Loading…

The Use of In Vivo, Ex Vivo, In Vitro, Computational Models and Volunteer Studies in Vision Research and Therapy, and Their Contribution to the Three Rs

Much is known about mammalian vision, and considerable progress has been achieved in treating many vision disorders, especially those due to changes in the eye, by using various therapeutic methods, including stem cell and gene therapy. While cells and tissues from the main parts of the eye and the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Alternatives to laboratory animals 2016-07, Vol.44 (3), p.187-238
Main Authors: Combes, Robert D., Shah, Atul B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-d917ce094f15940fc749343da363eed8c2c6083e8e523bfe08ab920ba70f517f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-d917ce094f15940fc749343da363eed8c2c6083e8e523bfe08ab920ba70f517f3
container_end_page 238
container_issue 3
container_start_page 187
container_title Alternatives to laboratory animals
container_volume 44
creator Combes, Robert D.
Shah, Atul B.
description Much is known about mammalian vision, and considerable progress has been achieved in treating many vision disorders, especially those due to changes in the eye, by using various therapeutic methods, including stem cell and gene therapy. While cells and tissues from the main parts of the eye and the visual cortex (VC) can be maintained in culture, and many computer models exist, the current non-animal approaches are severely limiting in the study of visual perception and retinotopic imaging. Some of the early studies with cats and non-human primates (NHPs) are controversial for animal welfare reasons and are of questionable clinical relevance, particularly with respect to the treatment of amblyopia. More recently, the UK Home Office records have shown that attention is now more focused on rodents, especially the mouse. This is likely to be due to the perceived need for genetically-altered animals, rather than to knowledge of the similarities and differences of vision in cats, NHPs and rodents, and the fact that the same techniques can be used for all of the species. We discuss the advantages and limitations of animal and non-animal methods for vision research, and assess their relative contributions to basic knowledge and clinical practice, as well as outlining the opportunities they offer for implementing the principles of the Three Rs (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement).
doi_str_mv 10.1177/026119291604400302
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1810353055</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_026119291604400302</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1810353055</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-d917ce094f15940fc749343da363eed8c2c6083e8e523bfe08ab920ba70f517f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctOwzAQRS0EolXpD7BAXrJowI84jyWqClQqQoLCNnKSCTVK4mI7iP4Jn4vTBxskVh5b597xzEXonJIrSuP4mrCI0pSlNCJhSAgn7AgNWcRZwIVIj9GwB4KeGKCxtSongvMk5ok4RQMWh2kYMT5E38sV4BcLWFd43uJX9aknePa1L7Yvzvhqqpt156RTupU1ftAl1BbLtsSvuu5aB2Dws-tKBRarXmQ9iJ_AgjTFagv6RkauN5PDRRlv2jqj8q53xU5j5_-yXBkA_GTP0Eklawvj_TlCL7ez5fQ-WDzezac3i6BgInFBmdK4AJKGFRVpSKrCT8ZDXkoecYAyKVgRkYRDAoLxvAKSyDxlJJcxqQSNKz5ClzvftdEfHViXNcoWUNeyBd3ZjCaUcMGJEB5lO7Qw2loDVbY2qpFmk1GS9aFkf0Pxoou9f5c3UP5KDhF44HoHWPkG2bvujN-w_c_yB6Alk9k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1810353055</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Use of In Vivo, Ex Vivo, In Vitro, Computational Models and Volunteer Studies in Vision Research and Therapy, and Their Contribution to the Three Rs</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Combes, Robert D. ; Shah, Atul B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Combes, Robert D. ; Shah, Atul B.</creatorcontrib><description>Much is known about mammalian vision, and considerable progress has been achieved in treating many vision disorders, especially those due to changes in the eye, by using various therapeutic methods, including stem cell and gene therapy. While cells and tissues from the main parts of the eye and the visual cortex (VC) can be maintained in culture, and many computer models exist, the current non-animal approaches are severely limiting in the study of visual perception and retinotopic imaging. Some of the early studies with cats and non-human primates (NHPs) are controversial for animal welfare reasons and are of questionable clinical relevance, particularly with respect to the treatment of amblyopia. More recently, the UK Home Office records have shown that attention is now more focused on rodents, especially the mouse. This is likely to be due to the perceived need for genetically-altered animals, rather than to knowledge of the similarities and differences of vision in cats, NHPs and rodents, and the fact that the same techniques can be used for all of the species. We discuss the advantages and limitations of animal and non-animal methods for vision research, and assess their relative contributions to basic knowledge and clinical practice, as well as outlining the opportunities they offer for implementing the principles of the Three Rs (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0261-1929</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2632-3559</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/026119291604400302</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27494623</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Animal Testing Alternatives ; Animal Welfare ; Animals ; Cats ; Computer Simulation ; Eye Diseases - pathology ; Humans ; Mice ; Models, Biological ; Ocular Physiological Phenomena ; Primates ; Research - standards ; Tissue Culture Techniques ; Vision, Ocular - physiology</subject><ispartof>Alternatives to laboratory animals, 2016-07, Vol.44 (3), p.187-238</ispartof><rights>2016 Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments</rights><rights>2016 FRAME.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-d917ce094f15940fc749343da363eed8c2c6083e8e523bfe08ab920ba70f517f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-d917ce094f15940fc749343da363eed8c2c6083e8e523bfe08ab920ba70f517f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27494623$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Combes, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Atul B.</creatorcontrib><title>The Use of In Vivo, Ex Vivo, In Vitro, Computational Models and Volunteer Studies in Vision Research and Therapy, and Their Contribution to the Three Rs</title><title>Alternatives to laboratory animals</title><addtitle>Altern Lab Anim</addtitle><description>Much is known about mammalian vision, and considerable progress has been achieved in treating many vision disorders, especially those due to changes in the eye, by using various therapeutic methods, including stem cell and gene therapy. While cells and tissues from the main parts of the eye and the visual cortex (VC) can be maintained in culture, and many computer models exist, the current non-animal approaches are severely limiting in the study of visual perception and retinotopic imaging. Some of the early studies with cats and non-human primates (NHPs) are controversial for animal welfare reasons and are of questionable clinical relevance, particularly with respect to the treatment of amblyopia. More recently, the UK Home Office records have shown that attention is now more focused on rodents, especially the mouse. This is likely to be due to the perceived need for genetically-altered animals, rather than to knowledge of the similarities and differences of vision in cats, NHPs and rodents, and the fact that the same techniques can be used for all of the species. We discuss the advantages and limitations of animal and non-animal methods for vision research, and assess their relative contributions to basic knowledge and clinical practice, as well as outlining the opportunities they offer for implementing the principles of the Three Rs (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement).</description><subject>Animal Testing Alternatives</subject><subject>Animal Welfare</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Cats</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Eye Diseases - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>Models, Biological</subject><subject>Ocular Physiological Phenomena</subject><subject>Primates</subject><subject>Research - standards</subject><subject>Tissue Culture Techniques</subject><subject>Vision, Ocular - physiology</subject><issn>0261-1929</issn><issn>2632-3559</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kctOwzAQRS0EolXpD7BAXrJowI84jyWqClQqQoLCNnKSCTVK4mI7iP4Jn4vTBxskVh5b597xzEXonJIrSuP4mrCI0pSlNCJhSAgn7AgNWcRZwIVIj9GwB4KeGKCxtSongvMk5ok4RQMWh2kYMT5E38sV4BcLWFd43uJX9aknePa1L7Yvzvhqqpt156RTupU1ftAl1BbLtsSvuu5aB2Dws-tKBRarXmQ9iJ_AgjTFagv6RkauN5PDRRlv2jqj8q53xU5j5_-yXBkA_GTP0Eklawvj_TlCL7ez5fQ-WDzezac3i6BgInFBmdK4AJKGFRVpSKrCT8ZDXkoecYAyKVgRkYRDAoLxvAKSyDxlJJcxqQSNKz5ClzvftdEfHViXNcoWUNeyBd3ZjCaUcMGJEB5lO7Qw2loDVbY2qpFmk1GS9aFkf0Pxoou9f5c3UP5KDhF44HoHWPkG2bvujN-w_c_yB6Alk9k</recordid><startdate>201607</startdate><enddate>201607</enddate><creator>Combes, Robert D.</creator><creator>Shah, Atul B.