Loading…

Benchmark study on motions and loads of a 6750-TEU containership

This study deals with a benchmark test on the performance of seakeeping analysis codes, which was carried out as part of the 2nd ITTC–ISSC joint workshop in 2014. Eleven institutes participated in the benchmark test with seventeen analysis codes. The target ship was the 6750-TEU containership, and t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ocean engineering 2016-06, Vol.119, p.262-273
Main Authors: Kim, Yonghwan, Kim, Jung-Hyun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-ba0dd5ad3c7c02a1cc30532597326e730df26fe9e60546e33a7d6d6f605eed9f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-ba0dd5ad3c7c02a1cc30532597326e730df26fe9e60546e33a7d6d6f605eed9f3
container_end_page 273
container_issue
container_start_page 262
container_title Ocean engineering
container_volume 119
creator Kim, Yonghwan
Kim, Jung-Hyun
description This study deals with a benchmark test on the performance of seakeeping analysis codes, which was carried out as part of the 2nd ITTC–ISSC joint workshop in 2014. Eleven institutes participated in the benchmark test with seventeen analysis codes. The target ship was the 6750-TEU containership, and the test of its flexible scale model was conducted by KRISO. A test matrix was composed of one condition for linear responses and three conditions for nonlinear responses. Participants were requested to conduct computational simulations and submit their heave, pitch, and vertical bending moment results in head regular waves. The computational results obtained are compared with each other using statistical analysis. The comparison reveals the performances and trends of the computational results. In addition, all the model data is included in the paper in order to encourage readers to participate in the benchmark test. •Benchmark test results are introduced for ship structural loads in waves.•Eleven set of computational results are compared for the benchmark test.•Most results showed that they are within a bandwidth, showing same trend.•There are some difference in hydroelastic case.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.04.015
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1816029281</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0029801816300804</els_id><sourcerecordid>1816029281</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-ba0dd5ad3c7c02a1cc30532597326e730df26fe9e60546e33a7d6d6f605eed9f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1LAzEYhIMoWKt_QXL0suubZJPdvVVL_YCCl_YcYvKuTW2TutkK_ntTqmc9DQMzA_MQcs2gZMDU7bqMFk3A8Fby7EuoSmDyhIxYU4tCctmckhEAb4sGWHNOLlJaA4BSIEZkco_Brramf6dp2LsvGgPdxsHHkKgJjm6icYnGjhqqagnFYrakNobB-IB9WvndJTnrzCbh1Y-OyfJhtpg-FfOXx-fp3bywUvGheDXgnDRO2NoCN8xaAVJw2daCK6wFuI6rDltUICuFQpjaKae6bBFd24kxuTnu7vr4scc06K1PFjeb_Dzuk2YNU_kjb9g_otCoigl-iKpj1PYxpR47vet9pvGlGegDXb3Wv3T1ga6GSme6uTg5FjF__vTY62R9RonO92gH7aL_a-IbyteEoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1808641321</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Benchmark study on motions and loads of a 6750-TEU containership</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Kim, Yonghwan ; Kim, Jung-Hyun</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yonghwan ; Kim, Jung-Hyun</creatorcontrib><description>This study deals with a benchmark test on the performance of seakeeping analysis codes, which was carried out as part of the 2nd ITTC–ISSC joint workshop in 2014. Eleven institutes participated in the benchmark test with seventeen analysis codes. The target ship was the 6750-TEU containership, and the test of its flexible scale model was conducted by KRISO. A test matrix was composed of one condition for linear responses and three conditions for nonlinear responses. Participants were requested to conduct computational simulations and submit their heave, pitch, and vertical bending moment results in head regular waves. The computational results obtained are compared with each other using statistical analysis. The comparison reveals the performances and trends of the computational results. In addition, all the model data is included in the paper in order to encourage readers to participate in the benchmark test. •Benchmark test results are introduced for ship structural loads in waves.•Eleven set of computational results are compared for the benchmark test.•Most results showed that they are within a bandwidth, showing same trend.•There are some difference in hydroelastic case.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-8018</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5258</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.04.015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Benchmark ; Benchmarking ; Bending moments ; Comparative study ; Computation ; Containers ; Containership ; Heave ; ISSC ; ITTC ; Marine ; Ocean engineering ; Readers ; Sea keeping ; Seakeeping analysis</subject><ispartof>Ocean engineering, 2016-06, Vol.119, p.262-273</ispartof><rights>2016 The Authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-ba0dd5ad3c7c02a1cc30532597326e730df26fe9e60546e33a7d6d6f605eed9f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-ba0dd5ad3c7c02a1cc30532597326e730df26fe9e60546e33a7d6d6f605eed9f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yonghwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jung-Hyun</creatorcontrib><title>Benchmark study on motions and loads of a 6750-TEU containership</title><title>Ocean engineering</title><description>This study deals with a benchmark test on the performance of seakeeping analysis codes, which was carried out as part of the 2nd ITTC–ISSC joint workshop in 2014. Eleven institutes participated in the benchmark test with seventeen analysis codes. The target ship was the 6750-TEU containership, and the test of its flexible scale model was conducted by KRISO. A test matrix was composed of one condition for linear responses and three conditions for nonlinear responses. Participants were requested to conduct computational simulations and submit their heave, pitch, and vertical bending moment results in head regular waves. The computational results obtained are compared with each other using statistical analysis. The comparison reveals the performances and trends of the computational results. In addition, all the model data is included in the paper in order to encourage readers to participate in the benchmark test. •Benchmark test results are introduced for ship structural loads in waves.•Eleven set of computational results are compared for the benchmark test.•Most results showed that they are within a bandwidth, showing same trend.•There are some difference in hydroelastic case.</description><subject>Benchmark</subject><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Bending moments</subject><subject>Comparative study</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Containers</subject><subject>Containership</subject><subject>Heave</subject><subject>ISSC</subject><subject>ITTC</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Ocean engineering</subject><subject>Readers</subject><subject>Sea keeping</subject><subject>Seakeeping analysis</subject><issn>0029-8018</issn><issn>1873-5258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1LAzEYhIMoWKt_QXL0suubZJPdvVVL_YCCl_YcYvKuTW2TutkK_ntTqmc9DQMzA_MQcs2gZMDU7bqMFk3A8Fby7EuoSmDyhIxYU4tCctmckhEAb4sGWHNOLlJaA4BSIEZkco_Brramf6dp2LsvGgPdxsHHkKgJjm6icYnGjhqqagnFYrakNobB-IB9WvndJTnrzCbh1Y-OyfJhtpg-FfOXx-fp3bywUvGheDXgnDRO2NoCN8xaAVJw2daCK6wFuI6rDltUICuFQpjaKae6bBFd24kxuTnu7vr4scc06K1PFjeb_Dzuk2YNU_kjb9g_otCoigl-iKpj1PYxpR47vet9pvGlGegDXb3Wv3T1ga6GSme6uTg5FjF__vTY62R9RonO92gH7aL_a-IbyteEoQ</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Kim, Yonghwan</creator><creator>Kim, Jung-Hyun</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Benchmark study on motions and loads of a 6750-TEU containership</title><author>Kim, Yonghwan ; Kim, Jung-Hyun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-ba0dd5ad3c7c02a1cc30532597326e730df26fe9e60546e33a7d6d6f605eed9f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Benchmark</topic><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Bending moments</topic><topic>Comparative study</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Containers</topic><topic>Containership</topic><topic>Heave</topic><topic>ISSC</topic><topic>ITTC</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Ocean engineering</topic><topic>Readers</topic><topic>Sea keeping</topic><topic>Seakeeping analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Yonghwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jung-Hyun</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Ocean engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Yonghwan</au><au>Kim, Jung-Hyun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Benchmark study on motions and loads of a 6750-TEU containership</atitle><jtitle>Ocean engineering</jtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>119</volume><spage>262</spage><epage>273</epage><pages>262-273</pages><issn>0029-8018</issn><eissn>1873-5258</eissn><abstract>This study deals with a benchmark test on the performance of seakeeping analysis codes, which was carried out as part of the 2nd ITTC–ISSC joint workshop in 2014. Eleven institutes participated in the benchmark test with seventeen analysis codes. The target ship was the 6750-TEU containership, and the test of its flexible scale model was conducted by KRISO. A test matrix was composed of one condition for linear responses and three conditions for nonlinear responses. Participants were requested to conduct computational simulations and submit their heave, pitch, and vertical bending moment results in head regular waves. The computational results obtained are compared with each other using statistical analysis. The comparison reveals the performances and trends of the computational results. In addition, all the model data is included in the paper in order to encourage readers to participate in the benchmark test. •Benchmark test results are introduced for ship structural loads in waves.•Eleven set of computational results are compared for the benchmark test.•Most results showed that they are within a bandwidth, showing same trend.•There are some difference in hydroelastic case.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.04.015</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0029-8018
ispartof Ocean engineering, 2016-06, Vol.119, p.262-273
issn 0029-8018
1873-5258
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1816029281
source Elsevier
subjects Benchmark
Benchmarking
Bending moments
Comparative study
Computation
Containers
Containership
Heave
ISSC
ITTC
Marine
Ocean engineering
Readers
Sea keeping
Seakeeping analysis
title Benchmark study on motions and loads of a 6750-TEU containership
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T21%3A58%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Benchmark%20study%20on%20motions%20and%20loads%20of%20a%206750-TEU%20containership&rft.jtitle=Ocean%20engineering&rft.au=Kim,%20Yonghwan&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=119&rft.spage=262&rft.epage=273&rft.pages=262-273&rft.issn=0029-8018&rft.eissn=1873-5258&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2016.04.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1816029281%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c562t-ba0dd5ad3c7c02a1cc30532597326e730df26fe9e60546e33a7d6d6f605eed9f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1808641321&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true