Loading…

Comparison of two different formulas for body surface area in adults at extremes of height and weight

Background Different equations for predicting body surface area have been derived. The DuBois and Mosteller body surface area equations are considered equivalent, but the accuracy in adult patients at extremes of height and weight is unknown. Purpose To compare body surface area in patients at extre...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of oncology pharmacy practice 2016-10, Vol.22 (5), p.690-695
Main Authors: Fancher, Karen M, Sacco, Alicia J, Gwin, Robert C, Gormley, Luke K, Mitchell, Caitlin B
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-1ee14a387cb393cd3f883986999924426310e3d4c4f2f38dfa8c761022a3dc423
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-1ee14a387cb393cd3f883986999924426310e3d4c4f2f38dfa8c761022a3dc423
container_end_page 695
container_issue 5
container_start_page 690
container_title Journal of oncology pharmacy practice
container_volume 22
creator Fancher, Karen M
Sacco, Alicia J
Gwin, Robert C
Gormley, Luke K
Mitchell, Caitlin B
description Background Different equations for predicting body surface area have been derived. The DuBois and Mosteller body surface area equations are considered equivalent, but the accuracy in adult patients at extremes of height and weight is unknown. Purpose To compare body surface area in patients at extremes of height and weight using both formulas to determine whether a difference affected chemotherapy dose. Methods Anthropometric data were extracted from the 2012 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Vital and Health Statistics. Data for both males and females were examined. The 50th percentiles of weight and height were used to calculate the body surface area with both formulas. Calculations were repeated using the 5th through 95th percentiles for weight, then the 5th through 95th percentiles for height, and so forth until all extremes of height and weight were examined. Each body surface area was used to calculate a chemotherapy dose. A difference of ≥4.5% in dose was considered clinically significant. Results Differences were apparent in both males and females. Dosing differences were most apparent in patients in the 50th, 75th or 95th percentile for both height and weight. Differences are also noted in other percentiles, suggesting that patients of smaller stature may also be affected. Conclusion Guidelines recommend full doses of chemotherapy for patients with curative intent but do not specify which body surface area formula is preferred. Our results imply that the Mosteller equation provides a greater chemotherapy dose, and this difference may be clinically significant in patients who are in the 50th to 95th percentiles for height, weight or both. Further study is necessary to validate these results and determine the impact on patient outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1078155215599669
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815692391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1078155215599669</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1815692391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-1ee14a387cb393cd3f883986999924426310e3d4c4f2f38dfa8c761022a3dc423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkc1LAzEQxYMotlbvniRHL6v52G6SoxS_oOBFwduSJpN2y-6mJrvU_vdmrXoQBAfCPJjfPMIbhM4puaJUiGtKhKTTKUtPqaJQB2hMcyEyotjrYdJpnA3zETqJcU0IkYLJYzRiBZdTRYoxgplvNjpU0bfYO9xtPbaVcxCg7bDzoelrHQeBF97ucOyD0wawDqBx1WJt-7qLWHcY3rsADcTBZQXVctVh3Vq8_ZSn6MjpOsLZV5-gl7vb59lDNn-6f5zdzDPDBekyCkBzzaUwC664sdxJyZUsVCqW5-nXlAC3uckdc1xap6URBSWMaW5NzvgEXe59N8G_9RC7sqmigbrWLfg-ljSlVSjGFf0PSplipOAJJXvUBB9jAFduQtXosCspKYc7lL_vkFYuvtz7RQP2Z-E7-ARkeyDqJZRr34c2BfO34QfRdI8K</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1811292063</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of two different formulas for body surface area in adults at extremes of height and weight</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Fancher, Karen M ; Sacco, Alicia J ; Gwin, Robert C ; Gormley, Luke K ; Mitchell, Caitlin B</creator><creatorcontrib>Fancher, Karen M ; Sacco, Alicia J ; Gwin, Robert C ; Gormley, Luke K ; Mitchell, Caitlin B</creatorcontrib><description>Background Different equations for predicting body surface area have been derived. The DuBois and Mosteller body surface area equations are considered equivalent, but the accuracy in adult patients at extremes of height and weight is unknown. Purpose To compare body surface area in patients at extremes of height and weight using both formulas to determine whether a difference affected chemotherapy dose. Methods Anthropometric data were extracted from the 2012 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Vital and Health Statistics. Data for both males and females were examined. The 50th percentiles of weight and height were used to calculate the body surface area with both formulas. Calculations were repeated using the 5th through 95th percentiles for weight, then the 5th through 95th percentiles for height, and so forth until all extremes of height and weight were examined. Each body surface area was used to calculate a chemotherapy dose. A difference of ≥4.5% in dose was considered clinically significant. Results Differences were apparent in both males and females. Dosing differences were most apparent in patients in the 50th, 75th or 95th percentile for both height and weight. Differences are also noted in other percentiles, suggesting that patients of smaller stature may also be affected. Conclusion Guidelines recommend full doses of chemotherapy for patients with curative intent but do not specify which body surface area formula is preferred. Our results imply that the Mosteller equation provides a greater chemotherapy dose, and this difference may be clinically significant in patients who are in the 50th to 95th percentiles for height, weight or both. Further study is necessary to validate these results and determine the impact on patient outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1078-1552</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-092X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1078155215599669</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26385906</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Anthropometry - methods ; Antineoplastic Agents - administration &amp; dosage ; Body Height ; Body Surface Area ; Body Weight ; Drug Dosage Calculations ; Female ; Humans ; Male</subject><ispartof>Journal of oncology pharmacy practice, 2016-10, Vol.22 (5), p.690-695</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2015</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2015.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-1ee14a387cb393cd3f883986999924426310e3d4c4f2f38dfa8c761022a3dc423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-1ee14a387cb393cd3f883986999924426310e3d4c4f2f38dfa8c761022a3dc423</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26385906$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fancher, Karen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sacco, Alicia J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gwin, Robert C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gormley, Luke K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Caitlin B</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of two different formulas for body surface area in adults at extremes of height and weight</title><title>Journal of oncology pharmacy practice</title><addtitle>J Oncol Pharm Pract</addtitle><description>Background Different equations for predicting body surface area have been derived. The DuBois and Mosteller body surface area equations are considered equivalent, but the accuracy in adult patients at extremes of height and weight is unknown. Purpose To compare body surface area in patients at extremes of height and weight using both formulas to determine whether a difference affected chemotherapy dose. Methods Anthropometric data were extracted from the 2012 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Vital and Health Statistics. Data for both males and females were examined. The 50th percentiles of weight and height were used to calculate the body surface area with both formulas. Calculations were repeated using the 5th through 95th percentiles for weight, then the 5th through 95th percentiles for height, and so forth until all extremes of height and weight were examined. Each body surface area was used to calculate a chemotherapy dose. A difference of ≥4.5% in dose was considered clinically significant. Results Differences were apparent in both males and females. Dosing differences were most apparent in patients in the 50th, 75th or 95th percentile for both height and weight. Differences are also noted in other percentiles, suggesting that patients of smaller stature may also be affected. Conclusion Guidelines recommend full doses of chemotherapy for patients with curative intent but do not specify which body surface area formula is preferred. Our results imply that the Mosteller equation provides a greater chemotherapy dose, and this difference may be clinically significant in patients who are in the 50th to 95th percentiles for height, weight or both. Further study is necessary to validate these results and determine the impact on patient outcomes.</description><subject>Anthropometry - methods</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Body Height</subject><subject>Body Surface Area</subject><subject>Body Weight</subject><subject>Drug Dosage Calculations</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><issn>1078-1552</issn><issn>1477-092X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkc1LAzEQxYMotlbvniRHL6v52G6SoxS_oOBFwduSJpN2y-6mJrvU_vdmrXoQBAfCPJjfPMIbhM4puaJUiGtKhKTTKUtPqaJQB2hMcyEyotjrYdJpnA3zETqJcU0IkYLJYzRiBZdTRYoxgplvNjpU0bfYO9xtPbaVcxCg7bDzoelrHQeBF97ucOyD0wawDqBx1WJt-7qLWHcY3rsADcTBZQXVctVh3Vq8_ZSn6MjpOsLZV5-gl7vb59lDNn-6f5zdzDPDBekyCkBzzaUwC664sdxJyZUsVCqW5-nXlAC3uckdc1xap6URBSWMaW5NzvgEXe59N8G_9RC7sqmigbrWLfg-ljSlVSjGFf0PSplipOAJJXvUBB9jAFduQtXosCspKYc7lL_vkFYuvtz7RQP2Z-E7-ARkeyDqJZRr34c2BfO34QfRdI8K</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>Fancher, Karen M</creator><creator>Sacco, Alicia J</creator><creator>Gwin, Robert C</creator><creator>Gormley, Luke K</creator><creator>Mitchell, Caitlin B</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>H94</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Comparison of two different formulas for body surface area in adults at extremes of height and weight</title><author>Fancher, Karen M ; Sacco, Alicia J ; Gwin, Robert C ; Gormley, Luke K ; Mitchell, Caitlin B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-1ee14a387cb393cd3f883986999924426310e3d4c4f2f38dfa8c761022a3dc423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Anthropometry - methods</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Agents - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Body Height</topic><topic>Body Surface Area</topic><topic>Body Weight</topic><topic>Drug Dosage Calculations</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fancher, Karen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sacco, Alicia J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gwin, Robert C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gormley, Luke K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitchell, Caitlin B</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of oncology pharmacy practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fancher, Karen M</au><au>Sacco, Alicia J</au><au>Gwin, Robert C</au><au>Gormley, Luke K</au><au>Mitchell, Caitlin B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of two different formulas for body surface area in adults at extremes of height and weight</atitle><jtitle>Journal of oncology pharmacy practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Oncol Pharm Pract</addtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>690</spage><epage>695</epage><pages>690-695</pages><issn>1078-1552</issn><eissn>1477-092X</eissn><abstract>Background Different equations for predicting body surface area have been derived. The DuBois and Mosteller body surface area equations are considered equivalent, but the accuracy in adult patients at extremes of height and weight is unknown. Purpose To compare body surface area in patients at extremes of height and weight using both formulas to determine whether a difference affected chemotherapy dose. Methods Anthropometric data were extracted from the 2012 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Vital and Health Statistics. Data for both males and females were examined. The 50th percentiles of weight and height were used to calculate the body surface area with both formulas. Calculations were repeated using the 5th through 95th percentiles for weight, then the 5th through 95th percentiles for height, and so forth until all extremes of height and weight were examined. Each body surface area was used to calculate a chemotherapy dose. A difference of ≥4.5% in dose was considered clinically significant. Results Differences were apparent in both males and females. Dosing differences were most apparent in patients in the 50th, 75th or 95th percentile for both height and weight. Differences are also noted in other percentiles, suggesting that patients of smaller stature may also be affected. Conclusion Guidelines recommend full doses of chemotherapy for patients with curative intent but do not specify which body surface area formula is preferred. Our results imply that the Mosteller equation provides a greater chemotherapy dose, and this difference may be clinically significant in patients who are in the 50th to 95th percentiles for height, weight or both. Further study is necessary to validate these results and determine the impact on patient outcomes.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>26385906</pmid><doi>10.1177/1078155215599669</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1078-1552
ispartof Journal of oncology pharmacy practice, 2016-10, Vol.22 (5), p.690-695
issn 1078-1552
1477-092X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815692391
source Sage Journals Online
subjects Anthropometry - methods
Antineoplastic Agents - administration & dosage
Body Height
Body Surface Area
Body Weight
Drug Dosage Calculations
Female
Humans
Male
title Comparison of two different formulas for body surface area in adults at extremes of height and weight
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A15%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20two%20different%20formulas%20for%20body%20surface%20area%20in%20adults%20at%20extremes%20of%20height%20and%20weight&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20oncology%20pharmacy%20practice&rft.au=Fancher,%20Karen%20M&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=690&rft.epage=695&rft.pages=690-695&rft.issn=1078-1552&rft.eissn=1477-092X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1078155215599669&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1815692391%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-1ee14a387cb393cd3f883986999924426310e3d4c4f2f38dfa8c761022a3dc423%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1811292063&rft_id=info:pmid/26385906&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1078155215599669&rfr_iscdi=true