Loading…
A multiprofessional information model for Brazilian primary care: Defining a consensus model towards an interoperable electronic health record
Abstract Objective To develop a multiprofessional information model to be used in the decision-making process in primary care in Brazil. Methods This was an observational study with a descriptive and exploratory approach, using action research associated with the Delphi method. A group of 13 health...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland) Ireland), 2016-06, Vol.90, p.48-57 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-d78d5948d988853e74869de4f145174dd225f3f4760d9524e89fae9e78221a483 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-d78d5948d988853e74869de4f145174dd225f3f4760d9524e89fae9e78221a483 |
container_end_page | 57 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 48 |
container_title | International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland) |
container_volume | 90 |
creator | Braga, Renata Dutra |
description | Abstract Objective To develop a multiprofessional information model to be used in the decision-making process in primary care in Brazil. Methods This was an observational study with a descriptive and exploratory approach, using action research associated with the Delphi method. A group of 13 health professionals made up a panel of experts that, through individual and group meetings, drew up a preliminary health information records model. The questionnaire used to validate this model included four questions based on a Likert scale. These questions evaluated the completeness and relevance of information on each of the four pillars that composed the model. The changes suggested in each round of evaluation were included when accepted by the majority (≥ 50%). This process was repeated as many times as necessary to obtain the desirable and recommended consensus level (> 50%), and the final version became the consensus model. Results Multidisciplinary health training of the panel of experts allowed a consensus model to be obtained based on four categories of health information, called pillars: Data Collection, Diagnosis, Care Plan and Evaluation. Conclusion The obtained consensus model was considered valid by the experts and can contribute to the collection and recording of multidisciplinary information in primary care, as well as the identification of relevant concepts for defining electronic health records at this level of complexity in health care. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.03.004 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808672704</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1386505616300454</els_id><sourcerecordid>1783918312</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-d78d5948d988853e74869de4f145174dd225f3f4760d9524e89fae9e78221a483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUstu1TAQjRAVLYVfqLxkk9TP2GGBKKVApUosgLXl2hPq4NgXOwGVj-Cb68u9ZdFNV_ZozkMzZ5rmhOCOYNKfTp2fZnA-jh2tdYdZhzF_0hwRJWmrKGdP65-pvhVY9IfN81ImjInEgj9rDqkkmJFBHjV_z9C8hsVvchqhFJ-iCaiqpjybpVZoTg4CqjV6l80fH7yJaJP9bPItsibDa_QeRh99_I4MsikWiGUte9qSfpvsCqocHxfIaQPZXAdAEMAuOUVv0Q2YsNygDDZl96I5GE0o8HL_HjffPlx8Pf_UXn3-eHl-dtVaLvqldVI5MXDlBqWUYCC56gcHfCRcEMmdo1SMbOSyx24QlIMaRgMDSEUpMVyx4-bVTrfO_XOFsujZFwshmAhpLZoorHpJJeaPQ6ViA1GM0Artd1CbUykZRr3flCZYb2PTk76PTW9j05hp_M_jZO-xXtf2f9p9ThXwdgeAupRfHrIu1kO0VaoubtEu-cc93jyQsKHmZk34AbdQprTmmn2dRxeqsf6yPZ7t7ZCeVbrg7A6bRcM7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1783918312</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A multiprofessional information model for Brazilian primary care: Defining a consensus model towards an interoperable electronic health record</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Braga, Renata Dutra</creator><creatorcontrib>Braga, Renata Dutra ; Panel of Specialists in Health</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objective To develop a multiprofessional information model to be used in the decision-making process in primary care in Brazil. Methods This was an observational study with a descriptive and exploratory approach, using action research associated with the Delphi method. A group of 13 health professionals made up a panel of experts that, through individual and group meetings, drew up a preliminary health information records model. The questionnaire used to validate this model included four questions based on a Likert scale. These questions evaluated the completeness and relevance of information on each of the four pillars that composed the model. The changes suggested in each round of evaluation were included when accepted by the majority (≥ 50%). This process was repeated as many times as necessary to obtain the desirable and recommended consensus level (> 50%), and the final version became the consensus model. Results Multidisciplinary health training of the panel of experts allowed a consensus model to be obtained based on four categories of health information, called pillars: Data Collection, Diagnosis, Care Plan and Evaluation. Conclusion The obtained consensus model was considered valid by the experts and can contribute to the collection and recording of multidisciplinary information in primary care, as well as the identification of relevant concepts for defining electronic health records at this level of complexity in health care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1386-5056</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-8243</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.03.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27103197</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier Ireland Ltd</publisher><subject>Action research ; Brazil ; Consensus ; Datasets as Topic ; Decision Making ; Decision Support Techniques ; Delphi study ; Delphi Technique ; Electronic Health Records ; Humans ; Information needs ; Internal Medicine ; Models, Theoretical ; Other ; Patient-centred care ; Primary health care ; Primary Health Care - methods</subject><ispartof>International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland), 2016-06, Vol.90, p.48-57</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-d78d5948d988853e74869de4f145174dd225f3f4760d9524e89fae9e78221a483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-d78d5948d988853e74869de4f145174dd225f3f4760d9524e89fae9e78221a483</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27103197$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Braga, Renata Dutra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panel of Specialists in Health</creatorcontrib><title>A multiprofessional information model for Brazilian primary care: Defining a consensus model towards an interoperable electronic health record</title><title>International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland)</title><addtitle>Int J Med Inform</addtitle><description>Abstract Objective To develop a multiprofessional information model to be used in the decision-making process in primary care in Brazil. Methods This was an observational study with a descriptive and exploratory approach, using action research associated with the Delphi method. A group of 13 health professionals made up a panel of experts that, through individual and group meetings, drew up a preliminary health information records model. The questionnaire used to validate this model included four questions based on a Likert scale. These questions evaluated the completeness and relevance of information on each of the four pillars that composed the model. The changes suggested in each round of evaluation were included when accepted by the majority (≥ 50%). This process was repeated as many times as necessary to obtain the desirable and recommended consensus level (> 50%), and the final version became the consensus model. Results Multidisciplinary health training of the panel of experts allowed a consensus model to be obtained based on four categories of health information, called pillars: Data Collection, Diagnosis, Care Plan and Evaluation. Conclusion The obtained consensus model was considered valid by the experts and can contribute to the collection and recording of multidisciplinary information in primary care, as well as the identification of relevant concepts for defining electronic health records at this level of complexity in health care.</description><subject>Action research</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Consensus</subject><subject>Datasets as Topic</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Decision Support Techniques</subject><subject>Delphi study</subject><subject>Delphi Technique</subject><subject>Electronic Health Records</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Information needs</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Other</subject><subject>Patient-centred care</subject><subject>Primary health care</subject><subject>Primary Health Care - methods</subject><issn>1386-5056</issn><issn>1872-8243</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUstu1TAQjRAVLYVfqLxkk9TP2GGBKKVApUosgLXl2hPq4NgXOwGVj-Cb68u9ZdFNV_ZozkMzZ5rmhOCOYNKfTp2fZnA-jh2tdYdZhzF_0hwRJWmrKGdP65-pvhVY9IfN81ImjInEgj9rDqkkmJFBHjV_z9C8hsVvchqhFJ-iCaiqpjybpVZoTg4CqjV6l80fH7yJaJP9bPItsibDa_QeRh99_I4MsikWiGUte9qSfpvsCqocHxfIaQPZXAdAEMAuOUVv0Q2YsNygDDZl96I5GE0o8HL_HjffPlx8Pf_UXn3-eHl-dtVaLvqldVI5MXDlBqWUYCC56gcHfCRcEMmdo1SMbOSyx24QlIMaRgMDSEUpMVyx4-bVTrfO_XOFsujZFwshmAhpLZoorHpJJeaPQ6ViA1GM0Artd1CbUykZRr3flCZYb2PTk76PTW9j05hp_M_jZO-xXtf2f9p9ThXwdgeAupRfHrIu1kO0VaoubtEu-cc93jyQsKHmZk34AbdQprTmmn2dRxeqsf6yPZ7t7ZCeVbrg7A6bRcM7</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Braga, Renata Dutra</creator><general>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>A multiprofessional information model for Brazilian primary care: Defining a consensus model towards