Loading…
Comparison of two different formulas for body surface area in adults at extremes of height and weight
Background Different equations for predicting body surface area have been derived. The DuBois and Mosteller body surface area equations are considered equivalent, but the accuracy in adult patients at extremes of height and weight is unknown. Purpose To compare body surface area in patients at extre...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of oncology pharmacy practice 2016-10, Vol.22 (5), p.690-695 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-1ee14a387cb393cd3f883986999924426310e3d4c4f2f38dfa8c761022a3dc423 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-1ee14a387cb393cd3f883986999924426310e3d4c4f2f38dfa8c761022a3dc423 |
container_end_page | 695 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 690 |
container_title | Journal of oncology pharmacy practice |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Fancher, Karen M Sacco, Alicia J Gwin, Robert C Gormley, Luke K Mitchell, Caitlin B |
description | Background
Different equations for predicting body surface area have been derived. The DuBois and Mosteller body surface area equations are considered equivalent, but the accuracy in adult patients at extremes of height and weight is unknown.
Purpose
To compare body surface area in patients at extremes of height and weight using both formulas to determine whether a difference affected chemotherapy dose.
Methods
Anthropometric data were extracted from the 2012 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Vital and Health Statistics. Data for both males and females were examined. The 50th percentiles of weight and height were used to calculate the body surface area with both formulas. Calculations were repeated using the 5th through 95th percentiles for weight, then the 5th through 95th percentiles for height, and so forth until all extremes of height and weight were examined. Each body surface area was used to calculate a chemotherapy dose. A difference of ≥4.5% in dose was considered clinically significant.
Results
Differences were apparent in both males and females. Dosing differences were most apparent in patients in the 50th, 75th or 95th percentile for both height and weight. Differences are also noted in other percentiles, suggesting that patients of smaller stature may also be affected.
Conclusion
Guidelines recommend full doses of chemotherapy for patients with curative intent but do not specify which body surface area formula is preferred. Our results imply that the Mosteller equation provides a greater chemotherapy dose, and this difference may be clinically significant in patients who are in the 50th to 95th percentiles for height, weight or both. Further study is necessary to validate these results and determine the impact on patient outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1078155215599669 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815692391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1078155215599669</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1815692391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-1ee14a387cb393cd3f883986999924426310e3d4c4f2f38dfa8c761022a3dc423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1LAzEQxYMotlbvniRHL6v52G6SoxS_oOBFwduSJpN2y-6mJrvU_vdmrXoQBAfCPJjfPMIbhM4puaJUiGtKhKTTKUtPqaJQB2hMcyEyotjrYdJpnA3zETqJcU0IkYLJYzRiBZdTRYoxgplvNjpU0bfYO9xtPbaVcxCg7bDzoelrHQeBF97ucOyD0wawDqBx1WJt-7qLWHcY3rsADcTBZQXVctVh3Vq8_ZSn6MjpOsLZV5-gl7vb59lDNn-6f5zdzDPDBekyCkBzzaUwC664sdxJyZUsVCqW5-nXlAC3uckdc1xap6URBSWMaW5NzvgEXe59N8G_9RC7sqmigbrWLfg-ljSlVSjGFf0PSplipOAJJXvUBB9jAFduQtXosCspKYc7lL_vkFYuvtz7RQP2Z-E7-ARkeyDqJZRr34c2BfO34QfRdI8K</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1811292063</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of two different formulas for body surface area in adults at extremes of height and weight</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Fancher, Karen M ; Sacco, Alicia J ; Gwin, Robert C ; Gormley, Luke K ; Mitchell, Caitlin B</creator><creatorcontrib>Fancher, Karen M ; Sacco, Alicia J ; Gwin, Robert C ; Gormley, Luke K ; Mitchell, Caitlin B</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Different equations for predicting body surface area have been derived. The DuBois and Mosteller body surface area equations are considered equivalent, but the accuracy in adult patients at extremes of height and weight is unknown.
Purpose
To compare body surface area in patients at extremes of height and weight using both formulas to determine whether a difference affected chemotherapy dose.
Methods
Anthropometric data were extracted from the 2012 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Vital and Health Statistics. Data for both males and females were examined. The 50th percentiles of weight and height were used to calculate the body surface area with both formulas. Calculations were repeated using the 5th through 95th percentiles for weight, then the 5th through 95th percentiles for height, and so forth until all extremes of height and weight were examined. Each body surface area was used to calculate a chemotherapy dose. A difference of ≥4.5% in dose was considered clinically significant.
Results
Differences were apparent in both males and females. Dosing differences were most apparent in patients in the 50th, 75th or 95th percentile for both height and weight. Differences are also noted in other percentiles, suggesting that patients of smaller stature may also be affected.
Conclusion
Guidelines recommend full doses of chemotherapy for patients with curative intent but do not specify which body surface area formula is preferred. Our results imply that the Mosteller equation provides a greater chemotherapy dose, and this difference may be clinically significant in patients who are in the 50th to 95th percentiles for height, weight or both. Further study is necessary to validate these results and determine the impact on patient outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-1552</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-092X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1078155215599669</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26385906</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Anthropometry - methods ; Antineoplastic Agents - administration & dosage ; Body Height ; Body Surface Area ; Body Weight ; Drug Dosage Calculations ; Female ; Humans ; Male</subject><ispartof>Journal of oncology pharmacy practice, 2016-10, Vol.22 (5), p.690-695</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2015</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2015.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-1ee14a387cb393cd3f883986999924426310e3d4c4f2f38dfa8c761022a3dc423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-1ee14a387cb393cd3f883986999924426310e3d4c4f2f38dfa8c761022a3dc423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26385906$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fancher, Karen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sacco, Alicia J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gwin, Robert C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gormley, Luke K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Caitlin B</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of two different formulas for body surface area in adults at extremes of height and weight</title><title>Journal of oncology pharmacy practice</title><addtitle>J Oncol Pharm Pract</addtitle><description>Background
Different equations for predicting body surface area have been derived. The DuBois and Mosteller body surface area equations are considered equivalent, but the accuracy in adult patients at extremes of height and weight is unknown.
Purpose
To compare body surface area in patients at extremes of height and weight using both formulas to determine whether a difference affected chemotherapy dose.
Methods
Anthropometric data were extracted from the 2012 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Vital and Health Statistics. Data for both males and females were examined. The 50th percentiles of weight and height were used to calculate the body surface area with both formulas. Calculations were repeated using the 5th through 95th percentiles for weight, then the 5th through 95th percentiles for height, and so forth until all extremes of height and weight were examined. Each body surface area was used to calculate a chemotherapy dose. A difference of ≥4.5% in dose was considered clinically significant.
Results
Differences were apparent in both males and females. Dosing differences were most apparent in patients in the 50th, 75th or 95th percentile for both height and weight. Differences are also noted in other percentiles, suggesting that patients of smaller stature may also be affected.
Conclusion
Guidelines recommend full doses of chemotherapy for patients with curative intent but do not specify which body surface area formula is preferred. Our results imply that the Mosteller equation provides a greater chemotherapy dose, and this difference may be clinically significant in patients who are in the 50th to 95th percentiles for height, weight or both. Further study is necessary to validate these results and determine the impact on patient outcomes.</description><subject>Anthropometry - methods</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Body Height</subject><subject>Body Surface Area</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Drug Dosage Calculations</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><issn>1078-1552</issn><issn>1477-092X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1LAzEQxYMotlbvniRHL6v52G6SoxS_oOBFwduSJpN2y-6mJrvU_vdmrXoQBAfCPJjfPMIbhM4puaJUiGtKhKTTKUtPqaJQB2hMcyEyotjrYdJpnA3zETqJcU0IkYLJYzRiBZdTRYoxgplvNjpU0bfYO9xtPbaVcxCg7bDzoelrHQeBF97ucOyD0wawDqBx1WJt-7qLWHcY3rsADcTBZQXVctVh3Vq8_ZSn6MjpOsLZV5-gl7vb59lDNn-6f5zdzDPDBekyCkBzzaUwC664sdxJyZUsVCqW5-nXlAC3uckdc1xap6URBSWMaW5NzvgEXe59N8G_9RC7sqmigbrWLfg-ljSlVSjGFf0PSplipOAJJXvUBB9jAFduQtXosCspKYc7lL_vkFYuvtz7RQP2Z-E7-ARkeyDqJZRr34c2BfO34QfRdI8K</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Fancher, Karen M</creator><creator>Sacco, Alicia J</creator><creator>Gwin, Robert C</creator><creator>Gormley, Luke K</creator><creator>Mitchell, Caitlin B</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Comparison of two different formulas for body surface area in adults at extremes of height and weight</title><author>Fancher, Karen M ; Sacco, Alicia J ; Gwin, Robert C ; Gormley, Luke K ; Mitchell, Caitlin B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-1ee14a387cb393cd3f883986999924426310e3d4c4f2f38dfa8c761022a3dc423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Anthropometry - methods</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Body Height</topic><topic>Body Surface Area</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Drug Dosage Calculations</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fancher, Karen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sacco, Alicia J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gwin, Robert C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gormley, Luke K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Caitlin B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of oncology pharmacy practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fancher, Karen M</au><au>Sacco, Alicia J</au><au>Gwin, Robert C</au><au>Gormley, Luke K</au><au>Mitchell, Caitlin B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of two different formulas for body surface area in adults at extremes of height and weight</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oncology pharmacy practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Oncol Pharm Pract</addtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>690</spage><epage>695</epage><pages>690-695</pages><issn>1078-1552</issn><eissn>1477-092X</eissn><abstract>Background
Different equations for predicting body surface area have been derived. The DuBois and Mosteller body surface area equations are considered equivalent, but the accuracy in adult patients at extremes of height and weight is unknown.
Purpose
To compare body surface area in patients at extremes of height and weight using both formulas to determine whether a difference affected chemotherapy dose.
Methods
Anthropometric data were extracted from the 2012 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Vital and Health Statistics. Data for both males and females were examined. The 50th percentiles of weight and height were used to calculate the body surface area with both formulas. Calculations were repeated using the 5th through 95th percentiles for weight, then the 5th through 95th percentiles for height, and so forth until all extremes of height and weight were examined. Each body surface area was used to calculate a chemotherapy dose. A difference of ≥4.5% in dose was considered clinically significant.
Results
Differences were apparent in both males and females. Dosing differences were most apparent in patients in the 50th, 75th or 95th percentile for both height and weight. Differences are also noted in other percentiles, suggesting that patients of smaller stature may also be affected.
Conclusion
Guidelines recommend full doses of chemotherapy for patients with curative intent but do not specify which body surface area formula is preferred. Our results imply that the Mosteller equation provides a greater chemotherapy dose, and this difference may be clinically significant in patients who are in the 50th to 95th percentiles for height, weight or both. Further study is necessary to validate these results and determine the impact on patient outcomes.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>26385906</pmid><doi>10.1177/1078155215599669</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1078-1552 |
ispartof | Journal of oncology pharmacy practice, 2016-10, Vol.22 (5), p.690-695 |
issn | 1078-1552 1477-092X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815692391 |
source | Sage Journals Online |
subjects | Anthropometry - methods Antineoplastic Agents - administration & dosage Body Height Body Surface Area Body Weight Drug Dosage Calculations Female Humans Male |
title | Comparison of two different formulas for body surface area in adults at extremes of height and weight |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A15%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20two%20different%20formulas%20for%20body%20surface%20area%20in%20adults%20at%20extremes%20of%20height%20and%20weight&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oncology%20pharmacy%20practice&rft.au=Fancher,%20Karen%20M&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=690&rft.epage=695&rft.pages=690-695&rft.issn=1078-1552&rft.eissn=1477-092X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1078155215599669&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1815692391%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-1ee14a387cb393cd3f883986999924426310e3d4c4f2f38dfa8c761022a3dc423%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1811292063&rft_id=info:pmid/26385906&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1078155215599669&rfr_iscdi=true |