Loading…
AT-11 FINAL RESULTS FROM THE RANDOMIZED PHASE II TRIAL AVAREG (ML25739) WITH BEVACIZUMAB (BEV) OR FOTEMUSTINE (FTM) IN RECURRENT GBM
AIM: The treatment of recurrent glioblastoma remains an open issue and the role of BEV has been largely debated since only few data compared this agent with the standard agents. METHODS: A multicenter, open-label, randomized (2:1), non-comparative phase II study (EudraCT:2011-001363-46; AVAREG-ML257...
Saved in:
Published in: | Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.) Va.), 2014-11, Vol.16 (suppl 5), p.v10-v10 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1631-9e2be06d7d6277113ff95877f90a00cdd0b1c5d7fc81428f6be5ce1ebdb7cb303 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | v10 |
container_issue | suppl 5 |
container_start_page | v10 |
container_title | Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.) |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Brandes, A. A. Finocchiaro, G. Zagonel, V. Reni, M. Fabi, A. Caserta, C. Clavarezza, M. Maiello, E. Carteni, G. Rosti, G. Eoli, M. Lombardi, G. Monteforte, M. Agati, R. Eusebi, V. Galli, A. Doria, S. Franceschi, E. |
description | AIM: The treatment of recurrent glioblastoma remains an open issue and the role of BEV has been largely debated since only few data compared this agent with the standard agents. METHODS: A multicenter, open-label, randomized (2:1), non-comparative phase II study (EudraCT:2011-001363-46; AVAREG-ML25739) with BEV 10 mg/m2 iv every 2 weeks or FTM 75 mg/m2 iv day 1-8-15 followed, after a 35 days interval, by FTM 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, was conducted. Primary endpoint was overall survival at 6 months (OS6). RESULTS: 91 pts with recurrent GBM were enrolled among 10 Italian centers between 11/2011 and 9/2012. Median age was 57 years (range:28-78), PS was 0/1/2 in 42/35/14 pts. All pts were treated with RT/TMZ accordingly with EORTC 26981-22981/NCIC-CE3. Time from diagnosis to 1st recurrence was 331 days in the BEV arm and 460 days in the FTM arm. At time of recurrence, 21 pts (23.1%) received re-resection before the study inclusion (13/8 pts in BEV/FTM arms). Fifty-nine pts were enrolled in the BEV arm and 32 pts in the FTM arm. OS6 was 62.1% (95%CI:48.4-74.5) and 73.3% (95%CI:54.1-87.7), OS9 was 37.9% (95%CI:25.5-51.6) and 46.7% (95%CI:28.3-65.7) in the BEV and FTM arms, respectively. Median OS was 7.3 months (95%CI:5.8-9.2) in the BEV arm and 8.7 months (95%CI:6.3-15.4) in the FTM arm. PFS6 was 26.3% and 10.7%, respectively. In the BEV arm, OS6 and OS9 were 77.8% (95%CI:57.7-91.4) and 59.3% (95%CI:38.8-77.6) in pts =55 yrs, and were 48.4% (95%CI:30.1-66.9) and 19.3% (95%CI:7.4-37.5) in pts >55 yrs. HR for OS in BEV group for pts >55 yrs compared with pts =55 yrs was 2.0 (95%CI:1.0-4.1, p = 0.05). G3-4 toxicity: thrombocytopenia 0% vs 21.9%, neutropenia 1.7% vs 12.5%, intestinal perforation and cerebral ischaemia/hemorrhage 3.4% vs 0%, pulmonary thromboembolism 1.7% vs 0%, and acute myocardial infarction 1.7% vs 0%, in the Bev and FTM arms respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BEV in recurrent GBM showed survival rates superimposable with FTM. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/neuonc/nou237.11 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808631598</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1808631598</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1631-9e2be06d7d6277113ff95877f90a00cdd0b1c5d7fc81428f6be5ce1ebdb7cb303</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1PwkAQhhujiYjePc4RDoWd1u22xwW2sEk_TNliwqWh222CAYqtHLz7w63iaWaSJ-87eSzrGckESeBOT-bSnPT01Fwcl00Qb6wBUse1qe95t3-7Y_sU2b310HXvhDhIPRxY31zZiBDKhEeQiXUeqTWEWRqDWgnIeLJIY7kVC3hd8bUAKUFlskf5hmdiCaM4cihzgzG8SbWCmdjwudzmMZ_BqD_GkGYQpkrE-VrJRMAoVPEYZNJXzfMsE4mC5Sx-tO7q3aEzT_9zaOWhUPOVHaVLOeeRrdFz0Q6MUxriVazyHMYQ3boOqM9YHZAdIbqqSImaVqzWPr44fu2VhmqDpqxKpkuXuENrdM09t83HxXSfxXHfaXM47E6muXQF-sTvi2jg9yi5orptuq41dXFu98dd-1UgKX6FF1fhxVV40X_zA5Enaqs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1808631598</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>AT-11 FINAL RESULTS FROM THE RANDOMIZED PHASE II TRIAL AVAREG (ML25739) WITH BEVACIZUMAB (BEV) OR FOTEMUSTINE (FTM) IN RECURRENT GBM</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Brandes, A. A. ; Finocchiaro, G. ; Zagonel, V. ; Reni, M. ; Fabi, A. ; Caserta, C. ; Clavarezza, M. ; Maiello, E. ; Carteni, G. ; Rosti, G. ; Eoli, M. ; Lombardi, G. ; Monteforte, M. ; Agati, R. ; Eusebi, V. ; Galli, A. ; Doria, S. ; Franceschi, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brandes, A. A. ; Finocchiaro, G. ; Zagonel, V. ; Reni, M. ; Fabi, A. ; Caserta, C. ; Clavarezza, M. ; Maiello, E. ; Carteni, G. ; Rosti, G. ; Eoli, M. ; Lombardi, G. ; Monteforte, M. ; Agati, R. ; Eusebi, V. ; Galli, A. ; Doria, S. ; Franceschi, E.</creatorcontrib><description>AIM: The treatment of recurrent glioblastoma remains an open issue and the role of BEV has been largely debated since only few data compared this agent with the standard agents. METHODS: A multicenter, open-label, randomized (2:1), non-comparative phase II study (EudraCT:2011-001363-46; AVAREG-ML25739) with BEV 10 mg/m2 iv every 2 weeks or FTM 75 mg/m2 iv day 1-8-15 followed, after a 35 days interval, by FTM 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, was conducted. Primary endpoint was overall survival at 6 months (OS6). RESULTS: 91 pts with recurrent GBM were enrolled among 10 Italian centers between 11/2011 and 9/2012. Median age was 57 years (range:28-78), PS was 0/1/2 in 42/35/14 pts. All pts were treated with RT/TMZ accordingly with EORTC 26981-22981/NCIC-CE3. Time from diagnosis to 1st recurrence was 331 days in the BEV arm and 460 days in the FTM arm. At time of recurrence, 21 pts (23.1%) received re-resection before the study inclusion (13/8 pts in BEV/FTM arms). Fifty-nine pts were enrolled in the BEV arm and 32 pts in the FTM arm. OS6 was 62.1% (95%CI:48.4-74.5) and 73.3% (95%CI:54.1-87.7), OS9 was 37.9% (95%CI:25.5-51.6) and 46.7% (95%CI:28.3-65.7) in the BEV and FTM arms, respectively. Median OS was 7.3 months (95%CI:5.8-9.2) in the BEV arm and 8.7 months (95%CI:6.3-15.4) in the FTM arm. PFS6 was 26.3% and 10.7%, respectively. In the BEV arm, OS6 and OS9 were 77.8% (95%CI:57.7-91.4) and 59.3% (95%CI:38.8-77.6) in pts =55 yrs, and were 48.4% (95%CI:30.1-66.9) and 19.3% (95%CI:7.4-37.5) in pts >55 yrs. HR for OS in BEV group for pts >55 yrs compared with pts =55 yrs was 2.0 (95%CI:1.0-4.1, p = 0.05). G3-4 toxicity: thrombocytopenia 0% vs 21.9%, neutropenia 1.7% vs 12.5%, intestinal perforation and cerebral ischaemia/hemorrhage 3.4% vs 0%, pulmonary thromboembolism 1.7% vs 0%, and acute myocardial infarction 1.7% vs 0%, in the Bev and FTM arms respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BEV in recurrent GBM showed survival rates superimposable with FTM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1522-8517</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-5866</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/nou237.11</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.), 2014-11, Vol.16 (suppl 5), p.v10-v10</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1631-9e2be06d7d6277113ff95877f90a00cdd0b1c5d7fc81428f6be5ce1ebdb7cb303</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brandes, A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finocchiaro, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zagonel, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reni, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caserta, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clavarezza, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maiello, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carteni, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosti, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eoli, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lombardi, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteforte, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agati, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eusebi, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galli, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doria, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franceschi, E.</creatorcontrib><title>AT-11 FINAL RESULTS FROM THE RANDOMIZED PHASE II TRIAL AVAREG (ML25739) WITH BEVACIZUMAB (BEV) OR FOTEMUSTINE (FTM) IN RECURRENT GBM</title><title>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)</title><description>AIM: The treatment of recurrent glioblastoma remains an open issue and the role of BEV has been largely debated since only few data compared this agent with the standard agents. METHODS: A multicenter, open-label, randomized (2:1), non-comparative phase II study (EudraCT:2011-001363-46; AVAREG-ML25739) with BEV 10 mg/m2 iv every 2 weeks or FTM 75 mg/m2 iv day 1-8-15 followed, after a 35 days interval, by FTM 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, was conducted. Primary endpoint was overall survival at 6 months (OS6). RESULTS: 91 pts with recurrent GBM were enrolled among 10 Italian centers between 11/2011 and 9/2012. Median age was 57 years (range:28-78), PS was 0/1/2 in 42/35/14 pts. All pts were treated with RT/TMZ accordingly with EORTC 26981-22981/NCIC-CE3. Time from diagnosis to 1st recurrence was 331 days in the BEV arm and 460 days in the FTM arm. At time of recurrence, 21 pts (23.1%) received re-resection before the study inclusion (13/8 pts in BEV/FTM arms). Fifty-nine pts were enrolled in the BEV arm and 32 pts in the FTM arm. OS6 was 62.1% (95%CI:48.4-74.5) and 73.3% (95%CI:54.1-87.7), OS9 was 37.9% (95%CI:25.5-51.6) and 46.7% (95%CI:28.3-65.7) in the BEV and FTM arms, respectively. Median OS was 7.3 months (95%CI:5.8-9.2) in the BEV arm and 8.7 months (95%CI:6.3-15.4) in the FTM arm. PFS6 was 26.3% and 10.7%, respectively. In the BEV arm, OS6 and OS9 were 77.8% (95%CI:57.7-91.4) and 59.3% (95%CI:38.8-77.6) in pts =55 yrs, and were 48.4% (95%CI:30.1-66.9) and 19.3% (95%CI:7.4-37.5) in pts >55 yrs. HR for OS in BEV group for pts >55 yrs compared with pts =55 yrs was 2.0 (95%CI:1.0-4.1, p = 0.05). G3-4 toxicity: thrombocytopenia 0% vs 21.9%, neutropenia 1.7% vs 12.5%, intestinal perforation and cerebral ischaemia/hemorrhage 3.4% vs 0%, pulmonary thromboembolism 1.7% vs 0%, and acute myocardial infarction 1.7% vs 0%, in the Bev and FTM arms respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BEV in recurrent GBM showed survival rates superimposable with FTM.</description><issn>1522-8517</issn><issn>1523-5866</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkE1PwkAQhhujiYjePc4RDoWd1u22xwW2sEk_TNliwqWh222CAYqtHLz7w63iaWaSJ-87eSzrGckESeBOT-bSnPT01Fwcl00Qb6wBUse1qe95t3-7Y_sU2b310HXvhDhIPRxY31zZiBDKhEeQiXUeqTWEWRqDWgnIeLJIY7kVC3hd8bUAKUFlskf5hmdiCaM4cihzgzG8SbWCmdjwudzmMZ_BqD_GkGYQpkrE-VrJRMAoVPEYZNJXzfMsE4mC5Sx-tO7q3aEzT_9zaOWhUPOVHaVLOeeRrdFz0Q6MUxriVazyHMYQ3boOqM9YHZAdIbqqSImaVqzWPr44fu2VhmqDpqxKpkuXuENrdM09t83HxXSfxXHfaXM47E6muXQF-sTvi2jg9yi5orptuq41dXFu98dd-1UgKX6FF1fhxVV40X_zA5Enaqs</recordid><startdate>20141101</startdate><enddate>20141101</enddate><creator>Brandes, A. A.</creator><creator>Finocchiaro, G.</creator><creator>Zagonel, V.</creator><creator>Reni, M.</creator><creator>Fabi, A.</creator><creator>Caserta, C.</creator><creator>Clavarezza, M.</creator><creator>Maiello, E.</creator><creator>Carteni, G.</creator><creator>Rosti, G.</creator><creator>Eoli, M.</creator><creator>Lombardi, G.</creator><creator>Monteforte, M.</creator><creator>Agati, R.</creator><creator>Eusebi, V.</creator><creator>Galli, A.</creator><creator>Doria, S.</creator><creator>Franceschi, E.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20141101</creationdate><title>AT-11 FINAL RESULTS FROM THE RANDOMIZED PHASE II TRIAL AVAREG (ML25739) WITH BEVACIZUMAB (BEV) OR FOTEMUSTINE (FTM) IN RECURRENT GBM</title><author>Brandes, A. A. ; Finocchiaro, G. ; Zagonel, V. ; Reni, M. ; Fabi, A. ; Caserta, C. ; Clavarezza, M. ; Maiello, E. ; Carteni, G. ; Rosti, G. ; Eoli, M. ; Lombardi, G. ; Monteforte, M. ; Agati, R. ; Eusebi, V. ; Galli, A. ; Doria, S. ; Franceschi, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1631-9e2be06d7d6277113ff95877f90a00cdd0b1c5d7fc81428f6be5ce1ebdb7cb303</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brandes, A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finocchiaro, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zagonel, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reni, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabi, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caserta, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clavarezza, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maiello, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carteni, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosti, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eoli, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lombardi, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monteforte, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agati, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eusebi, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galli, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doria, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Franceschi, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brandes, A. A.</au><au>Finocchiaro, G.</au><au>Zagonel, V.</au><au>Reni, M.</au><au>Fabi, A.</au><au>Caserta, C.</au><au>Clavarezza, M.</au><au>Maiello, E.</au><au>Carteni, G.</au><au>Rosti, G.</au><au>Eoli, M.</au><au>Lombardi, G.</au><au>Monteforte, M.</au><au>Agati, R.</au><au>Eusebi, V.</au><au>Galli, A.</au><au>Doria, S.</au><au>Franceschi, E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>AT-11 FINAL RESULTS FROM THE RANDOMIZED PHASE II TRIAL AVAREG (ML25739) WITH BEVACIZUMAB (BEV) OR FOTEMUSTINE (FTM) IN RECURRENT GBM</atitle><jtitle>Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.)