Loading…

Experimental acidification of Little Rock Lake, Wisconsin : The first four years of chemical and biological recovery

One basin of Little Rock lake was acidified during 1984-1990 with sulphuric acid, causing progressive decreases in pH from 6.1 to 4.7. The lake was then allowed to recover, so that by the fourth year about 50 per cent of the change necessary to return to pre-acidification values of pH, acid neutrali...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water, air and soil pollution air and soil pollution, 1995-01, Vol.85 (3), p.1713-1719
Main Authors: SAMPSON, C. J, BREZONIK, P. L, FROST, T. M, WEBSTER, K. E, SIMONSON, T. D
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-dea04e97b8b65add4ec3d9ba34d89bfcb4a340dc0f8a3e52b123768db232c58c3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-dea04e97b8b65add4ec3d9ba34d89bfcb4a340dc0f8a3e52b123768db232c58c3
container_end_page 1719
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1713
container_title Water, air and soil pollution
container_volume 85
creator SAMPSON, C. J
BREZONIK, P. L
FROST, T. M
WEBSTER, K. E
SIMONSON, T. D
description One basin of Little Rock lake was acidified during 1984-1990 with sulphuric acid, causing progressive decreases in pH from 6.1 to 4.7. The lake was then allowed to recover, so that by the fourth year about 50 per cent of the change necessary to return to pre-acidification values of pH, acid neutralizing capacity (ANC), sulphate and calcium had occurred. Increases in ANC during the first 2 years of recovery were closely predicted by models, but those in years 3-4 were slower than expected. This was possibly due to the 0-5 cm sediment layer acting as a sink for ANC generated by sulphate reduction. The biological recovery of the lake was not as swift or straightforward. Zooplankton species diminished by acidification had not returned while those favoured by acidity had diminished. The mayfly species Caenis had also failed to return. Further studies of the recovery responses were needed to produce more accurate models of recovery from acidification.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/BF00477227
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18161716</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18161716</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-dea04e97b8b65add4ec3d9ba34d89bfcb4a340dc0f8a3e52b123768db232c58c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhoMouK5e_AU5iAexmo-2abyprB9QEGTFY0mTicbtNmvSFfffG13R485lPnjmZZgXoUNKzigh4vzqhpBcCMbEFhrRQvCMSc620SiNZVZKIXfRXoxvJIWsxAgNk88FBDeHflAdVtoZZ51Wg_M99hbXbhg6wI9ez3CtZnCKn13Uvo-uxxd4-grYuhAHbP0y4BWoEL-39CvMk0jS6w1une_8y08bQPsPCKt9tGNVF-HgN4_R081ken2X1Q-399eXdaZ5xYbMgCI5SNFWbVkoY3LQ3MhW8dxUsrW6zVNJjCa2UhwK1lLGRVmZlnGmi0rzMTpe6y6Cf19CHJp5uh66TvXgl7GhFS2poOVmUJAyT__aDBaCFZSRzSAvc5bsSODJGtTBxxjANotkhwqrhpLm29Pm39MEH_2qqpgeaoPqtYt_G5wUXEjGvwCvLaEZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>13642979</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experimental acidification of Little Rock Lake, Wisconsin : The first four years of chemical and biological recovery</title><source>SpringerLink_过刊(NSTL购买)</source><creator>SAMPSON, C. J ; BREZONIK, P. L ; FROST, T. M ; WEBSTER, K. E ; SIMONSON, T. D</creator><contributor>Grennfelt, P ; Rodhe, H ; Thornelof</contributor><creatorcontrib>SAMPSON, C. J ; BREZONIK, P. L ; FROST, T. M ; WEBSTER, K. E ; SIMONSON, T. D ; Grennfelt, P ; Rodhe, H ; Thornelof</creatorcontrib><description>One basin of Little Rock lake was acidified during 1984-1990 with sulphuric acid, causing progressive decreases in pH from 6.1 to 4.7. The lake was then allowed to recover, so that by the fourth year about 50 per cent of the change necessary to return to pre-acidification values of pH, acid neutralizing capacity (ANC), sulphate and calcium had occurred. Increases in ANC during the first 2 years of recovery were closely predicted by models, but those in years 3-4 were slower than expected. This was possibly due to the 0-5 cm sediment layer acting as a sink for ANC generated by sulphate reduction. The biological recovery of the lake was not as swift or straightforward. Zooplankton species diminished by acidification had not returned while those favoured by acidity had diminished. The mayfly species Caenis had also failed to return. Further studies of the recovery responses were needed to produce more accurate models of recovery from acidification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0049-6979</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00477227</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WAPLAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Continental surface waters ; Exact sciences and technology ; Freshwater ; Natural water pollution ; Pollution ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Water, air and soil pollution, 1995-01, Vol.85 (3), p.1713-1719</ispartof><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-dea04e97b8b65add4ec3d9ba34d89bfcb4a340dc0f8a3e52b123768db232c58c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-dea04e97b8b65add4ec3d9ba34d89bfcb4a340dc0f8a3e52b123768db232c58c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=3053792$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Grennfelt, P</contributor><contributor>Rodhe, H</contributor><contributor>Thornelof</contributor><creatorcontrib>SAMPSON, C. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BREZONIK, P. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FROST, T. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WEBSTER, K. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIMONSON, T. D</creatorcontrib><title>Experimental acidification of Little Rock Lake, Wisconsin : The first four years of chemical and biological recovery</title><title>Water, air and soil pollution</title><description>One basin of Little Rock lake was acidified during 1984-1990 with sulphuric acid, causing progressive decreases in pH from 6.1 to 4.7. The lake was then allowed to recover, so that by the fourth year about 50 per cent of the change necessary to return to pre-acidification values of pH, acid neutralizing capacity (ANC), sulphate and calcium had occurred. Increases in ANC during the first 2 years of recovery were closely predicted by models, but those in years 3-4 were slower than expected. This was possibly due to the 0-5 cm sediment layer acting as a sink for ANC generated by sulphate reduction. The biological recovery of the lake was not as swift or straightforward. Zooplankton species diminished by acidification had not returned while those favoured by acidity had diminished. The mayfly species Caenis had also failed to return. Further studies of the recovery responses were needed to produce more accurate models of recovery from acidification.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Continental surface waters</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Natural water pollution</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0049-6979</issn><issn>1573-2932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhoMouK5e_AU5iAexmo-2abyprB9QEGTFY0mTicbtNmvSFfffG13R485lPnjmZZgXoUNKzigh4vzqhpBcCMbEFhrRQvCMSc620SiNZVZKIXfRXoxvJIWsxAgNk88FBDeHflAdVtoZZ51Wg_M99hbXbhg6wI9ez3CtZnCKn13Uvo-uxxd4-grYuhAHbP0y4BWoEL-39CvMk0jS6w1une_8y08bQPsPCKt9tGNVF-HgN4_R081ken2X1Q-399eXdaZ5xYbMgCI5SNFWbVkoY3LQ3MhW8dxUsrW6zVNJjCa2UhwK1lLGRVmZlnGmi0rzMTpe6y6Cf19CHJp5uh66TvXgl7GhFS2poOVmUJAyT__aDBaCFZSRzSAvc5bsSODJGtTBxxjANotkhwqrhpLm29Pm39MEH_2qqpgeaoPqtYt_G5wUXEjGvwCvLaEZ</recordid><startdate>19950101</startdate><enddate>19950101</enddate><creator>SAMPSON, C. J</creator><creator>BREZONIK, P. L</creator><creator>FROST, T. M</creator><creator>WEBSTER, K. E</creator><creator>SIMONSON, T. D</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950101</creationdate><title>Experimental acidification of Little Rock Lake, Wisconsin : The first four years of chemical and biological recovery</title><author>SAMPSON, C. J ; BREZONIK, P. L ; FROST, T. M ; WEBSTER, K. E ; SIMONSON, T. D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-dea04e97b8b65add4ec3d9ba34d89bfcb4a340dc0f8a3e52b123768db232c58c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Continental surface waters</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Natural water pollution</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SAMPSON, C. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BREZONIK, P. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FROST, T. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WEBSTER, K. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIMONSON, T. D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Water, air and soil pollution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SAMPSON, C. J</au><au>BREZONIK, P. L</au><au>FROST, T. M</au><au>WEBSTER, K. E</au><au>SIMONSON, T. D</au><au>Grennfelt, P</au><au>Rodhe, H</au><au>Thornelof</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experimental acidification of Little Rock Lake, Wisconsin : The first four years of chemical and biological recovery</atitle><jtitle>Water, air and soil pollution</jtitle><date>1995-01-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1713</spage><epage>1719</epage><pages>1713-1719</pages><issn>0049-6979</issn><eissn>1573-2932</eissn><coden>WAPLAC</coden><abstract>One basin of Little Rock lake was acidified during 1984-1990 with sulphuric acid, causing progressive decreases in pH from 6.1 to 4.7. The lake was then allowed to recover, so that by the fourth year about 50 per cent of the change necessary to return to pre-acidification values of pH, acid neutralizing capacity (ANC), sulphate and calcium had occurred. Increases in ANC during the first 2 years of recovery were closely predicted by models, but those in years 3-4 were slower than expected. This was possibly due to the 0-5 cm sediment layer acting as a sink for ANC generated by sulphate reduction. The biological recovery of the lake was not as swift or straightforward. Zooplankton species diminished by acidification had not returned while those favoured by acidity had diminished. The mayfly species Caenis had also failed to return. Further studies of the recovery responses were needed to produce more accurate models of recovery from acidification.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/BF00477227</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0049-6979
ispartof Water, air and soil pollution, 1995-01, Vol.85 (3), p.1713-1719
issn 0049-6979
1573-2932
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18161716
source SpringerLink_过刊(NSTL购买)
subjects Applied sciences
Continental surface waters
Exact sciences and technology
Freshwater
Natural water pollution
Pollution
Water treatment and pollution
title Experimental acidification of Little Rock Lake, Wisconsin : The first four years of chemical and biological recovery
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T13%3A54%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experimental%20acidification%20of%20Little%20Rock%20Lake,%20Wisconsin%20:%20The%20first%20four%20years%20of%20chemical%20and%20biological%20recovery&rft.jtitle=Water,%20air%20and%20soil%20pollution&rft.au=SAMPSON,%20C.%20J&rft.date=1995-01-01&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1713&rft.epage=1719&rft.pages=1713-1719&rft.issn=0049-6979&rft.eissn=1573-2932&rft.coden=WAPLAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00477227&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18161716%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-dea04e97b8b65add4ec3d9ba34d89bfcb4a340dc0f8a3e52b123768db232c58c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=13642979&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true