Loading…
Experimental acidification of Little Rock Lake, Wisconsin : The first four years of chemical and biological recovery
One basin of Little Rock lake was acidified during 1984-1990 with sulphuric acid, causing progressive decreases in pH from 6.1 to 4.7. The lake was then allowed to recover, so that by the fourth year about 50 per cent of the change necessary to return to pre-acidification values of pH, acid neutrali...
Saved in:
Published in: | Water, air and soil pollution air and soil pollution, 1995-01, Vol.85 (3), p.1713-1719 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-dea04e97b8b65add4ec3d9ba34d89bfcb4a340dc0f8a3e52b123768db232c58c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-dea04e97b8b65add4ec3d9ba34d89bfcb4a340dc0f8a3e52b123768db232c58c3 |
container_end_page | 1719 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1713 |
container_title | Water, air and soil pollution |
container_volume | 85 |
creator | SAMPSON, C. J BREZONIK, P. L FROST, T. M WEBSTER, K. E SIMONSON, T. D |
description | One basin of Little Rock lake was acidified during 1984-1990 with sulphuric acid, causing progressive decreases in pH from 6.1 to 4.7. The lake was then allowed to recover, so that by the fourth year about 50 per cent of the change necessary to return to pre-acidification values of pH, acid neutralizing capacity (ANC), sulphate and calcium had occurred. Increases in ANC during the first 2 years of recovery were closely predicted by models, but those in years 3-4 were slower than expected. This was possibly due to the 0-5 cm sediment layer acting as a sink for ANC generated by sulphate reduction. The biological recovery of the lake was not as swift or straightforward. Zooplankton species diminished by acidification had not returned while those favoured by acidity had diminished. The mayfly species Caenis had also failed to return. Further studies of the recovery responses were needed to produce more accurate models of recovery from acidification. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF00477227 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18161716</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18161716</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-dea04e97b8b65add4ec3d9ba34d89bfcb4a340dc0f8a3e52b123768db232c58c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhoMouK5e_AU5iAexmo-2abyprB9QEGTFY0mTicbtNmvSFfffG13R485lPnjmZZgXoUNKzigh4vzqhpBcCMbEFhrRQvCMSc620SiNZVZKIXfRXoxvJIWsxAgNk88FBDeHflAdVtoZZ51Wg_M99hbXbhg6wI9ez3CtZnCKn13Uvo-uxxd4-grYuhAHbP0y4BWoEL-39CvMk0jS6w1une_8y08bQPsPCKt9tGNVF-HgN4_R081ken2X1Q-399eXdaZ5xYbMgCI5SNFWbVkoY3LQ3MhW8dxUsrW6zVNJjCa2UhwK1lLGRVmZlnGmi0rzMTpe6y6Cf19CHJp5uh66TvXgl7GhFS2poOVmUJAyT__aDBaCFZSRzSAvc5bsSODJGtTBxxjANotkhwqrhpLm29Pm39MEH_2qqpgeaoPqtYt_G5wUXEjGvwCvLaEZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>13642979</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experimental acidification of Little Rock Lake, Wisconsin : The first four years of chemical and biological recovery</title><source>SpringerLink_过刊(NSTL购买)</source><creator>SAMPSON, C. J ; BREZONIK, P. L ; FROST, T. M ; WEBSTER, K. E ; SIMONSON, T. D</creator><contributor>Grennfelt, P ; Rodhe, H ; Thornelof</contributor><creatorcontrib>SAMPSON, C. J ; BREZONIK, P. L ; FROST, T. M ; WEBSTER, K. E ; SIMONSON, T. D ; Grennfelt, P ; Rodhe, H ; Thornelof</creatorcontrib><description>One basin of Little Rock lake was acidified during 1984-1990 with sulphuric acid, causing progressive decreases in pH from 6.1 to 4.7. The lake was then allowed to recover, so that by the fourth year about 50 per cent of the change necessary to return to pre-acidification values of pH, acid neutralizing capacity (ANC), sulphate and calcium had occurred. Increases in ANC during the first 2 years of recovery were closely predicted by models, but those in years 3-4 were slower than expected. This was possibly due to the 0-5 cm sediment layer acting as a sink for ANC generated by sulphate reduction. The biological recovery of the lake was not as swift or straightforward. Zooplankton species diminished by acidification had not returned while those favoured by acidity had diminished. The mayfly species Caenis had also failed to return. Further studies of the recovery responses were needed to produce more accurate models of recovery from acidification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0049-6979</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2932</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF00477227</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WAPLAC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Continental surface waters ; Exact sciences and technology ; Freshwater ; Natural water pollution ; Pollution ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Water, air and soil pollution, 1995-01, Vol.85 (3), p.1713-1719</ispartof><rights>1996 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-dea04e97b8b65add4ec3d9ba34d89bfcb4a340dc0f8a3e52b123768db232c58c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-dea04e97b8b65add4ec3d9ba34d89bfcb4a340dc0f8a3e52b123768db232c58c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3053792$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Grennfelt, P</contributor><contributor>Rodhe, H</contributor><contributor>Thornelof</contributor><creatorcontrib>SAMPSON, C. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BREZONIK, P. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FROST, T. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WEBSTER, K. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIMONSON, T. D</creatorcontrib><title>Experimental acidification of Little Rock Lake, Wisconsin : The first four years of chemical and biological recovery</title><title>Water, air and soil pollution</title><description>One basin of Little Rock lake was acidified during 1984-1990 with sulphuric acid, causing progressive decreases in pH from 6.1 to 4.7. The lake was then allowed to recover, so that by the fourth year about 50 per cent of the change necessary to return to pre-acidification values of pH, acid neutralizing capacity (ANC), sulphate and calcium had occurred. Increases in ANC during the first 2 years of recovery were closely predicted by models, but those in years 3-4 were slower than expected. This was possibly due to the 0-5 cm sediment layer acting as a sink for ANC generated by sulphate reduction. The biological recovery of the lake was not as swift or straightforward. Zooplankton species diminished by acidification had not returned while those favoured by acidity had diminished. The mayfly species Caenis had also failed to return. Further studies of the recovery responses were needed to produce more accurate models of recovery from acidification.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Continental surface waters</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Natural water pollution</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0049-6979</issn><issn>1573-2932</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkU1LxDAQhoMouK5e_AU5iAexmo-2abyprB9QEGTFY0mTicbtNmvSFfffG13R485lPnjmZZgXoUNKzigh4vzqhpBcCMbEFhrRQvCMSc620SiNZVZKIXfRXoxvJIWsxAgNk88FBDeHflAdVtoZZ51Wg_M99hbXbhg6wI9ez3CtZnCKn13Uvo-uxxd4-grYuhAHbP0y4BWoEL-39CvMk0jS6w1une_8y08bQPsPCKt9tGNVF-HgN4_R081ken2X1Q-399eXdaZ5xYbMgCI5SNFWbVkoY3LQ3MhW8dxUsrW6zVNJjCa2UhwK1lLGRVmZlnGmi0rzMTpe6y6Cf19CHJp5uh66TvXgl7GhFS2poOVmUJAyT__aDBaCFZSRzSAvc5bsSODJGtTBxxjANotkhwqrhpLm29Pm39MEH_2qqpgeaoPqtYt_G5wUXEjGvwCvLaEZ</recordid><startdate>19950101</startdate><enddate>19950101</enddate><creator>SAMPSON, C. J</creator><creator>BREZONIK, P. L</creator><creator>FROST, T. M</creator><creator>WEBSTER, K. E</creator><creator>SIMONSON, T. D</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19950101</creationdate><title>Experimental acidification of Little Rock Lake, Wisconsin : The first four years of chemical and biological recovery</title><author>SAMPSON, C. J ; BREZONIK, P. L ; FROST, T. M ; WEBSTER, K. E ; SIMONSON, T. D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-dea04e97b8b65add4ec3d9ba34d89bfcb4a340dc0f8a3e52b123768db232c58c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Continental surface waters</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Natural water pollution</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SAMPSON, C. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BREZONIK, P. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>FROST, T. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>WEBSTER, K. E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SIMONSON, T. D</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Water, air and soil pollution</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SAMPSON, C. J</au><au>BREZONIK, P. L</au><au>FROST, T. M</au><au>WEBSTER, K. E</au><au>SIMONSON, T. D</au><au>Grennfelt, P</au><au>Rodhe, H</au><au>Thornelof</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experimental acidification of Little Rock Lake, Wisconsin : The first four years of chemical and biological recovery</atitle><jtitle>Water, air and soil pollution</jtitle><date>1995-01-01</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1713</spage><epage>1719</epage><pages>1713-1719</pages><issn>0049-6979</issn><eissn>1573-2932</eissn><coden>WAPLAC</coden><abstract>One basin of Little Rock lake was acidified during 1984-1990 with sulphuric acid, causing progressive decreases in pH from 6.1 to 4.7. The lake was then allowed to recover, so that by the fourth year about 50 per cent of the change necessary to return to pre-acidification values of pH, acid neutralizing capacity (ANC), sulphate and calcium had occurred. Increases in ANC during the first 2 years of recovery were closely predicted by models, but those in years 3-4 were slower than expected. This was possibly due to the 0-5 cm sediment layer acting as a sink for ANC generated by sulphate reduction. The biological recovery of the lake was not as swift or straightforward. Zooplankton species diminished by acidification had not returned while those favoured by acidity had diminished. The mayfly species Caenis had also failed to return. Further studies of the recovery responses were needed to produce more accurate models of recovery from acidification.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/BF00477227</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0049-6979 |
ispartof | Water, air and soil pollution, 1995-01, Vol.85 (3), p.1713-1719 |
issn | 0049-6979 1573-2932 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18161716 |
source | SpringerLink_过刊(NSTL购买) |
subjects | Applied sciences Continental surface waters Exact sciences and technology Freshwater Natural water pollution Pollution Water treatment and pollution |
title | Experimental acidification of Little Rock Lake, Wisconsin : The first four years of chemical and biological recovery |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T13%3A54%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experimental%20acidification%20of%20Little%20Rock%20Lake,%20Wisconsin%20:%20The%20first%20four%20years%20of%20chemical%20and%20biological%20recovery&rft.jtitle=Water,%20air%20and%20soil%20pollution&rft.au=SAMPSON,%20C.%20J&rft.date=1995-01-01&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1713&rft.epage=1719&rft.pages=1713-1719&rft.issn=0049-6979&rft.eissn=1573-2932&rft.coden=WAPLAC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF00477227&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18161716%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-dea04e97b8b65add4ec3d9ba34d89bfcb4a340dc0f8a3e52b123768db232c58c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=13642979&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |