Loading…
Can symptoms help in differential diagnosis between substance-induced vs independent psychosis in adults with a lifetime diagnosis of cocaine use disorder?
Abstract The main goal of this study it is explore the psychopathological differences between IPD and SIPD in a sample of 125 adults with a lifetime diagnosis of cocaine disorder recruited from treatment setting and through street contacts. A secondary analysis of six cross-sectional studies was con...
Saved in:
Published in: | Psychiatry research 2016-08, Vol.242, p.94-100 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Abstract The main goal of this study it is explore the psychopathological differences between IPD and SIPD in a sample of 125 adults with a lifetime diagnosis of cocaine disorder recruited from treatment setting and through street contacts. A secondary analysis of six cross-sectional studies was conducted between 2000 and 2010. SIPD and IPD were diagnosed using the Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders (PRISM). 38 subjects (30.4%) were diagnosed with lifetime IPD and 87 (69.6%) with lifetime SIPD. A binomial logistic regression analysis using SIPD as the reference group showed that only previous prison admissions (OR 2.59; 95% CI 1.05, 6.36) and visual hallucinations (OR 5.21; 95% CI 1.54, 17.65) remained significant variables in the group with lifetime SIPD. In the group with lifetime IPD, grandiose delusions (OR 0.19; 95% CI 0.06, 0.60) and disorganized speech (OR 0.16; 95% CI 0.04, 0.61) remained significant. Model predicts the diagnosis of lifetime SIPD with a sensitivity of 80.3% and a specificity of 78.2%. This clinical profile of lifetime SIPD could help distinguish between IPD and SIPD among adults with lifetime diagnosis of cocaine disorder. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0165-1781 1872-7123 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.05.043 |