Loading…

Comparison of cough reflex testing with videoendoscopy in recently extubated intensive care unit patients

Abstract Purpose Orotracheal intubation is known to impair cough reflex, but the validity of cough reflex testing (CRT) as a screening tool for silent aspiration in this population is unknown. Material and methods One hundred and six participants in a tertiary-level intensive care unit (ICU) underwe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of critical care 2016-06, Vol.33, p.90-94
Main Authors: Kallesen, Molly, Psirides, Alex, Huckabee, Maggie-Lee
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-81e6f051867eef5b766c38ee93f3c49e3645584f0b6ae3ea8bd38e6e1725b34a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-81e6f051867eef5b766c38ee93f3c49e3645584f0b6ae3ea8bd38e6e1725b34a3
container_end_page 94
container_issue
container_start_page 90
container_title Journal of critical care
container_volume 33
creator Kallesen, Molly
Psirides, Alex
Huckabee, Maggie-Lee
description Abstract Purpose Orotracheal intubation is known to impair cough reflex, but the validity of cough reflex testing (CRT) as a screening tool for silent aspiration in this population is unknown. Material and methods One hundred and six participants in a tertiary-level intensive care unit (ICU) underwent CRT and videoendoscopic evaluation of swallowing (VES) within 24 hours of extubation. Cough reflex threshold was established for each participant using nebulized citric acid. Results Thirty-nine (37%) participants had an absent cough to CRT. Thirteen (12%) participants aspirated on VES, 9 (69%) without a cough response. Sensitivity of CRT to identify silent aspiration was excellent, but specificity was poor. There was a significant correlation between intubation duration and presence of aspiration on VES ( P = .0107). There was no significant correlation between silent aspiration on VES and length of intubation, age, sex, diagnosis at intensive care unit admission, indication for intubation, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score, morphine equivalent dose, or time of testing postextubation. Conclusions Intensive care unit patients are at increased risk of aspiration in the 24 hours following extubation, and an impaired cough reflex is common. However, CRT overidentifies risk of silent aspiration in this population.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.02.004
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1818330891</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0883944116000605</els_id><sourcerecordid>1784462959</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-81e6f051867eef5b766c38ee93f3c49e3645584f0b6ae3ea8bd38e6e1725b34a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk-L1TAUxYMozpvRL-BCAm7ctCbNn6Yggjx0FAZcqOuQprczqX3JM0mf8769qW9UmIWuEpLfuXDOuQg9o6SmhMpXUz3ZaOum3GvS1ITwB2hDhWgrJal4iDZEKVZ1nNMzdJ7SRAhtGROP0Vkju44x2W2Q24bd3kSXgsdhxDYs1zc4wjjDLc6QsvPX-IfLN_jgBgjgh5Bs2B-x84Wy4PN8xHCbl95kGMprBp_cAbA1EfDiXcZ7k13h0hP0aDRzgqd35wX6-v7dl-2H6urT5cft26vK8rbJlaIgRyKoki3AKPpWSssUQMdGZnkHTHIhFB9JLw0wMKofyrcE2jaiZ9ywC_TyNHcfw_elWNA7lyzMs_EQlqSpoooxojr6f7RVnMumE11BX9xDp7BEX4z8okqukrWFak6UjSGlEqPeR7cz8agp0WtnetJrZ3rtTJNGl86K6Pnd6KXfwfBH8rukArw-AVBiOziIOtkSqYXBlQ6yHoL79_w39-R2dt5ZM3-DI6S_PnQqAv153Zp1aagkhEgi2E9HP72E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1784733637</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of cough reflex testing with videoendoscopy in recently extubated intensive care unit patients</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kallesen, Molly ; Psirides, Alex ; Huckabee, Maggie-Lee</creator><creatorcontrib>Kallesen, Molly ; Psirides, Alex ; Huckabee, Maggie-Lee</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Purpose Orotracheal intubation is known to impair cough reflex, but the validity of cough reflex testing (CRT) as a screening tool for silent aspiration in this population is unknown. Material and methods One hundred and six participants in a tertiary-level intensive care unit (ICU) underwent CRT and videoendoscopic evaluation of swallowing (VES) within 24 hours of extubation. Cough reflex threshold was established for each participant using nebulized citric acid. Results Thirty-nine (37%) participants had an absent cough to CRT. Thirteen (12%) participants aspirated on VES, 9 (69%) without a cough response. Sensitivity of CRT to identify silent aspiration was excellent, but specificity was poor. There was a significant correlation between intubation duration and presence of aspiration on VES ( P = .0107). There was no significant correlation between silent aspiration on VES and length of intubation, age, sex, diagnosis at intensive care unit admission, indication for intubation, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score, morphine equivalent dose, or time of testing postextubation. Conclusions Intensive care unit patients are at increased risk of aspiration in the 24 hours following extubation, and an impaired cough reflex is common. However, CRT overidentifies risk of silent aspiration in this population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-9441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-8615</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.02.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26993369</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acids ; Aged ; Airway Extubation - adverse effects ; Aspiration ; Bronchoscopy ; Citric Acid - administration &amp; dosage ; Cough ; Cough reflex ; Critical Care ; Data analysis ; Dysphagia ; Endoscopy ; Extubation ; Female ; Humans ; ICU ; Intensive care ; Intensive Care Units ; Intubation ; Intubation, Intratracheal - adverse effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nebulizers and Vaporizers ; New Zealand - epidemiology ; Palliative care ; Prevalence ; Reflex - physiology ; Researchers ; Respiratory Aspiration - diagnosis ; Respiratory Aspiration - epidemiology ; Respiratory Aspiration - etiology ; Respiratory Aspiration - prevention &amp; control ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of critical care, 2016-06, Vol.33, p.90-94</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2016. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-81e6f051867eef5b766c38ee93f3c49e3645584f0b6ae3ea8bd38e6e1725b34a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-81e6f051867eef5b766c38ee93f3c49e3645584f0b6ae3ea8bd38e6e1725b34a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5925-2478 ; 0000-0002-7579-8809</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26993369$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kallesen, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Psirides, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huckabee, Maggie-Lee</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of cough reflex testing with videoendoscopy in recently extubated intensive care unit patients</title><title>Journal of critical care</title><addtitle>J Crit Care</addtitle><description>Abstract Purpose Orotracheal intubation is known to impair cough reflex, but the validity of cough reflex testing (CRT) as a screening tool for silent aspiration in this population is unknown. Material and methods One hundred and six participants in a tertiary-level intensive care unit (ICU) underwent CRT and videoendoscopic evaluation of swallowing (VES) within 24 hours of extubation. Cough reflex threshold was established for each participant using nebulized citric acid. Results Thirty-nine (37%) participants had an absent cough to CRT. Thirteen (12%) participants aspirated on VES, 9 (69%) without a cough response. Sensitivity of CRT to identify silent aspiration was excellent, but specificity was poor. There was a significant correlation between intubation duration and presence of aspiration on VES ( P = .0107). There was no significant correlation between silent aspiration on VES and length of intubation, age, sex, diagnosis at intensive care unit admission, indication for intubation, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score, morphine equivalent dose, or time of testing postextubation. Conclusions Intensive care unit patients are at increased risk of aspiration in the 24 hours following extubation, and an impaired cough reflex is common. However, CRT overidentifies risk of silent aspiration in this population.</description><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Airway Extubation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Aspiration</subject><subject>Bronchoscopy</subject><subject>Citric Acid - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Cough</subject><subject>Cough reflex</subject><subject>Critical Care</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Dysphagia</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Extubation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>ICU</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nebulizers and Vaporizers</subject><subject>New Zealand - epidemiology</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Reflex - physiology</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Respiratory Aspiration - diagnosis</subject><subject>Respiratory Aspiration - epidemiology</subject><subject>Respiratory Aspiration - etiology</subject><subject>Respiratory Aspiration - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0883-9441</issn><issn>1557-8615</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkk-L1TAUxYMozpvRL-BCAm7ctCbNn6Yggjx0FAZcqOuQprczqX3JM0mf8769qW9UmIWuEpLfuXDOuQg9o6SmhMpXUz3ZaOum3GvS1ITwB2hDhWgrJal4iDZEKVZ1nNMzdJ7SRAhtGROP0Vkju44x2W2Q24bd3kSXgsdhxDYs1zc4wjjDLc6QsvPX-IfLN_jgBgjgh5Bs2B-x84Wy4PN8xHCbl95kGMprBp_cAbA1EfDiXcZ7k13h0hP0aDRzgqd35wX6-v7dl-2H6urT5cft26vK8rbJlaIgRyKoki3AKPpWSssUQMdGZnkHTHIhFB9JLw0wMKofyrcE2jaiZ9ywC_TyNHcfw_elWNA7lyzMs_EQlqSpoooxojr6f7RVnMumE11BX9xDp7BEX4z8okqukrWFak6UjSGlEqPeR7cz8agp0WtnetJrZ3rtTJNGl86K6Pnd6KXfwfBH8rukArw-AVBiOziIOtkSqYXBlQ6yHoL79_w39-R2dt5ZM3-DI6S_PnQqAv153Zp1aagkhEgi2E9HP72E</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Kallesen, Molly</creator><creator>Psirides, Alex</creator><creator>Huckabee, Maggie-Lee</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5925-2478</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7579-8809</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Comparison of cough reflex testing with videoendoscopy in recently extubated intensive care unit patients</title><author>Kallesen, Molly ; Psirides, Alex ; Huckabee, Maggie-Lee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-81e6f051867eef5b766c38ee93f3c49e3645584f0b6ae3ea8bd38e6e1725b34a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Airway Extubation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Aspiration</topic><topic>Bronchoscopy</topic><topic>Citric Acid - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Cough</topic><topic>Cough reflex</topic><topic>Critical Care</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Dysphagia</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Extubation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>ICU</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nebulizers and Vaporizers</topic><topic>New Zealand - epidemiology</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Reflex - physiology</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Respiratory Aspiration - diagnosis</topic><topic>Respiratory Aspiration - epidemiology</topic><topic>Respiratory Aspiration - etiology</topic><topic>Respiratory Aspiration - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kallesen, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Psirides, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huckabee, Maggie-Lee</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of critical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kallesen, Molly</au><au>Psirides, Alex</au><au>Huckabee, Maggie-Lee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of cough reflex testing with videoendoscopy in recently extubated intensive care unit patients</atitle><jtitle>Journal of critical care</jtitle><addtitle>J Crit Care</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>33</volume><spage>90</spage><epage>94</epage><pages>90-94</pages><issn>0883-9441</issn><eissn>1557-8615</eissn><abstract>Abstract Purpose Orotracheal intubation is known to impair cough reflex, but the validity of cough reflex testing (CRT) as a screening tool for silent aspiration in this population is unknown. Material and methods One hundred and six participants in a tertiary-level intensive care unit (ICU) underwent CRT and videoendoscopic evaluation of swallowing (VES) within 24 hours of extubation. Cough reflex threshold was established for each participant using nebulized citric acid. Results Thirty-nine (37%) participants had an absent cough to CRT. Thirteen (12%) participants aspirated on VES, 9 (69%) without a cough response. Sensitivity of CRT to identify silent aspiration was excellent, but specificity was poor. There was a significant correlation between intubation duration and presence of aspiration on VES ( P = .0107). There was no significant correlation between silent aspiration on VES and length of intubation, age, sex, diagnosis at intensive care unit admission, indication for intubation, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score, morphine equivalent dose, or time of testing postextubation. Conclusions Intensive care unit patients are at increased risk of aspiration in the 24 hours following extubation, and an impaired cough reflex is common. However, CRT overidentifies risk of silent aspiration in this population.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26993369</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.02.004</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5925-2478</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7579-8809</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0883-9441
ispartof Journal of critical care, 2016-06, Vol.33, p.90-94
issn 0883-9441
1557-8615
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1818330891
source ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Acids
Aged
Airway Extubation - adverse effects
Aspiration
Bronchoscopy
Citric Acid - administration & dosage
Cough
Cough reflex
Critical Care
Data analysis
Dysphagia
Endoscopy
Extubation
Female
Humans
ICU
Intensive care
Intensive Care Units
Intubation
Intubation, Intratracheal - adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Nebulizers and Vaporizers
New Zealand - epidemiology
Palliative care
Prevalence
Reflex - physiology
Researchers
Respiratory Aspiration - diagnosis
Respiratory Aspiration - epidemiology
Respiratory Aspiration - etiology
Respiratory Aspiration - prevention & control
Sensitivity and Specificity
Studies
title Comparison of cough reflex testing with videoendoscopy in recently extubated intensive care unit patients
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A46%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20cough%20reflex%20testing%20with%20videoendoscopy%20in%20recently%20extubated%20intensive%20care%20unit%20patients&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20critical%20care&rft.au=Kallesen,%20Molly&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=33&rft.spage=90&rft.epage=94&rft.pages=90-94&rft.issn=0883-9441&rft.eissn=1557-8615&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.02.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1784462959%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-81e6f051867eef5b766c38ee93f3c49e3645584f0b6ae3ea8bd38e6e1725b34a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1784733637&rft_id=info:pmid/26993369&rfr_iscdi=true