Loading…

AT-11 FINAL RESULTS FROM THE RANDOMIZED PHASE II TRIAL AVAREG (ML25739) WITH BEVACIZUMAB (BEV) OR FOTEMUSTINE (FTM) IN RECURRENT GBM

AIM: The treatment of recurrent glioblastoma remains an open issue and the role of BEV has been largely debated since only few data compared this agent with the standard agents. METHODS: A multicenter, open-label, randomized (2:1), non-comparative phase II study (EudraCT:2011-001363-46; AVAREG-ML257...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.) Va.), 2014-11, Vol.16 (suppl 5), p.v10-v10
Main Authors: Brandes, A. A., Finocchiaro, G., Zagonel, V., Reni, M., Fabi, A., Caserta, C., Clavarezza, M., Maiello, E., Carteni, G., Rosti, G., Eoli, M., Lombardi, G., Monteforte, M., Agati, R., Eusebi, V., Galli, A., Doria, S., Franceschi, E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1631-9e2be06d7d6277113ff95877f90a00cdd0b1c5d7fc81428f6be5ce1ebdb7cb303
cites
container_end_page v10
container_issue suppl 5
container_start_page v10
container_title Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)
container_volume 16
creator Brandes, A. A.
Finocchiaro, G.
Zagonel, V.
Reni, M.
Fabi, A.
Caserta, C.
Clavarezza, M.
Maiello, E.
Carteni, G.
Rosti, G.
Eoli, M.
Lombardi, G.
Monteforte, M.
Agati, R.
Eusebi, V.
Galli, A.
Doria, S.
Franceschi, E.
description AIM: The treatment of recurrent glioblastoma remains an open issue and the role of BEV has been largely debated since only few data compared this agent with the standard agents. METHODS: A multicenter, open-label, randomized (2:1), non-comparative phase II study (EudraCT:2011-001363-46; AVAREG-ML25739) with BEV 10 mg/m2 iv every 2 weeks or FTM 75 mg/m2 iv day 1-8-15 followed, after a 35 days interval, by FTM 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, was conducted. Primary endpoint was overall survival at 6 months (OS6). RESULTS: 91 pts with recurrent GBM were enrolled among 10 Italian centers between 11/2011 and 9/2012. Median age was 57 years (range:28-78), PS was 0/1/2 in 42/35/14 pts. All pts were treated with RT/TMZ accordingly with EORTC 26981-22981/NCIC-CE3. Time from diagnosis to 1st recurrence was 331 days in the BEV arm and 460 days in the FTM arm. At time of recurrence, 21 pts (23.1%) received re-resection before the study inclusion (13/8 pts in BEV/FTM arms). Fifty-nine pts were enrolled in the BEV arm and 32 pts in the FTM arm. OS6 was 62.1% (95%CI:48.4-74.5) and 73.3% (95%CI:54.1-87.7), OS9 was 37.9% (95%CI:25.5-51.6) and 46.7% (95%CI:28.3-65.7) in the BEV and FTM arms, respectively. Median OS was 7.3 months (95%CI:5.8-9.2) in the BEV arm and 8.7 months (95%CI:6.3-15.4) in the FTM arm. PFS6 was 26.3% and 10.7%, respectively. In the BEV arm, OS6 and OS9 were 77.8% (95%CI:57.7-91.4) and 59.3% (95%CI:38.8-77.6) in pts =55 yrs, and were 48.4% (95%CI:30.1-66.9) and 19.3% (95%CI:7.4-37.5) in pts >55 yrs. HR for OS in BEV group for pts >55 yrs compared with pts =55 yrs was 2.0 (95%CI:1.0-4.1, p = 0.05). G3-4 toxicity: thrombocytopenia 0% vs 21.9%, neutropenia 1.7% vs 12.5%, intestinal perforation and cerebral ischaemia/hemorrhage 3.4% vs 0%, pulmonary thromboembolism 1.7% vs 0%, and acute myocardial infarction 1.7% vs 0%, in the Bev and FTM arms respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BEV in recurrent GBM showed survival rates superimposable with FTM.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/neuonc/nou237.11
