Loading…

Is spawning stock biomass a robust proxy for reproductive potential?

Reference points based on fishing mortality (F) and spawning stock biomass (SSB) are a requirement of many fisheries management frameworks. SSB is assumed to be a proxy for stock reproductive potential (SRP). Limit reference points based on SSB are used to indicate the level of biomass below which p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England) England), 2016-09, Vol.17 (3), p.596-616
Main Authors: Kell, Laurence T, Nash, Richard D M, Dickey-Collas, Mark, Mosqueira, Iago, Szuwalski, Cody
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4741-cae39d40cf2a7d15e6c015f71c0458c516243a1e637a4505d404ce00fc31e0283
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4741-cae39d40cf2a7d15e6c015f71c0458c516243a1e637a4505d404ce00fc31e0283
container_end_page 616
container_issue 3
container_start_page 596
container_title Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England)
container_volume 17
creator Kell, Laurence T
Nash, Richard D M
Dickey-Collas, Mark
Mosqueira, Iago
Szuwalski, Cody
description Reference points based on fishing mortality (F) and spawning stock biomass (SSB) are a requirement of many fisheries management frameworks. SSB is assumed to be a proxy for stock reproductive potential (SRP). Limit reference points based on SSB are used to indicate the level of biomass below which productivity is affected. SSB fails to account for changes in fecundity, egg viability and sex ratio, and it has been argued that total egg production (TEP) provides a better reflection of SRP. We explore how accounting for TEP impacts limit reference points and evidence for a relationship between stock and recruit. Time series of SSB and TEP are compared for three North Sea stocks: cod (Gadus morhua), herring (Clupea harengus) and plaice (Pleuronectes platessa). Dynamics based on TEP are different from those based on SSB for cod and plaice, but the stock–recruit relationships were not ‘improved’ using TEP. Shifts in productivity (spawner per recruit) occur in all three time series and SSB underestimated uncertainty. Yet again, it was shown that assumptions of stationarity about fish population productivity are incorrect. We argue that the use of TEP does improve the realism in our understanding of stock dynamics, and demographically, more complex management strategy evaluation is required to develop management procedures that are robust to uncertainty and integrate F and the demographic health of a stock. Empirical feedback control systems based on fisheries independent indices including surveys of eggs, larvae, recruits, juveniles or spawning adults should be evaluated and compared to traditional approaches.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/faf.12131
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815704073</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4148137831</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4741-cae39d40cf2a7d15e6c015f71c0458c516243a1e637a4505d404ce00fc31e0283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EFPwjAUB_DFaCKiB79BEy96GPSt7TpOhoAgCdHEYDRemlI6MxjrbDeBb29xysHEXt47_P7Nyz8ILgF3wL9uKtMOREDgKGgBjXkY9Xjv-LDH-DQ4c26JMY4ToK1gOHHIlXJTZMU7cpVRKzTPzFo6hySyZl67CpXWbHcoNRZZ7fdFrarsU6PSVLqoMpnfngcnqcydvviZ7eB5dDcb3IfTx_Fk0J-GinIKoZKa9BYUqzSSfAFMxwoDSzkoTFmiGMQRJRJ0TLikDDNPqdIYp4qAxlFC2sF186-_4qPWrhLrzCmd57LQpnYCEmAcU8yJp1d_6NLUtvDX7RUwGtMk8uqmUcoa56xORWmztbQ7AVjs-xS-T_Hdp7fdxm6yXO_-h2LUH_0mwiaRuUpvDwlpVyLmhDPx8jAWs6cBn74NI_FKvgDGtoRS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1811546482</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is spawning stock biomass a robust proxy for reproductive potential?</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Kell, Laurence T ; Nash, Richard D M ; Dickey-Collas, Mark ; Mosqueira, Iago ; Szuwalski, Cody</creator><creatorcontrib>Kell, Laurence T ; Nash, Richard D M ; Dickey-Collas, Mark ; Mosqueira, Iago ; Szuwalski, Cody</creatorcontrib><description>Reference points based on fishing mortality (F) and spawning stock biomass (SSB) are a requirement of many fisheries management frameworks. SSB is assumed to be a proxy for stock reproductive potential (SRP). Limit reference points based on SSB are used to indicate the level of biomass below which productivity is affected. SSB fails to account for changes in fecundity, egg viability and sex ratio, and it has been argued that total egg production (TEP) provides a better reflection of SRP. We explore how accounting for TEP impacts limit reference points and evidence for a relationship between stock and recruit. Time series of SSB and TEP are compared for three North Sea stocks: cod (Gadus morhua), herring (Clupea harengus) and plaice (Pleuronectes platessa). Dynamics based on TEP are different from those based on SSB for cod and plaice, but the stock–recruit relationships were not ‘improved’ using TEP. Shifts in productivity (spawner per recruit) occur in all three time series and SSB underestimated uncertainty. Yet again, it was shown that assumptions of stationarity about fish population productivity are incorrect. We argue that the use of TEP does improve the realism in our understanding of stock dynamics, and demographically, more complex management strategy evaluation is required to develop management procedures that are robust to uncertainty and integrate F and the demographic health of a stock. Empirical feedback control systems based on fisheries independent indices including surveys of eggs, larvae, recruits, juveniles or spawning adults should be evaluated and compared to traditional approaches.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1467-2960</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-2979</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/faf.12131</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal reproduction ; Biomass ; Brackish ; Clupea harengus ; Egg production ; Fisheries management ; Gadus morhua ; Marine ; Pleuronectes platessa ; reference points ; regime shifts ; reproductive potential ; spawning stock biomass ; stock recruitment ; Time series</subject><ispartof>Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England), 2016-09, Vol.17 (3), p.596-616</ispartof><rights>2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4741-cae39d40cf2a7d15e6c015f71c0458c516243a1e637a4505d404ce00fc31e0283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4741-cae39d40cf2a7d15e6c015f71c0458c516243a1e637a4505d404ce00fc31e0283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kell, Laurence T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nash, Richard D M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickey-Collas, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosqueira, Iago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szuwalski, Cody</creatorcontrib><title>Is spawning stock biomass a robust proxy for reproductive potential?</title><title>Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England)</title><addtitle>Fish Fish</addtitle><description>Reference points based on fishing mortality (F) and spawning stock biomass (SSB) are a requirement of many fisheries management frameworks. SSB is assumed to be a proxy for stock reproductive potential (SRP). Limit reference points based on SSB are used to indicate the level of biomass below which productivity is affected. SSB fails to account for changes in fecundity, egg viability and sex ratio, and it has been argued that total egg production (TEP) provides a better reflection of SRP. We explore how accounting for TEP impacts limit reference points and evidence for a relationship between stock and recruit. Time series of SSB and TEP are compared for three North Sea stocks: cod (Gadus morhua), herring (Clupea harengus) and plaice (Pleuronectes platessa). Dynamics based on TEP are different from those based on SSB for cod and plaice, but the stock–recruit relationships were not ‘improved’ using TEP. Shifts in productivity (spawner per recruit) occur in all three time series and SSB underestimated uncertainty. Yet again, it was shown that assumptions of stationarity about fish population productivity are incorrect. We argue that the use of TEP does improve the realism in our understanding of stock dynamics, and demographically, more complex management strategy evaluation is required to develop management procedures that are robust to uncertainty and integrate F and the demographic health of a stock. Empirical feedback control systems based on fisheries independent indices including surveys of eggs, larvae, recruits, juveniles or spawning adults should be evaluated and compared to traditional approaches.</description><subject>Animal reproduction</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Brackish</subject><subject>Clupea harengus</subject><subject>Egg production</subject><subject>Fisheries management</subject><subject>Gadus morhua</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Pleuronectes platessa</subject><subject>reference points</subject><subject>regime shifts</subject><subject>reproductive potential</subject><subject>spawning stock biomass</subject><subject>stock recruitment</subject><subject>Time series</subject><issn>1467-2960</issn><issn>1467-2979</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10EFPwjAUB_DFaCKiB79BEy96GPSt7TpOhoAgCdHEYDRemlI6MxjrbDeBb29xysHEXt47_P7Nyz8ILgF3wL9uKtMOREDgKGgBjXkY9Xjv-LDH-DQ4c26JMY4ToK1gOHHIlXJTZMU7cpVRKzTPzFo6hySyZl67CpXWbHcoNRZZ7fdFrarsU6PSVLqoMpnfngcnqcydvviZ7eB5dDcb3IfTx_Fk0J-GinIKoZKa9BYUqzSSfAFMxwoDSzkoTFmiGMQRJRJ0TLikDDNPqdIYp4qAxlFC2sF186-_4qPWrhLrzCmd57LQpnYCEmAcU8yJp1d_6NLUtvDX7RUwGtMk8uqmUcoa56xORWmztbQ7AVjs-xS-T_Hdp7fdxm6yXO_-h2LUH_0mwiaRuUpvDwlpVyLmhDPx8jAWs6cBn74NI_FKvgDGtoRS</recordid><startdate>201609</startdate><enddate>201609</enddate><creator>Kell, Laurence T</creator><creator>Nash, Richard D M</creator><creator>Dickey-Collas, Mark</creator><creator>Mosqueira, Iago</creator><creator>Szuwalski, Cody</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201609</creationdate><title>Is spawning stock biomass a robust proxy for reproductive potential?</title><author>Kell, Laurence T ; Nash, Richard D M ; Dickey-Collas, Mark ; Mosqueira, Iago ; Szuwalski, Cody</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4741-cae39d40cf2a7d15e6c015f71c0458c516243a1e637a4505d404ce00fc31e0283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animal reproduction</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Brackish</topic><topic>Clupea harengus</topic><topic>Egg production</topic><topic>Fisheries management</topic><topic>Gadus morhua</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Pleuronectes platessa</topic><topic>reference points</topic><topic>regime shifts</topic><topic>reproductive potential</topic><topic>spawning stock biomass</topic><topic>stock recruitment</topic><topic>Time series</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kell, Laurence T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nash, Richard D M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dickey-Collas, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosqueira, Iago</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szuwalski, Cody</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kell, Laurence T</au><au>Nash, Richard D M</au><au>Dickey-Collas, Mark</au><au>Mosqueira, Iago</au><au>Szuwalski, Cody</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is spawning stock biomass a robust proxy for reproductive potential?</atitle><jtitle>Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England)</jtitle><addtitle>Fish Fish</addtitle><date>2016-09</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>596</spage><epage>616</epage><pages>596-616</pages><issn>1467-2960</issn><eissn>1467-2979</eissn><abstract>Reference points based on fishing mortality (F) and spawning stock biomass (SSB) are a requirement of many fisheries management frameworks. SSB is assumed to be a proxy for stock reproductive potential (SRP). Limit reference points based on SSB are used to indicate the level of biomass below which productivity is affected. SSB fails to account for changes in fecundity, egg viability and sex ratio, and it has been argued that total egg production (TEP) provides a better reflection of SRP. We explore how accounting for TEP impacts limit reference points and evidence for a relationship between stock and recruit. Time series of SSB and TEP are compared for three North Sea stocks: cod (Gadus morhua), herring (Clupea harengus) and plaice (Pleuronectes platessa). Dynamics based on TEP are different from those based on SSB for cod and plaice, but the stock–recruit relationships were not ‘improved’ using TEP. Shifts in productivity (spawner per recruit) occur in all three time series and SSB underestimated uncertainty. Yet again, it was shown that assumptions of stationarity about fish population productivity are incorrect. We argue that the use of TEP does improve the realism in our understanding of stock dynamics, and demographically, more complex management strategy evaluation is required to develop management procedures that are robust to uncertainty and integrate F and the demographic health of a stock. Empirical feedback control systems based on fisheries independent indices including surveys of eggs, larvae, recruits, juveniles or spawning adults should be evaluated and compared to traditional approaches.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/faf.12131</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1467-2960
ispartof Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England), 2016-09, Vol.17 (3), p.596-616
issn 1467-2960
1467-2979
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1815704073
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Animal reproduction
Biomass
Brackish
Clupea harengus
Egg production
Fisheries management
Gadus morhua
Marine
Pleuronectes platessa
reference points
regime shifts
reproductive potential
spawning stock biomass
stock recruitment
Time series
title Is spawning stock biomass a robust proxy for reproductive potential?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T07%3A53%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20spawning%20stock%20biomass%20a%20robust%20proxy%20for%20reproductive%20potential?&rft.jtitle=Fish%20and%20fisheries%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Kell,%20Laurence%20T&rft.date=2016-09&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=596&rft.epage=616&rft.pages=596-616&rft.issn=1467-2960&rft.eissn=1467-2979&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/faf.12131&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4148137831%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4741-cae39d40cf2a7d15e6c015f71c0458c516243a1e637a4505d404ce00fc31e0283%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1811546482&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true