Loading…
The barriers and facilitators to evidence-based episiotomy practice in Jordan
This paper examines the barriers to evidence-based episiotomy practice in Jordan and identifies strategies that may be effective in introducing evidence-based practice. Episiotomy is routinely undertaken during birth in many parts of the world, including in the Middle East with little scientific evi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives 2016-08, Vol.29 (4), p.321-329 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-438143cce2d7944e2ded64e21cedf2f2c7b3dda983f1b524d2aa0db7b8df47843 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-438143cce2d7944e2ded64e21cedf2f2c7b3dda983f1b524d2aa0db7b8df47843 |
container_end_page | 329 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 321 |
container_title | Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Hussein, Suha Abed Almajeed Abdallah Dahlen, Hannah G. Duff, Margaret Schmied, Virginia |
description | This paper examines the barriers to evidence-based episiotomy practice in Jordan and identifies strategies that may be effective in introducing evidence-based practice.
Episiotomy is routinely undertaken during birth in many parts of the world, including in the Middle East with little scientific evidence of benefit. There is a paucity of research examining the underlying drivers for episiotomy rates, and why they are higher in some countries.
This study, conducted in Jordan, used a quality improvement approach and comprised three phases. In phase one, a retrospective file review of 300 births was conducted. In phase two, 15 face-to-face interviews were conducted with 10 midwives and five key stakeholders (managers and doctors). A feedback and discussion session using the audit and review model was conducted in phase three with 23 health professionals to identify strategies to reduce the episiotomy rate.
The episiotomy rate was 41.4% overall (91% of primiparous women and 24% of multiparous women). Six major themes emerged from the thematic analysis of data: ‘Policy: written but invisible and unwritten and assumed’; ‘the safest way’; ‘doctors set the rules’; ‘midwives swimming with the tide; ‘uncooperative and uninformed women’ and ‘the way forward’.
Non-evidence based episiotomy practices are widely used during birth in this Jordanian hospital and numerous barriers to change exist. Medical professionals dictate childbirth practice and midwives fear recrimination if they go against the ‘unwritten policy’. Strategies to change practice include development of evidence-based information for women, education of midwives and doctors, and policy review. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.12.006 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1819903692</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1871519216000032</els_id><sourcerecordid>1819903692</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-438143cce2d7944e2ded64e21cedf2f2c7b3dda983f1b524d2aa0db7b8df47843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kElPwzAQhS0EoqXwC5BQjlwSvGXxgQNCrCriUs6WY0-EqyQOdlrUf4-7wJHTG43em6f5ELokOCOYFDfL7Nt1tc0oJnlGaIZxcYSmpCqrlJRCHO9mkuZE0Ak6C2GJMS8ZFadoQouKlQVmU_S2-ISkVt5b8CFRvUkapW1rRzW6uBhdAmtroNeQ1iqASWCwwbrRdZtk8EqPVkNi--TVeaP6c3TSqDbAxUFn6OPxYXH_nM7fn17u7-ap5jQfU84qwpnWQE0pOI8CpohCNJiGNlSXNTNGiYo1pM4pN1QpbOqyrkzDy4qzGbre3x28-1pBGGVng4a2VT24VZCkIkJgVggarWxv1d6F4KGRg7ed8htJsNxylEu54yi3HCWhMnKMqatDwaruwPxlfsFFw-3eAPHNdYQng7ZbTMZ60KM0zv5b8AO0SoYO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1819903692</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The barriers and facilitators to evidence-based episiotomy practice in Jordan</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Hussein, Suha Abed Almajeed Abdallah ; Dahlen, Hannah G. ; Duff, Margaret ; Schmied, Virginia</creator><creatorcontrib>Hussein, Suha Abed Almajeed Abdallah ; Dahlen, Hannah G. ; Duff, Margaret ; Schmied, Virginia</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines the barriers to evidence-based episiotomy practice in Jordan and identifies strategies that may be effective in introducing evidence-based practice.
Episiotomy is routinely undertaken during birth in many parts of the world, including in the Middle East with little scientific evidence of benefit. There is a paucity of research examining the underlying drivers for episiotomy rates, and why they are higher in some countries.
This study, conducted in Jordan, used a quality improvement approach and comprised three phases. In phase one, a retrospective file review of 300 births was conducted. In phase two, 15 face-to-face interviews were conducted with 10 midwives and five key stakeholders (managers and doctors). A feedback and discussion session using the audit and review model was conducted in phase three with 23 health professionals to identify strategies to reduce the episiotomy rate.
The episiotomy rate was 41.4% overall (91% of primiparous women and 24% of multiparous women). Six major themes emerged from the thematic analysis of data: ‘Policy: written but invisible and unwritten and assumed’; ‘the safest way’; ‘doctors set the rules’; ‘midwives swimming with the tide; ‘uncooperative and uninformed women’ and ‘the way forward’.
Non-evidence based episiotomy practices are widely used during birth in this Jordanian hospital and numerous barriers to change exist. Medical professionals dictate childbirth practice and midwives fear recrimination if they go against the ‘unwritten policy’. Strategies to change practice include development of evidence-based information for women, education of midwives and doctors, and policy review.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1871-5192</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-1799</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2015.12.006</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26837603</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel ; Attitudes ; Delivery, Obstetric - statistics & numerical data ; Episiotomy ; Episiotomy - adverse effects ; Episiotomy - statistics & numerical data ; Evidence-Based Practice ; Female ; Humans ; Jordan - epidemiology ; Midwife ; Midwifery - methods ; Nursing ; Practice Patterns, Nurses' - statistics & numerical data ; Pregnancy ; Retrospective Studies</subject><ispartof>Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives, 2016-08, Vol.29 (4), p.321-329</ispartof><rights>2016</rights><rights>Crown Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-438143cce2d7944e2ded64e21cedf2f2c7b3dda983f1b524d2aa0db7b8df47843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-438143cce2d7944e2ded64e21cedf2f2c7b3dda983f1b524d2aa0db7b8df47843</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4450-3078 ; 0000-0002-0139-1483 ; 0000-0002-1336-0799</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26837603$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hussein, Suha Abed Almajeed Abdallah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlen, Hannah G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duff, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmied, Virginia</creatorcontrib><title>The barriers and facilitators to evidence-based episiotomy practice in Jordan</title><title>Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives</title><addtitle>Women Birth</addtitle><description>This paper examines the barriers to evidence-based episiotomy practice in Jordan and identifies strategies that may be effective in introducing evidence-based practice.
Episiotomy is routinely undertaken during birth in many parts of the world, including in the Middle East with little scientific evidence of benefit. There is a paucity of research examining the underlying drivers for episiotomy rates, and why they are higher in some countries.
This study, conducted in Jordan, used a quality improvement approach and comprised three phases. In phase one, a retrospective file review of 300 births was conducted. In phase two, 15 face-to-face interviews were conducted with 10 midwives and five key stakeholders (managers and doctors). A feedback and discussion session using the audit and review model was conducted in phase three with 23 health professionals to identify strategies to reduce the episiotomy rate.
The episiotomy rate was 41.4% overall (91% of primiparous women and 24% of multiparous women). Six major themes emerged from the thematic analysis of data: ‘Policy: written but invisible and unwritten and assumed’; ‘the safest way’; ‘doctors set the rules’; ‘midwives swimming with the tide; ‘uncooperative and uninformed women’ and ‘the way forward’.
Non-evidence based episiotomy practices are widely used during birth in this Jordanian hospital and numerous barriers to change exist. Medical professionals dictate childbirth practice and midwives fear recrimination if they go against the ‘unwritten policy’. Strategies to change practice include development of evidence-based information for women, education of midwives and doctors, and policy review.</description><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Delivery, Obstetric - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Episiotomy</subject><subject>Episiotomy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Episiotomy - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Evidence-Based Practice</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Jordan - epidemiology</subject><subject>Midwife</subject><subject>Midwifery - methods</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Nurses' - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><issn>1871-5192</issn><issn>1878-1799</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kElPwzAQhS0EoqXwC5BQjlwSvGXxgQNCrCriUs6WY0-EqyQOdlrUf4-7wJHTG43em6f5ELokOCOYFDfL7Nt1tc0oJnlGaIZxcYSmpCqrlJRCHO9mkuZE0Ak6C2GJMS8ZFadoQouKlQVmU_S2-ISkVt5b8CFRvUkapW1rRzW6uBhdAmtroNeQ1iqASWCwwbrRdZtk8EqPVkNi--TVeaP6c3TSqDbAxUFn6OPxYXH_nM7fn17u7-ap5jQfU84qwpnWQE0pOI8CpohCNJiGNlSXNTNGiYo1pM4pN1QpbOqyrkzDy4qzGbre3x28-1pBGGVng4a2VT24VZCkIkJgVggarWxv1d6F4KGRg7ed8htJsNxylEu54yi3HCWhMnKMqatDwaruwPxlfsFFw-3eAPHNdYQng7ZbTMZ60KM0zv5b8AO0SoYO</recordid><startdate>201608</startdate><enddate>201608</enddate><creator>Hussein, Suha Abed Almajeed Abdallah</creator><creator>Dahlen, Hannah G.</creator><creator>Duff, Margaret</creator><creator>Schmied, Virginia</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4450-3078</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0139-1483</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1336-0799</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201608</creationdate><title>The barriers and facilitators to evidence-based episiotomy practice in Jordan</title><author>Hussein, Suha Abed Almajeed Abdallah ; Dahlen, Hannah G. ; Duff, Margaret ; Schmied, Virginia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-438143cce2d7944e2ded64e21cedf2f2c7b3dda983f1b524d2aa0db7b8df47843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Delivery, Obstetric - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Episiotomy</topic><topic>Episiotomy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Episiotomy - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Evidence-Based Practice</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Jordan - epidemiology</topic><topic>Midwife</topic><topic>Midwifery - methods</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Nurses' - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hussein, Suha Abed Almajeed Abdallah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlen, Hannah G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duff, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmied, Virginia</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hussein, Suha Abed Almajeed Abdallah</au><au>Dahlen, Hannah G.</au><au>Duff, Margaret</au><au>Schmied, Virginia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The barriers and facilitators to evidence-based episiotomy practice in Jordan</atitle><jtitle>Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives</jtitle><addtitle>Women Birth</addtitle><date>2016-08</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>321</spage><epage>329</epage><pages>321-329</pages><issn>1871-5192</issn><eissn>1878-1799</eissn><abstract>This paper examines the barriers to evidence-based episiotomy practice in Jordan and identifies strategies that may be effective in introducing evidence-based practice.
Episiotomy is routinely undertaken during birth in many parts of the world, including in the Middle East with little scientific evidence of benefit. There is a paucity of research examining the underlying drivers for episiotomy rates, and why they are higher in some countries.
This study, conducted in Jordan, used a quality improvement approach and comprised three phases. In phase one, a retrospective file review of 300 births was conducted. In phase two, 15 face-to-face interviews were conducted with 10 midwives and five key stakeholders (managers and doctors). A feedback and discussion session using the audit and review model was conducted in phase three with 23 health professionals to identify strategies to reduce the episiotomy rate.
The episiotomy rate was 41.4% overall (91% of primiparous women and 24% of multiparous women). Six major themes emerged from the thematic analysis of data: ‘Policy: written but invisible and unwritten and assumed’; ‘the safest way’; ‘doctors set the rules’; ‘midwives swimming with the tide; ‘uncooperative and uninformed women’ and ‘the way forward’.
Non-evidence based episiotomy practices are widely used during birth in this Jordanian hospital and numerous barriers to change exist. Medical professionals dictate childbirth practice and midwives fear recrimination if they go against the ‘unwritten policy’. Strategies to change practice include development of evidence-based information for women, education of midwives and doctors, and policy review.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26837603</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wombi.2015.12.006</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4450-3078</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0139-1483</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1336-0799</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1871-5192 |
ispartof | Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives, 2016-08, Vol.29 (4), p.321-329 |
issn | 1871-5192 1878-1799 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1819903692 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Attitude of Health Personnel Attitudes Delivery, Obstetric - statistics & numerical data Episiotomy Episiotomy - adverse effects Episiotomy - statistics & numerical data Evidence-Based Practice Female Humans Jordan - epidemiology Midwife Midwifery - methods Nursing Practice Patterns, Nurses' - statistics & numerical data Pregnancy Retrospective Studies |
title | The barriers and facilitators to evidence-based episiotomy practice in Jordan |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T04%3A13%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20barriers%20and%20facilitators%20to%20evidence-based%20episiotomy%20practice%20in%20Jordan&rft.jtitle=Women%20and%20birth%20:%20journal%20of%20the%20Australian%20College%20of%20Midwives&rft.au=Hussein,%20Suha%20Abed%20Almajeed%20Abdallah&rft.date=2016-08&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=321&rft.epage=329&rft.pages=321-329&rft.issn=1871-5192&rft.eissn=1878-1799&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wombi.2015.12.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1819903692%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c425t-438143cce2d7944e2ded64e21cedf2f2c7b3dda983f1b524d2aa0db7b8df47843%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1819903692&rft_id=info:pmid/26837603&rfr_iscdi=true |