In Vitro Assessment of the Abrasion Resistance of Two Types of Artificial Teeth Submitted to Brushing

Purpose To assess the effect of brushing with different solutions on the abrasion resistance of two types of acrylic resin teeth. Materials and Methods Maxillary premolars from two types of acrylic teeth (Biotone and Biotone IPN) were divided into six groups (n = 12), according to the solution used...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of prosthodontics 2016-08, Vol.25 (6), p.485-488
Main Authors: Policastro, Vivian Barnabé, Giro, Gabriela, Leite, Andressa Rosa Perin, Mendoza-Marin, Danny Omar, Paleari, André Gustavo, Compagnoni, Marco Antonio, Pero, Ana Carolina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
artificial teeth
Complete denture
Dentifrices
Dentistry
Humans
Tooth Abrasion
Tooth, Artificial
Toothbrushing
Toothpastes
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5685-d04ed60a65464235c4106d543bfa6a85797dc715afaa3652a9fff07936a2d1af3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5685-d04ed60a65464235c4106d543bfa6a85797dc715afaa3652a9fff07936a2d1af3
container_end_page 488
container_issue 6
container_start_page 485
container_title Journal of prosthodontics
container_volume 25
creator Policastro, Vivian Barnabé
Giro, Gabriela
Leite, Andressa Rosa Perin
Mendoza-Marin, Danny Omar
Paleari, André Gustavo
Compagnoni, Marco Antonio
Pero, Ana Carolina
description Purpose To assess the effect of brushing with different solutions on the abrasion resistance of two types of acrylic resin teeth. Materials and Methods Maxillary premolars from two types of acrylic teeth (Biotone and Biotone IPN) were divided into six groups (n = 12), according to the solution used during brushing: distilled water (control), coconut soap, or dentifrice. A mechanical brushing machine was used to simulate approximately 1 year of brushing (11,000 strokes). The weight loss (WL) of teeth was obtained from the difference between the initial (IW) and final weight (FW) of each specimen, and the mean of percentage of weight loss (PWL) was calculated for each group. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal‐Wallis test, followed by Bonferroni's post‐test comparison (α = 0.05). Results A statistically significant difference was found for the factor solution (p < 0.001). Brushing using dentifrice caused the highest values of weight loss (–0.50%), in comparison with the groups brushed with coconut soap (0.00%) or distilled water (0.00%). Conclusions For both types of artificial teeth, brushing with dentifrice produced higher abrasion than brushing with coconut soap or water.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jopr.12455
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815691951</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4143726501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5685-d04ed60a65464235c4106d543bfa6a85797dc715afaa3652a9fff07936a2d1af3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUFv0zAUxyPExMbgwgdAlrggpGx-sZ8TH8sEY9O0obaw3iw3salLGhfb0ei3J1m3HTggfHm23u_9pedflr0BegLDOV37bTiBgiM-y44AWZFXXC6eD3eKMpccFofZyxjXlAJgBS-yw0JIEKwSR5m56Mh3l4InkxhNjBvTJeItSStDJsugo_MdmZroYtJdbcbW_M6T-W5r4viYhOSsq51uydyYtCKzfrlxKZmGJE8-hj6uXPfjVXZgdRvN64d6nH37_Gl-9iW_ujm_OJtc5TWKCvOGctMIqgVywQuGNQcqGuRsabXQFZaybOoSUFutmcBCS2stLSUTumhAW3acvd_nboP_1ZuY1MbF2rSt7ozvo4IKcFhdIvwPCoXkEkb03V_o2vehGxYZKYq8QMYH6sOeqoOPMRirtsFtdNgpoGr0pEZP6t7TAL99iBy-yzRP6KOYAYA9cOdas_tHlLq8-Tp9DM33M4Ms8_tpRoefSpSsRHV7fa6muJhdVzNQt-wPKEGroA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1810542534</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In Vitro Assessment of the Abrasion Resistance of Two Types of Artificial Teeth Submitted to Brushing</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Policastro, Vivian Barnabé ; Giro, Gabriela ; Leite, Andressa Rosa Perin ; Mendoza-Marin, Danny Omar ; Paleari, André Gustavo ; Compagnoni, Marco Antonio ; Pero, Ana Carolina</creator><creatorcontrib>Policastro, Vivian Barnabé ; Giro, Gabriela ; Leite, Andressa Rosa Perin ; Mendoza-Marin, Danny Omar ; Paleari, André Gustavo ; Compagnoni, Marco Antonio ; Pero, Ana Carolina</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To assess the effect of brushing with different solutions on the abrasion resistance of two types of acrylic resin teeth. Materials and Methods Maxillary premolars from two types of acrylic teeth (Biotone and Biotone IPN) were divided into six groups (n = 12), according to the solution used during brushing: distilled water (control), coconut soap, or dentifrice. A mechanical brushing machine was used to simulate approximately 1 year of brushing (11,000 strokes). The weight loss (WL) of teeth was obtained from the difference between the initial (IW) and final weight (FW) of each specimen, and the mean of percentage of weight loss (PWL) was calculated for each group. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal‐Wallis test, followed by Bonferroni's post‐test comparison (α = 0.05). Results A statistically significant difference was found for the factor solution (p &lt; 0.001). Brushing using dentifrice caused the highest values of weight loss (–0.50%), in comparison with the groups brushed with coconut soap (0.00%) or distilled water (0.00%). Conclusions For both types of artificial teeth, brushing with dentifrice produced higher abrasion than brushing with coconut soap or water.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1059-941X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-849X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jopr.12455</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26916386</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>artificial teeth ; Complete denture ; Dentifrices ; Dentistry ; Humans ; Tooth Abrasion ; Tooth, Artificial ; Toothbrushing ; Toothpastes</subject><ispartof>Journal of prosthodontics, 2016-08, Vol.25 (6), p.485-488</ispartof><rights>2016 by the American College of Prosthodontists</rights><rights>2016 by the American College of Prosthodontists.</rights><rights>2016 American College of Prosthodontists</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5685-d04ed60a65464235c4106d543bfa6a85797dc715afaa3652a9fff07936a2d1af3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5685-d04ed60a65464235c4106d543bfa6a85797dc715afaa3652a9fff07936a2d1af3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26916386$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Policastro, Vivian Barnabé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giro, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leite, Andressa Rosa Perin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendoza-Marin, Danny Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paleari, André Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Compagnoni, Marco Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pero, Ana Carolina</creatorcontrib><title>In Vitro Assessment of the Abrasion Resistance of Two Types of Artificial Teeth Submitted to Brushing</title><title>Journal of prosthodontics</title><addtitle>Journal of Prosthodontics</addtitle><description>Purpose To assess the effect of brushing with different solutions on the abrasion resistance of two types of acrylic resin teeth. Materials and Methods Maxillary premolars from two types of acrylic teeth (Biotone and Biotone IPN) were divided into six groups (n = 12), according to the solution used during brushing: distilled water (control), coconut soap, or dentifrice. A mechanical brushing machine was used to simulate approximately 1 year of brushing (11,000 strokes). The weight loss (WL) of teeth was obtained from the difference between the initial (IW) and final weight (FW) of each specimen, and the mean of percentage of weight loss (PWL) was calculated for each group. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal‐Wallis test, followed by Bonferroni's post‐test comparison (α = 0.05). Results A statistically significant difference was found for the factor solution (p &lt; 0.001). Brushing using dentifrice caused the highest values of weight loss (–0.50%), in comparison with the groups brushed with coconut soap (0.00%) or distilled water (0.00%). Conclusions For both types of artificial teeth, brushing with dentifrice produced higher abrasion than brushing with coconut soap or water.</description><subject>artificial teeth</subject><subject>Complete denture</subject><subject>Dentifrices</subject><subject>Dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Tooth Abrasion</subject><subject>Tooth, Artificial</subject><subject>Toothbrushing</subject><subject>Toothpastes</subject><issn>1059-941X</issn><issn>1532-849X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkUFv0zAUxyPExMbgwgdAlrggpGx-sZ8TH8sEY9O0obaw3iw3salLGhfb0ei3J1m3HTggfHm23u_9pedflr0BegLDOV37bTiBgiM-y44AWZFXXC6eD3eKMpccFofZyxjXlAJgBS-yw0JIEKwSR5m56Mh3l4InkxhNjBvTJeItSStDJsugo_MdmZroYtJdbcbW_M6T-W5r4viYhOSsq51uydyYtCKzfrlxKZmGJE8-hj6uXPfjVXZgdRvN64d6nH37_Gl-9iW_ujm_OJtc5TWKCvOGctMIqgVywQuGNQcqGuRsabXQFZaybOoSUFutmcBCS2stLSUTumhAW3acvd_nboP_1ZuY1MbF2rSt7ozvo4IKcFhdIvwPCoXkEkb03V_o2vehGxYZKYq8QMYH6sOeqoOPMRirtsFtdNgpoGr0pEZP6t7TAL99iBy-yzRP6KOYAYA9cOdas_tHlLq8-Tp9DM33M4Ms8_tpRoefSpSsRHV7fa6muJhdVzNQt-wPKEGroA</recordid><startdate>201608</startdate><enddate>201608</enddate><creator>Policastro, Vivian Barnabé</creator><creator>Giro, Gabriela</creator><creator>Leite, Andressa Rosa Perin</creator><creator>Mendoza-Marin, Danny Omar</creator><creator>Paleari, André Gustavo</creator><creator>Compagnoni, Marco Antonio</creator><creator>Pero, Ana Carolina</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201608</creationdate><title>In Vitro Assessment of the Abrasion Resistance of Two Types of Artificial Teeth Submitted to Brushing</title><author>Policastro, Vivian Barnabé ; Giro, Gabriela ; Leite, Andressa Rosa Perin ; Mendoza-Marin, Danny Omar ; Paleari, André Gustavo ; Compagnoni, Marco Antonio ; Pero, Ana Carolina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5685-d04ed60a65464235c4106d543bfa6a85797dc715afaa3652a9fff07936a2d1af3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>artificial teeth</topic><topic>Complete denture</topic><topic>Dentifrices</topic><topic>Dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Tooth Abrasion</topic><topic>Tooth, Artificial</topic><topic>Toothbrushing</topic><topic>Toothpastes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Policastro, Vivian Barnabé</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giro, Gabriela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leite, Andressa Rosa Perin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendoza-Marin, Danny Omar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paleari, André Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Compagnoni, Marco Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pero, Ana Carolina</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of prosthodontics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Policastro, Vivian Barnabé</au><au>Giro, Gabriela</au><au>Leite, Andressa Rosa Perin</au><au>Mendoza-Marin, Danny Omar</au><au>Paleari, André Gustavo</au><au>Compagnoni, Marco Antonio</au><au>Pero, Ana Carolina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In Vitro Assessment of the Abrasion Resistance of Two Types of Artificial Teeth Submitted to Brushing</atitle><jtitle>Journal of prosthodontics</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Prosthodontics</addtitle><date>2016-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>485</spage><epage>488</epage><pages>485-488</pages><issn>1059-941X</issn><eissn>1532-849X</eissn><abstract>Purpose To assess the effect of brushing with different solutions on the abrasion resistance of two types of acrylic resin teeth. Materials and Methods Maxillary premolars from two types of acrylic teeth (Biotone and Biotone IPN) were divided into six groups (n = 12), according to the solution used during brushing: distilled water (control), coconut soap, or dentifrice. A mechanical brushing machine was used to simulate approximately 1 year of brushing (11,000 strokes). The weight loss (WL) of teeth was obtained from the difference between the initial (IW) and final weight (FW) of each specimen, and the mean of percentage of weight loss (PWL) was calculated for each group. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal‐Wallis test, followed by Bonferroni's post‐test comparison (α = 0.05). Results A statistically significant difference was found for the factor solution (p &lt; 0.001). Brushing using dentifrice caused the highest values of weight loss (–0.50%), in comparison with the groups brushed with coconut soap (0.00%) or distilled water (0.00%). Conclusions For both types of artificial teeth, brushing with dentifrice produced higher abrasion than brushing with coconut soap or water.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>26916386</pmid><doi>10.1111/jopr.12455</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1059-941X
ispartof Journal of prosthodontics, 2016-08, Vol.25 (6), p.485-488
issn 1059-941X
1532-849X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815691951
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects artificial teeth
Complete denture
Dentifrices
Dentistry
Humans
Tooth Abrasion
Tooth, Artificial
Toothbrushing
Toothpastes
title In Vitro Assessment of the Abrasion Resistance of Two Types of Artificial Teeth Submitted to Brushing
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T20%3A12%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20Vitro%20Assessment%20of%20the%20Abrasion%20Resistance%20of%20Two%20Types%20of%20Artificial%20Teeth%20Submitted%20to%20Brushing&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20prosthodontics&rft.au=Policastro,%20Vivian%20Barnab%C3%A9&rft.date=2016-08&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=485&rft.epage=488&rft.pages=485-488&rft.issn=1059-941X&rft.eissn=1532-849X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jopr.12455&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4143726501%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5685-d04ed60a65464235c4106d543bfa6a85797dc715afaa3652a9fff07936a2d1af3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1810542534&rft_id=info:pmid/26916386&rfr_iscdi=true