Loading…

Mechanism of evolution of stress–structure controlled collapse of surrounding rock in caverns: A case study from the Baihetan hydropower station in China

•Spatiotemporal features of stress–structure controlled collapse are presented.•A typical collapse is investigated by field survey, SEM and MS monitoring.•Rock mass fracturing events are mostly tensile during this kind of collapse.•MS monitoring can play an important role for the warning of this kin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Tunnelling and underground space technology 2016-01, Vol.51, p.56-67
Main Authors: Xiao, Ya-Xun, Feng, Xia-Ting, Feng, Guang-Liang, Liu, Hua-Ji, Jiang, Quan, Qiu, Shi-Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•Spatiotemporal features of stress–structure controlled collapse are presented.•A typical collapse is investigated by field survey, SEM and MS monitoring.•Rock mass fracturing events are mostly tensile during this kind of collapse.•MS monitoring can play an important role for the warning of this kind of collapse. During the excavation of the underground powerhouse in the Baihetan hydropower station, which is currently still under construction, stress–structure controlled collapse has occurred frequently. In order to study the mechanism behind the evolution of this kind of collapse, an in situ experiment involving microseismic (MS) monitoring was carried out in the left main/auxiliary powerhouse. In this paper, the spatiotemporal characteristics of stress–structure controlled collapse are summarized and presented. A field survey, scanning electron microscopy and MS monitoring have been used to investigate a typical stress–structure controlled collapse that occurred during the monitoring period. These methods provided a consistent set of results, namely, that tensile fracturing is the rock-mass fracturing mechanism that is most active during the process of evolution of stress–structure controlled collapse. In addition, the evolution of the microseismicity during the development of the studied collapse was also obtained. The results provide a direct case history that will assist the prediction and support of stress–structure controlled collapse disasters and contribute to excavation of deeply-buried caverns in the field.
ISSN:0886-7798
1878-4364
DOI:10.1016/j.tust.2015.10.020