Loading…
Comparison of cough reflex testing with videoendoscopy in recently extubated intensive care unit patients
Abstract Purpose Orotracheal intubation is known to impair cough reflex, but the validity of cough reflex testing (CRT) as a screening tool for silent aspiration in this population is unknown. Material and methods One hundred and six participants in a tertiary-level intensive care unit (ICU) underwe...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of critical care 2016-06, Vol.33, p.90-94 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-81e6f051867eef5b766c38ee93f3c49e3645584f0b6ae3ea8bd38e6e1725b34a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-81e6f051867eef5b766c38ee93f3c49e3645584f0b6ae3ea8bd38e6e1725b34a3 |
container_end_page | 94 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 90 |
container_title | Journal of critical care |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Kallesen, Molly Psirides, Alex Huckabee, Maggie-Lee |
description | Abstract Purpose Orotracheal intubation is known to impair cough reflex, but the validity of cough reflex testing (CRT) as a screening tool for silent aspiration in this population is unknown. Material and methods One hundred and six participants in a tertiary-level intensive care unit (ICU) underwent CRT and videoendoscopic evaluation of swallowing (VES) within 24 hours of extubation. Cough reflex threshold was established for each participant using nebulized citric acid. Results Thirty-nine (37%) participants had an absent cough to CRT. Thirteen (12%) participants aspirated on VES, 9 (69%) without a cough response. Sensitivity of CRT to identify silent aspiration was excellent, but specificity was poor. There was a significant correlation between intubation duration and presence of aspiration on VES ( P = .0107). There was no significant correlation between silent aspiration on VES and length of intubation, age, sex, diagnosis at intensive care unit admission, indication for intubation, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score, morphine equivalent dose, or time of testing postextubation. Conclusions Intensive care unit patients are at increased risk of aspiration in the 24 hours following extubation, and an impaired cough reflex is common. However, CRT overidentifies risk of silent aspiration in this population. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.02.004 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1818330891</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0883944116000605</els_id><sourcerecordid>1784462959</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-81e6f051867eef5b766c38ee93f3c49e3645584f0b6ae3ea8bd38e6e1725b34a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkk-L1TAUxYMozpvRL-BCAm7ctCbNn6Yggjx0FAZcqOuQprczqX3JM0mf8769qW9UmIWuEpLfuXDOuQg9o6SmhMpXUz3ZaOum3GvS1ITwB2hDhWgrJal4iDZEKVZ1nNMzdJ7SRAhtGROP0Vkju44x2W2Q24bd3kSXgsdhxDYs1zc4wjjDLc6QsvPX-IfLN_jgBgjgh5Bs2B-x84Wy4PN8xHCbl95kGMprBp_cAbA1EfDiXcZ7k13h0hP0aDRzgqd35wX6-v7dl-2H6urT5cft26vK8rbJlaIgRyKoki3AKPpWSssUQMdGZnkHTHIhFB9JLw0wMKofyrcE2jaiZ9ywC_TyNHcfw_elWNA7lyzMs_EQlqSpoooxojr6f7RVnMumE11BX9xDp7BEX4z8okqukrWFak6UjSGlEqPeR7cz8agp0WtnetJrZ3rtTJNGl86K6Pnd6KXfwfBH8rukArw-AVBiOziIOtkSqYXBlQ6yHoL79_w39-R2dt5ZM3-DI6S_PnQqAv153Zp1aagkhEgi2E9HP72E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1784733637</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of cough reflex testing with videoendoscopy in recently extubated intensive care unit patients</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Kallesen, Molly ; Psirides, Alex ; Huckabee, Maggie-Lee</creator><creatorcontrib>Kallesen, Molly ; Psirides, Alex ; Huckabee, Maggie-Lee</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Purpose Orotracheal intubation is known to impair cough reflex, but the validity of cough reflex testing (CRT) as a screening tool for silent aspiration in this population is unknown. Material and methods One hundred and six participants in a tertiary-level intensive care unit (ICU) underwent CRT and videoendoscopic evaluation of swallowing (VES) within 24 hours of extubation. Cough reflex threshold was established for each participant using nebulized citric acid. Results Thirty-nine (37%) participants had an absent cough to CRT. Thirteen (12%) participants aspirated on VES, 9 (69%) without a cough response. Sensitivity of CRT to identify silent aspiration was excellent, but specificity was poor. There was a significant correlation between intubation duration and presence of aspiration on VES ( P = .0107). There was no significant correlation between silent aspiration on VES and length of intubation, age, sex, diagnosis at intensive care unit admission, indication for intubation, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score, morphine equivalent dose, or time of testing postextubation. Conclusions Intensive care unit patients are at increased risk of aspiration in the 24 hours following extubation, and an impaired cough reflex is common. However, CRT overidentifies risk of silent aspiration in this population.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0883-9441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1557-8615</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.02.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26993369</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Acids ; Aged ; Airway Extubation - adverse effects ; Aspiration ; Bronchoscopy ; Citric Acid - administration & dosage ; Cough ; Cough reflex ; Critical Care ; Data analysis ; Dysphagia ; Endoscopy ; Extubation ; Female ; Humans ; ICU ; Intensive care ; Intensive Care Units ; Intubation ; Intubation, Intratracheal - adverse effects ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nebulizers and Vaporizers ; New Zealand - epidemiology ; Palliative care ; Prevalence ; Reflex - physiology ; Researchers ; Respiratory Aspiration - diagnosis ; Respiratory Aspiration - epidemiology ; Respiratory Aspiration - etiology ; Respiratory Aspiration - prevention & control ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of critical care, 2016-06, Vol.33, p.90-94</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2016. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-81e6f051867eef5b766c38ee93f3c49e3645584f0b6ae3ea8bd38e6e1725b34a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-81e6f051867eef5b766c38ee93f3c49e3645584f0b6ae3ea8bd38e6e1725b34a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5925-2478 ; 0000-0002-7579-8809</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26993369$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kallesen, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Psirides, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huckabee, Maggie-Lee</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of cough reflex testing with videoendoscopy in recently extubated intensive care unit patients</title><title>Journal of critical care</title><addtitle>J Crit Care</addtitle><description>Abstract Purpose Orotracheal intubation is known to impair cough reflex, but the validity of cough reflex testing (CRT) as a screening tool for silent aspiration in this population is unknown. Material and methods One hundred and six participants in a tertiary-level intensive care unit (ICU) underwent CRT and videoendoscopic evaluation of swallowing (VES) within 24 hours of extubation. Cough reflex threshold was established for each participant using nebulized citric acid. Results Thirty-nine (37%) participants had an absent cough to CRT. Thirteen (12%) participants aspirated on VES, 9 (69%) without a cough response. Sensitivity of CRT to identify silent aspiration was excellent, but specificity was poor. There was a significant correlation between intubation duration and presence of aspiration on VES ( P = .0107). There was no significant correlation between silent aspiration on VES and length of intubation, age, sex, diagnosis at intensive care unit admission, indication for intubation, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score, morphine equivalent dose, or time of testing postextubation. Conclusions Intensive care unit patients are at increased risk of aspiration in the 24 hours following extubation, and an impaired cough reflex is common. However, CRT overidentifies risk of silent aspiration in this population.</description><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Airway Extubation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Aspiration</subject><subject>Bronchoscopy</subject><subject>Citric Acid - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Cough</subject><subject>Cough reflex</subject><subject>Critical Care</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Dysphagia</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>Extubation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>ICU</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Intubation</subject><subject>Intubation, Intratracheal - adverse effects</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nebulizers and Vaporizers</subject><subject>New Zealand - epidemiology</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Reflex - physiology</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Respiratory Aspiration - diagnosis</subject><subject>Respiratory Aspiration - epidemiology</subject><subject>Respiratory Aspiration - etiology</subject><subject>Respiratory Aspiration - prevention & control</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0883-9441</issn><issn>1557-8615</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkk-L1TAUxYMozpvRL-BCAm7ctCbNn6Yggjx0FAZcqOuQprczqX3JM0mf8769qW9UmIWuEpLfuXDOuQg9o6SmhMpXUz3ZaOum3GvS1ITwB2hDhWgrJal4iDZEKVZ1nNMzdJ7SRAhtGROP0Vkju44x2W2Q24bd3kSXgsdhxDYs1zc4wjjDLc6QsvPX-IfLN_jgBgjgh5Bs2B-x84Wy4PN8xHCbl95kGMprBp_cAbA1EfDiXcZ7k13h0hP0aDRzgqd35wX6-v7dl-2H6urT5cft26vK8rbJlaIgRyKoki3AKPpWSssUQMdGZnkHTHIhFB9JLw0wMKofyrcE2jaiZ9ywC_TyNHcfw_elWNA7lyzMs_EQlqSpoooxojr6f7RVnMumE11BX9xDp7BEX4z8okqukrWFak6UjSGlEqPeR7cz8agp0WtnetJrZ3rtTJNGl86K6Pnd6KXfwfBH8rukArw-AVBiOziIOtkSqYXBlQ6yHoL79_w39-R2dt5ZM3-DI6S_PnQqAv153Zp1aagkhEgi2E9HP72E</recordid><startdate>20160601</startdate><enddate>20160601</enddate><creator>Kallesen, Molly</creator><creator>Psirides, Alex</creator><creator>Huckabee, Maggie-Lee</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5925-2478</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7579-8809</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160601</creationdate><title>Comparison of cough reflex testing with videoendoscopy in recently extubated intensive care unit patients</title><author>Kallesen, Molly ; Psirides, Alex ; Huckabee, Maggie-Lee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-81e6f051867eef5b766c38ee93f3c49e3645584f0b6ae3ea8bd38e6e1725b34a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Airway Extubation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Aspiration</topic><topic>Bronchoscopy</topic><topic>Citric Acid - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Cough</topic><topic>Cough reflex</topic><topic>Critical Care</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Dysphagia</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>Extubation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>ICU</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Intubation</topic><topic>Intubation, Intratracheal - adverse effects</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nebulizers and Vaporizers</topic><topic>New Zealand - epidemiology</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Reflex - physiology</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Respiratory Aspiration - diagnosis</topic><topic>Respiratory Aspiration - epidemiology</topic><topic>Respiratory Aspiration - etiology</topic><topic>Respiratory Aspiration - prevention & control</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kallesen, Molly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Psirides, Alex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huckabee, Maggie-Lee</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of critical care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kallesen, Molly</au><au>Psirides, Alex</au><au>Huckabee, Maggie-Lee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of cough reflex testing with videoendoscopy in recently extubated intensive care unit patients</atitle><jtitle>Journal of critical care</jtitle><addtitle>J Crit Care</addtitle><date>2016-06-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>33</volume><spage>90</spage><epage>94</epage><pages>90-94</pages><issn>0883-9441</issn><eissn>1557-8615</eissn><abstract>Abstract Purpose Orotracheal intubation is known to impair cough reflex, but the validity of cough reflex testing (CRT) as a screening tool for silent aspiration in this population is unknown. Material and methods One hundred and six participants in a tertiary-level intensive care unit (ICU) underwent CRT and videoendoscopic evaluation of swallowing (VES) within 24 hours of extubation. Cough reflex threshold was established for each participant using nebulized citric acid. Results Thirty-nine (37%) participants had an absent cough to CRT. Thirteen (12%) participants aspirated on VES, 9 (69%) without a cough response. Sensitivity of CRT to identify silent aspiration was excellent, but specificity was poor. There was a significant correlation between intubation duration and presence of aspiration on VES ( P = .0107). There was no significant correlation between silent aspiration on VES and length of intubation, age, sex, diagnosis at intensive care unit admission, indication for intubation, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III score, morphine equivalent dose, or time of testing postextubation. Conclusions Intensive care unit patients are at increased risk of aspiration in the 24 hours following extubation, and an impaired cough reflex is common. However, CRT overidentifies risk of silent aspiration in this population.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26993369</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.02.004</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5925-2478</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7579-8809</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0883-9441 |
ispartof | Journal of critical care, 2016-06, Vol.33, p.90-94 |
issn | 0883-9441 1557-8615 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1818330891 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Acids Aged Airway Extubation - adverse effects Aspiration Bronchoscopy Citric Acid - administration & dosage Cough Cough reflex Critical Care Data analysis Dysphagia Endoscopy Extubation Female Humans ICU Intensive care Intensive Care Units Intubation Intubation, Intratracheal - adverse effects Male Middle Aged Nebulizers and Vaporizers New Zealand - epidemiology Palliative care Prevalence Reflex - physiology Researchers Respiratory Aspiration - diagnosis Respiratory Aspiration - epidemiology Respiratory Aspiration - etiology Respiratory Aspiration - prevention & control Sensitivity and Specificity Studies |
title | Comparison of cough reflex testing with videoendoscopy in recently extubated intensive care unit patients |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A46%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20cough%20reflex%20testing%20with%20videoendoscopy%20in%20recently%20extubated%20intensive%20care%20unit%20patients&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20critical%20care&rft.au=Kallesen,%20Molly&rft.date=2016-06-01&rft.volume=33&rft.spage=90&rft.epage=94&rft.pages=90-94&rft.issn=0883-9441&rft.eissn=1557-8615&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.02.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1784462959%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c472t-81e6f051867eef5b766c38ee93f3c49e3645584f0b6ae3ea8bd38e6e1725b34a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1784733637&rft_id=info:pmid/26993369&rfr_iscdi=true |