Assessment criteria for simple conceptual daily rainfall-runoff models

Four simple conceptual daily rainfall-runoff models are applied to a 25-basin data set. The drainage basins are all from the UK, covering a range of sizes, topographies, soils and climates. The quality of the simulation of the observed response is classically quantified by a minimized objective func...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hydrological sciences journal 1999-04, Vol.44 (2), p.237-261
Main Author: HOUGHTON-CARR, H. A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
Hydrology
Hydrology. Hydrogeology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Four simple conceptual daily rainfall-runoff models are applied to a 25-basin data set. The drainage basins are all from the UK, covering a range of sizes, topographies, soils and climates. The quality of the simulation of the observed response is classically quantified by a minimized objective function. However, in this instance, model performance is judged by a range of quantitative and qualitative measures of fit, applied to both the calibration and validation periods. These include efficiency, mean annual runoff, baseflow index, the synthetic monthly and daily flow regimes, and the flow duration curve. The main conclusion is that the quantitative criteria used alone are rarely sufficient to determine the quality of the model performance. It is usually necessary to include some qualitative indication of goodness-of-fit, such as the quality of the synthetic daily flow hydrograph. However, assessment of the quality of daily flow regimes can be highly subjective.
ISSN:0262-6667
2150-3435
DOI:10.1080/02626669909492220