Loading…
Analysis of Categorical Response in Small Sample Experiments
Statistical design of experiments (DOE) is widely used today for process and product characterization and optimization. Owing to cost and time considerations, sometimes only a minimum number of experimental runs can be conducted, with added challenges in analysis when the experimental outcomes canno...
Saved in:
Published in: | Quality and reliability engineering international 2016-07, Vol.32 (5), p.1621-1626 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-fdd0fc2055e6c31b53107bd6b4bb9f4af6f55f7402f30df348af948fd0127e683 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-fdd0fc2055e6c31b53107bd6b4bb9f4af6f55f7402f30df348af948fd0127e683 |
container_end_page | 1626 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1621 |
container_title | Quality and reliability engineering international |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Goh, T. N. |
description | Statistical design of experiments (DOE) is widely used today for process and product characterization and optimization. Owing to cost and time considerations, sometimes only a minimum number of experimental runs can be conducted, with added challenges in analysis when the experimental outcomes cannot be measured on a continuous scale and are expressed only in qualitative terms such as ‘excellent’, ‘satisfactory’ and ‘poor’: such outcomes are variously described as ‘categorical’, ‘attribute’, ‘qualitative’, ‘discrete’ or ‘counted’ in nature. This paper offers practical techniques of handling small experiments with such non‐standard DOE response data which are otherwise impossible to analyze by standard statistical software. The suggested procedures, built upon what is called a Likelihood Transfer Function (LTF), do not require complex data analysis but would yield results consistent with the constraints of experimental conditions as well as the objectives of stakeholders. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/qre.1894 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1825564641</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>4115621981</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-fdd0fc2055e6c31b53107bd6b4bb9f4af6f55f7402f30df348af948fd0127e683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10F9LwzAUBfAgCs4p-BEKvvjSedMkbQK-jLFNcUzcFB9D2ibSmf5Z0uH27e2YKAo-3Zcf53IOQpcYBhggulk7PcBc0CPUwyBEiGPCj1EPEspDDjg5RWferwA6LHgP3Q4rZXe-8EFtgpFq9VvtikzZYKF9U1deB0UVLEtlbbBUZWN1MN422hWlrlp_jk6Msl5ffN0-epmMn0d34exxej8azsKMdn9Dk-dgsggY03FGcMoIhiTN45SmqTBUmdgwZhIKkSGQG0K5MoJykwOOEh1z0kfXh9zG1euN9q0sC59pa1Wl642XmEeMxTSmuKNXf-iq3riu414BYZHgwH4CM1d777SRTVdJuZ3EIPczym5GuZ-xo-GBfhRW7_518mkx_u0L3-rtt1fuXcYJSZh8nU_lZDYlgrO5fCCfbimBJQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1803529805</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of Categorical Response in Small Sample Experiments</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Goh, T. N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Goh, T. N.</creatorcontrib><description>Statistical design of experiments (DOE) is widely used today for process and product characterization and optimization. Owing to cost and time considerations, sometimes only a minimum number of experimental runs can be conducted, with added challenges in analysis when the experimental outcomes cannot be measured on a continuous scale and are expressed only in qualitative terms such as ‘excellent’, ‘satisfactory’ and ‘poor’: such outcomes are variously described as ‘categorical’, ‘attribute’, ‘qualitative’, ‘discrete’ or ‘counted’ in nature. This paper offers practical techniques of handling small experiments with such non‐standard DOE response data which are otherwise impossible to analyze by standard statistical software. The suggested procedures, built upon what is called a Likelihood Transfer Function (LTF), do not require complex data analysis but would yield results consistent with the constraints of experimental conditions as well as the objectives of stakeholders. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-8017</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1638</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/qre.1894</identifier><identifier>CODEN: QREIE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>categorical data ; Computer programs ; Cost engineering ; Data processing ; Design of experiments ; empirical optimization ; likelihood transfer function ; Optimization ; process and product improvement ; Samples ; small samples ; Software</subject><ispartof>Quality and reliability engineering international, 2016-07, Vol.32 (5), p.1621-1626</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-fdd0fc2055e6c31b53107bd6b4bb9f4af6f55f7402f30df348af948fd0127e683</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-fdd0fc2055e6c31b53107bd6b4bb9f4af6f55f7402f30df348af948fd0127e683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goh, T. N.