Loading…

Constructing and Validating 3D-pharmacophore Models to a Set of MMP-9 Inhibitors for Designing Novel Anti-melanoma Agents

A receptor‐independent (RI) four‐dimensional structure‐activity relationship (4D‐QSAR) formalism was applied to a set of sixty‐four β‐N‐biaryl ether sulfonamide hydroxamate derivatives, previously reported as potent inhibitors against matrix metalloproteinase subtype 9 (MMP‐9). MMP‐9 belongs to a gr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Molecular informatics 2016-07, Vol.35 (6-7), p.238-252
Main Authors: Medeiros Turra, Kely, Pineda Rivelli, Diogo, Berlanga de Moraes Barros, Silvia, Mesquita Pasqualoto, Kerly Fernanda
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A receptor‐independent (RI) four‐dimensional structure‐activity relationship (4D‐QSAR) formalism was applied to a set of sixty‐four β‐N‐biaryl ether sulfonamide hydroxamate derivatives, previously reported as potent inhibitors against matrix metalloproteinase subtype 9 (MMP‐9). MMP‐9 belongs to a group of enzymes related to the cleavage of several extracellular matrix components and has been associated to cancer invasiveness/metastasis. The best RI 4D‐QSAR model was statistically significant (N=47; r2=0.91; q2=0.83; LSE=0.09; LOF=0.35; outliers=0). Leave‐N‐out (LNO) and y‐randomization approaches indicated the QSAR model was robust and presented no chance correlation, respectively. Furthermore, it also had good external predictability (82 %) regarding the test set (N=17). In addition, the grid cell occupancy descriptors (GCOD) of the predicted bioactive conformation for the most potent inhibitor were successfully interpreted when docked into the MMP‐9 active site. The 3D‐pharmacophore findings were used to predict novel ligands and exploit the MMP‐9 calculated binding affinity through molecular docking procedure.
ISSN:1868-1743
1868-1751
DOI:10.1002/minf.201600004