Elucidating the role of D4 receptors in mediating attributions of salience to incentive stimuli on Pavlovian conditioned approach and conditioned reinforcement paradigms

• Published in: Behavioural brain research 2016-10, Vol.312, p.55-63
• Main Authors: Cocker, P.J., Vonder Haar, C., Winstanley, C.A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Autoshaping; Behavior, Animal - drug effects; Benzamides - pharmacology; Conditioned reinforcement; Conditioning, Classical - drug effects; Conditioning, Classical - physiology; Dopamine; Female; Gambling; Gambling - physiopathology; Male; Motivation - drug effects; Motivation - physiology; Pavlovian conditioned approach; Piperazines - pharmacology; Rats; Rats, Long-Evans; Receptors, Dopamine D4 - agonists; Receptors, Dopamine D4 - physiology; Reward
• ISSN: 0166-4328; 1872-7549
• DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.06.007

•Augmented cue reactivity has been theorised to confer vulnerability to addiction.•D4 receptors have previously been shown to alter attributions of incentive salience.•Here, acute D4 agonism does not alter cue reactivity on simple behavioural tasks.•Simple tasks may not adequately encapsulate dysfunction seen in complex disorders. The power of drug-associated cues to instigate drug ‘wanting’ and consequently promote drug seeking is a corner stone of contemporary theories of addiction. Gambling disorder has recently been added to the pantheon of addictive disorders due to the phenomenological similarities between the diseases. However, the neurobiological mechanism that may mediate increased sensitivity towards conditioned stimuli in addictive disorders is unclear. We have previously demonstrated using a rodent analogue of a simple slot machine that the dopamine D4 receptor is critically engaged in controlling animals’ attribution of salience to stimuli associated with reward in this paradigm, and consequently may represent a target for the treatment of gambling disorder. Here, we investigated the role of acute administration of a D4 receptor agonist on animals’ responsivity to conditioned stimuli on both a Pavlovian conditioned approach (autoshaping) and a conditioned reinforcement paradigm. Following training on one of the two tasks, separate cohorts of rats (male and female) were administered a dose of PD168077 shown to be maximally effective at precipitating errors in reward expectancy on the rat slot machine task (10mg/kg). However, augmenting the activity of the D4 receptors in this manner did not alter behaviour on either task. These data therefore provide novel evidence that the D4 receptor does not alter incentive motivation in response to cues on simple behavioural tasks.