Loading…

A multiprofessional information model for Brazilian primary care: Defining a consensus model towards an interoperable electronic health record

Abstract Objective To develop a multiprofessional information model to be used in the decision-making process in primary care in Brazil. Methods This was an observational study with a descriptive and exploratory approach, using action research associated with the Delphi method. A group of 13 health...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland) Ireland), 2016-06, Vol.90, p.48-57
Main Author: Braga, Renata Dutra
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-d78d5948d988853e74869de4f145174dd225f3f4760d9524e89fae9e78221a483
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-d78d5948d988853e74869de4f145174dd225f3f4760d9524e89fae9e78221a483
container_end_page 57
container_issue
container_start_page 48
container_title International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland)
container_volume 90
creator Braga, Renata Dutra
description Abstract Objective To develop a multiprofessional information model to be used in the decision-making process in primary care in Brazil. Methods This was an observational study with a descriptive and exploratory approach, using action research associated with the Delphi method. A group of 13 health professionals made up a panel of experts that, through individual and group meetings, drew up a preliminary health information records model. The questionnaire used to validate this model included four questions based on a Likert scale. These questions evaluated the completeness and relevance of information on each of the four pillars that composed the model. The changes suggested in each round of evaluation were included when accepted by the majority (≥ 50%). This process was repeated as many times as necessary to obtain the desirable and recommended consensus level (> 50%), and the final version became the consensus model. Results Multidisciplinary health training of the panel of experts allowed a consensus model to be obtained based on four categories of health information, called pillars: Data Collection, Diagnosis, Care Plan and Evaluation. Conclusion The obtained consensus model was considered valid by the experts and can contribute to the collection and recording of multidisciplinary information in primary care, as well as the identification of relevant concepts for defining electronic health records at this level of complexity in health care.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.03.004
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808672704</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1386505616300454</els_id><sourcerecordid>1783918312</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-d78d5948d988853e74869de4f145174dd225f3f4760d9524e89fae9e78221a483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUstu1TAQjRAVLYVfqLxkk9TP2GGBKKVApUosgLXl2hPq4NgXOwGVj-Cb68u9ZdFNV_ZozkMzZ5rmhOCOYNKfTp2fZnA-jh2tdYdZhzF_0hwRJWmrKGdP65-pvhVY9IfN81ImjInEgj9rDqkkmJFBHjV_z9C8hsVvchqhFJ-iCaiqpjybpVZoTg4CqjV6l80fH7yJaJP9bPItsibDa_QeRh99_I4MsikWiGUte9qSfpvsCqocHxfIaQPZXAdAEMAuOUVv0Q2YsNygDDZl96I5GE0o8HL_HjffPlx8Pf_UXn3-eHl-dtVaLvqldVI5MXDlBqWUYCC56gcHfCRcEMmdo1SMbOSyx24QlIMaRgMDSEUpMVyx4-bVTrfO_XOFsujZFwshmAhpLZoorHpJJeaPQ6ViA1GM0Artd1CbUykZRr3flCZYb2PTk76PTW9j05hp_M_jZO-xXtf2f9p9ThXwdgeAupRfHrIu1kO0VaoubtEu-cc93jyQsKHmZk34AbdQprTmmn2dRxeqsf6yPZ7t7ZCeVbrg7A6bRcM7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1783918312</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A multiprofessional information model for Brazilian primary care: Defining a consensus model towards an interoperable electronic health record</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Braga, Renata Dutra</creator><creatorcontrib>Braga, Renata Dutra ; Panel of Specialists in Health</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective To develop a multiprofessional information model to be used in the decision-making process in primary care in Brazil. Methods This was an observational study with a descriptive and exploratory approach, using action research associated with the Delphi method. A group of 13 health professionals made up a panel of experts that, through individual and group meetings, drew up a preliminary health information records model. The questionnaire used to validate this model included four questions based on a Likert scale. These questions evaluated the completeness and relevance of information on each of the four pillars that composed the model. The changes suggested in each round of evaluation were included when accepted by the majority (≥ 50%). This process was repeated as many times as necessary to obtain the desirable and recommended consensus level (&gt; 50%), and the final version became the consensus model. Results Multidisciplinary health training of the panel of experts allowed a consensus model to be obtained based on four categories of health information, called pillars: Data Collection, Diagnosis, Care Plan and Evaluation. Conclusion The obtained consensus model was considered valid by the experts and can contribute to the collection and recording of multidisciplinary information in primary care, as well as the identification of relevant concepts for defining electronic health records at this level of complexity in health care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1386-5056</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8243</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.03.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27103197</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Action research ; Brazil ; Consensus ; Datasets as Topic ; Decision Making ; Decision Support Techniques ; Delphi study ; Delphi Technique ; Electronic Health Records ; Humans ; Information needs ; Internal Medicine ; Models, Theoretical ; Other ; Patient-centred care ; Primary health care ; Primary Health Care - methods</subject><ispartof>International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland), 2016-06, Vol.90, p.48-57</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-d78d5948d988853e74869de4f145174dd225f3f4760d9524e89fae9e78221a483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-d78d5948d988853e74869de4f145174dd225f3f4760d9524e89fae9e78221a483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27103197$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Braga, Renata Dutra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panel of Specialists in Health</creatorcontrib><title>A multiprofessional information model for Brazilian primary care: Defining a consensus model towards an interoperable electronic health record</title><title>International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland)</title><addtitle>Int J Med Inform</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective To develop a multiprofessional information model to be used in the decision-making process in primary care in Brazil. Methods This was an observational study with a descriptive and exploratory approach, using action research associated with the Delphi method. A group of 13 health professionals made up a panel of experts that, through individual and group meetings, drew up a preliminary health information records model. The questionnaire used to validate this model included four questions based on a Likert scale. These questions evaluated the completeness and relevance of information on each of the four pillars that composed the model. The changes suggested in each round of evaluation were included when accepted by the majority (≥ 50%). This process was repeated as many times as necessary to obtain the desirable and recommended consensus level (&gt; 50%), and the final version became the consensus model. Results Multidisciplinary health training of the panel of experts allowed a consensus model to be obtained based on four categories of health information, called pillars: Data Collection, Diagnosis, Care Plan and Evaluation. Conclusion The obtained consensus model was considered valid by the experts and can contribute to the collection and recording of multidisciplinary information in primary care, as well as the identification of relevant concepts for defining electronic health records at this level of complexity in health care.</description><subject>Action research</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Datasets as Topic</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Delphi study</subject><subject>Delphi Technique</subject><subject>Electronic Health Records</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information needs</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Other</subject><subject>Patient-centred care</subject><subject>Primary health care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - methods</subject><issn>1386-5056</issn><issn>1872-8243</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUstu1TAQjRAVLYVfqLxkk9TP2GGBKKVApUosgLXl2hPq4NgXOwGVj-Cb68u9ZdFNV_ZozkMzZ5rmhOCOYNKfTp2fZnA-jh2tdYdZhzF_0hwRJWmrKGdP65-pvhVY9IfN81ImjInEgj9rDqkkmJFBHjV_z9C8hsVvchqhFJ-iCaiqpjybpVZoTg4CqjV6l80fH7yJaJP9bPItsibDa_QeRh99_I4MsikWiGUte9qSfpvsCqocHxfIaQPZXAdAEMAuOUVv0Q2YsNygDDZl96I5GE0o8HL_HjffPlx8Pf_UXn3-eHl-dtVaLvqldVI5MXDlBqWUYCC56gcHfCRcEMmdo1SMbOSyx24QlIMaRgMDSEUpMVyx4-bVTrfO_XOFsujZFwshmAhpLZoorHpJJeaPQ6ViA1GM0Artd1CbUykZRr3flCZYb2PTk76PTW9j05hp_M_jZO-xXtf2f9p9ThXwdgeAupRfHrIu1kO0VaoubtEu-cc93jyQsKHmZk34AbdQprTmmn2dRxeqsf6yPZ7t7ZCeVbrg7A6bRcM7</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Braga, Renata Dutra</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>A multiprofessional information model for Brazilian primary care: Defining a consensus model towards an interoperable electronic health record</title><author>Braga, Renata Dutra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-d78d5948d988853e74869de4f145174dd225f3f4760d9524e89fae9e78221a483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Action research</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Datasets as Topic</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Delphi study</topic><topic>Delphi Technique</topic><topic>Electronic Health Records</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information needs</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Other</topic><topic>Patient-centred care</topic><topic>Primary health care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Braga, Renata Dutra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panel of Specialists in Health</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Braga, Renata Dutra</au><aucorp>Panel of Specialists in Health</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A multiprofessional information model for Brazilian primary care: Defining a consensus model towards an interoperable electronic health record</atitle><jtitle>International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland)</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Med Inform</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>90</volume><spage>48</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>48-57</pages><issn>1386-5056</issn><eissn>1872-8243</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective To develop a multiprofessional information model to be used in the decision-making process in primary care in Brazil. Methods This was an observational study with a descriptive and exploratory approach, using action research associated with the Delphi method. A group of 13 health professionals made up a panel of experts that, through individual and group meetings, drew up a preliminary health information records model. The questionnaire used to validate this model included four questions based on a Likert scale. These questions evaluated the completeness and relevance of information on each of the four pillars that composed the model. The changes suggested in each round of evaluation were included when accepted by the majority (≥ 50%). This process was repeated as many times as necessary to obtain the desirable and recommended consensus level (&gt; 50%), and the final version became the consensus model. Results Multidisciplinary health training of the panel of experts allowed a consensus model to be obtained based on four categories of health information, called pillars: Data Collection, Diagnosis, Care Plan and Evaluation. Conclusion The obtained consensus model was considered valid by the experts and can contribute to the collection and recording of multidisciplinary information in primary care, as well as the identification of relevant concepts for defining electronic health records at this level of complexity in health care.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>27103197</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.03.004</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1386-5056
ispartof International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland), 2016-06, Vol.90, p.48-57
issn 1386-5056
1872-8243
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808672704
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Action research
Brazil
Consensus
Datasets as Topic
Decision Making
Decision Support Techniques
Delphi study
Delphi Technique
Electronic Health Records
Humans
Information needs
Internal Medicine
Models, Theoretical
Other
Patient-centred care
Primary health care
Primary Health Care - methods
title A multiprofessional information model for Brazilian primary care: Defining a consensus model towards an interoperable electronic health record
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T18%3A58%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20multiprofessional%20information%20model%20for%20Brazilian%20primary%20care:%20Defining%20a%20consensus%20model%20towards%20an%20interoperable%20electronic%20health%20record&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20medical%20informatics%20(Shannon,%20Ireland)&rft.au=Braga,%20Renata%20Dutra&rft.aucorp=Panel%20of%20Specialists%20in%20Health&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=90&rft.spage=48&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=48-57&rft.issn=1386-5056&rft.eissn=1872-8243&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.03.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1783918312%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-d78d5948d988853e74869de4f145174dd225f3f4760d9524e89fae9e78221a483%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1783918312&rft_id=info:pmid/27103197&rfr_iscdi=true