The reintroduction of the white-tailed sea eagle to Ireland: People and wildlife

• Published in: Land use policy 2014-05, Vol.38, p.129-137
• Main Author: O’Rourke, Eileen
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animal, plant and microbial ecology; Applied ecology; Biodiversity; Biological and medical sciences; Communication; Conflict; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife; Ecology; Farmers; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Human–wildlife conflict; Ireland; Law enforcement; Legislation; Science; Scientists; Species reintroduction; Stakeholders; White-tailed sea eagle; Wildlife
• ISSN: 0264-8377; 1873-5754
• DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.10.020

•Human–wildlife conflict is a rapidly developing topic in biodiversity and conservation management.•Increased contact between people and wildlife has resulted in increased conflict.•Behind all human–wildlife conflict lies human–human conflict.•Early stakeholder engagement is critical to the success of species reintroduction projects.•Legislation and law enforcement on its own will not solve human–wildlife conflict issues. Human–wildlife conflict is a rapidly developing topic in biodiversity and conservation management. Restoration ecology and species reintroductions have increased contact between people and wildlife which in turn has led to increased conflict. This paper explores the conflict surrounding the reintroduction of the white-tailed sea eagle to Ireland. It provides a summary of how the diverse stakeholders – conservationists, farmers, tourist lobby and general public – interpret the eagle's homecoming after an absence from the landscape of over a hundred years. Species reintroduction projects tend to be dominated by natural scientists, who emphasise the impartiality of science and often ignore or down play the socio-economic aspects of species reintroductions. The conflict surrounding the reintroduction of the sea eagles to Ireland reinforce the truism that behind all human–wildlife conflict, lies human–human conflict. The paper argues that the human dimension of species reintroductions need to be taken seriously if the project management aims are to be achieved, and that legislation and law enforcement on its own will not solve human–wildlife conflict issues. The conflict between the ‘raptor and the lamb’ described in this paper highlights the need for the early involvement of all key stakeholders, and the importance of establishing effective dialogue and communications among the different parties. It should also be recognised that the reintroduction of a species may not always be the right option to pursue.