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808631598</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1808631598</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1631-9e2be06d7d6277113ff95877f90a00cdd0b1c5d7fc81428f6be5ce1ebdb7cb303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1PwkAQhhujiYjePc4RDoWd1u22xwW2sEk_TNliwqWh222CAYqtHLz7w63iaWaSJ-87eSzrGckESeBOT-bSnPT01Fwcl00Qb6wBUse1qe95t3-7Y_sU2b310HXvhDhIPRxY31zZiBDKhEeQiXUeqTWEWRqDWgnIeLJIY7kVC3hd8bUAKUFlskf5hmdiCaM4cihzgzG8SbWCmdjwudzmMZ_BqD_GkGYQpkrE-VrJRMAoVPEYZNJXzfMsE4mC5Sx-tO7q3aEzT_9zaOWhUPOVHaVLOeeRrdFz0Q6MUxriVazyHMYQ3boOqM9YHZAdIbqqSImaVqzWPr44fu2VhmqDpqxKpkuXuENrdM09t83HxXSfxXHfaXM47E6muXQF-sTvi2jg9yi5orptuq41dXFu98dd-1UgKX6FF1fhxVV40X_zA5Enaqs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1808631598</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>AT-11 FINAL RESULTS FROM THE RANDOMIZED PHASE II TRIAL AVAREG (ML25739) WITH BEVACIZUMAB (BEV) OR FOTEMUSTINE (FTM) IN RECURRENT GBM</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Brandes, A. A. ; Finocchiaro, G. ; Zagonel, V. ; Reni, M. ; Fabi, A. ; Caserta, C. ; Clavarezza, M. ; Maiello, E. ; Carteni, G. ; Rosti, G. ; Eoli, M. ; Lombardi, G. ; Monteforte, M. ; Agati, R. ; Eusebi, V. ; Galli, A. ; Doria, S. ; Franceschi, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brandes, A. A. ; Finocchiaro, G. ; Zagonel, V. ; Reni, M. ; Fabi, A. ; Caserta, C. ; Clavarezza, M. ; Maiello, E. ; Carteni, G. ; Rosti, G. ; Eoli, M. ; Lombardi, G. ; Monteforte, M. ; Agati, R. ; Eusebi, V. ; Galli, A. ; Doria, S. ; Franceschi, E.</creatorcontrib><description>AIM: The treatment of recurrent glioblastoma remains an open issue and the role of BEV has been largely debated since only few data compared this agent with the standard agents. METHODS: A multicenter, open-label, randomized (2:1), non-comparative phase II study (EudraCT:2011-001363-46; AVAREG-ML25739) with BEV 10 mg/m2 iv every 2 weeks or FTM 75 mg/m2 iv day 1-8-15 followed, after a 35 days interval, by FTM 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, was conducted. Primary endpoint was overall survival at 6 months (OS6). RESULTS: 91 pts with recurrent GBM were enrolled among 10 Italian centers between 11/2011 and 9/2012. Median age was 57 years (range:28-78), PS was 0/1/2 in 42/35/14 pts. All pts were treated with RT/TMZ accordingly with EORTC 26981-22981/NCIC-CE3. Time from diagnosis to 1st recurrence was 331 days in the BEV arm and 460 days in the FTM arm. At time of recurrence, 21 pts (23.1%) received re-resection before the study inclusion (13/8 pts in BEV/FTM arms). Fifty-nine pts were enrolled in the BEV arm and 32 pts in the FTM arm. OS6 was 62.1% (95%CI:48.4-74.5) and 73.3% (95%CI:54.1-87.7), OS9 was 37.9% (95%CI:25.5-51.6) and 46.7% (95%CI:28.3-65.7) in the BEV and FTM arms, respectively. Median OS was 7.3 months (95%CI:5.8-9.2) in the BEV arm and 8.7 months (95%CI:6.3-15.4) in the FTM arm. PFS6 was 26.3% and 10.7%, respectively. In the BEV arm, OS6 and OS9 were 77.8% (95%CI:57.7-91.4) and 59.3% (95%CI:38.8-77.6) in pts =55 yrs, and were 48.4% (95%CI:30.1-66.9) and 19.3% (95%CI:7.4-37.5) in pts &gt;55 yrs. HR for OS in BEV group for pts &gt;55 yrs compared with pts =55 yrs was 2.0 (95%CI:1.0-4.1, p = 0.05). G3-4 toxicity: thrombocytopenia 0% vs 21.9%, neutropenia 1.7% vs 12.5%, intestinal perforation and cerebral ischaemia/hemorrhage 3.4% vs 0%, pulmonary thromboembolism 1.7% vs 0%, and acute myocardial infarction 1.7% vs 0%, in the Bev and FTM arms respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BEV in recurrent GBM showed survival rates superimposable with FTM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-8517</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-5866</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nou237.11</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.), 2014-11, Vol.16 (suppl 5), p.v10-v10</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1631-9e2be06d7d6277113ff95877f90a00cdd0b1c5d7fc81428f6be5ce1ebdb7cb303</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brandes, A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finocchiaro, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zagonel, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reni, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caserta, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clavarezza, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maiello, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carteni, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosti, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eoli, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lombardi, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteforte, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agati, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eusebi, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galli, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doria, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franceschi, E.</creatorcontrib><title>AT-11 FINAL RESULTS FROM THE RANDOMIZED PHASE II TRIAL AVAREG (ML25739) WITH BEVACIZUMAB (BEV) OR FOTEMUSTINE (FTM) IN RECURRENT GBM</title><title>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)</title><description>AIM: The treatment of recurrent glioblastoma remains an open issue and the role of BEV has been largely debated since only few data compared this agent with the standard agents. METHODS: A multicenter, open-label, randomized (2:1), non-comparative phase II study (EudraCT:2011-001363-46; AVAREG-ML25739) with BEV 10 mg/m2 iv every 2 weeks or FTM 75 mg/m2 iv day 1-8-15 followed, after a 35 days interval, by FTM 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, was conducted. Primary endpoint was overall survival at 6 months (OS6). RESULTS: 91 pts with recurrent GBM were enrolled among 10 Italian centers between 11/2011 and 9/2012. Median age was 57 years (range:28-78), PS was 0/1/2 in 42/35/14 pts. All pts were treated with RT/TMZ accordingly with EORTC 26981-22981/NCIC-CE3. Time from diagnosis to 1st recurrence was 331 days in the BEV arm and 460 days in the FTM arm. At time of recurrence, 21 pts (23.1%) received re-resection before the study inclusion (13/8 pts in BEV/FTM arms). Fifty-nine pts were enrolled in the BEV arm and 32 pts in the FTM arm. OS6 was 62.1% (95%CI:48.4-74.5) and 73.3% (95%CI:54.1-87.7), OS9 was 37.9% (95%CI:25.5-51.6) and 46.7% (95%CI:28.3-65.7) in the BEV and FTM arms, respectively. Median OS was 7.3 months (95%CI:5.8-9.2) in the BEV arm and 8.7 months (95%CI:6.3-15.4) in the FTM arm. PFS6 was 26.3% and 10.7%, respectively. In the BEV arm, OS6 and OS9 were 77.8% (95%CI:57.7-91.4) and 59.3% (95%CI:38.8-77.6) in pts =55 yrs, and were 48.4% (95%CI:30.1-66.9) and 19.3% (95%CI:7.4-37.5) in pts &gt;55 yrs. HR for OS in BEV group for pts &gt;55 yrs compared with pts =55 yrs was 2.0 (95%CI:1.0-4.1, p = 0.05). G3-4 toxicity: thrombocytopenia 0% vs 21.9%, neutropenia 1.7% vs 12.5%, intestinal perforation and cerebral ischaemia/hemorrhage 3.4% vs 0%, pulmonary thromboembolism 1.7% vs 0%, and acute myocardial infarction 1.7% vs 0%, in the Bev and FTM arms respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BEV in recurrent GBM showed survival rates superimposable with FTM.