</jtitle><date>2014-11-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>suppl 5</issue><spage>v10</spage><epage>v10</epage><pages>v10-v10</pages><issn>1522-8517</issn><eissn>1523-5866</eissn><abstract>AIM: The treatment of recurrent glioblastoma remains an open issue and the role of BEV has been largely debated since only few data compared this agent with the standard agents. METHODS: A multicenter, open-label, randomized (2:1), non-comparative phase II study (EudraCT:2011-001363-46; AVAREG-ML25739) with BEV 10 mg/m2 iv every 2 weeks or FTM 75 mg/m2 iv day 1-8-15 followed, after a 35 days interval, by FTM 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, was conducted. Primary endpoint was overall survival at 6 months (OS6). RESULTS: 91 pts with recurrent GBM were enrolled among 10 Italian centers between 11/2011 and 9/2012. Median age was 57 years (range:28-78), PS was 0/1/2 in 42/35/14 pts. All pts were treated with RT/TMZ accordingly with EORTC 26981-22981/NCIC-CE3. Time from diagnosis to 1st recurrence was 331 days in the BEV arm and 460 days in the FTM arm. At time of recurrence, 21 pts (23.1%) received re-resection before the study inclusion (13/8 pts in BEV/FTM arms). Fifty-nine pts were enrolled in the BEV arm and 32 pts in the FTM arm. OS6 was 62.1% (95%CI:48.4-74.5) and 73.3% (95%CI:54.1-87.7), OS9 was 37.9% (95%CI:25.5-51.6) and 46.7% (95%CI:28.3-65.7) in the BEV and FTM arms, respectively. Median OS was 7.3 months (95%CI:5.8-9.2) in the BEV arm and 8.7 months (95%CI:6.3-15.4) in the FTM arm. PFS6 was 26.3% and 10.7%, respectively. In the BEV arm, OS6 and OS9 were 77.8% (95%CI:57.7-91.4) and 59.3% (95%CI:38.8-77.6) in pts =55 yrs, and were 48.4% (95%CI:30.1-66.9) and 19.3% (95%CI:7.4-37.5) in pts >55 yrs. HR for OS in BEV group for pts >55 yrs compared with pts =55 yrs was 2.0 (95%CI:1.0-4.1, p = 0.05). G3-4 toxicity: thrombocytopenia 0% vs 21.9%, neutropenia 1.7% vs 12.5%, intestinal perforation and cerebral ischaemia/hemorrhage 3.4% vs 0%, pulmonary thromboembolism 1.7% vs 0%, and acute myocardial infarction 1.7% vs 0%, in the Bev and FTM arms respectively. CONCLUSIONS: BEV in recurrent GBM showed survival rates superimposable with FTM.</abstract><doi>10.1093/neuonc/nou237.11</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1522-8517 |
ispartof | Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.), 2014-11, Vol.16 (suppl 5), p.v10-v10 |
issn | 1522-8517 1523-5866 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808631598 |
source | Oxford Journals Online; PubMed Central |
title | AT-11 FINAL RESULTS FROM THE RANDOMIZED PHASE II TRIAL AVAREG (ML25739) WITH BEVACIZUMAB (BEV) OR FOTEMUSTINE (FTM) IN RECURRENT GBM |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-22T03%3A52%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=AT-11%20FINAL%20RESULTS%20FROM%20THE%20RANDOMIZED%20PHASE%20II%20TRIAL%20AVAREG%20(ML25739)%20WITH%20BEVACIZUMAB%20(BEV)%20OR%20FOTEMUSTINE%20(FTM)%20IN%20RECURRENT%20GBM&rft.jtitle=Neuro-oncology%20(Charlottesville,%20Va.)&rft.au=Brandes,%20A.%20A.&rft.date=2014-11-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=suppl%205&rft.spage=v10&rft.epage=v10&rft.pages=v10-v10&rft.issn=1522-8517&rft.eissn=1523-5866&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/neuonc/nou237.11&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1808631598%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1631-9e2be06d7d6277113ff95877f90a00cdd0b1c5d7fc81428f6be5ce1ebdb7cb303%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1808631598&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |