Loading…

Exploring an environmental conflict from a capability perspective

Using the capability approach, we analyse a recent environmental conflict in the city of Leipzig, Germany. Following its concept of flood protection, a state authority felled thousands of trees in a highly popular nature protection area, which culminated in public protests and lawsuits. In analysing...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological economics 2014-04, Vol.100, p.30-39
Main Authors: Griewald, Yuliana, Rauschmayer, Felix
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-46f5218856faacb5c9af38cb2d025de88e5dee59ffb945ca85b3f6de60d8cf53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-46f5218856faacb5c9af38cb2d025de88e5dee59ffb945ca85b3f6de60d8cf53
container_end_page 39
container_issue
container_start_page 30
container_title Ecological economics
container_volume 100
creator Griewald, Yuliana
Rauschmayer, Felix
description Using the capability approach, we analyse a recent environmental conflict in the city of Leipzig, Germany. Following its concept of flood protection, a state authority felled thousands of trees in a highly popular nature protection area, which culminated in public protests and lawsuits. In analysing this conflict, we pursue a twofold aim: (1) to better understand the conflict at hand, and (2) to explore the advantages and limitations of using the capability approach for addressing an environmental conflict involving collective actors. We use qualitative research methods to examine the case, relying upon semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders as well as a document analysis. The freedom-agency lens of the capability approach proves helpful in analysing the actors' positions and interplay in the conflict. However, its limitations also become visible. We suggest that one should go beyond the variables included in a typical capability generation framework to understand the case better: certain variables need to be elaborated in more detail while some further variables need to be added to the framework.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.01.001
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808665330</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0921800914000056</els_id><sourcerecordid>1531431340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-46f5218856faacb5c9af38cb2d025de88e5dee59ffb945ca85b3f6de60d8cf53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1r3DAQhkVoIds0f6H4UujFzoy-Vr41hPQDArnkLmR5FLRoZVdylubf1-mmvWYPM3N5Zt6Bh7FPCB0C6qtdR35Ka-WOA8oOsAPAM7ZBsxWtRtDv2AZ6jq0B6M_Zh1p3AKB1Lzbs-vb3nKYS82PjckP5EMuU95QXl5r1YkjRL00o075xjXezG2KKy3MzU6kz-SUe6CN7H1yqdPk6L9jDt9uHmx_t3f33nzfXd63Xki-t1EFxNEbp4JwflO9dEMYPfASuRjKG1k6qD2HopfLOqEEEPZKG0figxAX7cjw7l-nXE9XF7mP1lJLLND1ViwaM1koIeBtVEvs1RG9PQIU0EtGoU1CUAoU85QEOYtsLwBXVR9SXqdZCwc4l7l15tgj2Ra_d2X967YteC2jh7-Ln1wxXvUuhuOxj_b_Njeg5SLlyX48crW4OkYqtPlL2NMayCrTjFN-K-gPVvL2d</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1520379301</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring an environmental conflict from a capability perspective</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Griewald, Yuliana ; Rauschmayer, Felix</creator><creatorcontrib>Griewald, Yuliana ; Rauschmayer, Felix</creatorcontrib><description>Using the capability approach, we analyse a recent environmental conflict in the city of Leipzig, Germany. Following its concept of flood protection, a state authority felled thousands of trees in a highly popular nature protection area, which culminated in public protests and lawsuits. In analysing this conflict, we pursue a twofold aim: (1) to better understand the conflict at hand, and (2) to explore the advantages and limitations of using the capability approach for addressing an environmental conflict involving collective actors. We use qualitative research methods to examine the case, relying upon semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders as well as a document analysis. The freedom-agency lens of the capability approach proves helpful in analysing the actors' positions and interplay in the conflict. However, its limitations also become visible. We suggest that one should go beyond the variables included in a typical capability generation framework to understand the case better: certain variables need to be elaborated in more detail while some further variables need to be added to the framework.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-8009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.01.001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Authority ; Biological and medical sciences ; Capability approach ; Civil proceedings ; Collective actors ; Conceptualization ; Conflict ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Environment ; Environmental conflict ; Environmental policy ; Flood protection ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Germany ; Interviews ; Nature protection ; Qualitative analysis ; Stakeholder ; Trees</subject><ispartof>Ecological economics, 2014-04, Vol.100, p.30-39</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-46f5218856faacb5c9af38cb2d025de88e5dee59ffb945ca85b3f6de60d8cf53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-46f5218856faacb5c9af38cb2d025de88e5dee59ffb945ca85b3f6de60d8cf53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4549-1272</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27844,27903,27904,33203</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28392044$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Griewald, Yuliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauschmayer, Felix</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring an environmental conflict from a capability perspective</title><title>Ecological economics</title><description>Using the capability approach, we analyse a recent environmental conflict in the city of Leipzig, Germany. Following its concept of flood protection, a state authority felled thousands of trees in a highly popular nature protection area, which culminated in public protests and lawsuits. In analysing this conflict, we pursue a twofold aim: (1) to better understand the conflict at hand, and (2) to explore the advantages and limitations of using the capability approach for addressing an environmental conflict involving collective actors. We use qualitative research methods to examine the case, relying upon semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders as well as a document analysis. The freedom-agency lens of the capability approach proves helpful in analysing the actors' positions and interplay in the conflict. However, its limitations also become visible. We suggest that one should go beyond the variables included in a typical capability generation framework to understand the case better: certain variables need to be elaborated in more detail while some further variables need to be added to the framework.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Authority</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Capability approach</subject><subject>Civil proceedings</subject><subject>Collective actors</subject><subject>Conceptualization</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental conflict</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>Flood protection</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Nature protection</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Stakeholder</subject><subject>Trees</subject><issn>0921-8009</issn><issn>1873-6106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1r3DAQhkVoIds0f6H4UujFzoy-Vr41hPQDArnkLmR5FLRoZVdylubf1-mmvWYPM3N5Zt6Bh7FPCB0C6qtdR35Ka-WOA8oOsAPAM7ZBsxWtRtDv2AZ6jq0B6M_Zh1p3AKB1Lzbs-vb3nKYS82PjckP5EMuU95QXl5r1YkjRL00o075xjXezG2KKy3MzU6kz-SUe6CN7H1yqdPk6L9jDt9uHmx_t3f33nzfXd63Xki-t1EFxNEbp4JwflO9dEMYPfASuRjKG1k6qD2HopfLOqEEEPZKG0figxAX7cjw7l-nXE9XF7mP1lJLLND1ViwaM1koIeBtVEvs1RG9PQIU0EtGoU1CUAoU85QEOYtsLwBXVR9SXqdZCwc4l7l15tgj2Ra_d2X967YteC2jh7-Ln1wxXvUuhuOxj_b_Njeg5SLlyX48crW4OkYqtPlL2NMayCrTjFN-K-gPVvL2d</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Griewald, Yuliana</creator><creator>Rauschmayer, Felix</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4549-1272</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Exploring an environmental conflict from a capability perspective</title><author>Griewald, Yuliana ; Rauschmayer, Felix</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-46f5218856faacb5c9af38cb2d025de88e5dee59ffb945ca85b3f6de60d8cf53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Authority</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Capability approach</topic><topic>Civil proceedings</topic><topic>Collective actors</topic><topic>Conceptualization</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental conflict</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>Flood protection</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Nature protection</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Stakeholder</topic><topic>Trees</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Griewald, Yuliana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rauschmayer, Felix</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Ecological economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Griewald, Yuliana</au><au>Rauschmayer, Felix</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring an environmental conflict from a capability perspective</atitle><jtitle>Ecological economics</jtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>100</volume><spage>30</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>30-39</pages><issn>0921-8009</issn><eissn>1873-6106</eissn><abstract>Using the capability approach, we analyse a recent environmental conflict in the city of Leipzig, Germany. Following its concept of flood protection, a state authority felled thousands of trees in a highly popular nature protection area, which culminated in public protests and lawsuits. In analysing this conflict, we pursue a twofold aim: (1) to better understand the conflict at hand, and (2) to explore the advantages and limitations of using the capability approach for addressing an environmental conflict involving collective actors. We use qualitative research methods to examine the case, relying upon semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders as well as a document analysis. The freedom-agency lens of the capability approach proves helpful in analysing the actors' positions and interplay in the conflict. However, its limitations also become visible. We suggest that one should go beyond the variables included in a typical capability generation framework to understand the case better: certain variables need to be elaborated in more detail while some further variables need to be added to the framework.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.01.001</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4549-1272</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0921-8009
ispartof Ecological economics, 2014-04, Vol.100, p.30-39
issn 0921-8009
1873-6106
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808665330
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Journals; PAIS Index
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Authority
Biological and medical sciences
Capability approach
Civil proceedings
Collective actors
Conceptualization
Conflict
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Environment
Environmental conflict
Environmental policy
Flood protection
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Germany
Interviews
Nature protection
Qualitative analysis
Stakeholder
Trees
title Exploring an environmental conflict from a capability perspective
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T17%3A46%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20an%20environmental%20conflict%20from%20a%20capability%20perspective&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20economics&rft.au=Griewald,%20Yuliana&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=100&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=30-39&rft.issn=0921-8009&rft.eissn=1873-6106&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.01.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1531431340%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c642t-46f5218856faacb5c9af38cb2d025de88e5dee59ffb945ca85b3f6de60d8cf53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1520379301&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true