Loading…
Exploring an environmental conflict from a capability perspective
Using the capability approach, we analyse a recent environmental conflict in the city of Leipzig, Germany. Following its concept of flood protection, a state authority felled thousands of trees in a highly popular nature protection area, which culminated in public protests and lawsuits. In analysing...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecological economics 2014-04, Vol.100, p.30-39 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-46f5218856faacb5c9af38cb2d025de88e5dee59ffb945ca85b3f6de60d8cf53 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-46f5218856faacb5c9af38cb2d025de88e5dee59ffb945ca85b3f6de60d8cf53 |
container_end_page | 39 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 30 |
container_title | Ecological economics |
container_volume | 100 |
creator | Griewald, Yuliana Rauschmayer, Felix |
description | Using the capability approach, we analyse a recent environmental conflict in the city of Leipzig, Germany. Following its concept of flood protection, a state authority felled thousands of trees in a highly popular nature protection area, which culminated in public protests and lawsuits. In analysing this conflict, we pursue a twofold aim: (1) to better understand the conflict at hand, and (2) to explore the advantages and limitations of using the capability approach for addressing an environmental conflict involving collective actors. We use qualitative research methods to examine the case, relying upon semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders as well as a document analysis. The freedom-agency lens of the capability approach proves helpful in analysing the actors' positions and interplay in the conflict. However, its limitations also become visible. We suggest that one should go beyond the variables included in a typical capability generation framework to understand the case better: certain variables need to be elaborated in more detail while some further variables need to be added to the framework. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.01.001 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808665330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0921800914000056</els_id><sourcerecordid>1531431340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-46f5218856faacb5c9af38cb2d025de88e5dee59ffb945ca85b3f6de60d8cf53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1r3DAQhkVoIds0f6H4UujFzoy-Vr41hPQDArnkLmR5FLRoZVdylubf1-mmvWYPM3N5Zt6Bh7FPCB0C6qtdR35Ka-WOA8oOsAPAM7ZBsxWtRtDv2AZ6jq0B6M_Zh1p3AKB1Lzbs-vb3nKYS82PjckP5EMuU95QXl5r1YkjRL00o075xjXezG2KKy3MzU6kz-SUe6CN7H1yqdPk6L9jDt9uHmx_t3f33nzfXd63Xki-t1EFxNEbp4JwflO9dEMYPfASuRjKG1k6qD2HopfLOqEEEPZKG0figxAX7cjw7l-nXE9XF7mP1lJLLND1ViwaM1koIeBtVEvs1RG9PQIU0EtGoU1CUAoU85QEOYtsLwBXVR9SXqdZCwc4l7l15tgj2Ra_d2X967YteC2jh7-Ln1wxXvUuhuOxj_b_Njeg5SLlyX48crW4OkYqtPlL2NMayCrTjFN-K-gPVvL2d</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1520379301</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring an environmental conflict from a capability perspective</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Griewald, Yuliana ; Rauschmayer, Felix</creator><creatorcontrib>Griewald, Yuliana ; Rauschmayer, Felix</creatorcontrib><description>Using the capability approach, we analyse a recent environmental conflict in the city of Leipzig, Germany. Following its concept of flood protection, a state authority felled thousands of trees in a highly popular nature protection area, which culminated in public protests and lawsuits. In analysing this conflict, we pursue a twofold aim: (1) to better understand the conflict at hand, and (2) to explore the advantages and limitations of using the capability approach for addressing an environmental conflict involving collective actors. We use qualitative research methods to examine the case, relying upon semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders as well as a document analysis. The freedom-agency lens of the capability approach proves helpful in analysing the actors' positions and interplay in the conflict. However, its limitations also become visible. We suggest that one should go beyond the variables included in a typical capability generation framework to understand the case better: certain variables need to be elaborated in more detail while some further variables need to be added to the framework.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-8009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.01.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Authority ; Biological and medical sciences ; Capability approach ; Civil proceedings ; Collective actors ; Conceptualization ; Conflict ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Environment ; Environmental conflict ; Environmental policy ; Flood protection ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Germany ; Interviews ; Nature protection ; Qualitative analysis ; Stakeholder ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Ecological economics, 2014-04, Vol.100, p.30-39</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-46f5218856faacb5c9af38cb2d025de88e5dee59ffb945ca85b3f6de60d8cf53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-46f5218856faacb5c9af38cb2d025de88e5dee59ffb945ca85b3f6de60d8cf53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4549-1272</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27844,27903,27904,33203</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28392044$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Griewald, Yuliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauschmayer, Felix</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring an environmental conflict from a capability perspective</title><title>Ecological economics</title><description>Using the capability approach, we analyse a recent environmental conflict in the city of Leipzig, Germany. Following its concept of flood protection, a state authority felled thousands of trees in a highly popular nature protection area, which culminated in public protests and lawsuits. In analysing this conflict, we pursue a twofold aim: (1) to better understand the conflict at hand, and (2) to explore the advantages and limitations of using the capability approach for addressing an environmental conflict involving collective actors. We use qualitative research methods to examine the case, relying upon semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders as well as a document analysis. The freedom-agency lens of the capability approach proves helpful in analysing the actors' positions and interplay in the conflict. However, its limitations also become visible. We suggest that one should go beyond the variables included in a typical capability generation framework to understand the case better: certain variables need to be elaborated in more detail while some further variables need to be added to the framework.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Authority</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Capability approach</subject><subject>Civil proceedings</subject><subject>Collective actors</subject><subject>Conceptualization</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental conflict</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Flood protection</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Nature protection</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Stakeholder</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0921-8009</issn><issn>1873-6106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1r3DAQhkVoIds0f6H4UujFzoy-Vr41hPQDArnkLmR5FLRoZVdylubf1-mmvWYPM3N5Zt6Bh7FPCB0C6qtdR35Ka-WOA8oOsAPAM7ZBsxWtRtDv2AZ6jq0B6M_Zh1p3AKB1Lzbs-vb3nKYS82PjckP5EMuU95QXl5r1YkjRL00o075xjXezG2KKy3MzU6kz-SUe6CN7H1yqdPk6L9jDt9uHmx_t3f33nzfXd63Xki-t1EFxNEbp4JwflO9dEMYPfASuRjKG1k6qD2HopfLOqEEEPZKG0figxAX7cjw7l-nXE9XF7mP1lJLLND1ViwaM1koIeBtVEvs1RG9PQIU0EtGoU1CUAoU85QEOYtsLwBXVR9SXqdZCwc4l7l15tgj2Ra_d2X967YteC2jh7-Ln1wxXvUuhuOxj_b_Njeg5SLlyX48crW4OkYqtPlL2NMayCrTjFN-K-gPVvL2d</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Griewald, Yuliana</creator><creator>Rauschmayer, Felix</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4549-1272</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Exploring an environmental conflict from a capability perspective</title><author>Griewald, Yuliana ; Rauschmayer, Felix</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-46f5218856faacb5c9af38cb2d025de88e5dee59ffb945ca85b3f6de60d8cf53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Authority</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Capability approach</topic><topic>Civil proceedings</topic><topic>Collective actors</topic><topic>Conceptualization</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental conflict</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Flood protection</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Nature protection</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Stakeholder</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Griewald, Yuliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauschmayer, Felix</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Ecological economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Griewald, Yuliana</au><au>Rauschmayer, Felix</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring an environmental conflict from a capability perspective</atitle><jtitle>Ecological economics</jtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>100</volume><spage>30</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>30-39</pages><issn>0921-8009</issn><eissn>1873-6106</eissn><abstract>Using the capability approach, we analyse a recent environmental conflict in the city of Leipzig, Germany. Following its concept of flood protection, a state authority felled thousands of trees in a highly popular nature protection area, which culminated in public protests and lawsuits. In analysing this conflict, we pursue a twofold aim: (1) to better understand the conflict at hand, and (2) to explore the advantages and limitations of using the capability approach for addressing an environmental conflict involving collective actors. We use qualitative research methods to examine the case, relying upon semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders as well as a document analysis. The freedom-agency lens of the capability approach proves helpful in analysing the actors' positions and interplay in the conflict. However, its limitations also become visible. We suggest that one should go beyond the variables included in a typical capability generation framework to understand the case better: certain variables need to be elaborated in more detail while some further variables need to be added to the framework.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.01.001</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4549-1272</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0921-8009 |
ispartof | Ecological economics, 2014-04, Vol.100, p.30-39 |
issn | 0921-8009 1873-6106 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808665330 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Journals; PAIS Index |
subjects | Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Authority Biological and medical sciences Capability approach Civil proceedings Collective actors Conceptualization Conflict Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife Environment Environmental conflict Environmental policy Flood protection Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Germany Interviews Nature protection Qualitative analysis Stakeholder Trees |
title | Exploring an environmental conflict from a capability perspective |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T17%3A46%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20an%20environmental%20conflict%20from%20a%20capability%20perspective&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20economics&rft.au=Griewald,%20Yuliana&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=100&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=30-39&rft.issn=0921-8009&rft.eissn=1873-6106&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.01.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1531431340%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-46f5218856faacb5c9af38cb2d025de88e5dee59ffb945ca85b3f6de60d8cf53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1520379301&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |