Loading…
An Effective NAT Traversal Mechanism for SIP/IMS Services in SDN-Enabled All-IP Mobile Networks
Network Address Translation (NAT) is the major solution to ease the IP address shortage problem and support the upcoming demands of huge IP address from the Machine-to-Machine communications and Internet of Things . However, NAT breaks the peer-to-peer communications and blocks the Internet-oriented...
Saved in:
Published in: | Wireless personal communications 2015-10, Vol.84 (3), p.2171-2185 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Network Address Translation (NAT) is the major solution to ease the IP address shortage problem and support the upcoming demands of huge IP address from the
Machine-to-Machine
communications and
Internet of Things
. However, NAT breaks the peer-to-peer communications and blocks the Internet-oriented requests. In order to resolve the problems, lots of NAT traversal solutions such as
Session Traversal Utilities for NAT
,
Universal Plug-and-Play
,
Traversal Using Relay NAT
,
Application-Layer Gateway
(ALG) and
Interactive Connectivity Establishment
have been proposed. Among the NAT traversal solutions, the
3rd Generation Partnership Project
adopts the ALG solution for SIP/IMS multimedia services in the mobile networks. The ALG solution does not require modifications to the clients (e.g., User Equipments). However, the ALG solution utilizes the
Real-time Transport Protocol
(RTP) proxy to translate the RTP packets, and thus this solution produces extra delay and packet loss possibility to the RTP packets. In this paper, we integrate
Software-defined networking
(SDN) to the All-IP mobile networks and propose a solution to improve the ALG solution in the SDN-enabled All-IP mobile networks. We derive the analytic models for analyzing the ALG solution and the proposed solution, and compare these two solutions in terms of the throughput, loss rate and delay. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0929-6212 1572-834X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11277-015-2549-1 |