Loading…

Diversity of archaeal and bacterial communities on exfoliated sandstone from Portchester Castle (UK)

In this study exfoliated sandstone samples from Portchester Castle were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersion X-ray (EDX) analyses to observe stone surface colonisation, geomorphological structure and to assess damage. Archaeal and bacterial diversity were asses...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International biodeterioration & biodegradation 2016-04, Vol.109, p.78-87
Main Authors: Zanardini, Elisabetta, May, Eric, Inkpen, Robert, Cappitelli, Francesca, Murrell, J. Colin, Purdy, Kevin J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-397d0ee633658a3fe58bd1d4aacc46c58f95ead1e5764ca7ee9a4afa9b7045b23
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-397d0ee633658a3fe58bd1d4aacc46c58f95ead1e5764ca7ee9a4afa9b7045b23
container_end_page 87
container_issue
container_start_page 78
container_title International biodeterioration & biodegradation
container_volume 109
creator Zanardini, Elisabetta
May, Eric
Inkpen, Robert
Cappitelli, Francesca
Murrell, J. Colin
Purdy, Kevin J.
description In this study exfoliated sandstone samples from Portchester Castle were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersion X-ray (EDX) analyses to observe stone surface colonisation, geomorphological structure and to assess damage. Archaeal and bacterial diversity were assessed using cultivation-dependent and cultivation-independent methods. SEM analysis showed that sandstone had high levels of stone decay. There was considerable weathering of the minerals associated with biofilms containing microbes with various cellular morphologies. Microorganisms were especially prevalent in pores, cavities and in the heavily decayed parts of the minerals, and some etching was seen. EDX analyses indicated microbes were associated with the sheet structures of aluminium-containing phyllosilicate minerals, most likely glauconite. Microbial colonisation was preferentially concentrated within specific sheets of the mineral structure. Isolation studies revealed the presence of Bacillus and Arthrobacter that appeared to be well adapted to “extreme” environments, specifically these isolates were tolerant to high salt, high UV and oligotrophic conditions. Cultivation-independent studies using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis fingerprinting of bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA gene fragments showed a more complex community. Chloroflexi, Actinobacteria, Deinococcus, α- and β-proteobacteria, Cyanobacteria and Bacteroidetes and halophilic Archaea from the family Halobacteriaceae, were the predominant types of Bacteria and Archaea detected respectively. •Integrated approach revealed complex microbial colonisation in altered sandstone.•Most of the microorganisms are well adapted to extreme environments.•Identity of key players that cause damage is vital to conserve heritage stonework.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.12.021
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1816005526</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0964830515301724</els_id><sourcerecordid>1790929872</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-397d0ee633658a3fe58bd1d4aacc46c58f95ead1e5764ca7ee9a4afa9b7045b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EEuXjF7B4LEOCncSJPTCg8imQYIDZutgX1VUSg-0i-u9JKTNMp5Oe59XdS8gZZzlnvL5Y5a513uYF4yLnRc4KvkdmXDYqYwWT-2TGVF1lsmTikBzFuGJsIiWfEXvtPjFElzbUdxSCWQJCT2G0tAWTMLhpM34Y1qNLDiP1I8WvzvcOEloaJzAmPyLtgh_oiw_JLDFOHl1ATD3S-dvj-Qk56KCPePo7j8nb7c3r4j57er57WFw9ZUbwJmWlaixDrMuyFhLKDoVsLbcVgDFVbYTslECwHEVTVwYaRAUVdKDahlWiLcpjMt_lvgf_sZ7O0IOLBvseRvTrqLnkNWNCFPX_aKOYKpRstqnlDjXBxxiw0-_BDRA2mjO9rV-v9E_9elu_5oWe6p-sy52F08OfDoOOxuFo0LqAJmnr3Z_-Ny3WkEE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1790929872</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Diversity of archaeal and bacterial communities on exfoliated sandstone from Portchester Castle (UK)</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zanardini, Elisabetta ; May, Eric ; Inkpen, Robert ; Cappitelli, Francesca ; Murrell, J. Colin ; Purdy, Kevin J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zanardini, Elisabetta ; May, Eric ; Inkpen, Robert ; Cappitelli, Francesca ; Murrell, J. Colin ; Purdy, Kevin J.</creatorcontrib><description>In this study exfoliated sandstone samples from Portchester Castle were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersion X-ray (EDX) analyses to observe stone surface colonisation, geomorphological structure and to assess damage. Archaeal and bacterial diversity were assessed using cultivation-dependent and cultivation-independent methods. SEM analysis showed that sandstone had high levels of stone decay. There was considerable weathering of the minerals associated with biofilms containing microbes with various cellular morphologies. Microorganisms were especially prevalent in pores, cavities and in the heavily decayed parts of the minerals, and some etching was seen. EDX analyses indicated microbes were associated with the sheet structures of aluminium-containing phyllosilicate minerals, most likely glauconite. Microbial colonisation was preferentially concentrated within specific sheets of the mineral structure. Isolation studies revealed the presence of Bacillus and Arthrobacter that appeared to be well adapted to “extreme” environments, specifically these isolates were tolerant to high salt, high UV and oligotrophic conditions. Cultivation-independent studies using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis fingerprinting of bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA gene fragments showed a more complex community. Chloroflexi, Actinobacteria, Deinococcus, α- and β-proteobacteria, Cyanobacteria and Bacteroidetes and halophilic Archaea from the family Halobacteriaceae, were the predominant types of Bacteria and Archaea detected respectively. •Integrated approach revealed complex microbial colonisation in altered sandstone.•Most of the microorganisms are well adapted to extreme environments.•Identity of key players that cause damage is vital to conserve heritage stonework.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-8305</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0208</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.12.021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Actinobacteria ; Archaea ; Arthrobacter ; Bacillus ; Bacteria ; Castles ; Cyanobacteria ; Decay ; Deinococcus ; DGGE analyses ; Exfoliation ; Halobacteriaceae ; Microbial diversity ; Microorganisms ; Minerals ; Sandstone ; Scanning electron microscopy ; SEM-EDX analyses ; Stone ; Stone biodeterioration</subject><ispartof>International biodeterioration &amp; biodegradation, 2016-04, Vol.109, p.78-87</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-397d0ee633658a3fe58bd1d4aacc46c58f95ead1e5764ca7ee9a4afa9b7045b23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-397d0ee633658a3fe58bd1d4aacc46c58f95ead1e5764ca7ee9a4afa9b7045b23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zanardini, Elisabetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>May, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inkpen, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cappitelli, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murrell, J. Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purdy, Kevin J.</creatorcontrib><title>Diversity of archaeal and bacterial communities on exfoliated sandstone from Portchester Castle (UK)</title><title>International biodeterioration &amp; biodegradation</title><description>In this study exfoliated sandstone samples from Portchester Castle were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersion X-ray (EDX) analyses to observe stone surface colonisation, geomorphological structure and to assess damage. Archaeal and bacterial diversity were assessed using cultivation-dependent and cultivation-independent methods. SEM analysis showed that sandstone had high levels of stone decay. There was considerable weathering of the minerals associated with biofilms containing microbes with various cellular morphologies. Microorganisms were especially prevalent in pores, cavities and in the heavily decayed parts of the minerals, and some etching was seen. EDX analyses indicated microbes were associated with the sheet structures of aluminium-containing phyllosilicate minerals, most likely glauconite. Microbial colonisation was preferentially concentrated within specific sheets of the mineral structure. Isolation studies revealed the presence of Bacillus and Arthrobacter that appeared to be well adapted to “extreme” environments, specifically these isolates were tolerant to high salt, high UV and oligotrophic conditions. Cultivation-independent studies using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis fingerprinting of bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA gene fragments showed a more complex community. Chloroflexi, Actinobacteria, Deinococcus, α- and β-proteobacteria, Cyanobacteria and Bacteroidetes and halophilic Archaea from the family Halobacteriaceae, were the predominant types of Bacteria and Archaea detected respectively. •Integrated approach revealed complex microbial colonisation in altered sandstone.•Most of the microorganisms are well adapted to extreme environments.•Identity of key players that cause damage is vital to conserve heritage stonework.</description><subject>Actinobacteria</subject><subject>Archaea</subject><subject>Arthrobacter</subject><subject>Bacillus</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Castles</subject><subject>Cyanobacteria</subject><subject>Decay</subject><subject>Deinococcus</subject><subject>DGGE analyses</subject><subject>Exfoliation</subject><subject>Halobacteriaceae</subject><subject>Microbial diversity</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>Sandstone</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>SEM-EDX analyses</subject><subject>Stone</subject><subject>Stone biodeterioration</subject><issn>0964-8305</issn><issn>1879-0208</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkD1PwzAQhi0EEuXjF7B4LEOCncSJPTCg8imQYIDZutgX1VUSg-0i-u9JKTNMp5Oe59XdS8gZZzlnvL5Y5a513uYF4yLnRc4KvkdmXDYqYwWT-2TGVF1lsmTikBzFuGJsIiWfEXvtPjFElzbUdxSCWQJCT2G0tAWTMLhpM34Y1qNLDiP1I8WvzvcOEloaJzAmPyLtgh_oiw_JLDFOHl1ATD3S-dvj-Qk56KCPePo7j8nb7c3r4j57er57WFw9ZUbwJmWlaixDrMuyFhLKDoVsLbcVgDFVbYTslECwHEVTVwYaRAUVdKDahlWiLcpjMt_lvgf_sZ7O0IOLBvseRvTrqLnkNWNCFPX_aKOYKpRstqnlDjXBxxiw0-_BDRA2mjO9rV-v9E_9elu_5oWe6p-sy52F08OfDoOOxuFo0LqAJmnr3Z_-Ny3WkEE</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Zanardini, Elisabetta</creator><creator>May, Eric</creator><creator>Inkpen, Robert</creator><creator>Cappitelli, Francesca</creator><creator>Murrell, J. Colin</creator><creator>Purdy, Kevin J.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>Diversity of archaeal and bacterial communities on exfoliated sandstone from Portchester Castle (UK)</title><author>Zanardini, Elisabetta ; May, Eric ; Inkpen, Robert ; Cappitelli, Francesca ; Murrell, J. Colin ; Purdy, Kevin J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-397d0ee633658a3fe58bd1d4aacc46c58f95ead1e5764ca7ee9a4afa9b7045b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Actinobacteria</topic><topic>Archaea</topic><topic>Arthrobacter</topic><topic>Bacillus</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Castles</topic><topic>Cyanobacteria</topic><topic>Decay</topic><topic>Deinococcus</topic><topic>DGGE analyses</topic><topic>Exfoliation</topic><topic>Halobacteriaceae</topic><topic>Microbial diversity</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>Sandstone</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>SEM-EDX analyses</topic><topic>Stone</topic><topic>Stone biodeterioration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zanardini, Elisabetta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>May, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inkpen, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cappitelli, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murrell, J. Colin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Purdy, Kevin J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>International biodeterioration &amp; biodegradation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zanardini, Elisabetta</au><au>May, Eric</au><au>Inkpen, Robert</au><au>Cappitelli, Francesca</au><au>Murrell, J. Colin</au><au>Purdy, Kevin J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Diversity of archaeal and bacterial communities on exfoliated sandstone from Portchester Castle (UK)</atitle><jtitle>International biodeterioration &amp; biodegradation</jtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>109</volume><spage>78</spage><epage>87</epage><pages>78-87</pages><issn>0964-8305</issn><eissn>1879-0208</eissn><abstract>In this study exfoliated sandstone samples from Portchester Castle were investigated using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersion X-ray (EDX) analyses to observe stone surface colonisation, geomorphological structure and to assess damage. Archaeal and bacterial diversity were assessed using cultivation-dependent and cultivation-independent methods. SEM analysis showed that sandstone had high levels of stone decay. There was considerable weathering of the minerals associated with biofilms containing microbes with various cellular morphologies. Microorganisms were especially prevalent in pores, cavities and in the heavily decayed parts of the minerals, and some etching was seen. EDX analyses indicated microbes were associated with the sheet structures of aluminium-containing phyllosilicate minerals, most likely glauconite. Microbial colonisation was preferentially concentrated within specific sheets of the mineral structure. Isolation studies revealed the presence of Bacillus and Arthrobacter that appeared to be well adapted to “extreme” environments, specifically these isolates were tolerant to high salt, high UV and oligotrophic conditions. Cultivation-independent studies using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis fingerprinting of bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA gene fragments showed a more complex community. Chloroflexi, Actinobacteria, Deinococcus, α- and β-proteobacteria, Cyanobacteria and Bacteroidetes and halophilic Archaea from the family Halobacteriaceae, were the predominant types of Bacteria and Archaea detected respectively. •Integrated approach revealed complex microbial colonisation in altered sandstone.•Most of the microorganisms are well adapted to extreme environments.•Identity of key players that cause damage is vital to conserve heritage stonework.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.12.021</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0964-8305
ispartof International biodeterioration & biodegradation, 2016-04, Vol.109, p.78-87
issn 0964-8305
1879-0208
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1816005526
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Actinobacteria
Archaea
Arthrobacter
Bacillus
Bacteria
Castles
Cyanobacteria
Decay
Deinococcus
DGGE analyses
Exfoliation
Halobacteriaceae
Microbial diversity
Microorganisms
Minerals
Sandstone
Scanning electron microscopy
SEM-EDX analyses
Stone
Stone biodeterioration
title Diversity of archaeal and bacterial communities on exfoliated sandstone from Portchester Castle (UK)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A32%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Diversity%20of%20archaeal%20and%20bacterial%20communities%20on%20exfoliated%20sandstone%20from%20Portchester%20Castle%20(UK)&rft.jtitle=International%20biodeterioration%20&%20biodegradation&rft.au=Zanardini,%20Elisabetta&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=109&rft.spage=78&rft.epage=87&rft.pages=78-87&rft.issn=0964-8305&rft.eissn=1879-0208&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.12.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1790929872%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c517t-397d0ee633658a3fe58bd1d4aacc46c58f95ead1e5764ca7ee9a4afa9b7045b23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1790929872&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true