Loading…

A case for studying country regimes in the public health model of violence

Many national and international institutions advocate approaching violence as a problem in public health and preventive medicine, in a manner similar to the way we address other disabling and life-threatening pathologies such as cancer, diabetes, and heart disease. Prevention by a health model requi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of public health policy 2016-09, Vol.37 (Suppl 1), p.133-144
Main Authors: Gilligan, James, Lee, Bandy X., Garg, Shikha, Blay-Tofey, Morkeh, Luo, Audrey
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Many national and international institutions advocate approaching violence as a problem in public health and preventive medicine, in a manner similar to the way we address other disabling and life-threatening pathologies such as cancer, diabetes, and heart disease. Prevention by a health model requires an ecological perspective. Previous work has found evidence that economic factors, including unemployment and relative poverty, as well as political culture and values, may affect violent death rates, including homicide and suicide. Nevertheless, wider political analyses of the effects that different regimes have on these variables have been notably absent, for understandable reasons given the sheer complexity of patterns of governance throughout the world. In view of the importance and scale of the problem, and implications of the United Nations’ 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development , we feel it is nevertheless important to bring regime types into the conversation of factors that can influence violent death.
ISSN:0197-5897
1745-655X
DOI:10.1057/s41271-016-0027-y