Loading…
Radiofrequency contact currents: sensory responses and dosimetry
The process of setting science-based exposure standards (or guidelines) for radiofrequency (RF) contact current exposure has been disadvantaged by a lack of relevant data. The authors first review the essential features and results of the available studies and illustrate the apparent discrepancies a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Radiation protection dosimetry 2014-12, Vol.162 (3), p.268-279 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-6cf99472da002d8bcd26ed22fe03ade681d3041549e959432e3d9846deb09a573 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-6cf99472da002d8bcd26ed22fe03ade681d3041549e959432e3d9846deb09a573 |
container_end_page | 279 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 268 |
container_title | Radiation protection dosimetry |
container_volume | 162 |
creator | Kavet, Robert Tell, R A Olsen, R G |
description | The process of setting science-based exposure standards (or guidelines) for radiofrequency (RF) contact current exposure has been disadvantaged by a lack of relevant data. The authors first review the essential features and results of the available studies and illustrate the apparent discrepancies among them. Then, they examine the manner in which current was administered in these studies and suggest as to how the physical relationship of a contacting finger to the current electrode may play a role in affecting sensory thresholds specific to those configurations. A major factor in this analysis relates to whether current density is uniformly distributed across the contact area or whether an electrode's 'edge effects' enhance currents with a net effect of decreasing apparent thresholds, when expressed as the bulk current entering a subject. For an exposure with a clear hazard potential, thresholds of human sensory response to RF currents require further investigation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/rpd/nct311 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808673352</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1639497064</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-6cf99472da002d8bcd26ed22fe03ade681d3041549e959432e3d9846deb09a573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1KxDAYRYMozji68QGkSxHq5K9p48ph8A8GBNF1yCRfoTJNar520be3MqNbV3dzuBwOIZeM3jKqxTJ1fhlcLxg7InNWSp4LSdUxmVMmZV5JTmfkDPGTUl7qQp6SGZeCS17wObl_s76JdYKvAYIbMxdDb12fuSElCD3eZQgBYxqzBNjFgICZDT7zEZsW-jSek5Pa7hAuDrsgH48P7-vnfPP69LJebXInOO1z5WqtZcm9nSx8tXWeK_Cc10CF9aAq5gWVrJAadKEnPRBeV1J52FJti1IsyPX-t0txcsXetA062O1sgDigYRWtVClEwf9HldBSl1TJCb3Zoy5FxAS16VLT2jQaRs1PXDPFNfu4E3x1-B22Lfg_9Lem-AbZp3XV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1639497064</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Radiofrequency contact currents: sensory responses and dosimetry</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Kavet, Robert ; Tell, R A ; Olsen, R G</creator><creatorcontrib>Kavet, Robert ; Tell, R A ; Olsen, R G</creatorcontrib><description>The process of setting science-based exposure standards (or guidelines) for radiofrequency (RF) contact current exposure has been disadvantaged by a lack of relevant data. The authors first review the essential features and results of the available studies and illustrate the apparent discrepancies among them. Then, they examine the manner in which current was administered in these studies and suggest as to how the physical relationship of a contacting finger to the current electrode may play a role in affecting sensory thresholds specific to those configurations. A major factor in this analysis relates to whether current density is uniformly distributed across the contact area or whether an electrode's 'edge effects' enhance currents with a net effect of decreasing apparent thresholds, when expressed as the bulk current entering a subject. For an exposure with a clear hazard potential, thresholds of human sensory response to RF currents require further investigation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0144-8420</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-3406</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nct311</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24324252</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Electric Conductivity ; Humans ; Radio Waves ; Radiometry - standards ; Sensation - radiation effects</subject><ispartof>Radiation protection dosimetry, 2014-12, Vol.162 (3), p.268-279</ispartof><rights>The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-6cf99472da002d8bcd26ed22fe03ade681d3041549e959432e3d9846deb09a573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-6cf99472da002d8bcd26ed22fe03ade681d3041549e959432e3d9846deb09a573</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24324252$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kavet, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tell, R A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsen, R G</creatorcontrib><title>Radiofrequency contact currents: sensory responses and dosimetry</title><title>Radiation protection dosimetry</title><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><description>The process of setting science-based exposure standards (or guidelines) for radiofrequency (RF) contact current exposure has been disadvantaged by a lack of relevant data. The authors first review the essential features and results of the available studies and illustrate the apparent discrepancies among them. Then, they examine the manner in which current was administered in these studies and suggest as to how the physical relationship of a contacting finger to the current electrode may play a role in affecting sensory thresholds specific to those configurations. A major factor in this analysis relates to whether current density is uniformly distributed across the contact area or whether an electrode's 'edge effects' enhance currents with a net effect of decreasing apparent thresholds, when expressed as the bulk current entering a subject. For an exposure with a clear hazard potential, thresholds of human sensory response to RF currents require further investigation.</description><subject>Electric Conductivity</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Radio Waves</subject><subject>Radiometry - standards</subject><subject>Sensation - radiation effects</subject><issn>0144-8420</issn><issn>1742-3406</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM1KxDAYRYMozji68QGkSxHq5K9p48ph8A8GBNF1yCRfoTJNar520be3MqNbV3dzuBwOIZeM3jKqxTJ1fhlcLxg7InNWSp4LSdUxmVMmZV5JTmfkDPGTUl7qQp6SGZeCS17wObl_s76JdYKvAYIbMxdDb12fuSElCD3eZQgBYxqzBNjFgICZDT7zEZsW-jSek5Pa7hAuDrsgH48P7-vnfPP69LJebXInOO1z5WqtZcm9nSx8tXWeK_Cc10CF9aAq5gWVrJAadKEnPRBeV1J52FJti1IsyPX-t0txcsXetA062O1sgDigYRWtVClEwf9HldBSl1TJCb3Zoy5FxAS16VLT2jQaRs1PXDPFNfu4E3x1-B22Lfg_9Lem-AbZp3XV</recordid><startdate>201412</startdate><enddate>201412</enddate><creator>Kavet, Robert</creator><creator>Tell, R A</creator><creator>Olsen, R G</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201412</creationdate><title>Radiofrequency contact currents: sensory responses and dosimetry</title><author>Kavet, Robert ; Tell, R A ; Olsen, R G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-6cf99472da002d8bcd26ed22fe03ade681d3041549e959432e3d9846deb09a573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Electric Conductivity</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Radio Waves</topic><topic>Radiometry - standards</topic><topic>Sensation - radiation effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kavet, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tell, R A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsen, R G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kavet, Robert</au><au>Tell, R A</au><au>Olsen, R G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Radiofrequency contact currents: sensory responses and dosimetry</atitle><jtitle>Radiation protection dosimetry</jtitle><addtitle>Radiat Prot Dosimetry</addtitle><date>2014-12</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>162</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>268</spage><epage>279</epage><pages>268-279</pages><issn>0144-8420</issn><eissn>1742-3406</eissn><abstract>The process of setting science-based exposure standards (or guidelines) for radiofrequency (RF) contact current exposure has been disadvantaged by a lack of relevant data. The authors first review the essential features and results of the available studies and illustrate the apparent discrepancies among them. Then, they examine the manner in which current was administered in these studies and suggest as to how the physical relationship of a contacting finger to the current electrode may play a role in affecting sensory thresholds specific to those configurations. A major factor in this analysis relates to whether current density is uniformly distributed across the contact area or whether an electrode's 'edge effects' enhance currents with a net effect of decreasing apparent thresholds, when expressed as the bulk current entering a subject. For an exposure with a clear hazard potential, thresholds of human sensory response to RF currents require further investigation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>24324252</pmid><doi>10.1093/rpd/nct311</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0144-8420 |
ispartof | Radiation protection dosimetry, 2014-12, Vol.162 (3), p.268-279 |
issn | 0144-8420 1742-3406 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808673352 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Electric Conductivity Humans Radio Waves Radiometry - standards Sensation - radiation effects |
title | Radiofrequency contact currents: sensory responses and dosimetry |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T22%3A54%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Radiofrequency%20contact%20currents:%20sensory%20responses%20and%20dosimetry&rft.jtitle=Radiation%20protection%20dosimetry&rft.au=Kavet,%20Robert&rft.date=2014-12&rft.volume=162&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=268&rft.epage=279&rft.pages=268-279&rft.issn=0144-8420&rft.eissn=1742-3406&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/rpd/nct311&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1639497064%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-6cf99472da002d8bcd26ed22fe03ade681d3041549e959432e3d9846deb09a573%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1639497064&rft_id=info:pmid/24324252&rfr_iscdi=true |