Loading…
Benchmark study on motions and loads of a 6750-TEU containership
This study deals with a benchmark test on the performance of seakeeping analysis codes, which was carried out as part of the 2nd ITTC–ISSC joint workshop in 2014. Eleven institutes participated in the benchmark test with seventeen analysis codes. The target ship was the 6750-TEU containership, and t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ocean engineering 2016-06, Vol.119, p.262-273 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-ba0dd5ad3c7c02a1cc30532597326e730df26fe9e60546e33a7d6d6f605eed9f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-ba0dd5ad3c7c02a1cc30532597326e730df26fe9e60546e33a7d6d6f605eed9f3 |
container_end_page | 273 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 262 |
container_title | Ocean engineering |
container_volume | 119 |
creator | Kim, Yonghwan Kim, Jung-Hyun |
description | This study deals with a benchmark test on the performance of seakeeping analysis codes, which was carried out as part of the 2nd ITTC–ISSC joint workshop in 2014. Eleven institutes participated in the benchmark test with seventeen analysis codes. The target ship was the 6750-TEU containership, and the test of its flexible scale model was conducted by KRISO. A test matrix was composed of one condition for linear responses and three conditions for nonlinear responses. Participants were requested to conduct computational simulations and submit their heave, pitch, and vertical bending moment results in head regular waves. The computational results obtained are compared with each other using statistical analysis. The comparison reveals the performances and trends of the computational results. In addition, all the model data is included in the paper in order to encourage readers to participate in the benchmark test.
•Benchmark test results are introduced for ship structural loads in waves.•Eleven set of computational results are compared for the benchmark test.•Most results showed that they are within a bandwidth, showing same trend.•There are some difference in hydroelastic case. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.04.015 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1816029281</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0029801816300804</els_id><sourcerecordid>1816029281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-ba0dd5ad3c7c02a1cc30532597326e730df26fe9e60546e33a7d6d6f605eed9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LAzEYhIMoWKt_QXL0suubZJPdvVVL_YCCl_YcYvKuTW2TutkK_ntTqmc9DQMzA_MQcs2gZMDU7bqMFk3A8Fby7EuoSmDyhIxYU4tCctmckhEAb4sGWHNOLlJaA4BSIEZkco_Brramf6dp2LsvGgPdxsHHkKgJjm6icYnGjhqqagnFYrakNobB-IB9WvndJTnrzCbh1Y-OyfJhtpg-FfOXx-fp3bywUvGheDXgnDRO2NoCN8xaAVJw2daCK6wFuI6rDltUICuFQpjaKae6bBFd24kxuTnu7vr4scc06K1PFjeb_Dzuk2YNU_kjb9g_otCoigl-iKpj1PYxpR47vet9pvGlGegDXb3Wv3T1ga6GSme6uTg5FjF__vTY62R9RonO92gH7aL_a-IbyteEoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1808641321</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Benchmark study on motions and loads of a 6750-TEU containership</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Kim, Yonghwan ; Kim, Jung-Hyun</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yonghwan ; Kim, Jung-Hyun</creatorcontrib><description>This study deals with a benchmark test on the performance of seakeeping analysis codes, which was carried out as part of the 2nd ITTC–ISSC joint workshop in 2014. Eleven institutes participated in the benchmark test with seventeen analysis codes. The target ship was the 6750-TEU containership, and the test of its flexible scale model was conducted by KRISO. A test matrix was composed of one condition for linear responses and three conditions for nonlinear responses. Participants were requested to conduct computational simulations and submit their heave, pitch, and vertical bending moment results in head regular waves. The computational results obtained are compared with each other using statistical analysis. The comparison reveals the performances and trends of the computational results. In addition, all the model data is included in the paper in order to encourage readers to participate in the benchmark test.
•Benchmark test results are introduced for ship structural loads in waves.•Eleven set of computational results are compared for the benchmark test.•Most results showed that they are within a bandwidth, showing same trend.•There are some difference in hydroelastic case.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-8018</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5258</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.04.015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Benchmark ; Benchmarking ; Bending moments ; Comparative study ; Computation ; Containers ; Containership ; Heave ; ISSC ; ITTC ; Marine ; Ocean engineering ; Readers ; Sea keeping ; Seakeeping analysis</subject><ispartof>Ocean engineering, 2016-06, Vol.119, p.262-273</ispartof><rights>2016 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-ba0dd5ad3c7c02a1cc30532597326e730df26fe9e60546e33a7d6d6f605eed9f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-ba0dd5ad3c7c02a1cc30532597326e730df26fe9e60546e33a7d6d6f605eed9f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yonghwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jung-Hyun</creatorcontrib><title>Benchmark study on motions and loads of a 6750-TEU containership</title><title>Ocean engineering</title><description>This study deals with a benchmark test on the performance of seakeeping analysis codes, which was carried out as part of the 2nd ITTC–ISSC joint workshop in 2014. Eleven institutes participated in the benchmark test with seventeen analysis codes. The target ship was the 6750-TEU containership, and the test of its flexible scale model was conducted by KRISO. A test matrix was composed of one condition for linear responses and three conditions for nonlinear responses. Participants were requested to conduct computational simulations and submit their heave, pitch, and vertical bending moment results in head regular waves. The computational results obtained are compared with each other using statistical analysis. The comparison reveals the performances and trends of the computational results. In addition, all the model data is included in the paper in order to encourage readers to participate in the benchmark test.
•Benchmark test results are introduced for ship structural loads in waves.•Eleven set of computational results are compared for the benchmark test.•Most results showed that they are within a bandwidth, showing same trend.•There are some difference in hydroelastic case.</description><subject>Benchmark</subject><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Bending moments</subject><subject>Comparative study</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Containers</subject><subject>Containership</subject><subject>Heave</subject><subject>ISSC</subject><subject>ITTC</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Ocean engineering</subject><subject>Readers</subject><subject>Sea keeping</subject><subject>Seakeeping analysis</subject><issn>0029-8018</issn><issn>1873-5258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1LAzEYhIMoWKt_QXL0suubZJPdvVVL_YCCl_YcYvKuTW2TutkK_ntTqmc9DQMzA_MQcs2gZMDU7bqMFk3A8Fby7EuoSmDyhIxYU4tCctmckhEAb4sGWHNOLlJaA4BSIEZkco_Brramf6dp2LsvGgPdxsHHkKgJjm6icYnGjhqqagnFYrakNobB-IB9WvndJTnrzCbh1Y-OyfJhtpg-FfOXx-fp3bywUvGheDXgnDRO2NoCN8xaAVJw2daCK6wFuI6rDltUICuFQpjaKae6bBFd24kxuTnu7vr4scc06K1PFjeb_Dzuk2YNU_kjb9g_otCoigl-iKpj1PYxpR47vet9pvGlGegDXb3Wv3T1ga6GSme6uTg5FjF__vTY62R9RonO92gH7aL_a-IbyteEoQ</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Kim, Yonghwan</creator><creator>Kim, Jung-Hyun</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Benchmark study on motions and loads of a 6750-TEU containership</title><author>Kim, Yonghwan ; Kim, Jung-Hyun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-ba0dd5ad3c7c02a1cc30532597326e730df26fe9e60546e33a7d6d6f605eed9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Benchmark</topic><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Bending moments</topic><topic>Comparative study</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Containers</topic><topic>Containership</topic><topic>Heave</topic><topic>ISSC</topic><topic>ITTC</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Ocean engineering</topic><topic>Readers</topic><topic>Sea keeping</topic><topic>Seakeeping analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yonghwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jung-Hyun</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Ocean engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Yonghwan</au><au>Kim, Jung-Hyun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Benchmark study on motions and loads of a 6750-TEU containership</atitle><jtitle>Ocean engineering</jtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>119</volume><spage>262</spage><epage>273</epage><pages>262-273</pages><issn>0029-8018</issn><eissn>1873-5258</eissn><abstract>This study deals with a benchmark test on the performance of seakeeping analysis codes, which was carried out as part of the 2nd ITTC–ISSC joint workshop in 2014. Eleven institutes participated in the benchmark test with seventeen analysis codes. The target ship was the 6750-TEU containership, and the test of its flexible scale model was conducted by KRISO. A test matrix was composed of one condition for linear responses and three conditions for nonlinear responses. Participants were requested to conduct computational simulations and submit their heave, pitch, and vertical bending moment results in head regular waves. The computational results obtained are compared with each other using statistical analysis. The comparison reveals the performances and trends of the computational results. In addition, all the model data is included in the paper in order to encourage readers to participate in the benchmark test.
•Benchmark test results are introduced for ship structural loads in waves.•Eleven set of computational results are compared for the benchmark test.•Most results showed that they are within a bandwidth, showing same trend.•There are some difference in hydroelastic case.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.04.015</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0029-8018 |
ispartof | Ocean engineering, 2016-06, Vol.119, p.262-273 |
issn | 0029-8018 1873-5258 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1816029281 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Benchmark Benchmarking Bending moments Comparative study Computation Containers Containership Heave ISSC ITTC Marine Ocean engineering Readers Sea keeping Seakeeping analysis |
title | Benchmark study on motions and loads of a 6750-TEU containership |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T21%3A58%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Benchmark%20study%20on%20motions%20and%20loads%20of%20a%206750-TEU%20containership&rft.jtitle=Ocean%20engineering&rft.au=Kim,%20Yonghwan&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=119&rft.spage=262&rft.epage=273&rft.pages=262-273&rft.issn=0029-8018&rft.eissn=1873-5258&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.04.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1816029281%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-ba0dd5ad3c7c02a1cc30532597326e730df26fe9e60546e33a7d6d6f605eed9f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1808641321&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |