Loading…

Towards a General Theory of Agricultural Knowledge Production: Environmental, Social, and Didactic Learning

Social scientists and input producers alike have seen farmer decision making as driven by environmental learning based on experimentation and empirical observation. A more robust body of theory influenced by behavioral ecology sees a major role for social learning based on emulation of models select...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Culture, agriculture, food and the environment agriculture, food and the environment, 2016-06, Vol.38 (1), p.5-17
Main Author: Stone, Glenn Davis
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3441-b02963bb5a6dbc3a6c65e5f5573c02f8d228552e717091abbddf43167e27a08e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3441-b02963bb5a6dbc3a6c65e5f5573c02f8d228552e717091abbddf43167e27a08e3
container_end_page 17
container_issue 1
container_start_page 5
container_title Culture, agriculture, food and the environment
container_volume 38
creator Stone, Glenn Davis
description Social scientists and input producers alike have seen farmer decision making as driven by environmental learning based on experimentation and empirical observation. A more robust body of theory influenced by behavioral ecology sees a major role for social learning based on emulation of models selected on social criteria, although the relationship between these learning modes is not well understood. But a larger problem is that these perspectives ignore what is here termed didactic learning, whereby various parties bring instruction to the farm. Although not previously theorized, didactic learning is often crucial in agricultural learning and also distinct because it is driven by off‐farm interests. The outline of a general theory of farmer learning is presented, comprising an analysis of the salient characteristics of the three modalities and consideration of interaction among them. The successes of nonindustrial small farm management notwithstanding, there are serious limitations to the experimental basis of environmental learning. Agriculture is particularly suited to formal experimentation, but only because of simplifications that contradict the nature of actual decision making. Social learning is essential in agriculture but it may become maladaptive when environmental learning is particularly challenged. Among the entities involved in didactic learning are the state (with interests in monitoring and control), input developers and sellers (with interests in sales), and Non Governmental Organizations (with interests in media showing impacts of didactic learning).
doi_str_mv 10.1111/cuag.12061
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1810067340</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1810067340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3441-b02963bb5a6dbc3a6c65e5f5573c02f8d228552e717091abbddf43167e27a08e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhCMEElXhwi_wESECfsR5cKsKBGgFSBRxtBx7UwypDXZC6b8npcCRucxq9c1qNVF0QPAJ6XWqOjk_IRSnZCsaUMJZXPCUbP_NnO1G-yG84F6sKApGBtHrzC2l1wFJVIIFLxs0ewbnV8jVaDT3RnVN263XE-uWDeg5oHvvdKda4-wZurAfxju7ANvK5hg9OGXWLq1G50bLnlJoCtJbY-d70U4tmwD7Pz6MHi8vZuOreHpXXo9H01ixJCFxhWmRsqriMtWVYjJVKQdec54xhWmda0pzzilkJMMFkVWldZ0wkmZAM4lzYMPocHP3zbv3DkIrFiYoaBppwXVBkJxgnGYswT16tEGVdyF4qMWbNwvpV4JgsS5VrEsV36X2MNnAS9PA6h9SjB9H5W8m3mRMaOHzLyP9q-g_yLh4ui3FbHJe5nRyIxL2BYEhiJk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1810067340</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Towards a General Theory of Agricultural Knowledge Production: Environmental, Social, and Didactic Learning</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley</source><creator>Stone, Glenn Davis</creator><creatorcontrib>Stone, Glenn Davis</creatorcontrib><description>Social scientists and input producers alike have seen farmer decision making as driven by environmental learning based on experimentation and empirical observation. A more robust body of theory influenced by behavioral ecology sees a major role for social learning based on emulation of models selected on social criteria, although the relationship between these learning modes is not well understood. But a larger problem is that these perspectives ignore what is here termed didactic learning, whereby various parties bring instruction to the farm. Although not previously theorized, didactic learning is often crucial in agricultural learning and also distinct because it is driven by off‐farm interests. The outline of a general theory of farmer learning is presented, comprising an analysis of the salient characteristics of the three modalities and consideration of interaction among them. The successes of nonindustrial small farm management notwithstanding, there are serious limitations to the experimental basis of environmental learning. Agriculture is particularly suited to formal experimentation, but only because of simplifications that contradict the nature of actual decision making. Social learning is essential in agriculture but it may become maladaptive when environmental learning is particularly challenged. Among the entities involved in didactic learning are the state (with interests in monitoring and control), input developers and sellers (with interests in sales), and Non Governmental Organizations (with interests in media showing impacts of didactic learning).</description><identifier>ISSN: 2153-9553</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2153-9561</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cuag.12061</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>agricultural extension ; Agricultural production ; agriculture ; Environmental education ; farmer knowledge ; farmer learning ; Knowledge ; Learning ; political ecology ; Social policy ; technology adoption ; Theory</subject><ispartof>Culture, agriculture, food and the environment, 2016-06, Vol.38 (1), p.5-17</ispartof><rights>2016 by the American Anthropological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3441-b02963bb5a6dbc3a6c65e5f5573c02f8d228552e717091abbddf43167e27a08e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3441-b02963bb5a6dbc3a6c65e5f5573c02f8d228552e717091abbddf43167e27a08e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stone, Glenn Davis</creatorcontrib><title>Towards a General Theory of Agricultural Knowledge Production: Environmental, Social, and Didactic Learning</title><title>Culture, agriculture, food and the environment</title><addtitle>Cult Agric Food Environ</addtitle><description>Social scientists and input producers alike have seen farmer decision making as driven by environmental learning based on experimentation and empirical observation. A more robust body of theory influenced by behavioral ecology sees a major role for social learning based on emulation of models selected on social criteria, although the relationship between these learning modes is not well understood. But a larger problem is that these perspectives ignore what is here termed didactic learning, whereby various parties bring instruction to the farm. Although not previously theorized, didactic learning is often crucial in agricultural learning and also distinct because it is driven by off‐farm interests. The outline of a general theory of farmer learning is presented, comprising an analysis of the salient characteristics of the three modalities and consideration of interaction among them. The successes of nonindustrial small farm management notwithstanding, there are serious limitations to the experimental basis of environmental learning. Agriculture is particularly suited to formal experimentation, but only because of simplifications that contradict the nature of actual decision making. Social learning is essential in agriculture but it may become maladaptive when environmental learning is particularly challenged. Among the entities involved in didactic learning are the state (with interests in monitoring and control), input developers and sellers (with interests in sales), and Non Governmental Organizations (with interests in media showing impacts of didactic learning).</description><subject>agricultural extension</subject><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>agriculture</subject><subject>Environmental education</subject><subject>farmer knowledge</subject><subject>farmer learning</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>political ecology</subject><subject>Social policy</subject><subject>technology adoption</subject><subject>Theory</subject><issn>2153-9553</issn><issn>2153-9561</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhCMEElXhwi_wESECfsR5cKsKBGgFSBRxtBx7UwypDXZC6b8npcCRucxq9c1qNVF0QPAJ6XWqOjk_IRSnZCsaUMJZXPCUbP_NnO1G-yG84F6sKApGBtHrzC2l1wFJVIIFLxs0ewbnV8jVaDT3RnVN263XE-uWDeg5oHvvdKda4-wZurAfxju7ANvK5hg9OGXWLq1G50bLnlJoCtJbY-d70U4tmwD7Pz6MHi8vZuOreHpXXo9H01ixJCFxhWmRsqriMtWVYjJVKQdec54xhWmda0pzzilkJMMFkVWldZ0wkmZAM4lzYMPocHP3zbv3DkIrFiYoaBppwXVBkJxgnGYswT16tEGVdyF4qMWbNwvpV4JgsS5VrEsV36X2MNnAS9PA6h9SjB9H5W8m3mRMaOHzLyP9q-g_yLh4ui3FbHJe5nRyIxL2BYEhiJk</recordid><startdate>201606</startdate><enddate>201606</enddate><creator>Stone, Glenn Davis</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201606</creationdate><title>Towards a General Theory of Agricultural Knowledge Production: Environmental, Social, and Didactic Learning</title><author>Stone, Glenn Davis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3441-b02963bb5a6dbc3a6c65e5f5573c02f8d228552e717091abbddf43167e27a08e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>agricultural extension</topic><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>agriculture</topic><topic>Environmental education</topic><topic>farmer knowledge</topic><topic>farmer learning</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>political ecology</topic><topic>Social policy</topic><topic>technology adoption</topic><topic>Theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stone, Glenn Davis</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Culture, agriculture, food and the environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stone, Glenn Davis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Towards a General Theory of Agricultural Knowledge Production: Environmental, Social, and Didactic Learning</atitle><jtitle>Culture, agriculture, food and the environment</jtitle><addtitle>Cult Agric Food Environ</addtitle><date>2016-06</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>5</spage><epage>17</epage><pages>5-17</pages><issn>2153-9553</issn><eissn>2153-9561</eissn><abstract>Social scientists and input producers alike have seen farmer decision making as driven by environmental learning based on experimentation and empirical observation. A more robust body of theory influenced by behavioral ecology sees a major role for social learning based on emulation of models selected on social criteria, although the relationship between these learning modes is not well understood. But a larger problem is that these perspectives ignore what is here termed didactic learning, whereby various parties bring instruction to the farm. Although not previously theorized, didactic learning is often crucial in agricultural learning and also distinct because it is driven by off‐farm interests. The outline of a general theory of farmer learning is presented, comprising an analysis of the salient characteristics of the three modalities and consideration of interaction among them. The successes of nonindustrial small farm management notwithstanding, there are serious limitations to the experimental basis of environmental learning. Agriculture is particularly suited to formal experimentation, but only because of simplifications that contradict the nature of actual decision making. Social learning is essential in agriculture but it may become maladaptive when environmental learning is particularly challenged. Among the entities involved in didactic learning are the state (with interests in monitoring and control), input developers and sellers (with interests in sales), and Non Governmental Organizations (with interests in media showing impacts of didactic learning).</abstract><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/cuag.12061</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2153-9553
ispartof Culture, agriculture, food and the environment, 2016-06, Vol.38 (1), p.5-17
issn 2153-9553
2153-9561
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1810067340
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley
subjects agricultural extension
Agricultural production
agriculture
Environmental education
farmer knowledge
farmer learning
Knowledge
Learning
political ecology
Social policy
technology adoption
Theory
title Towards a General Theory of Agricultural Knowledge Production: Environmental, Social, and Didactic Learning
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T02%3A16%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Towards%20a%20General%20Theory%20of%20Agricultural%20Knowledge%20Production:%20Environmental,%20Social,%20and%20Didactic%20Learning&rft.jtitle=Culture,%20agriculture,%20food%20and%20the%20environment&rft.au=Stone,%20Glenn%20Davis&rft.date=2016-06&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=5&rft.epage=17&rft.pages=5-17&rft.issn=2153-9553&rft.eissn=2153-9561&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cuag.12061&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1810067340%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3441-b02963bb5a6dbc3a6c65e5f5573c02f8d228552e717091abbddf43167e27a08e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1810067340&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true