;0.001). Scores on the SF-36 Physical functioning and Role limitations due to physical problems correlated with BI scores (0.49 and 0.25, p-values &lt;0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In neurosurgical brain tumor patients, the greatest impairment was found in General health, Role limitations due to physical problems and Energy/vitality domains of HRQoL. The SF-36 subscales had acceptable internal consistency with an exception of Social functioning subscale. The SF-36 subscales pertaining to physical health and emotional health aspects of HRQoL demonstrated adequate construct validity. The SF-36 is a reliable measure of HRQoL in neurosurgical brain tumor patients.</abstract><doi>10.1093/neuonc/nou269.6</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1522-8517
ispartof Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.), 2014-11, Vol.16 (suppl 5), p.v179-v179
issn 1522-8517
1523-5866
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808619434
source PubMed Central; Oxford University Press:Jisc Collections:OUP Read and Publish 2024-2025 (2024 collection) (Reading list)
title QL-06 RELIABILITY OF THE SF-36 QUESTIONNAIRE FOR ASSESSMENT OF HEALTH RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE IN NEUROSURGICAL BRAIN TUMOR PATIENTS
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T04%3A10%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=QL-06%20RELIABILITY%20OF%20THE%20SF-36%20QUESTIONNAIRE%20FOR%20ASSESSMENT%20OF%20HEALTH%20RELATED%20QUALITY%20OF%20LIFE%20IN%20NEUROSURGICAL%20BRAIN%20TUMOR%20PATIENTS&rft.jtitle=Neuro-oncology%20(Charlottesville,%20Va.)&rft.au=Bunevicius,%20A.&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=suppl%205&rft.spage=v179&rft.epage=v179&rft.pages=v179-v179&rft.issn=1522-8517&rft.eissn=1523-5866&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/neuonc/nou269.6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1808619434%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1146-6e58b58f797e4580ff450baf729c9451dc3dbc088e1f16640952287d353502833%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1808619434&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true