Loading…

Analysis of Categorical Response in Small Sample Experiments

Statistical design of experiments (DOE) is widely used today for process and product characterization and optimization. Owing to cost and time considerations, sometimes only a minimum number of experimental runs can be conducted, with added challenges in analysis when the experimental outcomes canno...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Quality and reliability engineering international 2016-07, Vol.32 (5), p.1621-1626
Main Author: Goh, T. N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-fdd0fc2055e6c31b53107bd6b4bb9f4af6f55f7402f30df348af948fd0127e683
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-fdd0fc2055e6c31b53107bd6b4bb9f4af6f55f7402f30df348af948fd0127e683
container_end_page 1626
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1621
container_title Quality and reliability engineering international
container_volume 32
creator Goh, T. N.
description Statistical design of experiments (DOE) is widely used today for process and product characterization and optimization. Owing to cost and time considerations, sometimes only a minimum number of experimental runs can be conducted, with added challenges in analysis when the experimental outcomes cannot be measured on a continuous scale and are expressed only in qualitative terms such as ‘excellent’, ‘satisfactory’ and ‘poor’: such outcomes are variously described as ‘categorical’, ‘attribute’, ‘qualitative’, ‘discrete’ or ‘counted’ in nature. This paper offers practical techniques of handling small experiments with such non‐standard DOE response data which are otherwise impossible to analyze by standard statistical software. The suggested procedures, built upon what is called a Likelihood Transfer Function (LTF), do not require complex data analysis but would yield results consistent with the constraints of experimental conditions as well as the objectives of stakeholders. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/qre.1894
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1825564641</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4115621981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-fdd0fc2055e6c31b53107bd6b4bb9f4af6f55f7402f30df348af948fd0127e683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10F9LwzAUBfAgCs4p-BEKvvjSedMkbQK-jLFNcUzcFB9D2ibSmf5Z0uH27e2YKAo-3Zcf53IOQpcYBhggulk7PcBc0CPUwyBEiGPCj1EPEspDDjg5RWferwA6LHgP3Q4rZXe-8EFtgpFq9VvtikzZYKF9U1deB0UVLEtlbbBUZWN1MN422hWlrlp_jk6Msl5ffN0-epmMn0d34exxej8azsKMdn9Dk-dgsggY03FGcMoIhiTN45SmqTBUmdgwZhIKkSGQG0K5MoJykwOOEh1z0kfXh9zG1euN9q0sC59pa1Wl642XmEeMxTSmuKNXf-iq3riu414BYZHgwH4CM1d777SRTVdJuZ3EIPczym5GuZ-xo-GBfhRW7_518mkx_u0L3-rtt1fuXcYJSZh8nU_lZDYlgrO5fCCfbimBJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1803529805</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of Categorical Response in Small Sample Experiments</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Goh, T. N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goh, T. N.</creatorcontrib><description>Statistical design of experiments (DOE) is widely used today for process and product characterization and optimization. Owing to cost and time considerations, sometimes only a minimum number of experimental runs can be conducted, with added challenges in analysis when the experimental outcomes cannot be measured on a continuous scale and are expressed only in qualitative terms such as ‘excellent’, ‘satisfactory’ and ‘poor’: such outcomes are variously described as ‘categorical’, ‘attribute’, ‘qualitative’, ‘discrete’ or ‘counted’ in nature. This paper offers practical techniques of handling small experiments with such non‐standard DOE response data which are otherwise impossible to analyze by standard statistical software. The suggested procedures, built upon what is called a Likelihood Transfer Function (LTF), do not require complex data analysis but would yield results consistent with the constraints of experimental conditions as well as the objectives of stakeholders. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-8017</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1638</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/qre.1894</identifier><identifier>CODEN: QREIE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>categorical data ; Computer programs ; Cost engineering ; Data processing ; Design of experiments ; empirical optimization ; likelihood transfer function ; Optimization ; process and product improvement ; Samples ; small samples ; Software</subject><ispartof>Quality and reliability engineering international, 2016-07, Vol.32 (5), p.1621-1626</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-fdd0fc2055e6c31b53107bd6b4bb9f4af6f55f7402f30df348af948fd0127e683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-fdd0fc2055e6c31b53107bd6b4bb9f4af6f55f7402f30df348af948fd0127e683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goh, T. N.</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of Categorical Response in Small Sample Experiments</title><title>Quality and reliability engineering international</title><addtitle>Qual. Reliab. Engng. Int</addtitle><description>Statistical design of experiments (DOE) is widely used today for process and product characterization and optimization. Owing to cost and time considerations, sometimes only a minimum number of experimental runs can be conducted, with added challenges in analysis when the experimental outcomes cannot be measured on a continuous scale and are expressed only in qualitative terms such as ‘excellent’, ‘satisfactory’ and ‘poor’: such outcomes are variously described as ‘categorical’, ‘attribute’, ‘qualitative’, ‘discrete’ or ‘counted’ in nature. This paper offers practical techniques of handling small experiments with such non‐standard DOE response data which are otherwise impossible to analyze by standard statistical software. The suggested procedures, built upon what is called a Likelihood Transfer Function (LTF), do not require complex data analysis but would yield results consistent with the constraints of experimental conditions as well as the objectives of stakeholders. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>categorical data</subject><subject>Computer programs</subject><subject>Cost engineering</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Design of experiments</subject><subject>empirical optimization</subject><subject>likelihood transfer function</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>process and product improvement</subject><subject>Samples</subject><subject>small samples</subject><subject>Software</subject><issn>0748-8017</issn><issn>1099-1638</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10F9LwzAUBfAgCs4p-BEKvvjSedMkbQK-jLFNcUzcFB9D2ibSmf5Z0uH27e2YKAo-3Zcf53IOQpcYBhggulk7PcBc0CPUwyBEiGPCj1EPEspDDjg5RWferwA6LHgP3Q4rZXe-8EFtgpFq9VvtikzZYKF9U1deB0UVLEtlbbBUZWN1MN422hWlrlp_jk6Msl5ffN0-epmMn0d34exxej8azsKMdn9Dk-dgsggY03FGcMoIhiTN45SmqTBUmdgwZhIKkSGQG0K5MoJykwOOEh1z0kfXh9zG1euN9q0sC59pa1Wl642XmEeMxTSmuKNXf-iq3riu414BYZHgwH4CM1d777SRTVdJuZ3EIPczym5GuZ-xo-GBfhRW7_518mkx_u0L3-rtt1fuXcYJSZh8nU_lZDYlgrO5fCCfbimBJQ</recordid><startdate>201607</startdate><enddate>201607</enddate><creator>Goh, T. N.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201607</creationdate><title>Analysis of Categorical Response in Small Sample Experiments</title><author>Goh, T. N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-fdd0fc2055e6c31b53107bd6b4bb9f4af6f55f7402f30df348af948fd0127e683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>categorical data</topic><topic>Computer programs</topic><topic>Cost engineering</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Design of experiments</topic><topic>empirical optimization</topic><topic>likelihood transfer function</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>process and product improvement</topic><topic>Samples</topic><topic>small samples</topic><topic>Software</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goh, T. N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>Quality and reliability engineering international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goh, T. N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of Categorical Response in Small Sample Experiments</atitle><jtitle>Quality and reliability engineering international</jtitle><addtitle>Qual. Reliab. Engng. Int</addtitle><date>2016-07</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1621</spage><epage>1626</epage><pages>1621-1626</pages><issn>0748-8017</issn><eissn>1099-1638</eissn><coden>QREIE5</coden><abstract>Statistical design of experiments (DOE) is widely used today for process and product characterization and optimization. Owing to cost and time considerations, sometimes only a minimum number of experimental runs can be conducted, with added challenges in analysis when the experimental outcomes cannot be measured on a continuous scale and are expressed only in qualitative terms such as ‘excellent’, ‘satisfactory’ and ‘poor’: such outcomes are variously described as ‘categorical’, ‘attribute’, ‘qualitative’, ‘discrete’ or ‘counted’ in nature. This paper offers practical techniques of handling small experiments with such non‐standard DOE response data which are otherwise impossible to analyze by standard statistical software. The suggested procedures, built upon what is called a Likelihood Transfer Function (LTF), do not require complex data analysis but would yield results consistent with the constraints of experimental conditions as well as the objectives of stakeholders. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/qre.1894</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0748-8017
ispartof Quality and reliability engineering international, 2016-07, Vol.32 (5), p.1621-1626
issn 0748-8017
1099-1638
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1825564641
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects categorical data
Computer programs
Cost engineering
Data processing
Design of experiments
empirical optimization
likelihood transfer function
Optimization
process and product improvement
Samples
small samples
Software
title Analysis of Categorical Response in Small Sample Experiments
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T10%3A58%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20Categorical%20Response%20in%20Small%20Sample%20Experiments&rft.jtitle=Quality%20and%20reliability%20engineering%20international&rft.au=Goh,%20T.%20N.&rft.date=2016-07&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1621&rft.epage=1626&rft.pages=1621-1626&rft.issn=0748-8017&rft.eissn=1099-1638&rft.coden=QREIE5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/qre.1894&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4115621981%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-fdd0fc2055e6c31b53107bd6b4bb9f4af6f55f7402f30df348af948fd0127e683%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1803529805&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true