Loading…

Mathematical modelling of turbulent flow for flue gas–air Chevron type plate heat exchangers

•Mathematical modelling of turbulent flow for flue gas–air Chevron type plate heat exchanger was developed.•The results reveal that, the bigger angle of the Chevron type plates resulted in 18% enhancement in the output air temperature as well as an increase in the resulting flue gas pressure drop of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of heat and mass transfer 2016-06, Vol.97, p.596-602
Main Authors: Vafajoo, Leila, Moradifar, Karim, Hosseini, S. Masoud, Salman, B.H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Mathematical modelling of turbulent flow for flue gas–air Chevron type plate heat exchanger was developed.•The results reveal that, the bigger angle of the Chevron type plates resulted in 18% enhancement in the output air temperature as well as an increase in the resulting flue gas pressure drop of 63% in comparison with the plate heat exchanger.•Two-dimensional, compressible and turbulent flow conditions were presented. A mathematical model of a plate recuperative heat exchanger was developed in order to recover energy for refinery flue gases and preheating of the inlet air of a combustion chamber. Two-dimensional, compressible and turbulent flow conditions were undertaken. After the model verified, the results revealed that, replacing flat plate to Chevron-type plates led to major changes through the velocity vectors into the angular and eddy forms. Moreover, as the Chevron angle increased, more pronounced changes observed in the velocity vectors. Also it was revealed that, a five folds enhancement in the Reynolds number led to increasing of the corresponding Nusselt number and the pressure drop while lowering the Fanning friction factor. The bigger angle of the Chevron type plates resulted in 18% enhancement in the output air temperature as well as; an increase in the resulting flue gas pressure drop of 63% in comparison with the plate heat exchanger.
ISSN:0017-9310
1879-2189
DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.02.035