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201607</creationdate><title>The Use of In Vivo, Ex Vivo, In Vitro, Computational Models and Volunteer Studies in Vision Research and Therapy, and Their Contribution to the Three Rs</title><author>Combes, Robert D. ; Shah, Atul B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-d917ce094f15940fc749343da363eed8c2c6083e8e523bfe08ab920ba70f517f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animal Testing Alternatives</topic><topic>Animal Welfare</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Cats</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Eye Diseases - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>Models, Biological</topic><topic>Ocular Physiological Phenomena</topic><topic>Primates</topic><topic>Research - standards</topic><topic>Tissue Culture Techniques</topic><topic>Vision, Ocular - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Combes, Robert D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Atul B.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Alternatives to laboratory animals</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Combes, Robert D.</au><au>Shah, Atul B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Use of In Vivo, Ex Vivo, In Vitro, Computational Models and Volunteer Studies in Vision Research and Therapy, and Their Contribution to the Three Rs</atitle><jtitle>Alternatives to laboratory animals</jtitle><addtitle>Altern Lab Anim</addtitle><date>2016-07</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>187</spage><epage>238</epage><pages>187-238</pages><issn>0261-1929</issn><eissn>2632-3559</eissn><abstract>Much is known about mammalian vision, and considerable progress has been achieved in treating many vision disorders, especially those due to changes in the eye, by using various therapeutic methods, including stem cell and gene therapy. While cells and tissues from the main parts of the eye and the visual cortex (VC) can be maintained in culture, and many computer models exist, the current non-animal approaches are severely limiting in the study of visual perception and retinotopic imaging. Some of the early studies with cats and non-human primates (NHPs) are controversial for animal welfare reasons and are of questionable clinical relevance, particularly with respect to the treatment of amblyopia. More recently, the UK Home Office records have shown that attention is now more focused on rodents, especially the mouse. This is likely to be due to the perceived need for genetically-altered animals, rather than to knowledge of the similarities and differences of vision in cats, NHPs and rodents, and the fact that the same techniques can be used for all of the species. We discuss the advantages and limitations of animal and non-animal methods for vision research, and assess their relative contributions to basic knowledge and clinical practice, as well as outlining the opportunities they offer for implementing the principles of the Three Rs (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement).</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>27494623</pmid><doi>10.1177/026119291604400302</doi><tpages>52</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0261-1929
ispartof Alternatives to laboratory animals, 2016-07, Vol.44 (3), p.187-238
issn 0261-1929
2632-3559
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1810353055
source Sage Journals Online
subjects Animal Testing Alternatives
Animal Welfare
Animals
Cats
Computer Simulation
Eye Diseases - pathology
Humans
Mice
Models, Biological
Ocular Physiological Phenomena
Primates
Research - standards
Tissue Culture Techniques
Vision, Ocular - physiology
title The Use of In Vivo, Ex Vivo, In Vitro, Computational Models and Volunteer Studies in Vision Research and Therapy, and Their Contribution to the Three Rs
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T14%3A01%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Use%20of%20In%20Vivo,%20Ex%20Vivo,%20In%20Vitro,%20Computational%20Models%20and%20Volunteer%20Studies%20in%20Vision%20Research%20and%20Therapy,%20and%20Their%20Contribution%20to%20the%20Three%20Rs&rft.jtitle=Alternatives%20to%20laboratory%20animals&rft.au=Combes,%20Robert%20D.&rft.date=2016-07&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=187&rft.epage=238&rft.pages=187-238&rft.issn=0261-1929&rft.eissn=2632-3559&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/026119291604400302&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1810353055%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-d917ce094f15940fc749343da363eed8c2c6083e8e523bfe08ab920ba70f517f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1810353055&rft_id=info:pmid/27494623&rft_sage_id=10.1177_026119291604400302&rfr_iscdi=true