Loading…
Extraction of organic contaminants from marine sediments and tissues using microwave energy
In this study, we compared microwave solvent extraction (MSE) to conventional methods for extracting organic contaminants from marine sediments and tissues with high and varying moisture content. The organic contaminants measured were polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) congeners, chlorinated pesticides,...
Saved in:
Published in: | Chemosphere (Oxford) 2001-07, Vol.44 (2), p.181-191 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-b6aac8d21ed652081bd0663af99aa02de34889e25fac704cc609cefc116791f43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-b6aac8d21ed652081bd0663af99aa02de34889e25fac704cc609cefc116791f43 |
container_end_page | 191 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 181 |
container_title | Chemosphere (Oxford) |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Jayaraman, Saro Pruell, Richard J McKinney, Richard |
description | In this study, we compared microwave solvent extraction (MSE) to conventional methods for extracting organic contaminants from marine sediments and tissues with high and varying moisture content. The organic contaminants measured were polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) congeners, chlorinated pesticides, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Initial experiments were conducted on dry standard reference materials (SRMs) and field collected marine sediments. Moisture content in samples greatly influenced the recovery of the analytes of interest. When wet sediments were included in a sample batch, low recoveries were often encountered in other samples in the batch, including the dry SRM. Experiments were conducted to test the effect of standardizing the moisture content in all samples in a batch prior to extraction. SRM1941a (marine sediment), SRM1974a (mussel tissue), as well as QA96SED6 (marine sediment), and QA96TIS7 (marine tissue), both from 1996 NIST Intercalibration Exercise were extracted using microwave and conventional methods. Moisture levels were adjusted in SRMs to match those of marine sediment and tissue samples before microwave extraction. The results demonstrated that it is crucial to standardize the moisture content in all samples, including dry reference material to ensure good recovery of organic contaminants. MSE yielded equivalent or superior recoveries compared to conventional methods for the majority of the compounds evaluated. The advantages of MSE over conventional methods are reduced solvent usage, higher sample throughput and the elimination of halogenated solvent usage. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00201-0 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18171630</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0045653500002010</els_id><sourcerecordid>18171630</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-b6aac8d21ed652081bd0663af99aa02de34889e25fac704cc609cefc116791f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOHDEQRa2ICAbCJwR5Q0QWnVT1w91eoQiRh4SURcKKhVXjLo8cTdtg95Dw9_Ewo7DMqiTr3KrrI8RbhA8IqD7-AGi7SnVNdwHwHqAGrOCVWODQ6wprPRyIxT_kSBzn_AugBDt9KI4Q27attV6Iu-s_cyI7-xhkdDKmFQVvpY1hpskHCnOWLsVJTpR8YJl59BNvXymMcvY5bzjLTfZhJSdvU_xNjyw5cFo9vRGvHa0zn-7nibj9fP3z6mt18_3Lt6tPN5Vth2GulorIDmONPKquhgGXIyjVkNOaCOqRm4JprjtHtofWWgXasrOIqtfo2uZEvNvtvU_xodSZzeSz5fWaAsdNNjhgj6qBAnY7sPTMObEz98mXjz0ZBLO1ap6tmq0yA2CerZpt7mx_YLOceHxJ7TUW4HwPULa0domC9fmFa7Gs6ofCXe44LjoePSeTredgi9TEdjZj9P-p8hdksZU5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18171630</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Extraction of organic contaminants from marine sediments and tissues using microwave energy</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Jayaraman, Saro ; Pruell, Richard J ; McKinney, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>Jayaraman, Saro ; Pruell, Richard J ; McKinney, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>In this study, we compared microwave solvent extraction (MSE) to conventional methods for extracting organic contaminants from marine sediments and tissues with high and varying moisture content. The organic contaminants measured were polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) congeners, chlorinated pesticides, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Initial experiments were conducted on dry standard reference materials (SRMs) and field collected marine sediments. Moisture content in samples greatly influenced the recovery of the analytes of interest. When wet sediments were included in a sample batch, low recoveries were often encountered in other samples in the batch, including the dry SRM. Experiments were conducted to test the effect of standardizing the moisture content in all samples in a batch prior to extraction. SRM1941a (marine sediment), SRM1974a (mussel tissue), as well as QA96SED6 (marine sediment), and QA96TIS7 (marine tissue), both from 1996 NIST Intercalibration Exercise were extracted using microwave and conventional methods. Moisture levels were adjusted in SRMs to match those of marine sediment and tissue samples before microwave extraction. The results demonstrated that it is crucial to standardize the moisture content in all samples, including dry reference material to ensure good recovery of organic contaminants. MSE yielded equivalent or superior recoveries compared to conventional methods for the majority of the compounds evaluated. The advantages of MSE over conventional methods are reduced solvent usage, higher sample throughput and the elimination of halogenated solvent usage.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-6535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1298</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00201-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11444299</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CMSHAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis methods ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Applied ecology ; Applied sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chlorinated pesticides ; Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Geologic Sediments - chemistry ; Insecticides - analysis ; Microwave extraction ; Microwaves ; moisture ; PAHs ; PCBs ; Pollution ; Polychlorinated Biphenyls - analysis ; Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons - analysis ; Soil and sediments pollution ; Techniques ; Tissue Distribution ; Water</subject><ispartof>Chemosphere (Oxford), 2001-07, Vol.44 (2), p.181-191</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-b6aac8d21ed652081bd0663af99aa02de34889e25fac704cc609cefc116791f43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-b6aac8d21ed652081bd0663af99aa02de34889e25fac704cc609cefc116791f43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14100278$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11444299$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jayaraman, Saro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pruell, Richard J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKinney, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>Extraction of organic contaminants from marine sediments and tissues using microwave energy</title><title>Chemosphere (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><description>In this study, we compared microwave solvent extraction (MSE) to conventional methods for extracting organic contaminants from marine sediments and tissues with high and varying moisture content. The organic contaminants measured were polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) congeners, chlorinated pesticides, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Initial experiments were conducted on dry standard reference materials (SRMs) and field collected marine sediments. Moisture content in samples greatly influenced the recovery of the analytes of interest. When wet sediments were included in a sample batch, low recoveries were often encountered in other samples in the batch, including the dry SRM. Experiments were conducted to test the effect of standardizing the moisture content in all samples in a batch prior to extraction. SRM1941a (marine sediment), SRM1974a (mussel tissue), as well as QA96SED6 (marine sediment), and QA96TIS7 (marine tissue), both from 1996 NIST Intercalibration Exercise were extracted using microwave and conventional methods. Moisture levels were adjusted in SRMs to match those of marine sediment and tissue samples before microwave extraction. The results demonstrated that it is crucial to standardize the moisture content in all samples, including dry reference material to ensure good recovery of organic contaminants. MSE yielded equivalent or superior recoveries compared to conventional methods for the majority of the compounds evaluated. The advantages of MSE over conventional methods are reduced solvent usage, higher sample throughput and the elimination of halogenated solvent usage.</description><subject>Analysis methods</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chlorinated pesticides</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Geologic Sediments - chemistry</subject><subject>Insecticides - analysis</subject><subject>Microwave extraction</subject><subject>Microwaves</subject><subject>moisture</subject><subject>PAHs</subject><subject>PCBs</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Polychlorinated Biphenyls - analysis</subject><subject>Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons - analysis</subject><subject>Soil and sediments pollution</subject><subject>Techniques</subject><subject>Tissue Distribution</subject><subject>Water</subject><issn>0045-6535</issn><issn>1879-1298</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkMtOHDEQRa2ICAbCJwR5Q0QWnVT1w91eoQiRh4SURcKKhVXjLo8cTdtg95Dw9_Ewo7DMqiTr3KrrI8RbhA8IqD7-AGi7SnVNdwHwHqAGrOCVWODQ6wprPRyIxT_kSBzn_AugBDt9KI4Q27attV6Iu-s_cyI7-xhkdDKmFQVvpY1hpskHCnOWLsVJTpR8YJl59BNvXymMcvY5bzjLTfZhJSdvU_xNjyw5cFo9vRGvHa0zn-7nibj9fP3z6mt18_3Lt6tPN5Vth2GulorIDmONPKquhgGXIyjVkNOaCOqRm4JprjtHtofWWgXasrOIqtfo2uZEvNvtvU_xodSZzeSz5fWaAsdNNjhgj6qBAnY7sPTMObEz98mXjz0ZBLO1ap6tmq0yA2CerZpt7mx_YLOceHxJ7TUW4HwPULa0domC9fmFa7Gs6ofCXe44LjoePSeTredgi9TEdjZj9P-p8hdksZU5</recordid><startdate>20010701</startdate><enddate>20010701</enddate><creator>Jayaraman, Saro</creator><creator>Pruell, Richard J</creator><creator>McKinney, Richard</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010701</creationdate><title>Extraction of organic contaminants from marine sediments and tissues using microwave energy</title><author>Jayaraman, Saro ; Pruell, Richard J ; McKinney, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-b6aac8d21ed652081bd0663af99aa02de34889e25fac704cc609cefc116791f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Analysis methods</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chlorinated pesticides</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Geologic Sediments - chemistry</topic><topic>Insecticides - analysis</topic><topic>Microwave extraction</topic><topic>Microwaves</topic><topic>moisture</topic><topic>PAHs</topic><topic>PCBs</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Polychlorinated Biphenyls - analysis</topic><topic>Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons - analysis</topic><topic>Soil and sediments pollution</topic><topic>Techniques</topic><topic>Tissue Distribution</topic><topic>Water</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jayaraman, Saro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pruell, Richard J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McKinney, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jayaraman, Saro</au><au>Pruell, Richard J</au><au>McKinney, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Extraction of organic contaminants from marine sediments and tissues using microwave energy</atitle><jtitle>Chemosphere (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Chemosphere</addtitle><date>2001-07-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>181</spage><epage>191</epage><pages>181-191</pages><issn>0045-6535</issn><eissn>1879-1298</eissn><coden>CMSHAF</coden><abstract>In this study, we compared microwave solvent extraction (MSE) to conventional methods for extracting organic contaminants from marine sediments and tissues with high and varying moisture content. The organic contaminants measured were polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) congeners, chlorinated pesticides, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Initial experiments were conducted on dry standard reference materials (SRMs) and field collected marine sediments. Moisture content in samples greatly influenced the recovery of the analytes of interest. When wet sediments were included in a sample batch, low recoveries were often encountered in other samples in the batch, including the dry SRM. Experiments were conducted to test the effect of standardizing the moisture content in all samples in a batch prior to extraction. SRM1941a (marine sediment), SRM1974a (mussel tissue), as well as QA96SED6 (marine sediment), and QA96TIS7 (marine tissue), both from 1996 NIST Intercalibration Exercise were extracted using microwave and conventional methods. Moisture levels were adjusted in SRMs to match those of marine sediment and tissue samples before microwave extraction. The results demonstrated that it is crucial to standardize the moisture content in all samples, including dry reference material to ensure good recovery of organic contaminants. MSE yielded equivalent or superior recoveries compared to conventional methods for the majority of the compounds evaluated. The advantages of MSE over conventional methods are reduced solvent usage, higher sample throughput and the elimination of halogenated solvent usage.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>11444299</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00201-0</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0045-6535 |
ispartof | Chemosphere (Oxford), 2001-07, Vol.44 (2), p.181-191 |
issn | 0045-6535 1879-1298 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18171630 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Analysis methods Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Applied ecology Applied sciences Biological and medical sciences Chlorinated pesticides Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution Environmental Monitoring - methods Exact sciences and technology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Geologic Sediments - chemistry Insecticides - analysis Microwave extraction Microwaves moisture PAHs PCBs Pollution Polychlorinated Biphenyls - analysis Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons - analysis Soil and sediments pollution Techniques Tissue Distribution Water |
title | Extraction of organic contaminants from marine sediments and tissues using microwave energy |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T03%3A40%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Extraction%20of%20organic%20contaminants%20from%20marine%20sediments%20and%20tissues%20using%20microwave%20energy&rft.jtitle=Chemosphere%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Jayaraman,%20Saro&rft.date=2001-07-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=181&rft.epage=191&rft.pages=181-191&rft.issn=0045-6535&rft.eissn=1879-1298&rft.coden=CMSHAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00201-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18171630%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c488t-b6aac8d21ed652081bd0663af99aa02de34889e25fac704cc609cefc116791f43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18171630&rft_id=info:pmid/11444299&rfr_iscdi=true |