Comparison of semen variables, sperm DNA damage and sperm membrane proteins in two male layer breeder lines

• Published in: Animal reproduction science 2016-09, Vol.172, p.131-136
• Main Authors: M, Shanmugam, T R, Kannaki, A, Vinoth
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Breeding; Chicken; Chickens - genetics; Chickens - physiology; DNA Damage; Fertility; Male; Selection, Genetic; Semen; Semen - physiology; Semen Analysis - veterinary; Spermatozoa - physiology
• ISSN: 0378-4320; 1873-2232
• DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2016.07.010

Semen variables are affected by the breed and strain of chicken. The present study was undertaken to compare the semen quality in two lines of adult chickens with particular reference to sperm chromatin condensation, sperm DNA damage and sperm membrane proteins. Semen from a PD3 and White Leghorn control line was collected at 46 and 47 weeks and 55 weeks of age. The semen was evaluated for gross variables and sperm chromatin condensation by aniline blue staining. Sperm DNA damage was assessed by using the comet assay at 47 weeks of age and sperm membrane proteins were assessed at 55 weeks of age. The duration of fertility was studied by inseminating 100 million sperm once into the hens of the same line as well as another line. The eggs were collected after insemination for 15days and incubated. The eggs were candled on 18th day of incubation for observing embryonic development. The White Leghorn control line had a greater sperm concentration and lesser percentage of morphologically abnormal sperm at the different ages where assessments occurred. There was no difference in sperm chromatin condensation, DNA damage and membrane proteins between the lines. Only low molecular weight protein bands of less than 95kDa were observed in samples of both lines. The line from which semen was used had no effect on the duration over which fertility was sustained after insemination either when used in the same line or another line. Thus, from the results of the present study it may be concluded that there was a difference in gross semen variables between the lines that were studied, however, the sperm chromatin condensation, DNA damage, membrane proteins and duration over which fertility was sustained after insemination did not differ between the lines.