</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of Categorical Response in Small Sample Experiments</title><title>Quality and reliability engineering international</title><addtitle>Qual. Reliab. Engng. Int</addtitle><description>Statistical design of experiments (DOE) is widely used today for process and product characterization and optimization. Owing to cost and time considerations, sometimes only a minimum number of experimental runs can be conducted, with added challenges in analysis when the experimental outcomes cannot be measured on a continuous scale and are expressed only in qualitative terms such as ‘excellent’, ‘satisfactory’ and ‘poor’: such outcomes are variously described as ‘categorical’, ‘attribute’, ‘qualitative’, ‘discrete’ or ‘counted’ in nature. This paper offers practical techniques of handling small experiments with such non‐standard DOE response data which are otherwise impossible to analyze by standard statistical software. The suggested procedures, built upon what is called a Likelihood Transfer Function (LTF), do not require complex data analysis but would yield results consistent with the constraints of experimental conditions as well as the objectives of stakeholders. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>categorical data</subject><subject>Computer programs</subject><subject>Cost engineering</subject><subject>Data processing</subject><subject>Design of experiments</subject><subject>empirical optimization</subject><subject>likelihood transfer function</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>process and product improvement</subject><subject>Samples</subject><subject>small samples</subject><subject>Software</subject><issn>0748-8017</issn><issn>1099-1638</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10F9LwzAUBfAgCs4p-BEKvvjSedMkbQK-jLFNcUzcFB9D2ibSmf5Z0uH27e2YKAo-3Zcf53IOQpcYBhggulk7PcBc0CPUwyBEiGPCj1EPEspDDjg5RWferwA6LHgP3Q4rZXe-8EFtgpFq9VvtikzZYKF9U1deB0UVLEtlbbBUZWN1MN422hWlrlp_jk6Msl5ffN0-epmMn0d34exxej8azsKMdn9Dk-dgsggY03FGcMoIhiTN45SmqTBUmdgwZhIKkSGQG0K5MoJykwOOEh1z0kfXh9zG1euN9q0sC59pa1Wl642XmEeMxTSmuKNXf-iq3riu414BYZHgwH4CM1d777SRTVdJuZ3EIPczym5GuZ-xo-GBfhRW7_518mkx_u0L3-rtt1fuXcYJSZh8nU_lZDYlgrO5fCCfbimBJQ</recordid><startdate>201607</startdate><enddate>201607</enddate><creator>Goh, T. N.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201607</creationdate><title>Analysis of Categorical Response in Small Sample Experiments</title><author>Goh, T. N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-fdd0fc2055e6c31b53107bd6b4bb9f4af6f55f7402f30df348af948fd0127e683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>categorical data</topic><topic>Computer programs</topic><topic>Cost engineering</topic><topic>Data processing</topic><topic>Design of experiments</topic><topic>empirical optimization</topic><topic>likelihood transfer function</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>process and product improvement</topic><topic>Samples</topic><topic>small samples</topic><topic>Software</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goh, T. N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>Quality and reliability engineering international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goh, T. N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of Categorical Response in Small Sample Experiments</atitle><jtitle>Quality and reliability engineering international</jtitle><addtitle>Qual. Reliab. Engng. Int</addtitle><date>2016-07</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1621</spage><epage>1626</epage><pages>1621-1626</pages><issn>0748-8017</issn><eissn>1099-1638</eissn><coden>QREIE5</coden><abstract>Statistical design of experiments (DOE) is widely used today for process and product characterization and optimization. Owing to cost and time considerations, sometimes only a minimum number of experimental runs can be conducted, with added challenges in analysis when the experimental outcomes cannot be measured on a continuous scale and are expressed only in qualitative terms such as ‘excellent’, ‘satisfactory’ and ‘poor’: such outcomes are variously described as ‘categorical’, ‘attribute’, ‘qualitative’, ‘discrete’ or ‘counted’ in nature. This paper offers practical techniques of handling small experiments with such non‐standard DOE response data which are otherwise impossible to analyze by standard statistical software. The suggested procedures, built upon what is called a Likelihood Transfer Function (LTF), do not require complex data analysis but would yield results consistent with the constraints of experimental conditions as well as the objectives of stakeholders. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/qre.1894</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0748-8017 |
ispartof | Quality and reliability engineering international, 2016-07, Vol.32 (5), p.1621-1626 |
issn | 0748-8017 1099-1638 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1825564641 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | categorical data Computer programs Cost engineering Data processing Design of experiments empirical optimization likelihood transfer function Optimization process and product improvement Samples small samples Software |
title | Analysis of Categorical Response in Small Sample Experiments |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T10%3A58%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20Categorical%20Response%20in%20Small%20Sample%20Experiments&rft.jtitle=Quality%20and%20reliability%20engineering%20international&rft.au=Goh,%20T.%20N.&rft.date=2016-07&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1621&rft.epage=1626&rft.pages=1621-1626&rft.issn=0748-8017&rft.eissn=1099-1638&rft.coden=QREIE5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/qre.1894&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E4115621981%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4074-fdd0fc2055e6c31b53107bd6b4bb9f4af6f55f7402f30df348af948fd0127e683%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1803529805&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |