Loading…

Estimating compensation payments for on-farm conservation of agricultural biodiversity in developing countries

This paper examines the role of direct compensation payments for agrobiodiversity conservation, using minor millet landraces in India as an example. The cost of farmer participation in a hypothetical ‘payments for agrobiodiversity conservation services’ (PACS) scheme is estimated using a stated pref...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological economics 2013-03, Vol.87, p.110-123
Main Authors: Krishna, Vijesh V., Drucker, Adam G., Pascual, Unai, Raghu, Prabhakaran T., King, E.D. Israel Oliver
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-48548b27dd05800d4f09688a64270ec3b5fa2f30b45ed5ded8a6cd651d9ffb273
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-48548b27dd05800d4f09688a64270ec3b5fa2f30b45ed5ded8a6cd651d9ffb273
container_end_page 123
container_issue
container_start_page 110
container_title Ecological economics
container_volume 87
creator Krishna, Vijesh V.
Drucker, Adam G.
Pascual, Unai
Raghu, Prabhakaran T.
King, E.D. Israel Oliver
description This paper examines the role of direct compensation payments for agrobiodiversity conservation, using minor millet landraces in India as an example. The cost of farmer participation in a hypothetical ‘payments for agrobiodiversity conservation services’ (PACS) scheme is estimated using a stated preference valuation approach. Significant inter-crop and inter-varietal differences are observed with respect to consumption values, upon which the compensation demanded by farm households is shown to primarily depend. Drawing on a categorisation of consumption values and farmer preferences, the paper points to the importance of simultaneously considering a range of potential interventions in order to conserve a priority portfolio of agrobiodiverse resources in predominantly subsistence-based agricultural systems.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.013
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808665036</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S092180091200496X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1808665036</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-48548b27dd05800d4f09688a64270ec3b5fa2f30b45ed5ded8a6cd651d9ffb273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk2LFDEQhoMoOK7-BemL4KXHSuej0zdl2VVhwYueQyapLBm6kzbpHph_b8Zeve5AhRDy1FtF1UvIewp7ClR-Ou7RprGeuO-AdvsaQNkLsqOqZ62kIF-SHQwdbRXA8Jq8KeUIAFIObEfiXVnCZJYQHxubphljqY8Um9mcJ4xLaXzKTYqtN3mqRCyYTxuRfGMec7DruKzZjM0hJBdOmEtYzk2IjcMTjmnelNe45IDlLXnlzVjw3dN9Q37d3_28_dY-_Pj6_fbLQ2trV0vLleDq0PXOgahNO-5hkEoZybse0LKD8KbzDA5coBMOXf2yTgrqBu9rHrshHzfdOaffK5ZFT6FYHEcTMa1FUwVKSgFMPo8KxhWnnaJXoAD9QFl_RQOcKTEoOvBr0H6QQlylWudTF_53AnJDbU6lZPR6znXR-awp6Itv9FH_842--EbXqL6piR-eaphizeiziTaU_9ldTzn04jKMzxuHdY-ngFkXGzBadCGjXbRL4blSfwBbRNyo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1427010627</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimating compensation payments for on-farm conservation of agricultural biodiversity in developing countries</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Krishna, Vijesh V. ; Drucker, Adam G. ; Pascual, Unai ; Raghu, Prabhakaran T. ; King, E.D. Israel Oliver</creator><creatorcontrib>Krishna, Vijesh V. ; Drucker, Adam G. ; Pascual, Unai ; Raghu, Prabhakaran T. ; King, E.D. Israel Oliver</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines the role of direct compensation payments for agrobiodiversity conservation, using minor millet landraces in India as an example. The cost of farmer participation in a hypothetical ‘payments for agrobiodiversity conservation services’ (PACS) scheme is estimated using a stated preference valuation approach. Significant inter-crop and inter-varietal differences are observed with respect to consumption values, upon which the compensation demanded by farm households is shown to primarily depend. Drawing on a categorisation of consumption values and farmer preferences, the paper points to the importance of simultaneously considering a range of potential interventions in order to conserve a priority portfolio of agrobiodiverse resources in predominantly subsistence-based agricultural systems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-8009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agricultural and farming systems ; Agricultural systems ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Consumption ; Consumption utility ; Contingent valuation ; Cost ; Developing countries ; Farmers ; Farms ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agroecology ; General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development ; Households ; Incentive mechanisms ; India ; Lobbying ; Nature conservation ; Opportunity cost of on-farm conservation ; Payment ; Payments ; Payments for ecosystem services ; Synecology ; Valuation ; Willingness to accept</subject><ispartof>Ecological economics, 2013-03, Vol.87, p.110-123</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-48548b27dd05800d4f09688a64270ec3b5fa2f30b45ed5ded8a6cd651d9ffb273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-48548b27dd05800d4f09688a64270ec3b5fa2f30b45ed5ded8a6cd651d9ffb273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865,27924,27925,33224</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27140751$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krishna, Vijesh V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drucker, Adam G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pascual, Unai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raghu, Prabhakaran T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, E.D. Israel Oliver</creatorcontrib><title>Estimating compensation payments for on-farm conservation of agricultural biodiversity in developing countries</title><title>Ecological economics</title><description>This paper examines the role of direct compensation payments for agrobiodiversity conservation, using minor millet landraces in India as an example. The cost of farmer participation in a hypothetical ‘payments for agrobiodiversity conservation services’ (PACS) scheme is estimated using a stated preference valuation approach. Significant inter-crop and inter-varietal differences are observed with respect to consumption values, upon which the compensation demanded by farm households is shown to primarily depend. Drawing on a categorisation of consumption values and farmer preferences, the paper points to the importance of simultaneously considering a range of potential interventions in order to conserve a priority portfolio of agrobiodiverse resources in predominantly subsistence-based agricultural systems.</description><subject>Agricultural and farming systems</subject><subject>Agricultural systems</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Consumption</subject><subject>Consumption utility</subject><subject>Contingent valuation</subject><subject>Cost</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agroecology</subject><subject>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Incentive mechanisms</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Lobbying</subject><subject>Nature conservation</subject><subject>Opportunity cost of on-farm conservation</subject><subject>Payment</subject><subject>Payments</subject><subject>Payments for ecosystem services</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><subject>Valuation</subject><subject>Willingness to accept</subject><issn>0921-8009</issn><issn>1873-6106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkk2LFDEQhoMoOK7-BemL4KXHSuej0zdl2VVhwYueQyapLBm6kzbpHph_b8Zeve5AhRDy1FtF1UvIewp7ClR-Ou7RprGeuO-AdvsaQNkLsqOqZ62kIF-SHQwdbRXA8Jq8KeUIAFIObEfiXVnCZJYQHxubphljqY8Um9mcJ4xLaXzKTYqtN3mqRCyYTxuRfGMec7DruKzZjM0hJBdOmEtYzk2IjcMTjmnelNe45IDlLXnlzVjw3dN9Q37d3_28_dY-_Pj6_fbLQ2trV0vLleDq0PXOgahNO-5hkEoZybse0LKD8KbzDA5coBMOXf2yTgrqBu9rHrshHzfdOaffK5ZFT6FYHEcTMa1FUwVKSgFMPo8KxhWnnaJXoAD9QFl_RQOcKTEoOvBr0H6QQlylWudTF_53AnJDbU6lZPR6znXR-awp6Itv9FH_842--EbXqL6piR-eaphizeiziTaU_9ldTzn04jKMzxuHdY-ngFkXGzBadCGjXbRL4blSfwBbRNyo</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Krishna, Vijesh V.</creator><creator>Drucker, Adam G.</creator><creator>Pascual, Unai</creator><creator>Raghu, Prabhakaran T.</creator><creator>King, E.D. Israel Oliver</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Estimating compensation payments for on-farm conservation of agricultural biodiversity in developing countries</title><author>Krishna, Vijesh V. ; Drucker, Adam G. ; Pascual, Unai ; Raghu, Prabhakaran T. ; King, E.D. Israel Oliver</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-48548b27dd05800d4f09688a64270ec3b5fa2f30b45ed5ded8a6cd651d9ffb273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Agricultural and farming systems</topic><topic>Agricultural systems</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Consumption</topic><topic>Consumption utility</topic><topic>Contingent valuation</topic><topic>Cost</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agroecology</topic><topic>General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Incentive mechanisms</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Lobbying</topic><topic>Nature conservation</topic><topic>Opportunity cost of on-farm conservation</topic><topic>Payment</topic><topic>Payments</topic><topic>Payments for ecosystem services</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><topic>Valuation</topic><topic>Willingness to accept</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krishna, Vijesh V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drucker, Adam G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pascual, Unai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raghu, Prabhakaran T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, E.D. Israel Oliver</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Ecological economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krishna, Vijesh V.</au><au>Drucker, Adam G.</au><au>Pascual, Unai</au><au>Raghu, Prabhakaran T.</au><au>King, E.D. Israel Oliver</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimating compensation payments for on-farm conservation of agricultural biodiversity in developing countries</atitle><jtitle>Ecological economics</jtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>87</volume><spage>110</spage><epage>123</epage><pages>110-123</pages><issn>0921-8009</issn><eissn>1873-6106</eissn><abstract>This paper examines the role of direct compensation payments for agrobiodiversity conservation, using minor millet landraces in India as an example. The cost of farmer participation in a hypothetical ‘payments for agrobiodiversity conservation services’ (PACS) scheme is estimated using a stated preference valuation approach. Significant inter-crop and inter-varietal differences are observed with respect to consumption values, upon which the compensation demanded by farm households is shown to primarily depend. Drawing on a categorisation of consumption values and farmer preferences, the paper points to the importance of simultaneously considering a range of potential interventions in order to conserve a priority portfolio of agrobiodiverse resources in predominantly subsistence-based agricultural systems.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.013</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0921-8009
ispartof Ecological economics, 2013-03, Vol.87, p.110-123
issn 0921-8009
1873-6106
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808665036
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024; PAIS Index
subjects Agricultural and farming systems
Agricultural systems
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Biodiversity
Biological and medical sciences
Consumption
Consumption utility
Contingent valuation
Cost
Developing countries
Farmers
Farms
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agroecology
General agroecology. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development. Rural area planning. Landscaping
General agronomy. Plant production
Generalities. Agricultural and farming systems. Agricultural development
Households
Incentive mechanisms
India
Lobbying
Nature conservation
Opportunity cost of on-farm conservation
Payment
Payments
Payments for ecosystem services
Synecology
Valuation
Willingness to accept
title Estimating compensation payments for on-farm conservation of agricultural biodiversity in developing countries
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T11%3A29%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating%20compensation%20payments%20for%20on-farm%20conservation%20of%20agricultural%20biodiversity%20in%20developing%20countries&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20economics&rft.au=Krishna,%20Vijesh%20V.&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=87&rft.spage=110&rft.epage=123&rft.pages=110-123&rft.issn=0921-8009&rft.eissn=1873-6106&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1808665036%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c693t-48548b27dd05800d4f09688a64270ec3b5fa2f30b45ed5ded8a6cd651d9ffb273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1427010627&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true