Loading…

Lifecycle cost assessment and carbon dioxide emissions of diesel, natural gas, hybrid electric, fuel cell hybrid and electric transit buses

This paper evaluates the lifecycle costs and carbon dioxide emissions of different types of city buses. The simulation models of the different powertrains were developed in the Autonomie vehicle simulation software. The carbon dioxide emissions were calculated both for the bus operation and for the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Energy (Oxford) 2016-07, Vol.106, p.329-342
Main Authors: Lajunen, Antti, Lipman, Timothy
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-8e93c57e5eb8452300177db9b1f48ecb777d05e24be9645d959bb7adcd75ac283
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-8e93c57e5eb8452300177db9b1f48ecb777d05e24be9645d959bb7adcd75ac283
container_end_page 342
container_issue
container_start_page 329
container_title Energy (Oxford)
container_volume 106
creator Lajunen, Antti
Lipman, Timothy
description This paper evaluates the lifecycle costs and carbon dioxide emissions of different types of city buses. The simulation models of the different powertrains were developed in the Autonomie vehicle simulation software. The carbon dioxide emissions were calculated both for the bus operation and for the fuel and energy pathways from well to tank. Two different operating environment case scenarios were used for the primary energy sources, which were Finland and California (USA). The fuel and energy pathways were selected appropriately in relation to the operating environment. The lifecycle costs take into account the purchase, operating, maintenance, and possible carbon emission costs. Based on the simulation results, the energy efficiency of city buses can be significantly improved by the alternative powertrain technologies. Hybrid buses have moderately lower carbon dioxide emissions during the service life than diesel buses whereas fully-electric buses have potential to significantly reduce carbon dioxide emissions, by up to 75%. The lifecycle cost analysis indicates that diesel hybrid buses are already competitive with diesel and natural gas buses. The high costs of fuel cell and battery systems are the major challenges for the fuel cell hybrid buses in order to reduce lifecycle costs to more competitive levels. •Alternative powertrains can significantly improve energy efficiency of transit buses.•Operating environment has an important impact on the lifecycle costs of buses.•Diesel hybrid buses are already cost effective solution for public transportation.•The cost of fuel cell technology is the major challenge for fuel cell hybrid buses.•Fully-electric buses have potential to significantly reduce carbon dioxide emissions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.075
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1825541055</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S036054421630319X</els_id><sourcerecordid>1808719783</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-8e93c57e5eb8452300177db9b1f48ecb777d05e24be9645d959bb7adcd75ac283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUclOwzAQzQEkoPAHHHzk0AY7sevkgoQQm1SJC5wtLxNwldrgSRD9Bn4aR6VXxGm2N2-WVxTnjJaMsuXluoQA6XVbVjkqaV1SKQ6KY1ov6UJwXh0VJ4hrSqlo2va4-F75DuzW9kBsxIFoREDcQMhucMTqZGIgzscv74DAxiP6GJDELicBoZ-ToIcx6Z68apyTt61J3hHowQ7J2znpRuiJhb7flybafZkMSQf0AzFjHntaHHa6Rzj7tbPi5e72-eZhsXq6f7y5Xi0sZ_WwaKCtrZAgwDRcVDWlTEpnWsM63oA1MkdUQMUNtEsuXCtaY6R21kmhbdXUs-Jix_ue4scIOKh81rSiDhBHVKyphOCMCvEPKG0ka2VTZyjfQW2KiAk69Z78RqetYlRN0qi12kmjJmkUrVWWJrdd7dogX_zpISm0HoIF51N-knLR_03wA3HOnek</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1808719783</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lifecycle cost assessment and carbon dioxide emissions of diesel, natural gas, hybrid electric, fuel cell hybrid and electric transit buses</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Lajunen, Antti ; Lipman, Timothy</creator><creatorcontrib>Lajunen, Antti ; Lipman, Timothy</creatorcontrib><description>This paper evaluates the lifecycle costs and carbon dioxide emissions of different types of city buses. The simulation models of the different powertrains were developed in the Autonomie vehicle simulation software. The carbon dioxide emissions were calculated both for the bus operation and for the fuel and energy pathways from well to tank. Two different operating environment case scenarios were used for the primary energy sources, which were Finland and California (USA). The fuel and energy pathways were selected appropriately in relation to the operating environment. The lifecycle costs take into account the purchase, operating, maintenance, and possible carbon emission costs. Based on the simulation results, the energy efficiency of city buses can be significantly improved by the alternative powertrain technologies. Hybrid buses have moderately lower carbon dioxide emissions during the service life than diesel buses whereas fully-electric buses have potential to significantly reduce carbon dioxide emissions, by up to 75%. The lifecycle cost analysis indicates that diesel hybrid buses are already competitive with diesel and natural gas buses. The high costs of fuel cell and battery systems are the major challenges for the fuel cell hybrid buses in order to reduce lifecycle costs to more competitive levels. •Alternative powertrains can significantly improve energy efficiency of transit buses.