Loading…

Impacts of degree of milling on the appearance and aroma characteristics of raw rice

BACKGROUND Little has been reported about the sensory impact of degree of milling (DOM) on raw, uncooked rice. This study focuses on the effects of DOM, which was measured by surface lipid content (SLC), on appearance and aroma attributes of raw rice, as well as the appearance of cooked rice; greate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the science of food and agriculture 2016-07, Vol.96 (9), p.3017-3022
Main Authors: Rodríguez-Arzuaga, Mariana, Cho, Sungeun, Billiris, María A, Siebenmorgen, Terry, Seo, Han-Seok
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:BACKGROUND Little has been reported about the sensory impact of degree of milling (DOM) on raw, uncooked rice. This study focuses on the effects of DOM, which was measured by surface lipid content (SLC), on appearance and aroma attributes of raw rice, as well as the appearance of cooked rice; greater DOM leads to lesser SLC levels. RESULTS Milled‐rice samples with SLCs of 0.64, 0.59, 0.42 and 0.25%, as well as brown rice (2.27% total lipid content), were evaluated by trained panelists on three appearance‐ and five aroma‐related attributes of raw rice, as well as four appearance‐related attributes of the resultant cooked rice. All milled‐rice samples, varying in SLC level from 0.64% to 0.25%, differed from brown rice with respect to raw‐rice and cooked‐rice appearance and aroma attributes. A significant sensory difference among the four raw‐rice samples was present only in the degree of whiteness; however, such a difference was absent once the samples were cooked. When cooked, highly milled rice (0.25% SLC) was rated glossier than either lightly milled rice (0.64% SLC) or brown rice. CONCLUSION The present study demonstrated that sensory impacts of DOM on raw rice were present between brown rice and milled‐rice samples, but not among the milled‐rice samples varying in SLC level from 0.64% to 0.25%. The overall findings indicate that consumers may not detect appearance‐ or aroma‐related differences among raw‐rice samples ranging in SLC from 0.64% to 0.25%. © 2015 Society of Chemical Industry
ISSN:0022-5142
1097-0010
DOI:10.1002/jsfa.7471