</description><issn>1522-8517</issn><issn>1523-5866</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkE1PwkAQhhujiYjePc4RDoWd1u22xwW2sEk_TNliwqWh222CAYqtHLz7w63iaWaSJ-87eSzrGckESeBOT-bSnPT01Fwcl00Qb6wBUse1qe95t3-7Y_sU2b310HXvhDhIPRxY31zZiBDKhEeQiXUeqTWEWRqDWgnIeLJIY7kVC3hd8bUAKUFlskf5hmdiCaM4cihzgzG8SbWCmdjwudzmMZ_BqD_GkGYQpkrE-VrJRMAoVPEYZNJXzfMsE4mC5Sx-tO7q3aEzT_9zaOWhUPOVHaVLOeeRrdFz0Q6MUxriVazyHMYQ3boOqM9YHZAdIbqqSImaVqzWPr44fu2VhmqDpqxKpkuXuENrdM09t83HxXSfxXHfaXM47E6muXQF-sTvi2jg9yi5orptuq41dXFu98dd-1UgKX6FF1fhxVV40X_zA5Enaqs</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Brandes, A. A.</creator><creator>Finocchiaro, G.</creator><creator>Zagonel, V.</creator><creator>Reni, M.</creator><creator>Fabi, A.</creator><creator>Caserta, C.</creator><creator>Clavarezza, M.</creator><creator>Maiello, E.</creator><creator>Carteni, G.</creator><creator>Rosti, G.</creator><creator>Eoli, M.</creator><creator>Lombardi, G.</creator><creator>Monteforte, M.</creator><creator>Agati, R.</creator><creator>Eusebi, V.</creator><creator>Galli, A.</creator><creator>Doria, S.</creator><creator>Franceschi, E.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>AT-11 FINAL RESULTS FROM THE RANDOMIZED PHASE II TRIAL AVAREG (ML25739) WITH BEVACIZUMAB (BEV) OR FOTEMUSTINE (FTM) IN RECURRENT GBM</title><author>Brandes, A. A. ; Finocchiaro, G. ; Zagonel, V. ; Reni, M. ; Fabi, A. ; Caserta, C. ; Clavarezza, M. ; Maiello, E. ; Carteni, G. ; Rosti, G. ; Eoli, M. ; Lombardi, G. ; Monteforte, M. ; Agati, R. ; Eusebi, V. ; Galli, A. ; Doria, S. ; Franceschi, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1631-9e2be06d7d6277113ff95877f90a00cdd0b1c5d7fc81428f6be5ce1ebdb7cb303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brandes, A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finocchiaro, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zagonel, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reni, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caserta, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clavarezza, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maiello, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carteni, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosti, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eoli, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lombardi, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteforte, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agati, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eusebi, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galli, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doria, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franceschi, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brandes, A. A.</au><au>Finocchiaro, G.</au><au>Zagonel, V.</au><au>Reni, M.</au><au>Fabi, A.</au><au>Caserta, C.</au><au>Clavarezza, M.</au><au>Maiello, E.</au><au>Carteni, G.</au><au>Rosti, G.</au><au>Eoli, M.</au><au>Lombardi, G.</au><au>Monteforte, M.</au><au>Agati, R.</au><au>Eusebi, V.</au><au>Galli, A.</au><au>Doria, S.