•Operating environment has an important impact on the lifecycle costs of buses.•Diesel hybrid buses are already cost effective solution for public transportation.•The cost of fuel cell technology is the major challenge for fuel cell hybrid buses.•Fully-electric buses have potential to significantly reduce carbon dioxide emissions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-5442</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.075</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Battery ; Buses (vehicles) ; Carbon dioxide ; Carbon dioxide emissions ; City bus ; Computer simulation ; Cost engineering ; Diesel fuels ; Fuel cell ; Fuel cells ; Hybrid ; Life cycle costs ; Lifecycle costs ; Natural gas</subject><ispartof>Energy (Oxford), 2016-07, Vol.106, p.329-342</ispartof><rights>2016 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-8e93c57e5eb8452300177db9b1f48ecb777d05e24be9645d959bb7adcd75ac283</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-8e93c57e5eb8452300177db9b1f48ecb777d05e24be9645d959bb7adcd75ac283</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lajunen, Antti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipman, Timothy</creatorcontrib><title>Lifecycle cost assessment and carbon dioxide emissions of diesel, natural gas, hybrid electric, fuel cell hybrid and electric transit buses</title><title>Energy (Oxford)</title><description>This paper evaluates the lifecycle costs and carbon dioxide emissions of different types of city buses. The simulation models of the different powertrains were developed in the Autonomie vehicle simulation software. The carbon dioxide emissions were calculated both for the bus operation and for the fuel and energy pathways from well to tank. Two different operating environment case scenarios were used for the primary energy sources, which were Finland and California (USA). The fuel and energy pathways were selected appropriately in relation to the operating environment. The lifecycle costs take into account the purchase, operating, maintenance, and possible carbon emission costs. Based on the simulation results, the energy efficiency of city buses can be significantly improved by the alternative powertrain technologies. Hybrid buses have moderately lower carbon dioxide emissions during the service life than diesel buses whereas fully-electric buses have potential to significantly reduce carbon dioxide emissions, by up to 75%. The lifecycle cost analysis indicates that diesel hybrid buses are already competitive with diesel and natural gas buses. The high costs of fuel cell and battery systems are the major challenges for the fuel cell hybrid buses in order to reduce lifecycle costs to more competitive levels. •Alternative powertrains can significantly improve energy efficiency of transit buses.•Operating environment has an important impact on the lifecycle costs of buses.•Diesel hybrid buses are already cost effective solution for public transportation.•The cost of fuel cell technology is the major challenge for fuel cell hybrid buses.•Fully-electric buses have potential to significantly reduce carbon dioxide emissions.</description><subject>Battery</subject><subject>Buses (vehicles)</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide emissions</subject><subject>City bus</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Cost engineering</subject><subject>Diesel fuels</subject><subject>Fuel cell</subject><subject>Fuel cells</subject><subject>Hybrid</subject><subject>Life cycle costs</subject><subject>Lifecycle costs</subject><subject>Natural gas</subject><issn>0360-5442</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNUclOwzAQzQEkoPAHHHzk0AY7sevkgoQQm1SJC5wtLxNwldrgSRD9Bn4aR6VXxGm2N2-WVxTnjJaMsuXluoQA6XVbVjkqaV1SKQ6KY1ov6UJwXh0VJ4hrSqlo2va4-F75DuzW9kBsxIFoREDcQMhucMTqZGIgzscv74DAxiP6GJDELicBoZ-ToIcx6Z68apyTt61J3hHowQ7J2znpRuiJhb7flybafZkMSQf0AzFjHntaHHa6Rzj7tbPi5e72-eZhsXq6f7y5Xi0sZ_WwaKCtrZAgwDRcVDWlTEpnWsM63oA1MkdUQMUNtEsuXCtaY6R21kmhbdXUs-Jix_ue4scIOKh81rSiDhBHVKyphOCMCvEPKG0ka2VTZyjfQW2KiAk69Z78RqetYlRN0qi12kmjJmkUrVWWJrdd7dogX_zpISm0HoIF51N-knLR_03wA3HOnek</recordid><startdate>20160701</startdate><enddate>20160701</enddate><creator>Lajunen, Antti</creator><creator>Lipman, Timothy</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160701</creationdate><title>Lifecycle cost assessment and carbon dioxide emissions of diesel, natural gas, hybrid electric, fuel cell hybrid and electric transit buses</title><author>Lajunen, Antti ; Lipman, Timothy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-8e93c57e5eb8452300177db9b1f48ecb777d05e24be9645d959bb7adcd75ac283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Battery</topic><topic>Buses (vehicles)</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide emissions</topic><topic>City bus</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Cost engineering</topic><topic>Diesel fuels</topic><topic>Fuel cell</topic><topic>Fuel cells</topic><topic>Hybrid</topic><topic>Life cycle costs</topic><topic>Lifecycle costs</topic><topic>Natural gas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lajunen, Antti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipman, Timothy</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lajunen, Antti</au><au>Lipman, Timothy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lifecycle cost assessment and carbon dioxide emissions of diesel, natural gas, hybrid electric, fuel cell hybrid and electric transit buses</atitle><jtitle>Energy (Oxford)</jtitle><date>2016-07-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>106</volume><spage>329</spage><epage>342</epage><pages>329-342</pages><issn>0360-5442</issn><abstract>This paper evaluates the lifecycle costs and carbon dioxide emissions of different types of city buses. The simulation models of the different powertrains were developed in the Autonomie vehicle simulation software. The carbon dioxide emissions were calculated both for the bus operation and for the fuel and energy pathways from well to tank. Two different operating environment case scenarios were used for the primary energy sources, which were Finland and California (USA). The fuel and energy pathways were selected appropriately in relation to the operating environment. The lifecycle costs take into account the purchase, operating, maintenance, and possible carbon emission costs. Based on the simulation results, the energy efficiency of city buses can be significantly improved by the alternative powertrain technologies. Hybrid buses have moderately lower carbon dioxide emissions during the service life than diesel buses whereas fully-electric buses have potential to significantly reduce carbon dioxide emissions, by up to 75%. The lifecycle cost analysis indicates that diesel hybrid buses are already competitive with diesel and natural gas buses. The high costs of fuel cell and battery systems are the major challenges for the fuel cell hybrid buses in order to reduce lifecycle costs to more competitive levels. •Alternative powertrains can significantly improve energy efficiency of transit buses.•Operating environment has an important impact on the lifecycle costs of buses.•Diesel hybrid buses are already cost effective solution for public transportation.•The cost of fuel cell technology is the major challenge for fuel cell hybrid buses.•Fully-electric buses have potential to significantly reduce carbon dioxide emissions.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.075</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0360-5442
ispartof Energy (Oxford), 2016-07, Vol.106, p.329-342
issn 0360-5442
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1825541055
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Battery
Buses (vehicles)
Carbon dioxide
Carbon dioxide emissions
City bus
Computer simulation
Cost engineering
Diesel fuels
Fuel cell
Fuel cells
Hybrid
Life cycle costs
Lifecycle costs
Natural gas
title Lifecycle cost assessment and carbon dioxide emissions of diesel, natural gas, hybrid electric, fuel cell hybrid and electric transit buses
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T01%3A32%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lifecycle%20cost%20assessment%20and%20carbon%20dioxide%20emissions%20of%20diesel,%20natural%20gas,%20hybrid%20electric,%20fuel%20cell%20hybrid%20and%20electric%20transit%20buses&rft.jtitle=Energy%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Lajunen,%20Antti&rft.date=2016-07-01&rft.volume=106&rft.spage=329&rft.epage=342&rft.pages=329-342&rft.issn=0360-5442&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.075&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1808719783%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c413t-8e93c57e5eb8452300177db9b1f48ecb777d05e24be9645d959bb7adcd75ac283%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1808719783&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true