an interoperable electronic health record</title><author>Braga, Renata Dutra</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-d78d5948d988853e74869de4f145174dd225f3f4760d9524e89fae9e78221a483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Action research</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Consensus</topic><topic>Datasets as Topic</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Decision Support Techniques</topic><topic>Delphi study</topic><topic>Delphi Technique</topic><topic>Electronic Health Records</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Information needs</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Other</topic><topic>Patient-centred care</topic><topic>Primary health care</topic><topic>Primary Health Care - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Braga, Renata Dutra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Panel of Specialists in Health</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Braga, Renata Dutra</au><aucorp>Panel of Specialists in Health</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A multiprofessional information model for Brazilian primary care: Defining a consensus model towards an interoperable electronic health record</atitle><jtitle>International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland)</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Med Inform</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>90</volume><spage>48</spage><epage>57</epage><pages>48-57</pages><issn>1386-5056</issn><eissn>1872-8243</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objective To develop a multiprofessional information model to be used in the decision-making process in primary care in Brazil. Methods This was an observational study with a descriptive and exploratory approach, using action research associated with the Delphi method. A group of 13 health professionals made up a panel of experts that, through individual and group meetings, drew up a preliminary health information records model. The questionnaire used to validate this model included four questions based on a Likert scale. These questions evaluated the completeness and relevance of information on each of the four pillars that composed the model. The changes suggested in each round of evaluation were included when accepted by the majority (≥ 50%). This process was repeated as many times as necessary to obtain the desirable and recommended consensus level (> 50%), and the final version became the consensus model. Results Multidisciplinary health training of the panel of experts allowed a consensus model to be obtained based on four categories of health information, called pillars: Data Collection, Diagnosis, Care Plan and Evaluation. Conclusion The obtained consensus model was considered valid by the experts and can contribute to the collection and recording of multidisciplinary information in primary care, as well as the identification of relevant concepts for defining electronic health records at this level of complexity in health care.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ireland Ltd</pub><pmid>27103197</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.03.004</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1386-5056 |
ispartof | International journal of medical informatics (Shannon, Ireland), 2016-06, Vol.90, p.48-57 |
issn | 1386-5056 1872-8243 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808672704 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Action research Brazil Consensus Datasets as Topic Decision Making Decision Support Techniques Delphi study Delphi Technique Electronic Health Records Humans Information needs Internal Medicine Models, Theoretical Other Patient-centred care Primary health care Primary Health Care - methods |
title | A multiprofessional information model for Brazilian primary care: Defining a consensus model towards an interoperable electronic health record |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T18%3A58%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20multiprofessional%20information%20model%20for%20Brazilian%20primary%20care:%20Defining%20a%20consensus%20model%20towards%20an%20interoperable%20electronic%20health%20record&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20medical%20informatics%20(Shannon,%20Ireland)&rft.au=Braga,%20Renata%20Dutra&rft.aucorp=Panel%20of%20Specialists%20in%20Health&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=90&rft.spage=48&rft.epage=57&rft.pages=48-57&rft.issn=1386-5056&rft.eissn=1872-8243&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.03.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1783918312%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-d78d5948d988853e74869de4f145174dd225f3f4760d9524e89fae9e78221a483%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1783918312&rft_id=info:pmid/27103197&rfr_iscdi=true |