Loading…
Conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection for benign and malignant pathologies: a cohort study
The aim of our study was to evaluate different minimally invasive surgical approaches for liver resection in a tertiary surgical center. The study cohort comprised 104 consecutive patients who underwent total laparoscopic liver resection ( n = 17), hand-assisted laparoscopic liver resection ( n = ...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of robotic surgery 2012-12, Vol.6 (4), p.295-300 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-9f12d1e067c6b71c8575e694cf187396843ac2a6c562a9f49c177cae5b8785ad3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-9f12d1e067c6b71c8575e694cf187396843ac2a6c562a9f49c177cae5b8785ad3 |
container_end_page | 300 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 295 |
container_title | Journal of robotic surgery |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Lai, Eric C. H. Tang, Chung Ngai Li, Michael K. W. |
description | The aim of our study was to evaluate different minimally invasive surgical approaches for liver resection in a tertiary surgical center. The study cohort comprised 104 consecutive patients who underwent total laparoscopic liver resection (
n
= 17), hand-assisted laparoscopic liver resection (
n
= 55), or robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection (
n
= 32) in our center between October 1998 and January 2011. Surgical complications, postoperative course, disease-free survival, and overall survival for malignancy were assessed. These 104 resections were performed on 55 men and 49 women with a mean age of 60.4 years; 43.3% of patients had liver cirrhosis. The liver pathologies comprised malignant tumors (64.4%) and benign lesions (35.6%). The most common laparoscopic liver resection was left lateral sectionectomy (53.9%), wedge resection (26.9%), segmentectomy (13.5%), right hepatectomy (3.8%), and left hepatectomy (1.9%). Conversion from laparoscopy to open approach and from laparoscopy to hand-assisted approach occurred in 1.9 and 1% of the cases, respectively. Overall mortality was 0%, and morbidity was 17.3%. The median follow-up period was 24 months. The 5-year overall survival for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was 52%, and the 3-year overall survival for colorectal liver metastasis was 88%. Based on these results, we conclude that laparoscopic liver resection is feasible and safe in appropriately selected patients. In our patient cohort, it was associated with a low complications rate and favorable survival outcome. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11701-011-0311-6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1820594525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1820594525</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-9f12d1e067c6b71c8575e694cf187396843ac2a6c562a9f49c177cae5b8785ad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UU1v1DAQtRAVbbf8AC7IEhcuoR478Qc3tIKCVIkLPVuOM9mmytrBdir1wm_Hy5YikDh4PNK890bzHiGvgL0DxtRlBlAMGgb1iVrkM3IGWoqGtwaeP_VanJLznO8Y61Qn4AU55Upy3Up9Rn5sY7jHUKYY3Exnt7gUs4_L5KkLA02xj6VxOU-54PD3fJ7uMdGEGf2BTseYaI9h2oVf1L2ba-tCoYsrt3GOuwnze-qoj7cxFZrLOjxckJPRzRlfPv4bcvPp47ft5-b669WX7YfrxrdCl8aMwAdAJpWXvQKv6yEoTetH0EoYqVvhPHfSd5I7M7bGg1LeYddrpTs3iA15e9RdUvy-Yi52P2WP8-wCxjVb0Jx1pu14V6Fv_oHexTVVd7Llpq4DYaqjGwJHlK9-5ISjXdK0d-nBArOHcOwxHFvDsYdwrKyc14_Ka7_H4YnxO40K4EdArqOww_Rn9f9VfwJVvZue</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918713948</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection for benign and malignant pathologies: a cohort study</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Lai, Eric C. H. ; Tang, Chung Ngai ; Li, Michael K. W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lai, Eric C. H. ; Tang, Chung Ngai ; Li, Michael K. W.</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of our study was to evaluate different minimally invasive surgical approaches for liver resection in a tertiary surgical center. The study cohort comprised 104 consecutive patients who underwent total laparoscopic liver resection (
n
= 17), hand-assisted laparoscopic liver resection (
n
= 55), or robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection (
n
= 32) in our center between October 1998 and January 2011. Surgical complications, postoperative course, disease-free survival, and overall survival for malignancy were assessed. These 104 resections were performed on 55 men and 49 women with a mean age of 60.4 years; 43.3% of patients had liver cirrhosis. The liver pathologies comprised malignant tumors (64.4%) and benign lesions (35.6%). The most common laparoscopic liver resection was left lateral sectionectomy (53.9%), wedge resection (26.9%), segmentectomy (13.5%), right hepatectomy (3.8%), and left hepatectomy (1.9%). Conversion from laparoscopy to open approach and from laparoscopy to hand-assisted approach occurred in 1.9 and 1% of the cases, respectively. Overall mortality was 0%, and morbidity was 17.3%. The median follow-up period was 24 months. The 5-year overall survival for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was 52%, and the 3-year overall survival for colorectal liver metastasis was 88%. Based on these results, we conclude that laparoscopic liver resection is feasible and safe in appropriately selected patients. In our patient cohort, it was associated with a low complications rate and favorable survival outcome.