Loading…

Radiofrequency contact currents: sensory responses and dosimetry

The process of setting science-based exposure standards (or guidelines) for radiofrequency (RF) contact current exposure has been disadvantaged by a lack of relevant data. The authors first review the essential features and results of the available studies and illustrate the apparent discrepancies a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Radiation protection dosimetry 2014-12, Vol.162 (3), p.268-279
Main Authors: Kavet, Robert, Tell, R A, Olsen, R G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-6cf99472da002d8bcd26ed22fe03ade681d3041549e959432e3d9846deb09a573
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-6cf99472da002d8bcd26ed22fe03ade681d3041549e959432e3d9846deb09a573
container_end_page 279
container_issue 3
container_start_page 268
container_title Radiation protection dosimetry
container_volume 162
creator Kavet, Robert
Tell, R A
Olsen, R G
description The process of setting science-based exposure standards (or guidelines) for radiofrequency (RF) contact current exposure has been disadvantaged by a lack of relevant data. The authors first review the essential features and results of the available studies and illustrate the apparent discrepancies among them. Then, they examine the manner in which current was administered in these studies and suggest as to how the physical relationship of a contacting finger to the current electrode may play a role in affecting sensory thresholds specific to those configurations. A major factor in this analysis relates to whether current density is uniformly distributed across the contact area or whether an electrode's 'edge effects' enhance currents with a net effect of decreasing apparent thresholds, when expressed as the bulk current entering a subject. For an exposure with a clear hazard potential, thresholds of human sensory response to RF currents require further investigation.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/rpd/nct311
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808673352</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1639497064</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-6cf99472da002d8bcd26ed22fe03ade681d3041549e959432e3d9846deb09a573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1KxDAYRYMozji68QGkSxHq5K9p48ph8A8GBNF1yCRfoTJNar520be3MqNbV3dzuBwOIZeM3jKqxTJ1fhlcLxg7InNWSp4LSdUxmVMmZV5JTmfkDPGTUl7qQp6SGZeCS17wObl_s76JdYKvAYIbMxdDb12fuSElCD3eZQgBYxqzBNjFgICZDT7zEZsW-jSek5Pa7hAuDrsgH48P7-vnfPP69LJebXInOO1z5WqtZcm9nSx8tXWeK_Cc10CF9aAq5gWVrJAadKEnPRBeV1J52FJti1IsyPX-t0txcsXetA062O1sgDigYRWtVClEwf9HldBSl1TJCb3Zoy5FxAS16VLT2jQaRs1PXDPFNfu4E3x1-B22Lfg_9Lem-AbZp3XV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1639497064</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiofrequency contact currents: sensory responses and dosimetry</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Kavet, Robert ; Tell, R A ; Olsen, R G</creator><creatorcontrib>Kavet, Robert ; Tell, R A ; Olsen, R G</creatorcontrib><description>The process of setting science-based exposure standards (or guidelines) for radiofrequency (RF) contact current exposure has been disadvantaged by a lack of relevant data. The authors first review the essential features and results of the available studies and illustrate the apparent discrepancies among them. Then, they examine the manner in which current was administered in these studies and suggest as to how the physical relationship of a contacting finger to the current electrode may play a role in affecting sensory thresholds specific to those configurations. A major factor in this analysis relates to whether current density is uniformly distributed across the contact area or whether an electrode's 'edge effects' enhance currents with a net effect of decreasing apparent thresholds, when expressed as the bulk current entering a subject. For an exposure with a clear hazard potential, thresholds of human sensory response to RF currents require further investigation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-8420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-3406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nct311</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24324252</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Electric Conductivity ; Humans ; Radio Waves ; Radiometry - standards ; Sensation - radiation effects</subject><ispartof>Radiation protection dosimetry, 2014-12, Vol.162 (3), p.268-279</ispartof><rights>The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-6cf99472da002d8bcd26ed22fe03ade681d3041549e959432e3d9846deb09a573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-6cf99472da002d8bcd26ed22fe03ade681d3041549e959432e3d9846deb09a573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24324252$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kavet, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tell, R A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsen, R G</creatorcontrib><title>Radiofrequency contact currents: sensory responses and dosimetry</title><title>Radiation protection dosimetry</title><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><description>The process of setting science-based exposure standards (or guidelines) for radiofrequency (RF) contact current exposure has been disadvantaged by a lack of relevant data. The authors first review the essential features and results of the available studies and illustrate the apparent discrepancies among them. Then, they examine the manner in which current was administered in these studies and suggest as to how the physical relationship of a contacting finger to the current electrode may play a role in affecting sensory thresholds specific to those configurations. A major factor in this analysis relates to whether current density is uniformly distributed across the contact area or whether an electrode's 'edge effects' enhance currents with a net effect of decreasing apparent thresholds, when expressed as the bulk current entering a subject. For an exposure with a clear hazard potential, thresholds of human sensory response to RF currents require further investigation.</description><subject>Electric Conductivity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Radio Waves</subject><subject>Radiometry - standards</subject><subject>Sensation - radiation effects</subject><issn>0144-8420</issn><issn>1742-3406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1KxDAYRYMozji68QGkSxHq5K9p48ph8A8GBNF1yCRfoTJNar520be3MqNbV3dzuBwOIZeM3jKqxTJ1fhlcLxg7InNWSp4LSdUxmVMmZV5JTmfkDPGTUl7qQp6SGZeCS17wObl_s76JdYKvAYIbMxdDb12fuSElCD3eZQgBYxqzBNjFgICZDT7zEZsW-jSek5Pa7hAuDrsgH48P7-vnfPP69LJebXInOO1z5WqtZcm9nSx8tXWeK_Cc10CF9aAq5gWVrJAadKEnPRBeV1J52FJti1IsyPX-t0txcsXetA062O1sgDigYRWtVClEwf9HldBSl1TJCb3Zoy5FxAS16VLT2jQaRs1PXDPFNfu4E3x1-B22Lfg_9Lem-AbZp3XV</recordid><startdate>201412</startdate><enddate>201412</enddate><creator>Kavet, Robert</creator><creator>Tell, R A</creator><creator>Olsen, R G</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201412</creationdate><title>Radiofrequency contact currents: sensory responses and dosimetry</title><author>Kavet, Robert ; Tell, R A ; Olsen, R G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-6cf99472da002d8bcd26ed22fe03ade681d3041549e959432e3d9846deb09a573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Electric Conductivity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Radio Waves</topic><topic>Radiometry - standards</topic><topic>Sensation - radiation effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kavet, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tell, R A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsen, R G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kavet, Robert</au><au>Tell, R A</au><au>Olsen, R G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiofrequency contact currents: sensory responses and dosimetry</atitle><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><date>2014-12</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>162</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>268</spage><epage>279</epage><pages>268-279</pages><issn>0144-8420</issn><eissn>1742-3406</eissn><abstract>The process of setting science-based exposure standards (or guidelines) for radiofrequency (RF) contact current exposure has been disadvantaged by a lack of relevant data. The authors first review the essential features and results of the available studies and illustrate the apparent discrepancies among them. Then, they examine the manner in which current was administered in these studies and suggest as to how the physical relationship of a contacting finger to the current electrode may play a role in affecting sensory thresholds specific to those configurations. A major factor in this analysis relates to whether current density is uniformly distributed across the contact area or whether an electrode's 'edge effects' enhance currents with a net effect of decreasing apparent thresholds, when expressed as the bulk current entering a subject. For an exposure with a clear hazard potential, thresholds of human sensory response to RF currents require further investigation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>24324252</pmid><doi>10.1093/rpd/nct311</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0144-8420
ispartof Radiation protection dosimetry, 2014-12, Vol.162 (3), p.268-279
issn 0144-8420
1742-3406
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808673352
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Electric Conductivity
Humans
Radio Waves
Radiometry - standards
Sensation - radiation effects
title Radiofrequency contact currents: sensory responses and dosimetry
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T22%3A54%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiofrequency%20contact%20currents:%20sensory%20responses%20and%20dosimetry&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20protection%20dosimetry&rft.au=Kavet,%20Robert&rft.date=2014-12&rft.volume=162&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=268&rft.epage=279&rft.pages=268-279&rft.issn=0144-8420&rft.eissn=1742-3406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rpd/nct311&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1639497064%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-6cf99472da002d8bcd26ed22fe03ade681d3041549e959432e3d9846deb09a573%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1639497064&rft_id=info:pmid/24324252&rfr_iscdi=true