Scientometric characterization of Medwave's scientific production 2010-2014

• Published in: Medwave 2016-09, Vol.16 (8), p.e6538-e6538
• Main Authors: Gallardo Sánchez, Yurieth, Gallardo Arzuaga, Ruber Luis, Fonseca Arias, Madelin, Pérez Atencio, María Esther
• Format: Article
• Language: eng ; spa
• Subjects: Bibliometrics; Efficiency, Organizational; Humans; Periodicals as Topic - statistics & numerical data; Publishing - statistics & numerical data
• ISSN: 0717-6384; 0717-6384
• DOI: 10.5867/medwave.2016.08.6538

The use of bibliometric indicators for the evaluation of science allows an analysis of scientific production both from a quantitative and qualitative point of view. To characterize the scientific production of Medwave during the period 2010 to 2014 in terms of visibility and productivity. A bibliometric study was carried out. Variables analyzed were offered by the “Publish or Perish” program working with the Google Scholar database. The number of articles published were related to the number of authors involved in each research work. The articles cited, number of citations, authors and year were reported. Indicators were obtained by placing in name of the journal and its International Standard Serial Number (ISSN) in the navigation box of Publish or Perish. There were 481 articles published with 220 citations; at a rate of more than 36 citations per year and 20 citations per author and year. An index h = 5 and index g = 6 were achieved. There was an average of two authors per article. Only five articles had more citations than the total they provided. The scientometric indicators found place the journal in a favorable position relative to other medical journals of the region, in terms of visibility and productivity. There was a low rate of cooperation since articles with individual authors prevailed. A low number of articles contributed to the productivity of the journal despite having significant number of citations.