</au><au>Franceschi, E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>AT-11 FINAL RESULTS FROM THE RANDOMIZED PHASE II TRIAL AVAREG (ML25739) WITH BEVACIZUMAB (BEV) OR FOTEMUSTINE (FTM) IN RECURRENT GBM</atitle><jtitle>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>suppl 5</issue><spage>v10</spage><epage>v10</epage><pages>v10-v10</pages><issn>1522-8517</issn><eissn>1523-5866</eissn><abstract>AIM: The treatment of recurrent glioblastoma remains an open issue and the role of BEV has been largely debated since only few data compared this agent with the standard agents. METHODS: A multicenter, open-label, randomized (2:1), non-comparative phase II study (EudraCT:2011-001363-46; AVAREG-ML25739) with BEV 10 mg/m2 iv every 2 weeks or FTM 75 mg/m2 iv day 1-8-15 followed, after a 35 days interval, by FTM 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, was conducted. Primary endpoint was overall survival at 6 months (OS6). RESULTS: 91 pts with recurrent GBM were enrolled among 10 Italian centers between 11/2011 and 9/2012. Median age was 57 years (range:28-78), PS was 0/1/2 in 42/35/14 pts. All pts were treated with RT/TMZ accordingly with EORTC 26981-22981/NCIC-CE3. Time from diagnosis to 1st recurrence was 331 days in the BEV arm and 460 days in the FTM arm. At time of recurrence, 21 pts (23.1%) received re-resection before the study inclusion (13/8 pts in BEV/FTM arms). Fifty-nine pts were enrolled in the BEV arm and 32 pts in the FTM arm. OS6 was 62.1% (95%CI:48.4-74.5) and 73.3% (95%CI:54.1-87.7), OS9 was 37.9% (95%CI:25.5-51.6) and 46.7% (95%CI:28.3-65.7) in the BEV and FTM arms, respectively. Median OS was 7.3 months (95%CI:5.8-9.2) in the BEV arm and 8.7 months (95%CI:6.3-15.4) in the FTM arm. PFS6 was 26.3% and 10.7%, respectively. In the BEV arm, OS6 and OS9 were 77.8% (95%CI:57.7-91.4) and 59.3% (95%CI:38.8-77.6) in pts =55 yrs, and were 48.4% (95%CI:30.1-66.9) and 19.3% (95%CI:7.4-37.5) in pts &gt;55 yrs. HR for OS in BEV group for pts &gt;55 yrs compared with pts =55 yrs was 2.0 (95%CI:1.0-4.1, p = 0.05). G3-4 toxicity: thrombocytopenia 0% vs 21.9%, neutropenia 1.7% vs 12.5%, intestinal perforation and cerebral ischaemia/hemorrhage 3.4% vs 0%, pulmonary thromboembolism 1.7% vs 0%, and acute myocardial infarction 1.7% vs 0%, in the Bev and FTM arms respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BEV in recurrent GBM showed survival rates superimposable with FTM.</abstract><doi>10.1093/neuonc/nou237.11</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1522-8517
ispartof Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.), 2014-11, Vol.16 (suppl 5), p.v10-v10
issn 1522-8517
1523-5866
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808631598
source Oxford Journals Online; PubMed Central
title AT-11 FINAL RESULTS FROM THE RANDOMIZED PHASE II TRIAL AVAREG (ML25739) WITH BEVACIZUMAB (BEV) OR FOTEMUSTINE (FTM) IN RECURRENT GBM
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-22T03%3A52%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=AT-11%20FINAL%20RESULTS%20FROM%20THE%20RANDOMIZED%20PHASE%20II%20TRIAL%20AVAREG%20(ML25739)%20WITH%20BEVACIZUMAB%20(BEV)%20OR%20FOTEMUSTINE%20(FTM)%20IN%20RECURRENT%20GBM&rft.jtitle=Neuro-oncology%20(Charlottesville,%20Va.)&rft.au=Brandes,%20A.%20A.&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=suppl%205&rft.spage=v10&rft.epage=v10&rft.pages=v10-v10&rft.issn=1522-8517&rft.eissn=1523-5866&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/neuonc/nou237.11&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1808631598%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1631-9e2be06d7d6277113ff95877f90a00cdd0b1c5d7fc81428f6be5ce1ebdb7cb303%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1808631598&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true