Loading…

OP75Validation of diet and urinary excretion derived estimates of sodium excretion against 24-hour urine excretion in a worksite sample

BackgroundCurrent measurements of dietary and urinary sodium are fraught with methodological difficulties. Dietary methods tend to underestimate sodium consumption due to under-reporting of discretionary sources of salt (added at the table, or during cooking). The 24-hour urine collection method whi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979) 2015-09, Vol.69 (Suppl 1), p.A42-A42
Main Authors: Kelly, C, Geaney, F, Fitzgerald, A P, Browne, G M, Perry, I J
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page A42
container_issue Suppl 1
container_start_page A42
container_title Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)
container_volume 69
creator Kelly, C
Geaney, F
Fitzgerald, A P
Browne, G M
Perry, I J
description BackgroundCurrent measurements of dietary and urinary sodium are fraught with methodological difficulties. Dietary methods tend to underestimate sodium consumption due to under-reporting of discretionary sources of salt (added at the table, or during cooking). The 24-hour urine collection method which is considered the 'gold standard' is burdensome and potentially limited by under-collection. Several methods have been used to predict 24-hour sodium excretion from spot urine samples, including arithmetic extrapolation and the application of predictive formulae based on spot sodium to creatinine ratios as a means of controlling for urinary concentration, including those of Tanaka and Kawasaki. However the use of these methods in analytical epidemiological research is controversial. The aim of this study was to validate diet and urinary excretion derived estimates of sodium intake against those derived from 24-hour urine collections in an Irish manufacturing workplace sample.MethodsWe have compared daily sodium (Na) excretion from PABA (Para-aminobenzoic acid) validated 24-hour urine collections with estimated daily sodium excretion derived from the following methods: a standard Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ), a modified 24-hour dietary recall method, arithmetic extrapolations from morning and evening spot urine samples, predicted sodium excretion from morning and evening spot urine samples using both Tanaka's and Kawasaki's formula. All were assessed using mean differences (SD), Bland-Altman plots, correlation coefficients and ROC Area under the Curve (AUC) with a cut off of greater than or equal to 100 mmol of Na/day, used to define high salt intake.ResultsThe Food Choice at Work study recruited 802 participants aged 18-64 years, 50 of whom formed the validation sample (provided a complete 24-hour urine collection). The mean dietary sodium intake was 138 mmol/day (8.1g salt) from the 24-hour urine collections. At the group level mean differences (mmol/day) were small for the 24-hour dietary recall method (3.8 (SD 69.4)), FFQ method (9.1 (SD 52.4)) and the arithmetic extrapolation from morning urine samples (3.8 (SD 77.4)). Biassed estimates of 24-hour sodium excretion were reported for Tanaka (10.9 (SD 54)), and Kawasaki (-47 (SD 61)) based estimates. The AUC findings for all methods ranged from 0.56 (arithmetic extrapolations evening spot) to 0.76 (FFQ).ConclusionNeither dietary nor spot urine sample methods provide adequate validity in the estimation
doi_str_mv 10.1136/jech-2015-206256.74
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808704832</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1808704832</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_18087048323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVjb1OAzEQhF2AlPDzBDQuaS7Yvl_qKIgOCoTootV5k2zw2cFrQ_IEvDZHRJGWZmak-TQjxI1WM63L5m6L_aYwStejNKZuZm11JqZKV2WhVP02ERfMWzXG1txPxffTc1u_giMLiYKXYSUtYZLgrcyRPMSDxH0f8dhajPSJViInGiAh__IcLOXhhII1kOckTVVsQo7HHTzpaUTkV4jvTAklw7BzeCXOV-AYr__8Utw-LF7mj8Uuho88_i0H4h6dA48h81J3qmtV1ZWm_Af6A1kBXUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1808704832</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>OP75Validation of diet and urinary excretion derived estimates of sodium excretion against 24-hour urine excretion in a worksite sample</title><source>JSTOR-E-Journals</source><source>BMJ Publishing</source><creator>Kelly, C ; Geaney, F ; Fitzgerald, A P ; Browne, G M ; Perry, I J</creator><creatorcontrib>Kelly, C ; Geaney, F ; Fitzgerald, A P ; Browne, G M ; Perry, I J</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundCurrent measurements of dietary and urinary sodium are fraught with methodological difficulties. Dietary methods tend to underestimate sodium consumption due to under-reporting of discretionary sources of salt (added at the table, or during cooking). The 24-hour urine collection method which is considered the 'gold standard' is burdensome and potentially limited by under-collection. Several methods have been used to predict 24-hour sodium excretion from spot urine samples, including arithmetic extrapolation and the application of predictive formulae based on spot sodium to creatinine ratios as a means of controlling for urinary concentration, including those of Tanaka and Kawasaki. However the use of these methods in analytical epidemiological research is controversial. The aim of this study was to validate diet and urinary excretion derived estimates of sodium intake against those derived from 24-hour urine collections in an Irish manufacturing workplace sample.MethodsWe have compared daily sodium (Na) excretion from PABA (Para-aminobenzoic acid) validated 24-hour urine collections with estimated daily sodium excretion derived from the following methods: a standard Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ), a modified 24-hour dietary recall method, arithmetic extrapolations from morning and evening spot urine samples, predicted sodium excretion from morning and evening spot urine samples using both Tanaka's and Kawasaki's formula. All were assessed using mean differences (SD), Bland-Altman plots, correlation coefficients and ROC Area under the Curve (AUC) with a cut off of greater than or equal to 100 mmol of Na/day, used to define high salt intake.ResultsThe Food Choice at Work study recruited 802 participants aged 18-64 years, 50 of whom formed the validation sample (provided a complete 24-hour urine collection). The mean dietary sodium intake was 138 mmol/day (8.1g salt) from the 24-hour urine collections. At the group level mean differences (mmol/day) were small for the 24-hour dietary recall method (3.8 (SD 69.4)), FFQ method (9.1 (SD 52.4)) and the arithmetic extrapolation from morning urine samples (3.8 (SD 77.4)). Biassed estimates of 24-hour sodium excretion were reported for Tanaka (10.9 (SD 54)), and Kawasaki (-47 (SD 61)) based estimates. The AUC findings for all methods ranged from 0.56 (arithmetic extrapolations evening spot) to 0.76 (FFQ).ConclusionNeither dietary nor spot urine sample methods provide adequate validity in the estimation of 24-hour sodium excretion at the individual level. At the group level the errors from dietary methods are small and random and compare favourably with those from spot urine samples in this population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0143-005X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/jech-2015-206256.74</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979), 2015-09, Vol.69 (Suppl 1), p.A42-A42</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kelly, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geaney, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, A P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browne, G M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, I J</creatorcontrib><title>OP75Validation of diet and urinary excretion derived estimates of sodium excretion against 24-hour urine excretion in a worksite sample</title><title>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</title><description>BackgroundCurrent measurements of dietary and urinary sodium are fraught with methodological difficulties. Dietary methods tend to underestimate sodium consumption due to under-reporting of discretionary sources of salt (added at the table, or during cooking). The 24-hour urine collection method which is considered the 'gold standard' is burdensome and potentially limited by under-collection. Several methods have been used to predict 24-hour sodium excretion from spot urine samples, including arithmetic extrapolation and the application of predictive formulae based on spot sodium to creatinine ratios as a means of controlling for urinary concentration, including those of Tanaka and Kawasaki. However the use of these methods in analytical epidemiological research is controversial. The aim of this study was to validate diet and urinary excretion derived estimates of sodium intake against those derived from 24-hour urine collections in an Irish manufacturing workplace sample.MethodsWe have compared daily sodium (Na) excretion from PABA (Para-aminobenzoic acid) validated 24-hour urine collections with estimated daily sodium excretion derived from the following methods: a standard Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ), a modified 24-hour dietary recall method, arithmetic extrapolations from morning and evening spot urine samples, predicted sodium excretion from morning and evening spot urine samples using both Tanaka's and Kawasaki's formula. All were assessed using mean differences (SD), Bland-Altman plots, correlation coefficients and ROC Area under the Curve (AUC) with a cut off of greater than or equal to 100 mmol of Na/day, used to define high salt intake.ResultsThe Food Choice at Work study recruited 802 participants aged 18-64 years, 50 of whom formed the validation sample (provided a complete 24-hour urine collection). The mean dietary sodium intake was 138 mmol/day (8.1g salt) from the 24-hour urine collections. At the group level mean differences (mmol/day) were small for the 24-hour dietary recall method (3.8 (SD 69.4)), FFQ method (9.1 (SD 52.4)) and the arithmetic extrapolation from morning urine samples (3.8 (SD 77.4)). Biassed estimates of 24-hour sodium excretion were reported for Tanaka (10.9 (SD 54)), and Kawasaki (-47 (SD 61)) based estimates. The AUC findings for all methods ranged from 0.56 (arithmetic extrapolations evening spot) to 0.76 (FFQ).ConclusionNeither dietary nor spot urine sample methods provide adequate validity in the estimation of 24-hour sodium excretion at the individual level. At the group level the errors from dietary methods are small and random and compare favourably with those from spot urine samples in this population.</description><issn>0143-005X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVjb1OAzEQhF2AlPDzBDQuaS7Yvl_qKIgOCoTootV5k2zw2cFrQ_IEvDZHRJGWZmak-TQjxI1WM63L5m6L_aYwStejNKZuZm11JqZKV2WhVP02ERfMWzXG1txPxffTc1u_giMLiYKXYSUtYZLgrcyRPMSDxH0f8dhajPSJViInGiAh__IcLOXhhII1kOckTVVsQo7HHTzpaUTkV4jvTAklw7BzeCXOV-AYr__8Utw-LF7mj8Uuho88_i0H4h6dA48h81J3qmtV1ZWm_Af6A1kBXUw</recordid><startdate>20150901</startdate><enddate>20150901</enddate><creator>Kelly, C</creator><creator>Geaney, F</creator><creator>Fitzgerald, A P</creator><creator>Browne, G M</creator><creator>Perry, I J</creator><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150901</creationdate><title>OP75Validation of diet and urinary excretion derived estimates of sodium excretion against 24-hour urine excretion in a worksite sample</title><author>Kelly, C ; Geaney, F ; Fitzgerald, A P ; Browne, G M ; Perry, I J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_18087048323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kelly, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geaney, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fitzgerald, A P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Browne, G M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perry, I J</creatorcontrib><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kelly, C</au><au>Geaney, F</au><au>Fitzgerald, A P</au><au>Browne, G M</au><au>Perry, I J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>OP75Validation of diet and urinary excretion derived estimates of sodium excretion against 24-hour urine excretion in a worksite sample</atitle><jtitle>Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979)</jtitle><date>2015-09-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A42</spage><epage>A42</epage><pages>A42-A42</pages><issn>0143-005X</issn><abstract>BackgroundCurrent measurements of dietary and urinary sodium are fraught with methodological difficulties. Dietary methods tend to underestimate sodium consumption due to under-reporting of discretionary sources of salt (added at the table, or during cooking). The 24-hour urine collection method which is considered the 'gold standard' is burdensome and potentially limited by under-collection. Several methods have been used to predict 24-hour sodium excretion from spot urine samples, including arithmetic extrapolation and the application of predictive formulae based on spot sodium to creatinine ratios as a means of controlling for urinary concentration, including those of Tanaka and Kawasaki. However the use of these methods in analytical epidemiological research is controversial. The aim of this study was to validate diet and urinary excretion derived estimates of sodium intake against those derived from 24-hour urine collections in an Irish manufacturing workplace sample.MethodsWe have compared daily sodium (Na) excretion from PABA (Para-aminobenzoic acid) validated 24-hour urine collections with estimated daily sodium excretion derived from the following methods: a standard Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ), a modified 24-hour dietary recall method, arithmetic extrapolations from morning and evening spot urine samples, predicted sodium excretion from morning and evening spot urine samples using both Tanaka's and Kawasaki's formula. All were assessed using mean differences (SD), Bland-Altman plots, correlation coefficients and ROC Area under the Curve (AUC) with a cut off of greater than or equal to 100 mmol of Na/day, used to define high salt intake.ResultsThe Food Choice at Work study recruited 802 participants aged 18-64 years, 50 of whom formed the validation sample (provided a complete 24-hour urine collection). The mean dietary sodium intake was 138 mmol/day (8.1g salt) from the 24-hour urine collections. At the group level mean differences (mmol/day) were small for the 24-hour dietary recall method (3.8 (SD 69.4)), FFQ method (9.1 (SD 52.4)) and the arithmetic extrapolation from morning urine samples (3.8 (SD 77.4)). Biassed estimates of 24-hour sodium excretion were reported for Tanaka (10.9 (SD 54)), and Kawasaki (-47 (SD 61)) based estimates. The AUC findings for all methods ranged from 0.56 (arithmetic extrapolations evening spot) to 0.76 (FFQ).ConclusionNeither dietary nor spot urine sample methods provide adequate validity in the estimation of 24-hour sodium excretion at the individual level. At the group level the errors from dietary methods are small and random and compare favourably with those from spot urine samples in this population.</abstract><doi>10.1136/jech-2015-206256.74</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0143-005X
ispartof Journal of epidemiology and community health (1979), 2015-09, Vol.69 (Suppl 1), p.A42-A42
issn 0143-005X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1808704832
source JSTOR-E-Journals; BMJ Publishing
title OP75Validation of diet and urinary excretion derived estimates of sodium excretion against 24-hour urine excretion in a worksite sample
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T05%3A49%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=OP75Validation%20of%20diet%20and%20urinary%20excretion%20derived%20estimates%20of%20sodium%20excretion%20against%2024-hour%20urine%20excretion%20in%20a%20worksite%20sample&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20epidemiology%20and%20community%20health%20(1979)&rft.au=Kelly,%20C&rft.date=2015-09-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A42&rft.epage=A42&rft.pages=A42-A42&rft.issn=0143-005X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/jech-2015-206256.74&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1808704832%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_18087048323%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1808704832&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true