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1863-2483</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1863-2491</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11701-011-0311-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27628468</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Cholangiocarcinoma ; Cohort analysis ; Hepatectomy ; Laparoscopy ; Laparotomy ; Ligaments ; Liver ; Liver cancer ; Liver cirrhosis ; Liver diseases ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Minimally Invasive Surgery ; Original Article ; Ostomy ; Pathology ; Patients ; Robotic surgery ; Robots ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Survival ; Tumors ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Journal of robotic surgery, 2012-12, Vol.6 (4), p.295-300</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd 2011</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd 2011.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-9f12d1e067c6b71c8575e694cf187396843ac2a6c562a9f49c177cae5b8785ad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-9f12d1e067c6b71c8575e694cf187396843ac2a6c562a9f49c177cae5b8785ad3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27628468$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lai, Eric C. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Chung Ngai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Michael K. W.</creatorcontrib><title>Conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection for benign and malignant pathologies: a cohort study</title><title>Journal of robotic surgery</title><addtitle>J Robotic Surg</addtitle><addtitle>J Robot Surg</addtitle><description>The aim of our study was to evaluate different minimally invasive surgical approaches for liver resection in a tertiary surgical center. The study cohort comprised 104 consecutive patients who underwent total laparoscopic liver resection (
n
= 17), hand-assisted laparoscopic liver resection (
n
= 55), or robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection (
n
= 32) in our center between October 1998 and January 2011. Surgical complications, postoperative course, disease-free survival, and overall survival for malignancy were assessed. These 104 resections were performed on 55 men and 49 women with a mean age of 60.4 years; 43.3% of patients had liver cirrhosis. The liver pathologies comprised malignant tumors (64.4%) and benign lesions (35.6%). The most common laparoscopic liver resection was left lateral sectionectomy (53.9%), wedge resection (26.9%), segmentectomy (13.5%), right hepatectomy (3.8%), and left hepatectomy (1.9%). Conversion from laparoscopy to open approach and from laparoscopy to hand-assisted approach occurred in 1.9 and 1% of the cases, respectively. Overall mortality was 0%, and morbidity was 17.3%. The median follow-up period was 24 months. The 5-year overall survival for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was 52%, and the 3-year overall survival for colorectal liver metastasis was 88%. Based on these results, we conclude that laparoscopic liver resection is feasible and safe in appropriately selected patients. In our patient cohort, it was associated with a low complications rate and favorable survival outcome.</description><subject>Cholangiocarcinoma</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Hepatectomy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Laparotomy</subject><subject>Ligaments</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Liver cancer</subject><subject>Liver cirrhosis</subject><subject>Liver diseases</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Minimally Invasive Surgery</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Ostomy</subject><subject>Pathology</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Robotic surgery</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>1863-2483</issn><issn>1863-2491</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UU1v1DAQtRAVbbf8AC7IEhcuoR478Qc3tIKCVIkLPVuOM9mmytrBdir1wm_Hy5YikDh4PNK890bzHiGvgL0DxtRlBlAMGgb1iVrkM3IGWoqGtwaeP_VanJLznO8Y61Qn4AU55Upy3Up9Rn5sY7jHUKYY3Exnt7gUs4_L5KkLA02xj6VxOU-54PD3fJ7uMdGEGf2BTseYaI9h2oVf1L2ba-tCoYsrt3GOuwnze-qoj7cxFZrLOjxckJPRzRlfPv4bcvPp47ft5-b669WX7YfrxrdCl8aMwAdAJpWXvQKv6yEoTetH0EoYqVvhPHfSd5I7M7bGg1LeYddrpTs3iA15e9RdUvy-Yi52P2WP8-wCxjVb0Jx1pu14V6Fv_oHexTVVd7Llpq4DYaqjGwJHlK9-5ISjXdK0d-nBArOHcOwxHFvDsYdwrKyc14_Ka7_H4YnxO40K4EdArqOww_Rn9f9VfwJVvZue</recordid><startdate>20121201</startdate><enddate>20121201</enddate><creator>Lai, Eric C. H.</creator><creator>Tang, Chung Ngai</creator><creator>Li, Michael K. W.</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121201</creationdate><title>Conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection for benign and malignant pathologies: a cohort study</title><author>Lai, Eric C. H. ; Tang, Chung Ngai ; Li, Michael K. W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-9f12d1e067c6b71c8575e694cf187396843ac2a6c562a9f49c177cae5b8785ad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Cholangiocarcinoma</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Hepatectomy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Laparotomy</topic><topic>Ligaments</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Liver cancer</topic><topic>Liver cirrhosis</topic><topic>Liver diseases</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Minimally Invasive Surgery</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Ostomy</topic><topic>Pathology</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Robotic surgery</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lai, Eric C. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Chung Ngai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Michael K. W.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of robotic surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lai, Eric C. H.</au><au>Tang, Chung Ngai</au><au>Li, Michael K. W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection for benign and malignant pathologies: a cohort study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of robotic surgery</jtitle><stitle>J Robotic Surg</stitle><addtitle>J Robot Surg</addtitle><date>2012-12-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>295</spage><epage>300</epage><pages>295-300</pages><issn>1863-2483</issn><eissn>1863-2491</eissn><abstract>The aim of our study was to evaluate different minimally invasive surgical approaches for liver resection in a tertiary surgical center. The study cohort comprised 104 consecutive patients who underwent total laparoscopic liver resection (
n
= 17), hand-assisted laparoscopic liver resection (
n
= 55), or robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection (
n
= 32) in our center between October 1998 and January 2011. Surgical complications, postoperative course, disease-free survival, and overall survival for malignancy were assessed. These 104 resections were performed on 55 men and 49 women with a mean age of 60.4 years; 43.3% of patients had liver cirrhosis. The liver pathologies comprised malignant tumors (64.4%) and benign lesions (35.6%). The most common laparoscopic liver resection was left lateral sectionectomy (53.9%), wedge resection (26.9%), segmentectomy (13.5%), right hepatectomy (3.8%), and left hepatectomy (1.9%). Conversion from laparoscopy to open approach and from laparoscopy to hand-assisted approach occurred in 1.9 and 1% of the cases, respectively. Overall mortality was 0%, and morbidity was 17.3%. The median follow-up period was 24 months. The 5-year overall survival for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was 52%, and the 3-year overall survival for colorectal liver metastasis was 88%. Based on these results, we conclude that laparoscopic liver resection is feasible and safe in appropriately selected patients. In our patient cohort, it was associated with a low complications rate and favorable survival outcome.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>27628468</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11701-011-0311-6</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1863-2483 |
ispartof | Journal of robotic surgery, 2012-12, Vol.6 (4), p.295-300 |
issn | 1863-2483 1863-2491 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1820594525 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Cholangiocarcinoma Cohort analysis Hepatectomy Laparoscopy Laparotomy Ligaments Liver Liver cancer Liver cirrhosis Liver diseases Medicine Medicine & Public Health Minimally Invasive Surgery Original Article Ostomy Pathology Patients Robotic surgery Robots Surgeons Surgery Survival Tumors Urology |
title | Conventional laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic liver resection for benign and malignant pathologies: a cohort study |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T22%3A56%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conventional%20laparoscopic%20and%20robot-assisted%20laparoscopic%20liver%20resection%20for%20benign%20and%20malignant%20pathologies:%20a%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20robotic%20surgery&rft.au=Lai,%20Eric%20C.%20H.&rft.date=2012-12-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=295&rft.epage=300&rft.pages=295-300&rft.issn=1863-2483&rft.eissn=1863-2491&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11701-011-0311-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1820594525%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c438t-9f12d1e067c6b71c8575e694cf187396843ac2a6c562a9f49c177cae5b8785ad3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918713948&rft_id=info:pmid/27628468&rfr_iscdi=true |