Loading…

Dynamics of the predatory arthropod community in Spanish olive groves

1 A survey of the predatory fauna of olive pests, particularly the olive moth, Prays oleae, was undertaken in Granada, Spain, from May to September 1994–95. 2 At both experimental sites similar patterns of emergence were observed for all predatory species with peaks occurring in June, both in 1994 a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Agricultural and forest entomology 1999-08, Vol.1 (3), p.219-228
Main Authors: Morris, T.I, Campos, M, Kidd, N.A.C, Jervis, M.A, Symondson, W.O.C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3180-6d7db489a872dea6135eb6e12f864b9e0b1ee59324875b511e703dcf59394b003
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3180-6d7db489a872dea6135eb6e12f864b9e0b1ee59324875b511e703dcf59394b003
container_end_page 228
container_issue 3
container_start_page 219
container_title Agricultural and forest entomology
container_volume 1
creator Morris, T.I
Campos, M
Kidd, N.A.C
Jervis, M.A
Symondson, W.O.C
description 1 A survey of the predatory fauna of olive pests, particularly the olive moth, Prays oleae, was undertaken in Granada, Spain, from May to September 1994–95. 2 At both experimental sites similar patterns of emergence were observed for all predatory species with peaks occurring in June, both in 1994 and 1995. More individuals and species were captured in the morning than in the evening. 3 A weak inverse relationship existed between the mean monthly temperatures and the total number of predators caught. 4 The number of predatory species and of individuals caught at both sites was, respectively, two and three times larger in 1994 than in 1995; This difference is assumed to have been due to the accumulated affect of 6 years of drought. 5 Synchrony between P. oleae and predator phenology was suggested by the coincidental timing of peak predator numbers with the oviposition and subsequent emergence of the most vulnerable stage of the olive moth’s lifecycle, i.e. the flower generation. 6 There were more individuals of ants caught, whilst more spider species were captured than all other groups; predatory Coleoptera and Heteroptera were poorly represented. 7 Ants appeared to have a detrimental affect on the number of all other predators.
doi_str_mv 10.1046/j.1461-9563.1999.00030.x
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18213693</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>18213693</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3180-6d7db489a872dea6135eb6e12f864b9e0b1ee59324875b511e703dcf59394b003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1v2zAMho1iA5p1_Q3VaTe7kmXJErBL0KXtgGI79CNAL4Rs04ky2_Ikp43__Zx5yHknEuT7EOATRYTRhNFMXu8SlkkWayF5wrTWCaWU0-RwFi1Oiw-nXojz6FMIO0pZmudqEa2-jZ1pbRmIq8mwRdJ7rMzg_EiMH7be9a4ipWvbfWeHkdiOPPams2FLXGPfkGy8e8PwOfpYmybg5b96ET3frp5u7uOHn3ffb5YPccmZorGs8qrIlDYqTys0knGBhUSW1kpmhUZaMESheZqpXBSCMcwpr8p6GumsmP66iL7Md3vvfu8xDNDaUGLTmA7dPgBTKeNS8ymo5mDpXQgea-i9bY0fgVE4eoMdHJXAUQ8cvcFfb3CY0K8z-m4bHP-bg-XtamomPJ5xGwY8nHDjf4HMeS5g_eMO1MvTq1gLAXrKX8352jgwG28DPD-mlHGaai6UTvkfKHyLww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18213693</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dynamics of the predatory arthropod community in Spanish olive groves</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Morris, T.I ; Campos, M ; Kidd, N.A.C ; Jervis, M.A ; Symondson, W.O.C</creator><creatorcontrib>Morris, T.I ; Campos, M ; Kidd, N.A.C ; Jervis, M.A ; Symondson, W.O.C</creatorcontrib><description>1 A survey of the predatory fauna of olive pests, particularly the olive moth, Prays oleae, was undertaken in Granada, Spain, from May to September 1994–95. 2 At both experimental sites similar patterns of emergence were observed for all predatory species with peaks occurring in June, both in 1994 and 1995. More individuals and species were captured in the morning than in the evening. 3 A weak inverse relationship existed between the mean monthly temperatures and the total number of predators caught. 4 The number of predatory species and of individuals caught at both sites was, respectively, two and three times larger in 1994 than in 1995; This difference is assumed to have been due to the accumulated affect of 6 years of drought. 5 Synchrony between P. oleae and predator phenology was suggested by the coincidental timing of peak predator numbers with the oviposition and subsequent emergence of the most vulnerable stage of the olive moth’s lifecycle, i.e. the flower generation. 6 There were more individuals of ants caught, whilst more spider species were captured than all other groups; predatory Coleoptera and Heteroptera were poorly represented. 7 Ants appeared to have a detrimental affect on the number of all other predators.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1461-9555</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1461-9563</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1461-9563.1999.00030.x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>ambient temperature ; arthropod communities ; Crop protection ; Olea europaea ; olive moth ; phenology ; population density ; population dynamics ; Prays oleae ; Predation ; predator-prey relationships ; predators ; predators of insect pests ; predatory arthropods ; sampling ; seasonal abundance ; seasonal variation ; species diversity ; Yponomeutidae</subject><ispartof>Agricultural and forest entomology, 1999-08, Vol.1 (3), p.219-228</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3180-6d7db489a872dea6135eb6e12f864b9e0b1ee59324875b511e703dcf59394b003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3180-6d7db489a872dea6135eb6e12f864b9e0b1ee59324875b511e703dcf59394b003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Morris, T.I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kidd, N.A.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jervis, M.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Symondson, W.O.C</creatorcontrib><title>Dynamics of the predatory arthropod community in Spanish olive groves</title><title>Agricultural and forest entomology</title><description>1 A survey of the predatory fauna of olive pests, particularly the olive moth, Prays oleae, was undertaken in Granada, Spain, from May to September 1994–95. 2 At both experimental sites similar patterns of emergence were observed for all predatory species with peaks occurring in June, both in 1994 and 1995. More individuals and species were captured in the morning than in the evening. 3 A weak inverse relationship existed between the mean monthly temperatures and the total number of predators caught. 4 The number of predatory species and of individuals caught at both sites was, respectively, two and three times larger in 1994 than in 1995; This difference is assumed to have been due to the accumulated affect of 6 years of drought. 5 Synchrony between P. oleae and predator phenology was suggested by the coincidental timing of peak predator numbers with the oviposition and subsequent emergence of the most vulnerable stage of the olive moth’s lifecycle, i.e. the flower generation. 6 There were more individuals of ants caught, whilst more spider species were captured than all other groups; predatory Coleoptera and Heteroptera were poorly represented. 7 Ants appeared to have a detrimental affect on the number of all other predators.</description><subject>ambient temperature</subject><subject>arthropod communities</subject><subject>Crop protection</subject><subject>Olea europaea</subject><subject>olive moth</subject><subject>phenology</subject><subject>population density</subject><subject>population dynamics</subject><subject>Prays oleae</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>predator-prey relationships</subject><subject>predators</subject><subject>predators of insect pests</subject><subject>predatory arthropods</subject><subject>sampling</subject><subject>seasonal abundance</subject><subject>seasonal variation</subject><subject>species diversity</subject><subject>Yponomeutidae</subject><issn>1461-9555</issn><issn>1461-9563</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1v2zAMho1iA5p1_Q3VaTe7kmXJErBL0KXtgGI79CNAL4Rs04ky2_Ikp43__Zx5yHknEuT7EOATRYTRhNFMXu8SlkkWayF5wrTWCaWU0-RwFi1Oiw-nXojz6FMIO0pZmudqEa2-jZ1pbRmIq8mwRdJ7rMzg_EiMH7be9a4ipWvbfWeHkdiOPPams2FLXGPfkGy8e8PwOfpYmybg5b96ET3frp5u7uOHn3ffb5YPccmZorGs8qrIlDYqTys0knGBhUSW1kpmhUZaMESheZqpXBSCMcwpr8p6GumsmP66iL7Md3vvfu8xDNDaUGLTmA7dPgBTKeNS8ymo5mDpXQgea-i9bY0fgVE4eoMdHJXAUQ8cvcFfb3CY0K8z-m4bHP-bg-XtamomPJ5xGwY8nHDjf4HMeS5g_eMO1MvTq1gLAXrKX8352jgwG28DPD-mlHGaai6UTvkfKHyLww</recordid><startdate>199908</startdate><enddate>199908</enddate><creator>Morris, T.I</creator><creator>Campos, M</creator><creator>Kidd, N.A.C</creator><creator>Jervis, M.A</creator><creator>Symondson, W.O.C</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199908</creationdate><title>Dynamics of the predatory arthropod community in Spanish olive groves</title><author>Morris, T.I ; Campos, M ; Kidd, N.A.C ; Jervis, M.A ; Symondson, W.O.C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3180-6d7db489a872dea6135eb6e12f864b9e0b1ee59324875b511e703dcf59394b003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>ambient temperature</topic><topic>arthropod communities</topic><topic>Crop protection</topic><topic>Olea europaea</topic><topic>olive moth</topic><topic>phenology</topic><topic>population density</topic><topic>population dynamics</topic><topic>Prays oleae</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>predator-prey relationships</topic><topic>predators</topic><topic>predators of insect pests</topic><topic>predatory arthropods</topic><topic>sampling</topic><topic>seasonal abundance</topic><topic>seasonal variation</topic><topic>species diversity</topic><topic>Yponomeutidae</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Morris, T.I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Campos, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kidd, N.A.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jervis, M.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Symondson, W.O.C</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><jtitle>Agricultural and forest entomology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Morris, T.I</au><au>Campos, M</au><au>Kidd, N.A.C</au><au>Jervis, M.A</au><au>Symondson, W.O.C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dynamics of the predatory arthropod community in Spanish olive groves</atitle><jtitle>Agricultural and forest entomology</jtitle><date>1999-08</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>219</spage><epage>228</epage><pages>219-228</pages><issn>1461-9555</issn><eissn>1461-9563</eissn><abstract>1 A survey of the predatory fauna of olive pests, particularly the olive moth, Prays oleae, was undertaken in Granada, Spain, from May to September 1994–95. 2 At both experimental sites similar patterns of emergence were observed for all predatory species with peaks occurring in June, both in 1994 and 1995. More individuals and species were captured in the morning than in the evening. 3 A weak inverse relationship existed between the mean monthly temperatures and the total number of predators caught. 4 The number of predatory species and of individuals caught at both sites was, respectively, two and three times larger in 1994 than in 1995; This difference is assumed to have been due to the accumulated affect of 6 years of drought. 5 Synchrony between P. oleae and predator phenology was suggested by the coincidental timing of peak predator numbers with the oviposition and subsequent emergence of the most vulnerable stage of the olive moth’s lifecycle, i.e. the flower generation. 6 There were more individuals of ants caught, whilst more spider species were captured than all other groups; predatory Coleoptera and Heteroptera were poorly represented. 7 Ants appeared to have a detrimental affect on the number of all other predators.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><doi>10.1046/j.1461-9563.1999.00030.x</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1461-9555
ispartof Agricultural and forest entomology, 1999-08, Vol.1 (3), p.219-228
issn 1461-9555
1461-9563
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_18213693
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects ambient temperature
arthropod communities
Crop protection
Olea europaea
olive moth
phenology
population density
population dynamics
Prays oleae
Predation
predator-prey relationships
predators
predators of insect pests
predatory arthropods
sampling
seasonal abundance
seasonal variation
species diversity
Yponomeutidae
title Dynamics of the predatory arthropod community in Spanish olive groves
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T01%3A45%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dynamics%20of%20the%20predatory%20arthropod%20community%20in%20Spanish%20olive%20groves&rft.jtitle=Agricultural%20and%20forest%20entomology&rft.au=Morris,%20T.I&rft.date=1999-08&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=219&rft.epage=228&rft.pages=219-228&rft.issn=1461-9555&rft.eissn=1461-9563&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1461-9563.1999.00030.x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E18213693%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3180-6d7db489a872dea6135eb6e12f864b9e0b1ee59324875b511e703dcf59394b003%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18213693&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true