Loading…
Catalytic behavior of Ru supported on Ce sub(0.8)Zr sub(0.2)O sub(2) for hydrogen production
Ru (2 wt.%) on Ce sub(0.8)Zr sub(0.2)O sub(2) catalysts were investigated to test their ethanol steam reforming (ESR) performance. The supports were obtained through two different synthesis methods: co-precipitation (PI) and mechanochemical reaction (MR). Characterization of the catalysts, before an...
Saved in:
Published in: | Applied catalysis. B, Environmental Environmental, 2016-02, Vol.181, p.58-70 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Ru (2 wt.%) on Ce sub(0.8)Zr sub(0.2)O sub(2) catalysts were investigated to test their ethanol steam reforming (ESR) performance. The supports were obtained through two different synthesis methods: co-precipitation (PI) and mechanochemical reaction (MR). Characterization of the catalysts, before and after ESR, were performed using X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD), nitrogen physisorption, CO chemisorption, temperature programmed reduction (TPR), high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HR-TEM), thermogravimetry, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements. The Ru (2 wt.%) PI catalyst exhibited the highest activity and selectivity to hydrogen and no coke deposition was observed during catalytic operation, even when compared to Ni (8 wt.%) PI catalyst. A possible reaction pathway is proposed. The remarkably good catalytic performance of Ru (2 wt.%) PI is regarded as being due to a combination of factors: improved metal dispersion on Ce sub(0.8)Zr sub(0.2)O sub(2), favorable metal-support interaction and water gas shift reaction promotion. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0926-3373 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.07.025 |