Using isotopic dilution to assess chemical extraction of labile Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb in soils

• Published in: Chemosphere (Oxford) 2016-07, Vol.155, p.534-541
• Main Authors: Garforth, J.M., Bailey, E.H., Tye, A.M., Young, S.D., Lofts, S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Acetic Acid - chemistry; Cadmium - analysis; Calcium Chloride - chemistry; Copper - analysis; Edetic Acid - chemistry; Environmental Pollution - analysis; Lead - analysis; Metals, Heavy - analysis; Nickel - analysis; Nitric Acid - chemistry; Soil - chemistry; Soil chemical extraction; Soil Pollutants - analysis; Solid Phase Extraction - methods; Stable isotope dilution; United Kingdom; Zinc - analysis
• ISSN: 0045-6535; 1879-1298
• DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.04.096

Chemical extractants used to measure labile soil metal must ideally select for and solubilise the labile fraction, with minimal solubilisation of non-labile metal. We assessed four extractants (0.43 M HNO3, 0.43 M CH3COOH, 0.05 M Na2H2EDTA and 1 M CaCl2) against these requirements. For soils contaminated by contrasting sources, we compared isotopically exchangeable Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd and Pb (EValue, mg kg−1), with the concentrations of metal solubilised by the chemical extractants (MExt, mg kg−1). Crucially, we also determined isotopically exchangeable metal in the soil–extractant systems (EExt, mg kg−1). Thus ‘EExt – EValue’ quantifies the concentration of mobilised non-labile metal, while ‘EExt – MExt’ represents adsorbed labile metal in the presence of the extractant. Extraction with CaCl2 consistently underestimated EValue for Ni, Cu, Zn and Pb, while providing a reasonable estimate of EValue for Cd. In contrast, extraction with HNO3 both consistently mobilised non-labile metal and overestimated the EValue. Extraction with CH3COOH appeared to provide a good estimate of EValue for Cd; however, this was the net outcome of incomplete solubilisation of labile metal, and concurrent mobilisation of non-labile metal by the extractant (MExt EValue). The Na2H2EDTA extractant mobilised some non-labile metal in three of the four soils, but consistently solubilised the entire labile fraction for all soil-metal combinations (MExt ≈ EExt). Comparison of EValue, MExt and EExt provides a rigorous means of assessing the underlying action of soil chemical extraction methods and could be used to refine long-standing soil extraction methodologies. •Stable isotope dilution can inform underlying mechanisms during chemical extraction.•Agreement between extracted metal and E values is sometimes fortuitous.•Powerful extractants (0.05 M EDTA and 0.43 M Nitric acid) solubilise non-labile metal.•Weaker extractants (0.43 M CH3COOH and 1 M CaCl2) fail to solubilise all labile metal.•E values measured within on the soil extraction reveal non-labile metal mobilisation.