Loading…
Estimating compensation payments for on-farm conservation of agricultural biodiversity in developing countries
This paper examines the role of direct compensation payments for agrobiodiversity conservation, using minor millet landraces in India as an example. The cost of farmer participation in a hypothetical ‘payments for agrobiodiversity conservation services’ (PACS) scheme is estimated using a stated pref...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecological economics 2013-03, Vol.87, p.110-123 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-48548b27dd05800d4f09688a64270ec3b5fa2f30b45ed5ded8a6cd651d9ffb273 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-48548b27dd05800d4f09688a64270ec3b5fa2f30b45ed5ded8a6cd651d9ffb273 |
container_end_page | 123 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 110 |
container_title | Ecological economics |
container_volume | 87 |
creator | Krishna, Vijesh V. Drucker, Adam G. Pascual, Unai Raghu, Prabhakaran T. King, E.D. Israel Oliver |
description | This paper examines the role of direct compensation payments for agrobiodiversity conservation, using minor millet landraces in India as an example. The cost of farmer participation in a hypothetical ‘payments for agrobiodiversity conservation services’ (PACS) scheme is estimated using a stated preference valuation approach. Significant inter-crop and inter-varietal differences are observed with respect to consumption values, upon which the compensation demanded by farm households is shown to primarily depend. Drawing on a categorisation of consumption values and farmer preferences, the paper points to the importance of simultaneously considering a range of potential interventions in order to conserve a priority portfolio of agrobiodiverse resources in predominantly subsistence-based agricultural systems. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.013 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808665036</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S092180091200496X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1808665036</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-48548b27dd05800d4f09688a64270ec3b5fa2f30b45ed5ded8a6cd651d9ffb273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk2LFDEQhoMoOK7-BemL4KXHSuej0zdl2VVhwYueQyapLBm6kzbpHph_b8Zeve5AhRDy1FtF1UvIewp7ClR-Ou7RprGeuO-AdvsaQNkLsqOqZ62kIF-SHQwdbRXA8Jq8KeUIAFIObEfiXVnCZJYQHxubphljqY8Um9mcJ4xLaXzKTYqtN3mqRCyYTxuRfGMec7DruKzZjM0hJBdOmEtYzk2IjcMTjmnelNe45IDlLXnlzVjw3dN9Q37d3_28_dY-_Pj6_fbLQ2trV0vLleDq0PXOgahNO-5hkEoZybse0LKD8KbzDA5coBMOXf2yTgrqBu9rHrshHzfdOaffK5ZFT6FYHEcTMa1FUwVKSgFMPo8KxhWnnaJXoAD9QFl_RQOcKTEoOvBr0H6QQlylWudTF_53AnJDbU6lZPR6znXR-awp6Itv9FH_842--EbXqL6piR-eaphizeiziTaU_9ldTzn04jKMzxuHdY-ngFkXGzBadCGjXbRL4blSfwBbRNyo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1427010627</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimating compensation payments for on-farm conservation of agricultural biodiversity in developing countries</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Krishna, Vijesh V. ; Drucker, Adam G. ; Pascual, Unai ; Raghu, Prabhakaran T. ; King, E.D. Israel Oliver</creator><creatorcontrib>Krishna, Vijesh V. ; Drucker, Adam G. ; Pascual, Unai ; Raghu, Prabhakaran T. ; King, E.D. Israel Oliver</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines the role of direct compensation payments for agrobiodiversity conservation, using minor millet landraces in India as an example. The cost of farmer participation in a hypothetical ‘payments for agrobiodiversity conservation services’ (PACS) scheme is estimated using a stated preference valuation approach. Significant inter-crop and inter-varietal differences are observed with respect to consumption values, upon which the compensation demanded by farm households is shown to primarily depend. Drawing on a categorisation of consumption values and farmer preferences, the paper points to the importance of simultaneously considering a range of potential interventions in order to conserve a priority portfolio of agrobiodiverse resources in predominantly subsistence-based agricultural systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-8009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agricultural and farming systems ; Agricultural systems ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Consumption ; Consumption utility ; Contingent valuation ; Cost ; Developing countries ; Farmers ; Farms ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agroecology ; General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development ; Households ; Incentive mechanisms ; India ; Lobbying ; Nature conservation ; Opportunity cost of on-farm conservation ; Payment ; Payments ; Payments for ecosystem services ; Synecology ; Valuation ; Willingness to accept</subject><ispartof>Ecological economics, 2013-03, Vol.87, p.110-123</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-48548b27dd05800d4f09688a64270ec3b5fa2f30b45ed5ded8a6cd651d9ffb273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-48548b27dd05800d4f09688a64270ec3b5fa2f30b45ed5ded8a6cd651d9ffb273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865,27924,27925,33224</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27140751$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krishna, Vijesh V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drucker, Adam G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pascual, Unai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raghu, Prabhakaran T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, E.D. Israel Oliver</creatorcontrib><title>Estimating compensation payments for on-farm conservation of agricultural biodiversity in developing countries</title><title>Ecological economics</title><description>This paper examines the role of direct compensation payments for agrobiodiversity conservation, using minor millet landraces in India as an example. The cost of farmer participation in a hypothetical ‘payments for agrobiodiversity conservation services’ (PACS) scheme is estimated using a stated preference valuation approach. Significant inter-crop and inter-varietal differences are observed with respect to consumption values, upon which the compensation demanded by farm households is shown to primarily depend. Drawing on a categorisation of consumption values and farmer preferences, the paper points to the importance of simultaneously considering a range of potential interventions in order to conserve a priority portfolio of agrobiodiverse resources in predominantly subsistence-based agricultural systems.</description><subject>Agricultural and farming systems</subject><subject>Agricultural systems</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Consumption utility</subject><subject>Contingent valuation</subject><subject>Cost</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agroecology</subject><subject>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Incentive mechanisms</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Lobbying</subject><subject>Nature conservation</subject><subject>Opportunity cost of on-farm conservation</subject><subject>Payment</subject><subject>Payments</subject><subject>Payments for ecosystem services</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><subject>Willingness to accept</subject><issn>0921-8009</issn><issn>1873-6106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk2LFDEQhoMoOK7-BemL4KXHSuej0zdl2VVhwYueQyapLBm6kzbpHph_b8Zeve5AhRDy1FtF1UvIewp7ClR-Ou7RprGeuO-AdvsaQNkLsqOqZ62kIF-SHQwdbRXA8Jq8KeUIAFIObEfiXVnCZJYQHxubphljqY8Um9mcJ4xLaXzKTYqtN3mqRCyYTxuRfGMec7DruKzZjM0hJBdOmEtYzk2IjcMTjmnelNe45IDlLXnlzVjw3dN9Q37d3_28_dY-_Pj6_fbLQ2trV0vLleDq0PXOgahNO-5hkEoZybse0LKD8KbzDA5coBMOXf2yTgrqBu9rHrshHzfdOaffK5ZFT6FYHEcTMa1FUwVKSgFMPo8KxhWnnaJXoAD9QFl_RQOcKTEoOvBr0H6QQlylWudTF_53AnJDbU6lZPR6znXR-awp6Itv9FH_842--EbXqL6piR-eaphizeiziTaU_9ldTzn04jKMzxuHdY-ngFkXGzBadCGjXbRL4blSfwBbRNyo</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Krishna, Vijesh V.</creator><creator>Drucker, Adam G.</creator><creator>Pascual, Unai</creator><creator>Raghu, Prabhakaran T.</creator><creator>King, E.D. Israel Oliver</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Estimating compensation payments for on-farm conservation of agricultural biodiversity in developing countries</title><author>Krishna, Vijesh V. ; Drucker, Adam G. ; Pascual, Unai ; Raghu, Prabhakaran T. ; King, E.D. Israel Oliver</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-48548b27dd05800d4f09688a64270ec3b5fa2f30b45ed5ded8a6cd651d9ffb273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Agricultural and farming systems</topic><topic>Agricultural systems</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Consumption utility</topic><topic>Contingent valuation</topic><topic>Cost</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agroecology</topic><topic>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Incentive mechanisms</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Lobbying</topic><topic>Nature conservation</topic><topic>Opportunity cost of on-farm conservation</topic><topic>Payment</topic><topic>Payments</topic><topic>Payments for ecosystem services</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><topic>Willingness to accept</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krishna, Vijesh V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drucker, Adam G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pascual, Unai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raghu, Prabhakaran T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, E.D. Israel Oliver</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Ecological economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krishna, Vijesh V.</au><au>Drucker, Adam G.</au><au>Pascual, Unai</au><au>Raghu, Prabhakaran T.</au><au>King, E.D. Israel Oliver</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimating compensation payments for on-farm conservation of agricultural biodiversity in developing countries</atitle><jtitle>Ecological economics</jtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>87</volume><spage>110</spage><epage>123</epage><pages>110-123</pages><issn>0921-8009</issn><eissn>1873-6106</eissn><abstract>This paper examines the role of direct compensation payments for agrobiodiversity conservation, using minor millet landraces in India as an example. The cost of farmer participation in a hypothetical ‘payments for agrobiodiversity conservation services’ (PACS) scheme is estimated using a stated preference valuation approach. Significant inter-crop and inter-varietal differences are observed with respect to consumption values, upon which the compensation demanded by farm households is shown to primarily depend. Drawing on a categorisation of consumption values and farmer preferences, the paper points to the importance of simultaneously considering a range of potential interventions in order to conserve a priority portfolio of agrobiodiverse resources in predominantly subsistence-based agricultural systems.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.013</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0921-8009 |
ispartof | Ecological economics, 2013-03, Vol.87, p.110-123 |
issn | 0921-8009 1873-6106 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808665036 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024; PAIS Index |
subjects | Agricultural and farming systems Agricultural systems Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Biodiversity Biological and medical sciences Consumption Consumption utility Contingent valuation Cost Developing countries Farmers Farms Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General agroecology General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping General agronomy. Plant production Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development Households Incentive mechanisms India Lobbying Nature conservation Opportunity cost of on-farm conservation Payment Payments Payments for ecosystem services Synecology Valuation Willingness to accept |
title | Estimating compensation payments for on-farm conservation of agricultural biodiversity in developing countries |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T11%3A29%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating%20compensation%20payments%20for%20on-farm%20conservation%20of%20agricultural%20biodiversity%20in%20developing%20countries&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20economics&rft.au=Krishna,%20Vijesh%20V.&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=87&rft.spage=110&rft.epage=123&rft.pages=110-123&rft.issn=0921-8009&rft.eissn=1873-6106&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1808665036%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-48548b27dd05800d4f09688a64270ec3b5fa2f30b45ed5ded8a6cd651d9ffb273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1427010627&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |